This forum has a higher turnover rate than McDonalds.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 June 2002 00:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Yeah, you're right. Even though I posted just my Exchange experience, I
We use netbackup from Veritas as a backup solution. when we perform
mailbox backups we get the following error on some mailboxes. I have
looked and dealt with veritas and they are saying its an exchange issue
and not veritas. Has anyone got any idea what could be causing this and a
possible
I would check all the permissions on the Information store.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 09:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Permissons are setup fine, because normal backups work, and also the error
comes up on only some mailboxes and others work fine, which to be shows
that permissions are setup fine. Service account admin rights on the IS
I would check all the permissions on the Information store.
Regards
Are you carrying out bricklevel backups?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 10:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Permissons are
Hi all,
I noticed on my laptop if I have Out of Office feature turned on and someone
sends me a message they will get a notification as expected. However, any
subsequent msgs sent by that user do not seem to generate Out of Office
notification/replies. Is this the way Outlook 2000 is meant to
It is by design. It helps to prevent message looping. If the sender suddenly
turns his/her OOF on then your OOF reply may trigger off another reply and
so on and so on.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim
This is the way it works. I mean, once you know they're out of the
office, why would you want to keep getting notified?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 June 2002 11:16
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Re Outlook2K
Great... not even noon on Monday and we've got a winner already for I
can't read the manual or the help files...
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re Outlook2K
Hi all,
I noticed on
Yes we are carrying out Brick level backups -
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you enable message journalling does it journal inbound and outbound
mail as well as internal email as well or is that a separate hack on the
individual servers to get the internal email.
Dot
_
List posting FAQ:
I'll assume you mean for Exchange 5.5. Check this out:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239427
There's sections for journaling Internet email, local messages, etc.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 June
Caution: Filling is hot.
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
This forum has a higher turnover rate than McDonalds.
-Original Message-
Well, then stop that.
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Yes we are carrying out Brick level backups -
The point, which you're missing, is for OWA (or a FE server) to work in the
DMZ, you're punching a few dozen holes in the firewall to begin with, so
you've already given that box significant internal reign, in addition to
having opened a few dozen ports on the firewall that potentially give other
Is this really necessary?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 11:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
Great... not even noon on Monday and we've got a winner already for I
can't read the manual or the help files...
Thanks Neil and Louis. I had thought as much, but wasn't sure wether or not
there was a workaround for those forgetful ones. Some of my Sales users
enquired about this, which I then sunsequently tested on my laptop. They
keep forgetting if so and so is away on a trip and such like. But thats
Always read the label.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 13:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Caution: Filling is hot.
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I felt so, yes. Was it really necessary for you to post to several thousand
admins about (a) an Outlook issue which doesn't belong on this list, and (b)
is a trivial piece of information that was readily available in the help
files, or any number of other places such as Technet.
Did you read
S
80 TCP (HTTP)
389 TCP/UDP (LDAP)
88 TCP/UDP (Kerberos)
53 TCP/UDP (DNS)
135 TCP (RPC Endpoint)
3268 TCP (GC LDAP)
445 TCP (NETLOGON)
Plus a static port for RPC 1024
Plus Registry change on DC's for lookups
OR
443 TCP (SSL)
H.. choices choices.
-Original Message-
From:
Or maybe use IPSec?
Rob Ellis
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 13:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
S
80 TCP (HTTP)
389 TCP/UDP (LDAP)
88 TCP/UDP (Kerberos)
53 TCP/UDP (DNS)
135 TCP
Not only did I think you were gibbering idiot when I read your initial msg,
but I now have a much lower opinion of you. So do us a favour and if you
have something to say shutup. If I want any shit out of you I'll be sure to
squeeze your head little man.
Besides, I got better things to do than
errr chaps, off-list perhaps?
Just a suggestion.
Regards
E.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
Not only did I think you were gibbering idiot when I read your initial msg,
but I now have a much lower opinion of you. So do us a
Well... I'd check Appendix D out before you start shooting.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxd.htm
This is a friendly reminder that the odds of a sarcastic response or outright flaming
go up significantly if the answer to your question is easily found in the index or
table of
I'm getting the following error:
Event ID: 1110
Source: MSExchangeIS Public
Description: Error 0x0 occurred while writing per-user information for (user account)
on database First Storage Group\Public Information Store (EXCH2).
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California
Check this out:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1110source=
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 13:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error - Event ID: 1110
I refer you to Damian's answer further up the list. Assuming you can handle
reality.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 13:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
Not only did I think you were gibbering idiot
The Backup Agent works fine. I use it everyday. You just haven't
configured it properly. Useful to you? Probably not, but as valid a
comment as your initial pointless and gratuitous comment about Microsoft.
If that is the case it is funny that so many other people have complained
about the
That's exactly how it is supposed to work. One reply for each sender, one
time.
I mean how many times does someone need to know you are out?
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
Tell them to use a descriptive message.
I will be out of the office from 6-10 to 6-14, and returning on the
15th
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
Thanks Neil
How about denying access to their own hard drives and not allowing to use
any network drives?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 10:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to prevent end users from using Outlook
Not necessarily a bad idea, but unless OWA access is limited to a corp
intranet, I would think that SSL would be the only viable option for a FE
OWA server .
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Repeated blows to the head with a fairly large hammer also works.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to prevent end users from using Outlook personal folders
There are seldom better technological solutions to behavioural problems
than that of a sharp jab to the chin
Or something.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002
We do carryout Brick-level backups for when this occurs.
Are you carrying out bricklevel backups?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 10:14
To: Exchange
Im sorry, im getting confused now. Do you get the error when doing a brick
level back-up? Or when you just back up the store on its own?
Are you saying you only carry out BLB's when you get this type of error?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original
I hate it.
I frequently find that a user is being sent mail, which the connector
downloads from our ISP, and then promptly dumps into a black whole.
Deleting and re-creating the affected user entry on the connector
resolves it (until next time), but why is it happening, and can I
recover any of
Why do you need new infrastructure to drop the cludge?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SBS 2000 POP connector
I hate it.
I frequently find that a user is being sent mail, which the
we get the error when doing a BLB only. when doing normal full backups of
the store - everything is fine - the mailbox account that we use has the
exchange service account set as the nt account, sop has the permissions
set.
Im sorry, im getting confused now. Do you get the error when doing a
Reason 245 why you shouldn't do BLB.
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
we get the error when doing a BLB only. when doing normal full backups of
Thanks for the info.
Well then, might i suggest, as Andy and no doubt other admins would
recommend, that you should stop doing BLB's. Here are a few links for you to
ponder over.
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
http://www.exchangefaq.org/recovery/0004.php3
Regards
Mr
Then, that is your problem... You don't change that in IIS admin,
because the settings will be overwritten. Change it in the ESM.
(Exchange System Manager)
Andrew
MCSE (W2K NT4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, June 09,
Andrew,
When you go to HTTP protocol and right click on Exchange Virtual Settings it
tells you to use IIS manager to makes changes.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: IIS
Never mind it has to be done at the folder called Exchange under the Virtual
HTTP server.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
You need to go one more level deep... Double click on the Exchange
Virtual Settings... Then go to properties of the Exchange folder and
other folders...
Q290341
Andrew
MCSE (W2K NT4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, June
Yahoo did the same recently. Must be a conspiracy. I blame Elvis [1]. But
junk mail relating to mail clients on Exchange? I think you can relax.
JDE
[1] he denies it.
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:31 AM
To:
While point (b) is valid, with regard to point (a), out of office
notifications are fire on the server and therefore it's a valid topic
for this forum. Even if it were an Outlook issue, Outlook issues have
traditionally been considered on-topic herein.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech
I'm sorry David, I can't do that.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones
you need to do
cscript.exe adsutil.vbs set w3svc/1/root/defaultlogonDomain \
this is from Exchange 2000 hosting whitepaper
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 10:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS Authentication changes
You cannot change the default HTTP Virtual Server settings in ESM. It refers
you to IIS Admin for that.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
Then,
All,
Our company is buying a new Exchange server. At the start running 5.5
hopefully migrating to E2K sooner rather than later. I was hoping that
someone may be able to help me decide whether or not to invest in 1MB or 2MB
L2 processor cache rather than buying the 512K L2 cache. This server over
Not wanting to suggest that you write a blank check, I guess it would
depend on the cost.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Amount of users is one thing, but storage and message/time is what you
should be concerned with. Go to MS's Exchange site they have tools/papers to
guide you.
Just go to 2000 and be happy.
- Original Message -
From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
If you have limited budget, spend your extra cash on memory.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hardware Question
All,
Our company is buying a new Exchange server. At
Both yahoo and hotmail used to be great tools. Now, it's a hassle to
maintain an account with them.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and
Absolutely nothing. . . I still think that disclaimers are a totally useless annoyance.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Of course it is - what's to stop me
Ed,
We're looking at a 8K to 10K difference in the cost between the two. Will
there be any signifigant/noticable differences?
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hardware
I still like Yahoo, especially when I'm away and want to pull my POP3
mail from my ISP without dialing in to them. Yahoo's junk mail filters
are quite good.
Hotmail is a Spam magnet and their filters are poor.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world
I think the following disclaimer says it all:
DISCLAIMER: The information and opinions expressed on this site are not
necessarily the opinions of the author and may be denied or disregarded at a
later date. Reading of this paragraph constitutes an agreement on the part
of the reader not to hold
Oh shit I'm putting that one on mine from now onComedy Gold Sir
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Tullis
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I think the following
Sent to me by a co-worker:
DISCLAIMER:
This Email message does not reflect the thoughts or opinions of either
myself, my company, my friends or my cat; don't quote me on that;
don't quote me on anything; you may distribute this posting and all
its associated parts freely but you may not make a
Hey!!! I'm the author of the how to move Exchange servers to a different domain [1].
Sheesh . . Ed gets all the credit around here mutter
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
Fortunately I have not had many restore problems so I am not up to speed on
the abilities of exchange to restore specific data. A customer has Exchange
Server. A user has deleted (and emptied from his deleted items) a whole
series of e-mails which were very important. Is there any way to recover
In outlook, tools recover deleted items, assuming you have a deleted item
retention period on the server that is greater than zero days.
-Original Message-
From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering
Is Deleted Items Retention turned on? You can recover them easily from Deleted Items
for that period. For those older than that, you'll have to do a restore to a recovery
server. Lots of info about this in the archives for this list.
David
-Original Message-
From: David Stafford
welcome :)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Oh shit I'm putting that one on mine from now onComedy Gold Sir
-Original Message-
From:
Excellnetconsider it stolen g...
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Sent to me by a co-worker:
DISCLAIMER:
This Email message does not reflect the thoughts or
Do they have Deleted Item Retention in place? If so, how far back? If it
is in place and the customer is running Outlook 98 or better then you are
all set. Just select Deleted Items Folder, then go to Tools - Recover
Deleted Items - select the ones you want to recover and voila - you are a
Greater than Day0?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
In outlook, tools recover deleted items, assuming you have a deleted item
retention period on
I didn't say you change the IIS properties on ESM. Checkout Q290341.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K NT4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:02 AM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: IIS Authentication changes
He's a suck-up. We all know who really wrote it.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
Hey!!! I'm the author of the how to move Exchange servers to a different
domain [1].
I do not believe they have retention on. By the way it is a Exchange 2K
box. I realized I neglected to specify in my original posting.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering
I thought there *was* nothing greater than Day 0.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
Greater than Day0?
-Original Message-
From: Baker,
No. Looks like they left the defaults when they loaded Exchange. My only
option to restore to another machine?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
That's your only option as I see it. However, I would talk to them about
implementing the Deleted Item Retention after this event (all of our
customers typically run about 14 days DIR). This will save you and your
customer future hassles.
--
From: David Stafford
Reply To:
And, if I may throw my 2 cents in...
Be aware that if you do turn it on, it only works for those items that were
originally in the Deleted Items folder. If a person hard-deletes a
message, by keying shift-delete for example, it bypasses the Deleted Items
folder.
I got burned on this a while
Thanks everyone. I appreciate everyone's time.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
And, if I may throw my 2 cents in...
Be aware that if you do
I'm not sure if this is the right list. If not, please point me to an
appropriate place.
environment
We have an Exchange2000 server running with SP2.
The Exchange Database is on one drive (G: - RAID 5)
The Exchange Logs are on another drive (L: - RAID 0)
Backup Exec 8.5 installed
/environment
All-
I'd like to set up public folder replication between two unrelated Exchange
2000 organizations. Each server is in a separate forest and separate domain
without any trusts. Is this possible? I haven't been able to find any
information related to replication between unrelated Exchange
To all the Genii out thereĀ
..your assistance would be truly appreciated.
I have a problem, experienced by a couple of users, that has so far defied
all attempts at resolution.
Running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4, incl. all hotfixes on Windows NT4 SP6a.
Antivirus:Trend Micro Scanmail for Exchange.
eventcomb work good sometime for check log. Try
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/security/prodtech/windows/windows2000/staysecure/secops06.asp
Chu Fu
Hi
Exch 5.5 sp54
Win2k sp2
I am wondering if there is a way to move the diagnostic logging events
Hi,
New customer, Exchange 5.0 (upgrade now in works). They have trouble
sending email to a few select outside mailboxes. (Just a couple, vast
majority of outbound mail delivered flawlessly). I don't see any
restrictions anywhere in IMS. They're using the IMS connector only,
address space
Last week we upgraded from Exchange 2000 server to Enterprise, users who
are mobile using offline folders had to synchronize their whole mailbox
after this, included items that were already synchronized. When they had
finished that synchronization all seemed fine, untill this morning. They
are
But, Martin, that is NOT the way it worked in earlier versions of Outlook.
You would get repeated OOO replies, depending on how many messages you sent
to that individual.
Geoff. . . .
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002
last week users who are mobile using offline folders had to synchronise
their whole mailbox after we upgraded from Exchange 2000 server to
Enterprise, this included items that were already synchronised. When they
had finished that synchronization all seemed fine, untill this morning.
They are all
Hi,
Have a new customer who is having problems sending mail to a couple to
outside mailboxes using the IMS (the address space is set to *,1 and I see
no delivery restrictions anywhere). They are not listed on any
relay-blocking lists. The messages appear not to be hanging anywhere
internally.
Compaq has done extensive performance testing of Exchange 2000 on their
line of Proliant servers...and have published them.
In the Compaq Active Answer Microsoft Exchange 2000 Performance and
Configuration on Compaq ProLiant Servers, they did a comparison test of
the 1MB vs. 2MB L2 cache. The
Nope you wanna try the Linux list. If they don't answer your question
come back and we will figure something out.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matt Usher
What could I be doing
wrong?
A lot, I
know.
I'm trying to send
internet e-mail through my Exchange server with Outlook clients. I thought
I had a SMTP virtual server and a SMTP connector configured correctly, but
obviously, I'm mistaken.
Specs:
Server running Win2k, Exchange 2k,
ISA.
Hello!
Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access
Exchange mailbox? I know there is MIS 2002, but it requires a AD which
I don't have. I also looked at the Infowave software, but it's taking a
over week to talk to Pre sales people.
I am looking for a software that will
I'm not sure if this is the right list. If not, please point me to an
appropriate place.
environment
We have an Exchange2000 server running with SP2.
The Exchange Database is on one drive (G: - RAID 5)
The Exchange Logs are on another drive (L: - RAID 0)
Backup
We made a conscious decision to Disable out of office responses and replies
to the Internet on our SMTP connector. We still think that we have valid
reasons for doing this but we are getting a lot of pressure from our users
to reverse this decision.
The biggest pressure is coming from those in
That's not entirely accurate. A hard delete simply marks it as deleted,
without moving it to the Deleted Items folder. Exchange doesn't care how its
deleted, it simply marks it as deleted and moves on, cleaning it up later.
You do, however, have to enable the DumpsterAlwaysOn reghack as outlined
Can you send to
anyone or just a select few domains. I'm having a problem withy only a few
domains.
-Original Message-From: Daniel L. Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:32
AMTo: Exchange DiscussionsSubject: FW: Exchange 2k
SMTP
What could I
Congratulations. Your customer is an open relay.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected
Hi,
New customer, Exchange 5.0 (upgrade now in works).
That is incorrect.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
But, Martin, that is NOT the way it worked in earlier versions of Outlook.
You would get repeated OOO
First you should upgrade to 8.6 + the latest build.
Is the Exchange job part of another backup job or separate backup job of
only the Exchange Server?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
The logs are not being flushed after the incremental or the full backup?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Log Files
I'm not sure if this is the right list. If not, please
Try upgrade your BE8.5 to the latest.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K NT4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:15 PM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: Exchange 2000 Log Files
Subject: Exchange 2000 Log Files
Judas Priest. Please send using Plain text.
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
Can you send to anyone or just a select few domains. I'm having a problem
withy
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
