Re: [Evolution] drag & drop attachments - Wayland issue?

On 5/3/21 3:21 AM, Wiethoff, Helge via evolution-list wrote: Hi, Am Montag, dem 03.05.2021 um 09:02 + schrieb Wiethoff, Helge via evolution-list: on Fedora 34 with Evolution 3.40.0 (3.40.0- 1.module_f34+11756+2e59385f) (with wayland) i am not able to drag & drop attachments to the compose

Re: [Evolution] HTML mails: default font

On 3/28/21 11:20 AM, Wiethoff, Helge via evolution-list wrote: I was wondering if it is possible to adjust this "default" a bit? I would like to define "sans-serif" as default font-family. Sort of an aside... I've been needing to learn how to do CSS overrides in Thunderbird because of

Re: [Evolution] Evolution resolves MLs to to, instead of using ML-address - compliance/privacy issue

On 3/25/21 3:30 AM, Sebastian Rottmann wrote: But evolution does some kind of usability and gives autocomplete to the user. The user then sees "mailinglist >" when they write their mail. If the user then presses enter the to: just shows an "mailinglist". When they send this mail, the mailinglist

Re: [Evolution] Would this have side effects ?

On 2/6/21 9:06 AM, Volker Wysk wrote: I've had the situation that the IMAP server didn't "manage concurrent connections to one account in a sane manner". This is what happened. I had two clients listening to one IMAP server with IMAP IDLE (evolution and getmail). It happened that both clients

Re: [Evolution] Sorting by "unread"

On 1/19/21 1:29 PM, Kiwi Rider via evolution-list wrote: As per previous, I'm still hoping to be able to simply sort my messages by whether or not an email is flagged as 'read'. You need to sort by _something_. Probably Received would work best. Then there is a dropdown near the top of the

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

On 1/16/21 1:07 PM, Ángel wrote: This shows an ext4 on /, and a xfs filesystem on /home However, your dmesg messages: [ 1357.401728] xfs filesystem being remounted at/newroot/home/greg/.local/share/webkitgtk/databases supports timestamps until 2038 (0x7fff) [ 1357.402413] xfs

Re: [Evolution] Safety of removing .cache files

On 1/1/21 1:25 PM, Andre Klapper via evolution-list wrote: On Fri, 2021-01-01 at 12:18 -0700, Zan Lynx wrote: On 12/31/20 5:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: It's always safe to remove cached files. Evo will just recreate them if needed. Just be sure that Evo isn't running when you do

Re: [Evolution] Safety of removing .cache files

On 12/31/20 5:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: It's always safe to remove cached files. Evo will just recreate them if needed. Just be sure that Evo isn't running when you do it. That is quite a caveat to add on there. Evolution has so many small daemon pieces that it is almost impossible

Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.38.1 composer pauses

On 11/17/20 8:51 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: Does anyone else see this? My system is not overloaded, there's nothing taking lots of CPU or IO. However evolution and various WebKit processes are each taking about 80-100Gb of virtual memory. Is this normal? (Resident memory is within normal ranges.)

Re: [Evolution] export collections of mails to txt file

On 11/2/20 1:14 PM, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list wrote: Depending on what you define as quick and easy, exporting to mbox and then writing a script to parse the mbox file and export the parts you want should be straightforward. Most languages have mbox parsing libraries that will do the

Re: [Evolution] Migrating from Thunderbird via import without duplicates

On 10/27/2020 10:29 AM, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: That feels like a lot of mails, or just few movies as attachments (just kidding). Do you know how many mails this is? My largest IMAP account has 498.162 messages at the moment, which is surely less than that yours. I do not download

Re: [Evolution] Font size in HTML mail ?

On 10/1/20 8:07 AM, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: Hi, there's nothing to be added back from my point of view. Users have the option fully under their control now. The option is not about the zoom, it's really about the minimum font size. Quoting from the WebKitGTK documentation:

Re: [Evolution] Stuck on fetching POP3 mail, how to debug?

On 8/25/20 1:37 AM, Martin Wagner wrote: Hey there again, back on topic: Just now it happened again. Sadly the logfile (generated by "CAMEL_DEBUG=pop3 evolution >& logfile") doesn't show any hint for me. It just stopped mid-sentence: /build/evolution-data-server-R_OWch/evolution-data-server-

Re: [Evolution] Evolution will send but not receive Emails

On 8/10/20 9:32 AM, John Nice via evolution-list wrote: No, it's just a vanilla isp, usses POP port 110 no encryption #John You can run Evolution with debugging to view the POP commands used. If you understand POP that might help you. Otherwise, if you are using POP with leaving email on

Re: [Evolution] Full history in reply

On 6/11/20 8:44 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: To be fair M$-Outlook [which many people, sadly, except as the gold standard of e-mail] just includes all the trash, including signatures, by default, in every ___ reply. So it sort of does this as most user's never both to delete anything.

Re: [Evolution] BURL in Evolution

On 6/2/2020 9:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4468 """The submission profile of Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) provides a standard way for an email client to submit a complete message for delivery. This specification extends the submission

Re: [Evolution] Cannot Archive Messages Keep Showing Up

On 4/16/2020 6:00 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: IMAP is not designed to handle immediate synchronisation between two clients active on the same account. They will eventually synchronise, but not immediately. That does depend on your clients and IMAP server. My personal email server running

Re: [Evolution] Email Threading

On 9/28/19 1:55 PM, Bradley G Ward via evolution-list wrote: I know that I found an old post, hit reply all, deleted the text of the email, changed the subject header and just had the evolution list address in the 'to' line after removing whoever posted the email I was using. How it ended up

Re: [Evolution] evolution and autokey

On August 8, 2019 9:16:32 AM MDT, Jaap wrote: >Hallo, > >What to do to make Autokey-gtk work on evolution? My autokey works on >all kinds of apps, but not on Gnome apps like Evolution or Gedit. > >(same with Snippy or Texpander) > >Evolution 3.32.4 (3.32.4-1.fc30) on Fedora 30 > >thanks

Re: [Evolution] Error loading attachments - version 3.32.3 (flatpak git)

On 7/5/2019 5:03 PM, Jairo Lopez via evolution-list wrote: Hello, I decided to switch my main computer from Windows to Linux. After comparing between Thunderbird and Evolution, I went with Evolution (really liked) and struggled a bit migrating my PST file. Now after finally configuring my

Re: [Evolution] Composer very slow

On 6/26/19 1:39 PM, Graham Sawyer via evolution-list wrote: > Hi > I recently did a clean install of Ubuntu mate 16.04.6 LTS  and Evolution > 3.18.5.2 . When typing an email there is a significant lag to the > characters showing on screen. Any advice on what to do? Try Fedora 30 with Gnome 3 and

Re: [Evolution] Evolution email really slow

On 6/21/19 5:19 AM, Graham Sawyer via evolution-list wrote: > Hi >  My first time on here and hope I'm doing the right thing. > > I've been using Evolution for years. I recently did a clean install of > Ubuntu mate and Evolution. When typing an email there is a significant > lag to the characters

Re: [Evolution] Filter rules automatically sending mail to trash

On 5/8/19 2:45 PM, Jason Franklin via evolution-list wrote: > The issue is consistency. For example, I'm on the vim-dev mailing > list. Some new messages from this list end up in my trash bin. Some > don't. I've reviewed the list of rules several times. None of my > filters delete anything.

Re: [Evolution] encrypt if possible

On 5/6/19 12:48 PM, Lukas Pirl wrote: > However, what I'd also expect is the availability of an option saying "always > encrypt emails when sending to contacts for which public keys are available". > Can this be achieved? Thunderbird does that. But I turned it off. You may not want to do it

Re: [Evolution] How to delete single messages from the trash bin

On February 25, 2019 3:10:05 AM MST, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 16:54 -0700, Zan Lynx > >No, this is not how Evolution Trash works. > >The fundamental model in Evolution follows the IMAP paradigm, in which >deleted messages are merely marked for del

Re: [Evolution] How to delete single messages from the trash bin

On 2/24/2019 1:16 PM, Bradley G Ward via evolution-list wrote: This may be, and probably is, a basic question. But how can I delete single messages from the trash bin so that I can reduce the amount of messages that are in there? I've searched the Help option which tells me how to expunge an

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Ubuntu 18.04 : window too wide !

On January 15, 2019 10:10:15 AM MST, FROISSART Remy wrote: >Hi, >I have a problem that arise recently (Evolution was working well >before): when I launch Evolution on my portable computer (that run with >Ubuntu 18.04), the window freezes and Evolution can not work... when I >open it from my

Re: [Evolution] search feature slow - in one account only

On December 12, 2018 3:07:20 AM MST, Herr Oswald wrote: >Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2018, 09:42 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha via >evolution-list: >> On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 09:30 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote: >> > When I do a keyword search, it >> > takes 23 secs till I get the results. >> >> The 1300

Re: [Evolution] GPG - cannot verify sender

On 08/15/2018 02:34 PM, Japhering via evolution-list wrote: > > if I'm correct, then the following should resolve the yellow > > > gpg --keyserver --recv-keys No, that's not enough. Anyone can upload a key to the keyservers. They have no way to ensure that it actually belongs to a particular

Re: [Evolution] Cannot find the menu bar (v. 3.26.1-1)

On 3/18/2018 10:01 AM, Leo Beltran wrote: Hello, I made a big mistake and accidentally deactivated the menu bar. Now I cannot find it and I do not know how to restore it. What should I do? The shortcut keys should still work even if the menu bar is disabled. Try tapping Alt and see if it

Re: [Evolution] Some keys not enterable in search?

On December 31, 2017 8:39:39 AM MST, Paul Smith wrote: >Here's something super-strange: I can't type the numbers 0-5 into the >search bar (the one at the top of the vertical view showing both >subjects and message preview) in Evolution!! > >Can anyone else see this? I can

Re: [Evolution] open

On 12/29/2017 05:18 PM, Gottfried wrote: > > >> It sounds like Evolution "hangs" (does not respond to anything in >> the user interface anymore) but does not "crash" (the application >> window vanishes unexpectedly). >> >> Please make sure that "gdb" is installed. Then open a Terminal >>

Re: [Evolution] Save sent messages in a chosen folder

On 12/9/2017 11:49 AM, da...@thekramers.net wrote: I'm looking to move away from Thunderbird, for performance reasons. It may depend on your IMAP server and particular configuration options but I wouldn't count on Evolution performing better than Thunderbird. The last time I used Evolution

Re: [Evolution] Minimise to tray?

On 08/13/2017 05:17 PM, Phil wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to evolution through debian. > > Just got a quick question, is there a way I can close evolution to the > Gnome tray? (which appears at the bottom left) > If you just want to get it off your screen but leave it running, put it on

Re: [Evolution] evolution

On 7/19/2017 10:17 AM, Marcin Kozyra wrote: How would I go about moving email accounts with passwords to new computer? Restoring backup is not working for me. Using fedora 26. I believe passwords are stored in the Gnome keyring. By default they are decrypted with the login password. The

Re: [Evolution] Problem with character encoding?

On 2/17/2017 5:17 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: Yes, if I choose ISO-8859-1 instead of default, which is UTF-8, then everything looks ok except for the subject.. Could you show us the source of the message - removing any personal information of course. We would need to see the mime structure of the

Re: [Evolution] pls explain to me an error msg

On 11/17/2016 12:49 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 19:39 +0100, mario chiari wrote: >> So, does it mean I need to delete maybe just a single msg? >> Would it be >> mail://local/Inbox%2FArt%20Newsletter/1479199473.5059_7593? >> if so, how do I locate it? > > How does a warning

Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

On 11/02/2016 08:36 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > +1. Evolution can already search all folders in a given account so > what's the point of having "All Mail" which just duplicates it? Google's All Mail still contains messages after all of their labels are removed. This is where archived messages can

Re: [Evolution] Newbie-questions

On 10/24/2016 04:52 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > There is a backup/restore feature built into Evolution - File: backup / > restore. Use that. Where Evolution does / does-not store information > is not something a user should need to know and may change between > versions. Every time you

Re: [Evolution] how to move mails and configs to a new machine

On 03/24/2016 10:42 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: > I meant your Linux account. But that's because you need to make sure > nothing is using the filesystem when you move the data around - but you > can't actually do this trick if the home belongs to root because you > can't move the data without being

Re: [Evolution] SSL cert problems after server move

On 03/07/2016 09:26 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > A quick way to check on DNS lookups is to specify the server directly, > e.g.: > > % dig @8.8.8.8 foo.bar.com And something I always do to check what the system thinks the IP is: use ping. For example: $ ping core-01 PING core-01

Re: [Evolution] Backing up Evolution Data

On 09/08/2015 09:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > As has been said repeatedly, the "backup" command in Evo is not > intended for periodic backups but for when you need to move your Evo > installation to another machine. If the Evolution developers are reading this I'd like to point out (again)

Re: [Evolution] 3.16.3: Failed to refresh folder INBOX,

On 06/24/2015 11:05 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: Gnome applications tend to use the GIO libraries. And DNS querying programs like nslookup, host and dig go directly to the DNS server. Things are complicate further by systems such as nscd - Name Service Cache Daemon that, as it says in the man

Re: [Evolution] 3.16.3: Failed to refresh folder INBOX,

On 06/23/2015 02:24 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: Don't get confused by using utilities such as nslookup - they perform the DNS queries themselves so by-pass the cache. Only if you tell them to do so. By default dig and nslookup do the query to the same resolver IP that the system libraries use. If

Re: [Evolution] WebKit editor undo problems

On 06/11/2015 11:23 AM, John Lauterbach wrote: Today's business e-mails are the equivalent of typewritten business letters of the past. They need to be formatted correctly and look professional. Then using HTML is a bad idea. HTML formats differently in every email client. Editing it is a

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts

On 03/17/2015 05:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:07 +, Pete Biggs wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? You are using

[Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts

Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? A full account restore from a system of a different host name resulted in doubled online accounts in $HOME/.config/evolution/sources. Like so: $ grep

Re: [Evolution] Evolution doesn't start

On 02/24/2015 07:31 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: Not saying that the official help is perfect either, but I generally fail to understand why people follow random pages on the interwebs instead of the official help (under 'Help About' in the application and on

Re: [Evolution] MAIL FROM timeout

On 10/28/2014 04:05 PM, Ángel González wrote: Looks like a sysadmin problem. I suspect it is checking in dns blacklists / doing SPF checks, and they are taking a long time. Perhaps it is consulting an overloaded dns blacklist? I agree that something like this is the likely cause. The email

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 110, Issue 13

On 09/08/2014 10:39 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote: To be frank I really don't think USB devices are especially well-suited to backup purposes. If it's so important, get a NAS devce or similar. What do you back up your NAS device to? I use a 4 TB USB 3 external drive. Two, actually. I rotate one to

Re: [Evolution] Errors receiving mail via POP

On 9/3/2014 5:45 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: I've never heard of a problem of IMAP duplicating emails and, knowing how the protocol works, I can't see how it can! The protocol won't, but servers and clients will. I've had Thunderbird (old version, now fixed) time out while copying large numbers of

Re: [Evolution] Recognizing Junk Header from ISP

On 6/16/2014 12:54 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote: Because the automated systems are bad at it? No. I have to recover 5 or 6 messages every day from my spam trap. For some reason a lot of sci-fi author's mailing list messages land in there. Don't blame the automated system because you don't know

Re: [Evolution] Recognizing Junk Header from ISP

On 06/13/2014 01:10 PM, G.W. Haywood wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Pete Biggs wrote: The issue is that when you reject mail at smtp time you are explicitly relying on the accuracy of an automated system to determine what is, or is not, junk. ... Why is this an issue? Because the automated

Re: [Evolution] Evolution is dying

On 05/30/2014 04:34 PM, Jimmy Montague wrote: OK, folks. I got it. No more top posting. I see why you like it that way and will not do it any more. But what you just did there isn't right either. Quote only what is needed for your response to make sense. It should have looked like this: On

Re: [Evolution] Evolution is dying

On 05/28/2014 06:16 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:07 +0200, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: Now, I do not expect that Evolution solves this particular problem. The asking for a password again and again issue is only caused by Evolution, other MUAs don't ask again and again. Sure, a

Re: [Evolution] Installation page for the Evolution wiki

On 05/13/2014 04:29 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: Have a look on the other Gnome projects at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps - a few have build instructions, none have install instructions. That's because they are part of the Gnome desktop and it is expected that they are installed as part of Gnome or

Re: [Evolution] Idealism face plants against asphalt [Was: downloads page]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.comwrote: On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 20:15 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: If users will never compile anything then why are we expected to do so? Users very often compile by their own, this is common practise for *nix systems.

Re: [Evolution] how to start over

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com wrote: I don't know what you're basing your opinion on, but you're way off base. If you've been paying attention, you already know that we've made great strides toward making Evolution's configuration far more readable and

Re: [Evolution] how to start over

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.orgwrote: +1 +1 +1 +1 WHY THE CONSTANT SNEAKING AROUND UNDERNEATH THE APPLICATION?? IF YOU DO THAT AND THE APPLICATION BREAKS IT IS YOUR FAULT, AND **NOT** THE FAULT OF THE APPLICATION. To add, remove,

Re: [Evolution] Evolution composer text wrap width

On 2/24/2013 3:53 PM, Thomas Prost wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 21.02.2013, 17:23 -0700 schrieb Zan Lynx: In plain text mode, the Evolution mail composer seems to have a width limit much smaller than 72 which is where I think it is supposed to be. This email is probably (I hope) an example

Re: [Evolution] bus error causing crashes

On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 07:11 +, Pete Biggs wrote: using Debian Sid/unstable with Evolution 3.4.4 (but happened since 3.4.x), wanting to reply to some message, Evolution often crashes due to a »bus error«. Does somebody experience something similar? I think that is a euphamism for

Re: [Evolution] bug re Message menu item

On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 09:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: This concept of re-installing software to make it work again is a total Windows anomaly - it only works in Windows because of the ability to over-write system DLLs (i.e. some other software package installed a better version of a DLL that

Re: [Evolution] Search folders not updating

I get that every so often with 3.2. A workaround is to edit the folder's search filter. I usually just add a space at the end. That will force a refresh. Only on that one folder unfortunately. Graham Murray gmur...@webwayone.co.uk wrote: I am using evolution 3.4.4 with the ews backend. In

Re: [Evolution] What's New in Evolution 3.6

On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 20:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 10:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: Evolution 3.6 will move your account data to plain text files which live in $HOME/.config/evolution/sources. I think I speak for all of us when I say: woohoo! Yes. Yay!

Re: [Evolution] Data migration Evolution 2.24.5 to 3.4.3

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:33 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:31 -0600, Brian A Anderson wrote: If I follow what you said below, Does this mean that I have to convert 2.24.5 data to 2.32 data and then to 3.4 or is it just one conversion? Is there a utility that someone

Re: [Evolution] Tranfer of accounts

On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:34 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: rant I should open an issue on Bugzilla that the existence of these two options should be displayed in the largest possible font and pulsing in bright orange. Perhaps with a sound effect of nails being scraped across chalk

Re: [Evolution] Tranfer of accounts [Scanned]

On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 21:18 +1000, Christopher M Bailey wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 11:44 +0200, Antonio M wrote: [snip] evolution-3.2.3-3 on the old computer with Fedora 16 Evolution 3.4.1 is running on Fedora 17 Hang on, have I got this right? You're running BETA software (Fedora 16

Re: [Evolution] Feature request - live debug

On 2/3/2012 3:20 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 12:06 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote: On a slow internet connection line - watching my 'sending messages - 25%' - wondering whats going on... It would be handy to view the live, raw interaction of what is going on at times, whether for

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Hello, Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them (thread date was the last message's date). Now thez left where they lie, so when a mail

[Evolution] Infinite read loop bug in Evolution 3.0.3?

Evolution seems to have got stuck using 100% of the CPU and eating my laptop battery again. One of its threads has gone insane. strace -p [thread-id] shows an apparently infinite number of the following recvfrom, poll operations: recvfrom(63, , 5, 0, NULL, NULL) = 0 poll([{fd=63,

[Evolution] Really super terribly awful slow performance Generating message list

Does anyone know why Evolution spends all of its time Generating message list? When I click on any folder to read it, it generates a message list. When I move a message to a different folder it generates a message list. When I double click on a message in a folder that is not using the Preview

Re: [Evolution] Really super terribly awful slow performance Generating message list

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 19:11 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Quoting Zan Lynx zl...@acm.org: No, I don't see it either. I only see the Generating message list if I do a search in a large folder or on the whole account. Are you

Re: [Evolution] Really super terribly awful slow performance Generating message list

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Quoting Zan Lynx zl...@acm.org: First things first So, am I doing something wrong, or have the Evolution developers forgotten the basics of O(n) data structure analysis Really? There is no need to be rude, accuse

Re: [Evolution] Why does Evolution IMAP send a \* flag with IMAP APPEND?

On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 17:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 13:42 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: When I try to move some messages from one folder to an archive folder, Evolution does a few messages and then stops with an error. I turned debugging on in the Courier server

[Evolution] Why does Evolution IMAP send a \* flag with IMAP APPEND?

I'm using a Courier IMAP server and the Evolution 3.0.2 included with Fedora 15. When I try to move some messages from one folder to an archive folder, Evolution does a few messages and then stops with an error. I turned debugging on in the Courier server and I get this when it fails: READ: