Outlook clients prompted for Username/Password/Domain

2003-10-14 Thread MATTSON, Winston
Hello all, For some unknown reason on Monday some of our clients are now being presented with the Enter password: dialogue box. These users computers are a member of the domain and when they enter there information once, Outlook opens normally. I have checked the profile and the logon network

Disable Display Name

2003-10-14 Thread Olle Gustafson
We have a problem! We are running Exchange2000 and want to disable sending the display name to the Internet. We have not(!)checked the option under Global Settings-Internet Message Format-Default, the option to Preserve sender's display name on message. Still we send the display name out on the

FW: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Kim Schotanus
I've started getting a lot of emails back with the following message: -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: maandag 13 oktober 2003 17:15 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Undeliverable: Reply to Experts: Proposal

RE: Outlook clients prompted for Username/Password/Domain

2003-10-14 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
I know Outlook XP goes crazy like this when someone's password is about to expire. Ctrl-Alt-Del, Change Password, Log out/Log in. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed

2003-10-14 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Did you make sure to keep the necessary ports open so that the front-end in the DMZ could talk to the domain controllers (which I assume are behind your firewall?) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

2003-10-14 Thread Hansen, Eric
Shawn, how are you fighting false positives with that product? we have it deployed and have since turned it off cause of that problem. We are working on a in house app that will email users with hyperlinks to their blocked email. e- -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

2003-10-14 Thread Etts, Russell
If it helps, we use Postini. Not too expensive while fighting off viruses and spam. It's work a look. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight

RE: How to change SMTP address for Public Folders

2003-10-14 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Import using the attribute Secondary-Proxy-Addresses. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of How, Say Chuan Sent: Monday, October 13,

RE: Disable Display Name

2003-10-14 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Does this help: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;288635Product=exch2 k Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
You should ask the postmaster for kapitza.ras.ru, no? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Tuesday, October 14,

Re: Trend's change to how it reacts to eicar

2003-10-14 Thread Steve
With pattern 653 (from today) this change in how Scanmail reacts to the EICAR file has been returned to the way it was (it no longer passes the EICAR by default anymore). Cheers Greetings all, I recently had a problem with Scanmail 6.1 that required using the eicar file to troubleshoot (SM

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Kim Schotanus
My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Arlo Clizer
Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Kim Schotanus
But how can it come back almost instantly? -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Paul Hutchings
Because it's refusing the connection right away? If I use sam spade to test smtp connectivity to that address it accepts mail from work (proper static IP) whilst at home I get the same as you, presumably because although I'm on a static IP it's in an IP range that's publicly known to be home

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
The 571 is part of the SMTP session your server has with the receiving server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Kim Schotanus
Our mail goes through ADSL, but a business line, not a home-line... What can I do? Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56

RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890

2003-10-14 Thread Paul Hutchings
What I'd do is check your IP at http://www.moensted.dk/spam, if nothing shows there, you might simply be on their manual blocklist, in which case short of asking them there's not much you can - their server, their rules however flawed their thinking :-) Paul -Original Message- From:

E2K3 and 5.5 smtp

2003-10-14 Thread Milt Atkinson
we have a mixed envirnoment ... E2K3 and Exchange 5.5. The 5.5 has the in and outbound bridgeheads and the bulk of the users. We have only 5 or 6 test accounts on the new E2K3 server. one of the E2K3 accounts creates a message to one of the real users on the 5.5 system which has a deliver

OT: DBs and daylight savings time

2003-10-14 Thread Orin Rehorst
A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. On the morning of Oct 26 an hour will be ran twice. A transaction could run at 1:15 AM, the hour be changed from 2 to 1 AM, and then another transaction ran after the first but be logged as 1:10 AM. That can mess up

RE: DBs and daylight savings time

2003-10-14 Thread Andy David
They are sequential: E001.log., E002.log. etc. E00.log is the current log file. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: DBs and daylight savings

Re: OT: DBs and daylight savings time

2003-10-14 Thread bscott
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, at 5:20pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. Most systems designed in the past thirty years or so use an absolute counter (the number of seconds since Midnight, 1 Jan 1970 is a popular choice) for time

Re: Message comes to inbox and disappears again

2003-10-14 Thread Uso
I am delivering to my mailbox and the mail is not delete by any rules. it keeps happening. Uso - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:16 PM Subject: RE: Message comes to inbox and