Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile
changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to
automate the changes to the users Outlook profile.
We are building out brand new E2K servers and exporting/importing all the
mail from 5.5 to
: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K migration issue
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile
changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to
automate
Sounds like a DNS/WINS setting. Take a look and make sure that the Exchange
server is looking at the correct DNS/WINS servers for the domain you are
trying join.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Exchange
Hello all,
I need a little assistance here. I am running NT4 SP6a Ex 5.5 SP4 in a
multi-site hub/spoke arrangement. It appears that the hub server (also the
IMC for the entire ORG) is bouncing any external email that has any
attachments in it. The filename/size/or sender doesn't seem to matter.
Singh, Ghanbir on Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:57:58 -0400
Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem
MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:COTLDOM21:COTLDOM21
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
suggest one of two possible motives:
1. These two personnel have reached their Send/Receive limit because their
mailbox is full;
2. These two personnel have a smaller limit on the attachment sizes that
can hit their mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL
I have found the culprit. Apparently NAVMSE (AV running on the server) was
hung scanning a message and caused the server to bounce any other
attachments (still not quite sure why). I restarted NAV and all is well.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Take a look at a company called Motivus. www.motivus.com
They also give you access to your desktop. Lots of nice features.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Wireless Email for Palm and
Hello all,
Little problem, I have set up a PF (Exchange 5.5 SP4/NT4 SP6/ Outlook 2002)
calendar as a Out List to maintain who is and is not in the office or on
vacation for the entire company. I have given 3 people Reviewing Author
rights and everyone else Reviewer rights.
My issue is this:
Folder calendar view
Are you using All Day event? If so, the screen resolution may play in
this role. You probably have the highest resolution than others so you
can see everything.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua
Sent
, 1024x768, 1280x1024, 1600x1200, etc if your video card
monitor can handle it.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view
to keep, something you should have been
doing all along through normal maintenenace.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
How is this method overly burdensome for end-users. All they will have to
do, if my testing has been correct, is change their Outlook profile to point
at the new server
Hello all,
Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get some
feedback.
I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing production
NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming down from 8 NT
domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so
Hello all,
I am having an issue with an X.400 connection from my hub server to a remote
site. My current environment is as follows: All mail servers are Exchange
5.5 SP4/WinNT4 SP6a all hotfixes applied. The remote EX server is also the
BDC in remote domain. The sites are connected by a
Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MTA Issues
Hello all,
I am having an issue with an X
Hello,
I am having an issue with users trying to delete a PF that they do not have
access to that is in their OST. Some users can delete it with no problems,
other users cannot.
The users that cannot are also seeing errors in background synch.
Set is:
E2K SP2 with users using Outlook 2002.
Got a question for you all. In the planning stages of a E2K migration from
5.5 SP4. My question is, do you need an ADC if you join your existing 5.5
ORG with your E2K server in a new site and are there any pitfalls to doing
it this way??
Josh Bennett
Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer
-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Got a question for you all. In the planning stages of a E2K
migration from
5.5 SP4. My question is, do you need an ADC if you join your
existing 5.5 ORG with your E2K
no theoretical reason I can come upon
with which would eliminate the need for an ADC.
What in your migration planning has made elimination of the ADC an object of
consideration?
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:28 PM
, November 21, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K migration
You can't join a 5.5 Org to an E2K server. You can join an E2K server to an
existing 5.5 ORG, but only if you have the ADC installed first.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL
Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
Not really an option.
The scenario is this:
The one remote server is in San Diego that used to be
connected to
the other
, November 04, 2002 5:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
So, it continues to sound more like a bandwidth or network problem. Did we
ever determine what 'too long' of a delivery time meant?
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent
, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
I've adjusted the number of control blocks the MTA has
available and again,
it did not correct
Both way's
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: X.400 issues
On which MTA? The sending or receiving one?
- Original Message -
From: Bennett, Joshua [EMAIL
?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
Event ID 57: Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning Category: X.400 Service
Blocks. These are set in the Registry at
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeMTA\Parameter
s\
There are other parameters that may need to be modified at the same time.
Cheers, Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: 01
, be prepared to rebuild any
cross-site distribution lists after you recreate the connectors (X400 and
dirrep).
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
I have
are
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:27 PM
- MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
I use supposed to be due
Hello all,
I have an incredibly annoying situation going on that I can't seem to get a
grip on. I am not sure of the magnitude of the errors I am seeing due to the
fact that mail is still flowing.
Here is my setup:
I am running WNT4.0 SP6 / EX 5.5 EE SP4 all hotfixes on all these
itself. Has
anyone complain they didn't get there mail sent?
- Original Message -
From: Bennett, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:55 AM
Subject: X.400 issues
Hello all,
I have an incredibly annoying situation going
No, however I am getting a lot of 9202 errors on the remote server.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Miles [mailto:miles.atkinson;bakerhughes.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
Any other events logged such as Event ID 57 ?
I do get 57/289/1290/9202 on one of the other remote servers. FYI: these 2
servers that I am having all the issues with are both on the West Coast
while the hub is on the East Coast.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01
it'd been six hours and the mail wasn't
delivered, we didn't troubleshoot it.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello all,
I have an incredibly annoying situation going
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: X.400 issues
Once it leaves the server you are at the mercy of the internet. Or are these
internal emails.
- Original Message -
From: Bennett, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:24
]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: X.400 issues
Hello all,
I have an incredibly annoying situation going on that I can't seem to get a
grip on. I am not sure of the magnitude of the errors I am
-
From: Bennett, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 12:59 PM
Subject: RE: X.400 issues
I am actually using the IP address (probably should have stated that
in
the
original post, sorry)
-Original Message-
From: Ed
I was thoroughly impressed, although this was my first and obviously last
MEC. I will be in Dalls in June, however. Was my first trip to S. CA and was
not impressed with it. Disney was disappointing for the fact that they had
half the park closed off. Food was good and the free beer even better.
I finally got my boss to sign off on it. I will, hopefully, see you all
there.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin
Hello all,
I have a NT4sp6a Ex5.5SP4 environment. Users are all on Windows XP.
The issue I am having is that users are trying to update their information
in the GAL and are getting errors. They would enter their changes but the
GAL would not reflect these changes.
I am not having much luck
...
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error using the changeaddressbook.exe from BORK
Hello all,
I have a NT4sp6a Ex5.5SP4 environment. Users are all on Windows XP.
The issue I am having
-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error using the changeaddressbook.exe from BORK
The changes never appear.
It is a tool out of the BORK 4.5 to let users make changes to
their contact
info
!)
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error using the changeaddressbook.exe from BORK
Yes, that is exactly what we are using. We have embedded a
link to it (as an
executable
One more question. I have a multi-site environment, do I need to make this
change to the specific site experiencing this issue or to any site in the
ORG?
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Take a look at a product called Motivus. Sweet stuff. http://ww.motivus.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Wireless email from Palm and Pocket PC 2002
Hello!
What's everyone using
You can also do a test defrag on a Non-Exchange server by following the
steps in MSKB Q163627. It will allow you to run a defrag on a copy of the
pub and priv and never even disturb the production files.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Sounds like Outlook is just busy communicating with the Exchange server. You
will usually see this pop-up box when Outlook is accessing a large Inbox or
large attachments.
It is expected behavior so just ignore it.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Mike Connolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
key, for that
matter...
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:30 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Removing a server from Admin program
Subject: Removing a server from Admin program
Hello all,
I have been
be available.
Regards,
-Juancho
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing a server from Admin program
The server is hung and it is preventing me from even opening the Admin
You can change the limits on an individual user in the properties of the
mailbox. Just de-select Use information store defaults and change it to what
ever limit needed.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:35 AM
To: Exchange
Hello All,
Got one for you.
I have two users that are homed in different Ex5.5SP4 sites in the same =
Org (user1 and user2). They both are using Outlook 2002 and have =
permissions to each others calendar. However, when user1 sends a meeting
request out = with user2 and other users in the To:
Hello All,
Got one for you.
I have a user (user1) that has editor permissions to another user's (user2)
calendar. It seems that user1 is receiving meeting requests that are only
being sent to user2. Also, when she replies to a meeting request sent to
her, it states in the From: field user1 on
Could be Klez...
-Original Message-
From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unknown users e-mails entering environment
exchange 5.5, sp4, nt4, sp6a
I am seeing a rash of e-mails being delivered to users where the FROM
]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Simple question
MX records.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Simple question
I have
is the
DNS entry if you don't have dynamic update.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua
Sent: Tuesday, July 09
Nevermind, as I dug through the amazingly unintuitive Microsoft site I found
that X.400 connectors do not rely on NT domain trusts, just site connectors
do.
Thanks for any replies you may have already sent.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
breaking the trust and then rebuilding?
- Original Message -
From: Bennett, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: breaking trusts
Hello all,
I am newly appointed Exchange Admin so please bear with me
59 matches
Mail list logo
