RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

As Tony says, search under Single Instance Storage (aka SIS) for the techie explanation. In the case your friend cites, he's wrong. What will happen is that your mail gets sent to 1000 people, and there is one copy of it. Now if one of them opens that mail and annotates it with their thoughts on

RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail

Actually, there are plenty of issues where a properly configured box gets hacked. In fact, that had been an issue with older sendmail implementations - they had holes that could be exploited with only connectivity to port 25. And some of them were outright nasty. Hence the reason for the boot

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Actually, its one copy per server containing a mailbox in the distribution. That's important to remember when dealing with multiple servers. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Quite so, thanks for the clarification Roger. -- Robert Moir Microsoft MVP Senior IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College RM Eunt Domus -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 December 2003 12:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Actually, its one copy per server

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

MS paid you to say that, didn't they... :P -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Yep. This year for Christmas they gave me the first season of Hello Larry on DVD. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? MS paid you to

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Andy is cheap at half that price. Me, I got a pen and some paper. I feel so paid for. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 December 2003 13:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Yep. This

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

confused Which one of the Teletubbies is Larry? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Yep. This year for Christmas they gave me the

What is SPAM - Please comment

Dear All I would be interested in any comments about the following ethical problem. Recently I was contacted by an acquaintance who sent me the following email. Hi I would be grateful if you could forward an email to your colleague’s users about a number of telephony and Internet access

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

::dresses up like Abraham Lincoln and shoots Don:: -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I wanna be Issac!! :P -Original Message- From:

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

That's enough, Deckler Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

That's definitely spam. No question about it. Unless your colleagues have specifically asked for emails about telco offers, that is. And of course we all know that they haven't. Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

I'd say that's spam. There is a lot of argument about what exactly spam is, and I would say this falls under the definition I use - unsolicited, commercial, bulk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 December 2003 12:54 To: Exchange

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Eh? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? That's enough, Deckler Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

The crack about being paid by MS. That was very Deckler-esque =) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15,

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

And? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? The crack about being paid by MS. That was very Deckler-esque =) Eric Fretz L-3

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

More ethical discussions? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is SPAM - Please comment Dear All I would be interested in any comments about the following ethical problem.

OT: company question

Has anyone heard anything about this company called CITCO (not the oil and gas Citgo), but CITCO Group - http://www.citco.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

It's all good. The comment was made tongue-in-cheek Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:11 AM

RE: OT: company question

Nope From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: company question Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:21:41 -0500 Has anyone heard anything about this company called CITCO (not the oil and gas Citgo),

Re: What is SPAM - Please comment

If you were to send it to a list like this then its SPAM. If, on the other hand, its a mail to people internally surely you have rules governing what can be sent over the network? In the past the company I worked for allowed this, but as the numbers grew messages sent out to ALL USERs (for

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

Spam. I'd be cross if you sent that to me. If you know me well enough to mention it and you think I'd be interested you can tell me when we're down the pub, otherwise you can keep this and anything else that isn't directly related to work to yourself. I don't see what the ethical problem is.

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Correct me if Im wrong (and I know you will.), unless the actual attachment itself is altered, Exchange still stores just 1 copy of the attachment for all 1000 recipients plus a copy of the original email, now shared by 999 recips, and 1 altered copy of the email stored by the person who

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Yeah. Whatever. goes and sulks at his Ex5.5 deployment -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

You do not know the specifics of their situation so I am not sure why you are so certain that the project was severly underscoped and underbid. Rushed, yes. Underscoped and underbid, no. The scope is to get them from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000 and that is what is being delivered. Underbid,

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Tl;dr. Will everyone just drop this discussion? We don't need another 75 e-mails on this today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

My cat's breath smells like cat food. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 Tl;dr. Will everyone just drop this

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

My brain tickles when I pick my nose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 My cat's breath smells like cat

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Sometimes I feel funny when I climb the rope in Gym class. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15,

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Obviously, you're either sticking your finger all the way past the second knuckle again or you've had too many facelifts -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Me fail english? Thats unpossible! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 Sometimes I feel funny when I climb

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

You've got the women just lining up for you don't ya... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 My brain tickles when I pick my

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

You can fix fat, but you can't fix ugly... -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 Sometimes I feel funny when I climb the rope in Gym

OT: HP USPS

Anyone here involved on the HP/USPS Exchange project? Contact me offlist? _ Cell phone ‘switch’ rules are taking effect — find out more here. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

I like crickets and figs John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Alpha Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other

Day 3: Lessons Learned GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Day 3 was pretty much finishing up some details with nothing much new and exciting to report. Was able to bring up the GW 6.5 client connected to both GW and Exchange and this allows one to drag and drop contacts but not PDL's. Also tried with the GW 5.2.6 client with similar results. Created a

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

You do too? I thought I was the only one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 Sometimes I feel funny

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

In my opinion, there are those with the opinion that stating anything as a fact and not an opinion is abrasive and rude. In my opinion, this opinion is absurd because it is fundamentally understood that anything that comes out of anyone's mouth is simply an opinion and not a fact. In my opinion,

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

My head hurts. That's a fact From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:50:03 -0800 In my opinion, there are those with the opinion that

OT: Sources of outages

Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin

RE: Sources of outages

Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate.

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

First of all, from a grammatical point-of-view, you only need to state that it is your opinion at the beginning of a paragraph or passage because it is fundamentally understood that follows the first phrase or sentence further backs up your opinion. It is my opinion that you are more worried

RE: Sources of outages

Thankfully (knocking on wood) not here. Why not figure in the desktop's into this calculation? In the last 12 months here, we have had about the following: Comm line/svs 85% (12% scheduled) (most caused by a mass outage due to that little thing called Isable) Servers (mid-range and windows) 2%

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Oh. My. I think that was TMI, Eric. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:26 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

You forget that you're comparing me to the guy that tickles his brain when he picks his nose. Frankly, I seem a bit tame. =) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

When I grow up I want to be a principalor a caterpillar. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 You

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Well, some day I'd like to be a dentist. - Hermey - Matt -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 When I grow up I want to be a

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

I want to be a fig farmer John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Alpha Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

Any email with MVP in the signature is spam. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is SPAM - Please comment More ethical discussions? -Original Message- From:

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

Oh wait, I get it. Since MVPs are unethical and SPAM is unethical, any message coming from an MVP must be unethical. Phew. I'm glad you pointed that out to the list. /tongue-in-cheek Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel:

RE: Sources of outages

Apathy - 75% -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

I'm just thankful that my anti-spam software has correctly identified and properly dealt with these Spam related posts. The best 2k of my companies money I've ever spent! Oh wait, I get it. Since MVPs are unethical and SPAM is unethical, any message coming from an MVP must be unethical.

RE: Sources of outages

What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret agendas ? -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Apathy - 75% -Original Message-

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

Is your software scanning for the word spam in the message subject? :) Or MVP? -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is SPAM - Please comment I'm just thankful that my

RE: Sources of outages

I don't know, but I bet its much less than can be atributed to covert actions by unethical end users with secret agendas who then tell you bald faced lies and repeat them in the face of obvious evidence. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

Cross Database Permisions/Issues

Hi Everyone, I am haviong a hard time figguring this simple issue out and I am hoping that you all can help me. For some reason when I give a user permission to a simple calendar (called scheduling or something) they keep getting a popup box that says 'Store Cannot Be Opened'. Ok thats easy

RE: Cross Database Permisions/Issues

Something rings a bell... I think we had a discussion about this a few weeks ago. I believe it is supposed to work across stores but there may be a bug. Maybe there is even a fix, I just can't remember yet. -Original Message- From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: Sources of outages

There is no secret cabal!!! -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret agendas ?

RE: Sources of outages

No, but it might be a government conspiracy. That's what my friend Rusty Shackleford thinks, anyways. (Note: $5 USD to the person that can name the TV show and character that said that line) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel:

RE: Cross Database Permisions/Issues

Thank you for the prompt reply, I should start by stating that all of our servers are at: Windows 2000 w/ SP4 Exchange 2000 w/ SP Post SP3 Hotfix (September) I have all hotfixes and everything else applied, this is just really wierd that its ok on the same servers or between stores on the same

RE: Sources of outages

I'll tell you what! That has to be Dale, the exterminator from King of the Hill. Keep your $ -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages No, but it might be a government

OT: RE: Sources of outages

Excellent job! I have 4 seasons of King of the Hill sitting on my Tivo right now. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

Do they have My Mother the Car? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:43 AM To:

RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?

We can help you with that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange

RE: Day 3: Lessons Learned GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

We should change the name of this list to Deckler's Blog. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Excuse me, but you seem to have us confused with people that give a rat's ass what you think. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Looking down, I see that you just pleaded, Will everyone just drop this discussion? Didn't you really mean everyone else? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

Spam is a synonym of the more technically correct term, unsolicited commercial e-mail, or UCE. The name is pretty much self-defining. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!™ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cross Database Permisions/Issues

That is not normal behavior. Sorry that I can't tell you what is causing it, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy

RE: What is SPAM - Please comment

We have some logical fallacies floating about here. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!™ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Actually I just gave up, and gave in -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000 Looking down, I see that you

RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000

Pretty quickly--six minutes. There's a name for that but this is a family forum. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher