Hello all,
For some unknown reason on Monday some of our clients are now being
presented with the Enter password: dialogue box. These users
computers are a member of the domain and when they enter there
information once, Outlook opens normally.
I have checked the profile and the logon network
We have a problem! We are running Exchange2000 and want to disable sending
the display name to the Internet. We have not(!)checked the option under
Global Settings-Internet Message Format-Default, the option to Preserve
sender's display name on message. Still we send the display name out on
the
I've started getting a lot of emails back with the following message:
-Original Message-
From: System Administrator
Sent: maandag 13 oktober 2003 17:15
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:Undeliverable: Reply to Experts: Proposal
I know Outlook XP goes crazy like this when someone's password is about
to expire. Ctrl-Alt-Del, Change Password, Log out/Log in.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: MATTSON, Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Did you make sure to keep the necessary ports open so that the front-end
in the DMZ could talk to the domain controllers (which I assume are
behind your firewall?)
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly
Shawn, how are you fighting false positives with that product?
we have it deployed and have since turned it off cause of that problem. We
are working on a in house app that will email users with hyperlinks to their
blocked email.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly
If it helps, we use Postini. Not too expensive while fighting off
viruses and spam. It's work a look.
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how does everyone fight
Import using the attribute Secondary-Proxy-Addresses.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of How, Say Chuan
Sent: Monday, October 13,
Does this help:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;288635Product=exch2
k
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
You should ask the postmaster for kapitza.ras.ru, no?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Tuesday, October 14,
With pattern 653 (from today) this change in how Scanmail reacts to the
EICAR file has been returned to the way it was (it no longer passes the
EICAR by default anymore).
Cheers
Greetings all,
I recently had a problem with Scanmail 6.1 that required using the eicar
file to troubleshoot (SM
My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second):
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be
Sent: 14-10-03 18:49
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on
Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them.
They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through
them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems
management IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
But how can it come back almost instantly?
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on
Because it's refusing the connection right away? If I use sam spade to test
smtp connectivity to that address it accepts mail from work (proper static
IP) whilst at home I get the same as you, presumably because although I'm on
a static IP it's in an IP range that's publicly known to be home
The 571 is part of the SMTP session your server has with the receiving
server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Our mail goes through ADSL, but a business line, not a home-line...
What can I do?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
What I'd do is check your IP at http://www.moensted.dk/spam, if nothing
shows there, you might simply be on their manual blocklist, in which case
short of asking them there's not much you can - their server, their rules
however flawed their thinking :-)
Paul
-Original Message-
From:
we have a mixed envirnoment ... E2K3 and Exchange 5.5. The 5.5 has the in
and outbound bridgeheads and the bulk of the users. We have only 5 or 6 test
accounts on the new E2K3 server. one of the E2K3 accounts creates a message
to one of the real users on the 5.5 system which has a deliver
A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. On the
morning of Oct 26 an hour will be ran twice. A transaction could run at 1:15 AM, the
hour be changed from 2 to 1 AM, and then another transaction ran after the first but
be logged as 1:10 AM. That can mess up
They are sequential: E001.log., E002.log. etc.
E00.log is the current log file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: DBs and daylight savings
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, at 5:20pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings
time.
Most systems designed in the past thirty years or so use an absolute
counter (the number of seconds since Midnight, 1 Jan 1970 is a popular
choice) for time
I am delivering to my mailbox and the mail is not delete by any rules.
it keeps happening.
Uso
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:16 PM
Subject: RE: Message comes to inbox and
23 matches
Mail list logo