I don't know about the 515 but a PIX can do PAT. I have done this a few time
and always put the FE Server inside with the BE Servers. FE/BE is only
useful to load balance protocols. Has no security benefit. For that use the
PIX and ISA(s).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you may not be clear on what PAT does. You don't use it to make
ports anything. It is dynamic, and PAT is simply a form of dynamic NAT that
maps multiple unregistered IP addresses to a single registered IP address by
using different ports. AKA single address NAT or port-level multiplexed
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:53 AM
Subject: Sloow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003
What are the best workarounds for slow logins with roaming profiles? How
does OL figure
I always use the Exchange CD for the preps and then install the SP. No
troubles.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep Domain Prep
It was
If a full BU is not removing the logs you need to find out why. ? BU
software ? Exchange aware?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pat Richard
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Flusing log files -
no.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Service Pack and Schema Permissions
Hi,
When applying SP3 for Exchange 2000 do you
What are the best workarounds for slow logins with roaming profiles? How
does OL figure into it, if at all? Some users have PSTs in addition to
Exchange Mailboxes on the server.
tia
_
List posting FAQ:
no place to write logsexchange quits.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennett, Warren
Mr 5 SIG CMD
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
The question
Timeout of what?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K OWA timeouts
We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We
are
the users will pick ?? Then they will get what they deserve, with luck.
Sounds like the patients running the asylum.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norris Carden
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Of logons so that when #$%@! idio^H^H^H^H users walk away from logged on
sessions someone can't walk in behind them and have their session.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K OWA
There are good and bad reasons to do most anything. The # of mailboxes on a
server, by itself, is not all that indicative of hardware requirements for
many reasons. However, for what passes for normal requirements in my
experience you have way more server than you need so it will probably
perform
creating new users
after the switch to native mode, since switching to native mode was the
last thing on the test plan.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5
I think you are not in mapi/workgroup mode?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook2000
I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to
If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the
connection?
It's using TCP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Page
: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Page cannot be displayed
That's my question. I can't figure it out either.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003
This list is for sharing? Whatever could it BE?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook2000
Thank everyone I found the answer
-Original
Have them do a local backup.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options
We have a remote office connected via T1. They
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options
Using Backup Exec, right?
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send
commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo.
(I am not Chris and not speaking for him)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send
commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts
use the ip address
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry J.
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders
I have tried that and it tells me that it cannot
Was/is this the 1st server in the admin group?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Issue with removing EX2000 Server
We are decommissioning an EX2000
Subject: RE: Issue with removing EX2000 Server
Yes it was.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Was/is this the 1st server in the admin group?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
msnews.microsoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dirk du Plooy -
CPX Mngd Services
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List?
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
The MS Documentation. It's free.
This site a some free reading material too.
http://microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
where is the zone file for the delegated mail.phytoceutica.com subdomain?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: owa dns
I get the following. I assume I
Check the backup logs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ashraph,
Elizabeth A.
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trans logs
All the backups being performed are full, and yet the logs are not
the phytoceutica.com FLZs to AD. And I have the
RLZ with the 192.168.70.
If I enter mail.newhaven.phytoceutica.com it works, but not
mail.phytoceutica.com.
Jim Liddil
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange
An alternate delivery location from the message store. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Gonna love this...
what does Exchange have to to
-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa dns
Well, it isn't a flat domain because you are not root. :-)
com delegated phytoceutica.com and the admin of
phytoceutica.com apparently
delegated
Yes, unless it's a DC.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: servername limited same as in 55?
MSX2000+sp3
1 Org
Hi All
We have two
limited same as in 55?
Aha! no this is not a DC, hence if i run DCPROMO on that box I will avoid
that problem?
Please do you have a Q-article as a reference
Rgds,
ER
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:21 PM
as in pst?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 bad?
They can do that just as well without POP. In fact, I would wager that
many of your users
How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be
load balancing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Front end Server
Dear
Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server
be
load balancing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
, they could
access their email also via owa (secured with SSL).
Any other suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
Why do you
How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
What is the swing method?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address List problem
Now I am very confused.
My environment is 3 Exchange
13:36, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
Exchange wouldn't know a drive, mapped or otherwise, from an oil filter.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Gonna love this...
Are you using
If you only have 1 domain and 1 site just set up another exchange server in
the remote site and test the performance.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
been looking at some technet articles about a trihomed ISA
Server in the Perimeter network. Is this a better option?
Thanks for all the ideas.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and
point to the exchange server directly.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
How, if at all, does MMIS figure into fulfilling the business requirement
that BB fills/filled?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Blackberry
Just disable it or remove it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Strock
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing from dual homed to single NIC
I am in the process of planning to move my
iirc you must allow relay for domains accessible by POP on 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Strock
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 12:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 550 errors
I'm administering a 5.5 box, SP3
Update RUS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tech
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail Address Already Exists?
Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account. I was
trying to
Try removing and re-establishing the trust.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
I've got an odd situation with an
Bad atmospherics. They'll get you every time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
Fixed the problem - by moving all
NT Backup is BE Lite.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Does NTBackup backup exchange faster
I haven't done a GW migration for awhile and was wondering if anyone that
has had a need for any 3rd party tools or did the MS tools work out ok?
Which 3rd party tools are best based on your experience?
5000 users.
tia,
Charles
_
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No originator mesages
I know this has been talked about
What systems are in the path to your Exchange Server and what version of
Exchange is it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
how about http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of RBHATIA
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA E2k vs E55
Hi,
Could someone tell me or point me to a
:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No originator
mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/22/03 13:51, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM
to me every day.
So...Pete's initial suggestion to add the SMTP address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Blackhole DL when the employee leaves the
company, is a legitimate and very good suggestion.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you specify it for
the private and the public store?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Users must
That is the method. ~del removes the info from the header field. Check the
header fields in the file. There must be data in each field identified in
the header. A blank for a field is ,,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lloyd, D (Dave)
Subject: Re: Transaction log reports
eh?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: Transaction log reports
What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k
Unlikely the code update alone caused the current behavior.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server
Yeah that's what I figured.
It's common law.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darrin J.
Carter
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Can anyone think of arguments against using html or
What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction
logs or can it be done?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
question
please?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Transaction log reports
eh?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL
. Did you have a
specific goal in mind with this information.
Any help?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:06 PM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Conversation: Transaction log reports
Subject: RE
are generally the most useful source for Exchange reporting
(not sure what one would glean that is useful from the transaction logs).
Oracle has an e-mail application?
On 1/9/03 18:38, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't either Jim but I was included in a discussion with some Oracle
to install on Win2k SP3 server. It made it almost to the end. I
am getting an error saying it needs a file called
Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.Exchangedataproviderservice Any ideas on what it
is looking for? Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Use ADSI edit.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Purcell
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Failed to install SRS with error The distinguished name
already exists...
Yes there was a
The restrictions are with Ex5.5 and Ex2K not running on .NET 2003.
Ex2003 will run on W2k with limited features or .NET with full feature
support.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:01 PM
To:
Turn on auditing and see.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc Mearns
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event 9175 and 9200
Roger
Thanks I don't know what account is trying to sign in?
Regards
And where does one locate that guy?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free/Busy confusion
Use the Leagcy DN tool to make the changes if needed.
-
Was it the original and 1st server in the site?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole
-Original Message-
From: Roger
Blackhole
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole
Was it the original and 1st server in the site?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
site.
As soon as I deleted the first server in the site Internet Email stopped
working. It doesn't go anywhere. Message Tracking shows the message being
submitted by the user, but it doesn't go anywhere else.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole
Well, it goes somewhere!
When users compose and send mail do messages stay in the users outboxes?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Just curious, did this require a schema mod?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
I had all of that correct. It
Who hasn't?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Hanna
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail in to China
RightFax has matured somewhat over the years.
--steve
-Original
problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Charles Marriott
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC2003
Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Can 5.5 be installed in a W2K native mode domain?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
it well because it was my first exposure to driving on the
wrong side of the road :-).
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 3:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC2003
It just says Microsoft Exchange Conference
Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC2003
MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into
My favorite answer. It depends.
Individual mailbox backup is a nice feature if you ever need to restore an
individual mb FAST. It does make the backup take longer.
I've used it in some smaller shops and it works fine. Check it out and see
if it works in your situation.
-Original Message-
IMO FE/BE is simply a load balancing method by protocol.
For an access point put ISA Server in the DMZ, OWA on a computer in the
internal, and the Exchange store on another computer in the internal.
Create web publishing rules on ISA Server for the OWA computer.
Use a 3rd party to LB server
A good thing to consider is ISA Server. FE/BE is really only designed for
load distribution so having them both inside is fine with only ISA in DMZ.
Then just publish Exchange on ISA. I think Exchange needs to be a Secure NAT
Client.
Just MHO.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a BIG Exchange 2000 customer that is thinking Aelita EDR and Event
Admin are going to be required to manage AD/EX2K and such.
Anyone have experience with this stuff to share?
tia
Charles
_
List posting FAQ:
Don't ever put ISA on a DC. (unless you create a separate forest)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Griffith
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ISA Server implementation for Exchange
Ok, here
Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else)
Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5329 ready at Fri, 29 Nov
2002 05:09:04 -0700
tia
Charles
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
I have a new customer that has this setup. I don't know why, yet. :-)
Senario:
One Exchange 2000 Server which is NOT connected to the Internet.
Users have Outlook 2002 and their profiles contain POP (from ISP) and
Exchange with Exchange as default and Exchange mailbox as delivery location.
Having trouble removing whitespace from 195 Gb store.
Is there an issue on DB size for this to work?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I can't seem to remove about 30Gb of white space.
You all know of any issues on this?
tia,
Charles
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
There are no trusts between forests, only between domains. Trusts between
domains in different forests are explicit, created one way and
nontransitive. Just like NT. :) User domain is trusted by resource domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
You need at least one in a forest.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AD/GC Clarification
Do Win2k AD controllers need to be GCs for Exchange to
95 matches
Mail list logo
