Also remember that it sends a notification to each recipient only once until
it is turned off and back on again.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Thursday, June
Sure we do, but sometimes it's nice to have some info on setting up the
lab. :-)
Mike - just run the ExDeploy utility supplied on the E2k3 CD - it covers
step-by-step several scenarios of installation, including deploying an
additional E2k3 server.
Neil
-Original Message-
From:
Oh well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but...
boggle
You tested someone else's domain at abuse.net without permission? You do
For an interesting article on time standards (or non-standards as they seem
to be) have a look at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,985020,00.html
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2003
Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to the Internet
;-)
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 June 2003 16:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Does it not work
Isn't allowing Out of Office replies to the Internet a great thing :-)
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion
Sent: 27 June 2003 10:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to
If OOF isn't working at all for this user, it could be that this user's
OOF message is corrupt. Try the following:
The OOF message is a hidden entry in the user's mailbox. The Out of
Office Assistant creates a set of two rules in the Inbox subtree.
The first contains a Message Class of
Cheers Neil I'll give it a go.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 June 2003 10:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
If OOF isn't working at all for this user, it could be that this user's
OOF
New server install,
Hard drive failure within days.
Wait for engineer.
Tim
--
Tim Gowen
RAF Museum
IT Dept.
Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you
must take no action
If you are using Veritas as a backup system and you ant to restore
Exchange5.5,which procedure would you follow Microsoft restore or Veritas
restore? I am getting readt to restore exchange and i was looking at
Veritas way of doing it, and also Microsoft way, and i figured since i am
using Veritas,
We use Spamcop's BL, and have had very good success with it - although we're
calling it from Sendmail directly on our external relays.
One of the biggest advantages is that they post *exactly* why a mail server
is listed, and they give specific steps to get unlisted.
I think Spamcop is a little to aggressive for some. Then again, if you want to block
spam, go for it.
-Original Message-
From: Ludwig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We use Spamcop as primary and NJABL as secondary. The most
What are the differences?
- Original Message -
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:13 AM
Subject: Veritas OR Microsoft Echange Restore
If you are using Veritas as a backup system and you ant to
On several machine in my organisation, attempting to open a message from one
particular supplier causes Outlook to hang - I can open it in Outlook XP on
my machine, but even previewing it in Outlook 2000 on at least three other
machines causes a Not responding message in task manager. This even
WD Click of Death
Christmas Day in Nighty Eight
I survived, barely
I Feel your pain
Exchange Server 5.0
Nightmare it was then
Michael Harmer
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
New server install,
Good morning all!
I'm asking around in the group for different methods of what would be the safe choice
to migrating 5.5 to E2K(not at once, we're looking at a period of six-months before
retire 5.5). This is kind of what I have in my environment:
One NT4.0 domain with a single site of
Hi.
We have a box running XChange 5.5 Sp4 on NT Server 4 Sp6a.
A long time ago we served NNTP from this box, but since it was used very
little, and since it requires a hefty amount of disk, we got rid of it.
However, the news entries remain in the main site, hidden, but they still
slow down alot
Find anything good here? Interesting augmentation, if you don't do business with the
target country...
http://blackholes.us/
-Original Message-
From: Greg Marr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:03 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
Confusion Reigns here
Contemplate the past, reboot
Bluescreen vexes me.
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP
files..
i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I
need to block it..
Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!)
rec's from anyone??? please
FYI: presently exch55sp4.
But I
Antigen will do it.
I spoke to Trend about this yesterday and they said it is a limitation of
the program (whatever that means). I would not look for them add any new
features to their E55 versions of Scanmail.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
thanks
No I was kind'a hoping they might add it to IMSS
Dont know If I can get the $$$ Antigen..will have to see...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types
What version of Trend are you running? All of the versions I know about
from Trend allow file blocking based on file extension.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Antigen, Tumbleweed etc..
Most of the gateway products will do this for you.
- Original Message -
From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
I need something
IMSS 5.12..true while it will allow attachment blocking.
IF say the EXE in questions is zip'd up..NG it passes right thru
It does get scanned for vireses...BUT hey...Im a bit of a dictator...NO
EXE..etc.. period! in my system
so now people have a way of getting around the EXEetc
They all do. But the 3.x versions for Exchange 5.5 will not block an
extension if it is in a ZIP file.
I have no clue if the E2K versions can.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rec on
Are you willing to change the name of your Domain?
From: Pham, Tuan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Migrating strategy
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:46:56 -0500
Good morning all!
I'm asking around in the group for
I see the light.
--
From: Martin Blackstone
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
They all do. But the 3.x versions for Exchange 5.5 will not block
I am looking for a way to script pf creation in a native win2k\e2k
environment. I was hoping that I could use pfadmin to create public
folders, but it does not seem to be able to do it. Could anyone point
me in the right direction on how to script pf creation in e2k (examples,
links, etc..)?
Hello Everyone,
Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on all outbound internet
emails? (using the SMTP or Exchange Server)
(Exchange 2000 SP3 Enterprise, Windows 2000 Sp2)
Thanks
Raj
**
This e-mail message,
You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Hello Everyone,
Is there a way or tool to insert company logo on
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
You will definitely need a 3rd party tool for this.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj
Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps?
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Couldn't you just create your own stationary that would include the
logo?
Gill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
Any
I've thought of that but that then requires touching each client does it
not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level?
-Original Message-
From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting
Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business
thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on
I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from
another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their
company letterhead.
That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't
support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with
Oy. Because Email has to be made the *exact* equivalent of paper messages,
right?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I've been seeing a lot
Heck, why stop there.
Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email!
- Original Message -
From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I've been seeing a
I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme
song. Announce your presence with authority! :)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From:
All,
We're looking at our options for a new exchange server. On the hardware
side of things we're leaning towards Dell. We have never used Dell before
though, so I was curious if any one has any feedback as far as Dell servers
are concerned and how their support is?
Thanks in advance for all
I guess. I advised against it, but as usual the PHB's don't want to hear
it.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Always go with first tier Servers, Storage and backup devices. If you
consider Dell in that catergory then fine.
From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Server Feedback
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003
I've used Dell before and really didn't have too many issues. Their
support is decent. The only problems were with the remote assist cards
with Netware 5.
I'd pay for the 4hr response time if it's an important server with any
vendor.
I'm using Compaq/HP now and they are also fine.
I have users logging into Outlook to Exchange that is in a different
domain. The change password feature does not work. Any ideas?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every
mailbox?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
You can add a disclaimer/default signature with a lot of the Anti-virus
products that
are available. I use Trendmicro's IMSS.
Other alternative is to add an SMTP event sync. Search the Microsoft KB
for the article.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes, thanks. I even know how to read a FAQ and search with google.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
Anyone know how to make a
And an electric email commanded taser to shock some sense into him/her
Fenton
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I'll suggest that! Maybe something
Ditto this comment.
For some reason I have been around Dell servers probably more than any
other make for the last 5-6 years. In that time I can tell you I have
seen one RAID card and one hard drive (Fujitsu - but sold through Dell)
fail. This was not on the same server. Oh, also one DLT changer
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the
I don't see the benefits either. Your two points are spot on. Exchange
failures are generally due to poor hardware or poor administration.
Mitigate these two issues and you will have a great single-node [1] cluster.
[1] Single-Node copyright Ed Crowley.
-Original Message-
From:
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering...
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not
likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply
patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can
failover in a matter of seconds and you have as
Havent they recommended Active/Passive for awhile now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schneider, Bryan D
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of
Definitely Active/Passive.
The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to
tape after.
This is per a TechEd presentation.
William
- Original Message -
From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June
A major automotive manufacturer did this for a bit, required in the company
pronounced sig. It was very silly and amateurish, made employees very
embarrassed to send email.
The logo was about 200x200 and they used fonts at about 16 pt. I guess they
saw the light, I don't see it in their sigs
I believe they have always recommended an Active/Active cluster.
Paul Roubicheux sais the E2K3 clusters awesomely.
-Original Message-
From: Schneider, Bryan D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth
Active/Active Clusters however are limited to 1900 mapi connections (Sp2+) so for that
reason and others, Active/Passive is generally recommended.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:35 PM
To:
The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
Definitely Active/Passive.
The 8-node cluster I mentioned it
The PPT would be wrong then as 4+1+2 8
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that,
OK, I'll try it another way - the presentation that I heard at Tech-Ed,
matched up against my notes, indicated that it was:
A) 4 x 4-way servers, active, plus
B) 1 x 4-way server, passive, plus
C) 2 x 2-way servers, passive, for backups, etc.
Equals 7.
I never claimed 8. I'm perfectly capable
You are totally right. Cochran's slides do say that. My notes do not.
I am wrong. I'm sorry, Gary.
7-node cluster per the slides. 4-1-2. Not 5-1-2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:55 PM
64 matches
Mail list logo
