Hi,
does scanmail works on SBS?
I believe SBS is built on NT4.0 and Exch5.5?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Guys,
I'm trying to fully understand what happens with MX preferences and SMTP
relays.
Let me draw a picture. Lets says a company has 2 SMTP inbound
connections for domain name example.com and the MX records show that
example.com has 4 servers that will accept the mail. i.e.
Hi,
Can anyone clarify whether the 'Allow all computers which successfully authenticate to
relay, regardless of the list above' checkbox on an SMTP Virtual Server would define a
logged-on user (AD), telnetting to Port 25 of the Exchange Server as being
'authenticated'. Our test environment is
Hi all,
I have a problem on a couple of servers running Windows 2000 SP2, Exchange
5.5 SP4 with post SP4 hotfixes and ScanMail 3.52 with hotfix.
Here is the issue, we have recently been moving mailboxes from old Exchange
servers to new ones using the Move Mailbox method, while this was being
Just as a follow up.. my (mis) understanding (delete as applicable)
'Allow all computers which successfully authenticate to relay, regardless of the list
above'
Allows computers that meet authentication requirements set in the Authentication
dialog box to relay messages to the SMTP virtual
If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that
takes the mail unless it has reached the maximum number of sessions ?
Yes, although I have seen my 'secondary inbound' box accepting mail when the
'primary' box was clearly available. If you'd like them load balanced then
have
Check out:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318source=MSExchangeMTA
- Original Message -
From: Tony McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:31 AM
Subject: Unable to bind over RPC
Hi Everyone,
I've just added a
Cheers, that's cleared that up!
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 11:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DNS behaviour with MX preferences...
If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that
What does www.trendmicro.com say?
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:01 AM
Subject: Scanmail
Hi,
does scanmail works on SBS?
I believe SBS is built on NT4.0 and Exch5.5?
Kim
What?
What are you trying to accomplish? Explain it differently and clearly.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Multiple Public folder hierarchy
Mapi clients can only see
not much
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Scanmail
What does www.trendmicro.com say?
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Hi guys,
We have a few sites around the country but they all access a central
exchange server here at head office. I'm thinking about delegating admin
duties (i.e. creating new mailboxes) to the technical guys at each site.
Is there any best practice here? I know I could create separate
Sorry, 5.5 sp4.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Delegating Admin Duties
What version of Exchange?
- Original Message -
From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Daniel,
You might be able to set some granularity by using custom roles and making
sure you only give the rights that are necessary. You might want to try
Q261092 and Q168753 for a good jumping off point. I believe the answer will
vary depending on what exactly you want the 'remote' admins to
Thanks matt,
I'm thinking I might give the remote admins just the 'add child' right so
they can create new accounts but not mess up existing ones.
Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 12:11
To: Exchange Discussions
If all you want them to do is create new mailboxes. That should do the
trick. Just make sure you don't give them Modify Permissions attributes.
Also make sure you are only giving this right on the recipients container.
To make this a little easier, create a domain global group for the remote
Yep, works a treat. I've tested on a PC here - can run exchange admin, add
accounts but not modify or delete existing ones.
Yes, they will create accounts in their own NT domains (each site has a
domain and trusts are in place) and assign those to the mailboxes. Since
each admin is in a separate
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 10:50am, Adam Romain wrote:
If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that takes
the mail unless it has reached the maximum number of sessions ?
In theory, yes. In practice, always available is not a realistic
condition. Some random mail
Hooray!! Someone with my mentality!!!
Typical phone call with this new virus:
User: I got an email that says (insert something stupid or vulgar). Should
I open it?
Me: It doesn't sound work related. Does it have an attachment?
User: Yes
Me: Delete it
User: Why? It might be something from my
This virus has its own email system the reason why your admins are recieving
messages from you is probable cause someone you know has the virus on their
machine. The virus will then use the infected users address book and send
as those contacts.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van
What is the OS? Does it work sometimes and then stop, or did it ever work
at all?
--jim
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unable to bind over RPC
Hi Everyone,
I've just added a
Substitute the word virus for user, and voila ... proliferation :)
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 14:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact
This virus has its own email system the reason why your admins
Alternatively, you can put multiple servers behind a local director device
and advertise the virtual name/IP as your smtp host with the lowest cost.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:18 AM
To: Exchange
Cheers Bud.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 13:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DNS behaviour with MX preferences...
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 10:50am, Adam Romain wrote:
If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the
Are you sure that both servers can successfully resolve each other's names
(both FQDN and NetBIOS).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to bind over RPC
Hi
If you had read the tech specs on that virus, you would've know that it does
spoof email addresses. Any admin who contacts you and claims that you're
sending them viruses also has not read the specifications of this virus.
They also have no idea on how to decipher (or even locate) SMTP header
Did you do any research on the virus?
From Symantec's site:
The From address is randomly-chosen from email addresses that the worm
finds on the infected computer.
That's why.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:04 AM
euhhh
if there is a way to stop these messages coming in let me know, 'cause
Im getting like 100/hour for 4 days now...
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact
Did
If the same person is sending these in, just put that person in your Do not allow to
receive from pile (and server parameters).
When SirCam was going on, there was this one person that was infected, and every day I
would get hundreds of emails saying we stripped the attachment, the rest was
I don't see a pattern in the originators...
Guess I'll just have to sit it out...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April, 2002 3:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact
If the same person is sending these in, just put
It should be noted that if you want to see where these message are coming,
you can easily open the virus e-mail and click view, then go down to
options, and in the internet heading it will tell you what mail server the
message was sent from. That should give you a really good heads up on where
Am I missing something here? According to my AV vendor, signatures from
January detect and clean this thingThere seem to be 2 variants, KLEZ.G
and KLEZ.H and both are covered. Besides which I get maybe one or two a
week...perhaps I should keep quiet. It's just a nagging feeling that I may
be
Directory replication?
Virus?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Hello,
One of our Exchange servers (5.5 Sp4) is sending loads of
Hi there
The problem is really not the virus itself (that gets stripped), but the
stupid script that open Windows media player. I have my machine (Windows
2K, IE 6) fully patched and it still happens!!
What a pain in the butt!!
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic
I've seen three or four instances make it through NAV for Gateways and
Mailsweeper (blocking *.scr, *.pif, *.exe *.bat *.wma) with attachments.
They get caught by NAV on the mailbox server.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
I went to www.antivirus.com and found the same answer too! ;o)
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From:
I thought it might be public folder replication, goes off every four hours.
But this is constant. All I get from the transport guys is the source name
and the destination, is there any way to check which process is sending the
traffic?I've got NAV running and updated on the server so I'm
Well, one very simple thing you can do is shutdown the MTA on the IMC
server. That'll queue up things on the originating server's MTA queues and
then you can look at what kind of messages are being queued up.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL
Also, can you define loads of traffic?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
I thought it might be public folder replication, goes
The user isn't trying to open it. They have preview pane and it
automatically tries to download something. They did not open anything.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus
It's the Klez virus.
Also from Symantec's site:
If the message is opened in an unpatched version of Microsoft Outlook or
Outlook Express, the attachment may be automatically executed. Information
about this vulnerability and a patch are available at
OfficeScan-SBS version 4.5 protects SBS 4.5 networks -- that's what I have here (it
includes ScanMail for MSX 5.5 server + OfficeScan for server/clients)
OfficeScan-SBS version 5 is for SBS-2000
You can find info on Trend Micro's site: http://www.antivirus.com/products/ossbs/
You should also
We dont need no stinkin patches.
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Question
It's the Klez virus.
Also from Symantec's site:
If the message is opened in an unpatched
Actually I did it on my machine, and I am running IE 6. So it doesn't make
any sense.
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Question
It's the Klez virus.
Also from
We suddenly have a problem where people running any Outlook version less
than 2002 CANNOT do the following:
- Hit Print Screen Key.
- E-mail it to yourself in an HTML format Outlook e-mail. (uses OLE)
Users are getting the following notice back: (without attachment)
Trend ScanMail has found
in windows media player disable the extension associated with the program or
put your internet security level on high.
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact
Never mind.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Question
We dont need no stinkin patches.
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Of course you do! :0
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Question
Never mind.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Right, sorry.
When stopping the MTA, I stopped it for about 10 minutes, I got about 30
messages in the queue to the hub server about 2/3 public folder replication
and 1/3 mail. Inbound was a lot bigger, some 200 Public folder rep and 100
or so mail. That's what made me think it was public
Sweet, I'll take a banana split with 2 chocolates and 1 strawberry.
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Right, sorry.
When stopping the MTA, I
Don't
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Question
Of course you do! :0
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23,
Does DQ do chocolate? Damn, I didn't know that. There goes my DQCSE.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Sweet, I'll take a banana split with 2
Does anyone have a chart that shows the minutia of mail flow steps in
Exchange 5.5?
Thanks!!!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
If you start Outlook (2000 or 2002) in the Work offline mode, and the
network connection or Exchange server becomes available, is there a way
to switch the mode that Outlook is currently in without exiting and
restarting Outlook?
Thanks
In current versions? No.
-Original Message-
From: Davis,Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Switch to Online
If you start Outlook (2000 or 2002) in the Work offline
mode, and the network connection or
I assume you're talking about anonymous under Access Control tab of
your SMTP virtual server's property pages. This MUST be set to
anonymous if you want to give access to other servers to send you
inbound mail. Now under relay that's a different animal. They would
need to authenticate as a
Yeah, the way outlook handles online/offline is rubbish, especially what
happens if the connection to the server is lost.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 16:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Switch to Online
In current
Prolly already been said, but netstat -a work?
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|-+---
|
You could switch to Outlook 2002 Beta 3, which handled that particular
function more gracefully.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Switch to Online
Yeah, the way
I have noticed that when store.exe uses a lot of memory, such as during a
mailbox import, it never releases the memory with E2K SP2.
Has anyone else noticed this?
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Is that a problem?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage
I have noticed that when store.exe uses a lot of memory, such as during a
mailbox import, it never
Possibly I could do one up right quick. Local, intrasite or extrasite? What
kind of site connectors?
- Original Message -
From: Smith, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: Mailflow chart
Does anyone
It'll release it if the system says the memory is needed elsewhere.
- Original Message -
From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage
I have noticed that when store.exe uses a
Did your network guys stick a sniffer out there? What did the sniff
show?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Right, sorry.
When stopping
Diskkeeper CANNOT touch the databases if Exchange is running - it will get
access denied because it tries to create an exclusive lock on the file.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Most SMTP servers will try all listed MX records (in increasing preference
order) prior to queuing for later delivery.
Your assumption is correct that mailgate1 would receive all inbound traffic
(to its connection limits).
--
Roger D.
If you have a gateway virus checker (Nemex or VirusWall) you can set it to
delete the mails rather than cleaning them and letting them through.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you.
Could you include a 3D visual simulation as well? Nicely shaped envelopes
flying through gateways and such. Please make all MTAs various shades of
blue.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange
Exchange: Oooh! There's some free memory. Hey, I'll take it. I'll take it
all! Mine mine mine!
Other App: But, I need some free memory too! And you took it all!
Exchange: All right. Here you go. Give it back when you're done, though!
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From:
That the pipe had a cold.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then
you win. --Mahatma Gandhi
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
No no no, mauve. Mauve has more RAM.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailflow chart
Could you include a 3D visual simulation as well? Nicely
shaped envelopes
And for who's PHB is this mauve, 3D, animated, flow chart?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then
you win. --Mahatma Gandhi
-Original Message-
Sound, must have sound
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/04/23 Tue PM 12:57:18 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mailflow chart
Could you include a 3D visual simulation as well? Nicely shaped envelopes
flying through gateways and such. Please
Getting back to David's original question - what do you need to know?
Searching TechNet for Mail flow returned some useful hits...
- Original Message -
From: Smith, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:17 AM
AC-3 sound
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
e-mail disclaimer
All,
I need to migrate a single user from Lotus Notes to Exchange. Does
anyone know of any documents or any strategies that I can use to
accomplish this? I need to move the user's entire mailbox from Notes to
Exchange. Any Ideas?
Thanks,
___
John Bowles
Exchange
Network guys just showed traffic from the Exchange server headed to
10.10.10.10.
Nothing else. Like pulling teeth.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to
When did you first notice this?
when you do a netstat -n , what port is the traffic using?
( I apologize if you have already stated this)
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Export then import
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:36 PM
Subject: Lotus Notes Migration
All,
I need to migrate a single user from Lotus Notes to Exchange. Does
anyone know of any
Have you looked at this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/NotesImporter.asp
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L.
No I haven't I was half a$$ checking around on the Exchange site then I
got swamped. Thanks a lot, I will check it out.
Thanks,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
I'm having a probelm here during my conversion from Exchange 5.5 to E2K.
I'm trying to setup our Address Lists to mirror how our Address Book
looked on Exchange 5.5. The way we have it setup on the 5.5 server is
that we have a container named Distribution Lists. Underneath that we
have
I just restored my 1st server in the site from backup tape in my test lab.
No problem
Problem though is that the server is trying to replicate with the other
servers in the site, that
don't exist. Therefore I can't delete the servers listed in the site
because it is trying to replica.
Plus it
The best way to accomplish the task involves delegation to an SSM... Do you
have any of those hanging around?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Address Lists in E2K
All,
Or go to Costco and get a bucket of ShavedSeielstads.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Address Lists in E2K
The best way to accomplish the task involves delegation to an SSM...
Exchange 5.5 sp4, WinNT 4.0 SP6. Multiprocessor: PIII/866mhz and 868MB Ram.
Is there a limit to how many recipients can be addressed in an email?
One of my users needs to send 400 emails outside the firm. I know it will
create a lot of network traffic and bog down the Server.
Is it a good idea
Stained fingers..ha hanothing here
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BLACKBERRY
We are planning to install Blackberry Service Pack
Does anyone know of a good website besides (Technet) that explains how to
set permissions in iis 5 for outside users to see the web page. I was tryin
to set up a web page on windows xp pro and for some reason it works at home
but when you go outside the page cannot be displayed. sorry this is so
Firewall?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: iis 5
Does anyone know of a good website besides (Technet) that explains how to
set permissions in iis 5
The best website for immediate use is http://localhost/iisHelp
In this case I'm gonna guess that it's NAT that's causing your problem.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 04:15 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Hi !
Have You bind the Website to an IP-address ? You must.
Anonymous-user must have read/execut on the website. User like IUSR_MACHINE.
ROnny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pa vegne av Tom Meunier
Sendt: 23. april 2002 23:22
Til: Exchange
Can you telnet to port 80 on the machine from the outside?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
Im not in front of the computer now however I was basically giving all the
I didn't think the current version of Robert's script was supported on E2K..
Has that changed?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
Also see this website:
http://www.iisanswers.com/
Ronny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne av Tener, Richard
Sendt: 23. april 2002 23:32
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: iis 5
Im not in front of the computer now however I was basically
No
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
Can you telnet to port 80 on the machine from the outside?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
Then you must have the port blocked or IIS isnt running.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
No
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Just wanted to make sure I was right in my thinking and the FAQ 3.23 appears
to verify that.
I need to add another email domain to the exchange box (5.5 sp4) The new
domain lets say is called water.com. I have an MX record pointing to our
exchange box. Our current (Primary) domain is
By outside the firm I assume you mean SMTP mail. RFC-821/2821 states that
a mailer must support at least 100 recipients; anything beyond that is
implementation-specific.
- Original Message -
From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Receiving.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass email question
Is that on the receiving end or the sending?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault
Are you using the 5810's?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BLACKBERRY
We are planning to install Blackberry Service Pack 3A on our server in the
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
