Well, I said 'brightest,' I'll leave size up to you and him... ;-}
Up to everyone to take their advice from where it suits them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Ed C. is one of the brightest folks we have here. He may have
'alternative' answers and very 'direct' answers, but they will never be
'unintelligent.' You'd do well to ask him to explain what he meant, you
might learn something.
Good luck.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Make sure he's turned off the Outlook IM client -- Tools / Options /
Other
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
all
Permission granted for users to log on locally? See the archives for
extensive discussion...
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
There have been some probs noted, mostly with OWA, on both Sue Mosher's
Outlook list and the Sunbelt Exchange list. Some of this seems to
revolve around users with Outlook 2003. You might check those lists
first. I've applied it here, no problems, but I don't have any
instances of Outlook 2003
What are you using as your spam filter app?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam: False Positives
I'm curious how people on the list are address the
I'm using the free version, and scanning about 35 machines in maybe 10
minutes - that's in its 'quick scan' mode. I'm perfectly happy with it.
Many of my workstations didn't have the office software installed from
the network, so the office patches don't work as well. But the OS
patches seem to
I'm not sure that exists in Antigen either, though I don't have their
latest Beta yet.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question
I have not seen this
You didn't say whether both of these accounts are regular Exchange
accounts or other. If you set her up w/ Outlook Express for that, you
can save the authentication in the accounts and all she would have to do
is click on the 'send/receive' button. Might still have the issue of
separating the
I see a lot of stuff there about money, inclusiveness, and diversity.
I'd be more interested in the future of excellence, but that's not in
vogue today.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cool, that's one more reason to upgrade, eventually.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question
It does. You list it as a file in a file filter, then
Thanks, appreciate the tip. It hasn't been an issue though, and I
probably wouldn't even let my users know the ability exists if I could
help it...
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
If you happen to be using NAV for Exchange - then you may do so by using
a registry tweak. Info on Symantec's site somewhere.
David
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering pif and
Gosh, some companies are truly humorless, aren't they...
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep
on Wi n2003 Domain?)
No
I think CJ is still around. He does seem to be concentrating more on
'deep' thoughts, though. Hopefully he'll 'surface' one of these days...
-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Storage capacity, backup storage capacity, backup time window,
recovery time window. Those things are not all independent items, but
work together. Or not, if you let your mailboxes grow to (Humungous)gb
sizes.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I had HTML display problems after this patch. As a test I applied the
DirectX 9.0 runtimes that show up in Windows Update, rebooted, and all
was well. I can't say that it wasn't just the reboot that fixed it,
however, I'm wondering if the issue wasn't interaction between that
patch and W2K SP4,
I put SP4 on my W2K/E2K Exchange box last night, and it seems to have
broken some functionality, remote users who connect via VPN are unable
to connect, and some users cannot view HTML messages. Anyone come
across similar behavior?
David
Lots of systems do mail, maybe it's a question of whether they would
benefit from calendaring, the import/export/archive utilities,
integrated contact lists, etc. And of course, you're right to question
DR ability.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I kill all traffic from Brazil (200.x.x.x). You might try that, unless
your company does business in that part of the world.
David
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: something
Seems like a tracert from their end would tell them where the routing
stops.
-Original Message-
From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message 451 4.4.2 Bad connection (connection reset)
Jim
No, we
I'm assuming we were all just kidding...
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Assuming you're not kidding, UTC is the same as GMT is the same as Zulu
Nope - Zulu time.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
I thought they were in UTC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting
I don't find much out there -- a little info at
http://www.sgi-hi.com/files/nt_bug_codes.htm...
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Server Crashed This Morning
Hello
Lowest crime rate in the nation, I understand.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
Sounds like it must be a real quite neighborhood
From:
As I'm sure everyone will tell you shortly, there is no M: drive. It
does not exist. Make sure nothing tries to touch the non-existent M:
drive, especially AV products.
David
-Original Message-
From: Richard Dann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:55 AM
To:
This is more of a curiousity - I attempted to send mail to several
addresses at unc.edu this morning, and I simply could not get mail there
from my mail server (Exch2K, W2K). This is the error message:
*
Subject: Test
Sent: 6/5/2003 9:27 AM
The following recipient(s) could
Use OWA, or bring her in via VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5
What would be the best option if I had a person at work who works part
time brings in her laptop and wants
That machine isn't able to hit the Exchange server, it's a network
problem rather than an Outlook problem. Can you ping/tracert to it?
Double check your network DNS settings, including the gateway.
David
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
That's per store? Surely you don't mean per mailbox...
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll
Most of our priv's are between 10-20GB. We do have some in the 70GB
range
I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing
Negative, this is just an archiving solution in an 'unalterable format',
and apparently must include a 'searchable index.'
They also mandate archival of IM, but I assume that's only if you use an
in-house IM server...
David
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amen. I'm a regular attendee of that school...
-Original Message-
From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators
You know how when you're out on a windy day, you feel little pieces of
stuff hit your face sometimes? Those are like all the bits of those
messages that got dumped out to a DL with no members, just scattering
off into the ether...
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL
If you're using Exchange 5.5 and not upgrading that, you'll get better
advice about a W2K upgrade on an NT admin list. Athough if you're just
going to upgrade the one server from NT4 to W2K, it's not difficult,
just pop in the CD - after reading all the KB articles and doing the
obligatory
I got no hits on the Sunbelt list with this, let me try it here:
I'm trying to narrow down a problem w/ OWA permissions:
User A has permissions (publishing editor) to User B's calendar. When
using regular Outlook, she can view, edit create on User B's calendar.
But when she switches to OWA,
First, is Sue Mosher's Outlook list still operating?
Second, my CEO's contact folder has come down with a bug -- it wants to
mark every contact private, no matter whether it's entered on his
machine or by one of his assistants. Even after they're unmarked, they
revert to private within a day or
Hmmm, don't suppose you could mail me the text of that? I'm not signed
up as an MVP. No, I found the SBCM reference in Technet, and we've not
no instances of that running. Given that, that's my best guess too.
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm not clear on what your network is - W2K Active Directory, native or
mixed? In AD there is no such thing as a BDC, they're all DCs. Is that
what you built? Or is yours a BDC left over from an NT4 domain?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
When you go into ADUC and click on 'Domain Controllers' do you see both
of your DCs there? Take a good look at your event logs - if you are
having authentication errors, those should be showing up. How about
when you check the zones in your domain's DNS server - are both of the
DCs listed there
Is anyone having as much trouble with the list suspending their mail?
The last couple of weeks it has happened almost every day, saying at
least 13 or 14 messages could not be delivered. I never have any probs
with my Exch2K box here, never any reports of undelivered mail. I think
we should send
That's the first thing I did, it was 6.0. In checking further, I think
my 'Plus Pack' install from Messageware may have had something to do
with it. I'll advise if I track it down.
David
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003
Will either of these utilities work against a public store for a
contact-type folder? I have a 5.5 pub.edb but wondering whether there's
any other way to recover a shared contacts folder from it except to
build a 5.5 recovery server.
David
I do, but in E2K. This is an outside client with only one (SBS) server
which is also now E2K. I'll help him do it if that's the only way it
can be done, just wondered. (Yep, somebody forgot to copy out a shared
contact file before wiping the old server...)
-Original Message-
From: Ed
DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange
box from these workstations.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Hi,
We
Is this an AD network? Are there firewalls inbetween the clients and
the Exchange box or multiple subnets? The odds are it's still DNS; try
troubleshooting it by putting an entry in the hosts file on the client.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Any way you can get to W2K? It's a far better OWA product.
David
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Planning OWA
I need some tips on this layout on Exchange Org.
Server A
NT4 sp6
Well, sure, but the interface won't change from NT4 - you'd get a better
server product. What I really meant was going on to W2K *and* E2K. If
the budget allows, of course.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:34 PM
To:
Sure you can. Do it in two separate jobs, one backing up Exchange (no,
don't stop Exchange) and then one backing up everything else if there's
anything else you have to have. Do this locally or do it remotely, per
Ed. Look up the commands and do it from a batch file - I can send you a
sample if
Finding the battery compartment is tough, though.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private
I buy them at 10 for 99 cents at Office Depot.
Klez, Sobig, a series of suspicious javascript files blocked this AM.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity
Nothing out of the ordinary from my end. Just that
Are you running Exchange Server, and if so what version? By good
mailbox management and backup considerations, you should not have to
back up pst files at all. I don't keep my users from creating pst files
(though that's a consideration) but I don't back them up. If for some
reason you feel you
I had a similar problem with Antigen on the notification messages for
awhile, it turned out we were not using the default Virtual SMTP server,
but a secondary one. Had to make a registry change to direct the smtp
output to the second one. May not be your issue, though...
David
-Original
I'm thinking of going to the USB2 external drive system for offsite
storage, I can put together an 80mb system for under $200, and have 5
rotatable drives for about a grand. Except that the drives are a bit
more heavy and sensitive to being thrown off a train, I don't see much
downside, and I
Good idea. I expect to do these in the middle of the night, but that's
still important if you're doing 30 or 40 gb. I'll go out see if there
are any reviews out there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:44 PM
Hmmm, $264 today, I'll have to watch closer...what part of the DR
routine do you think would be made more complex?
-Original Message-
From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup hardware
Yeah, BUY.COM
While we're not starving
First local Krispy Kreme comes
Not too soon, methinks
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
I am very sad
For it
The domains reminded me of the Bond flicks, Bond v. Spectre v.
TitaniumFinger...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Incoming Mail not working
Are you laughing at
I heard it had to be at least 28 degrees C, but yeah, I agree.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:eastb;PFFCU.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Relaying Originator
There are tiny evil gremlins in your server that are
What are some of these folks smoking?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Mail rejected
Content filter rejection of the week!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech
guffaw
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
The Republican Imperialist Evangelical Army has just seized the US
Congress, and we're STILL sweating RBLs?
Trust me--there are
I agree with the facts in your short version. Still gripes me to have
somebody recover for their own stupidity, however.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
The
In E2KSP3, what is the executable that Mailbox Manager actually runs?
I've gone thru all the MS Q articles I can find, slipstick.com, as well
as other sites and can't find what the actual .exe file is. I'm still
trying to track down the source of extra instances of the manager
running.
Thanks,
It's just a bandwidth issue, isn't it? If you're on a 33.6 dialup
connection, you can't get much more in way of speed out of it. Even if
you had them VPN in, the speed doesn't change. My remote users that use
OWA with dialup get by with it, and those with broadband think it's
pretty darn neat!
Is this the one? Kind of looked like the type of thing your training
could inspire...
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap021014.html
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
It's Klez or a related (BugBear) worm, on a third party's PC somewhere,
spoofing your address as the 'from' address. So if it bounces, it
bounces back to you. Delete, Fuggedaboutit.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:46 PM
Tony, thanks for that link. Right off the bat discovered one domain
entry I'd missed, works now. I'll be bookmarking that one for the next
issue...
David
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 10/8/2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
I'd be pessimistic that anyone could give you any kind of even a SWAG to
that. But you can build in a whole bunch of wiggle room by just
spending a few bucks on much, much more RAM. Put in all your box will
hold, it's very cheap.
David
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List
I know the topic has been hit before, but it seems to me I've tried all
the fixes: W2KSP3, E2KSP3, simple network, only one exchange box.
Public folders are visible via OWA while on the LAN. OWA works fine
outside the LAN as well, except for public folders.
From outside, going to
I'm running a copy of IHateSpam from Sunbelt (www.sunbelt-software.com).
Seems to work well. This is not a server-based solution, but does most
of the other things you want. You could add it to a standard image.
David
-Original Message-
From: ITS.Teams.TNT.Mailing-Lists.MailingList
Is there a concensus on this?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance
I always thought that write-back cache should be always turned off,
whether it has
Tener - man - you're making Jim's case for him. Go have a beer or
something!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 7:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
peter pan one is very good try this one
What syntax did you use to stop the services? It's more likely your
problem was there than with your copy commands. If you check the
archives, I think you'll find at least a couple of set of instructions
on batch files which will stop all the services.
Good luck on your tape drive...
David
What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to
check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of
space? How does your page file compare to your RAM?
David
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats
look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what
perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue.
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Tom, I used to get those all the time, I finally took my Exch server out
of the group, and let the system add it back in itself, that seemed to
eventually stop the errors. Though I can't say those errors ever caused
any problem before that.
David
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray
Terrific. I don't think even Ariel Sharon could think those
anti-semitic...
-Original Message-
From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Jewish Haiku
NEW JEWISH HAIKU
After the warm
More so on Friday
All intelligent people
can laugh at themselves.
Crapulent minds sink
in the midst of their slim fare.
No sense of humor.
He puckered his lips -
Political correctness!
She frowned. No swearing!
_
List posting
A much improved OWA, for one - a steadily decreasing lack of support for
another. Especially if you're starting from scratch, I recommend
Exch2K. AD will not hurt you, and you need not switch to native mode,
ever, unless you wish.
David
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fors, II
Anyone know if we are making any progress at all on the list gremlin
that randomly suspends accounts? Happened twice over the weekend.
David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have enough youth -- how about
Have you cranked up logging on the IS, and/or are you seeing anything of
note in the event log? Have you tried re-running performance optomizer?
Sometimes that will cure 'unusual' problems for no good reason.
-Original Message-
From: Sauer, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Not that option - the 'automatic name checking' option...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
As
Ah, yes, Ex2KSP3 on W2KSP3. Did all that, set the policies under
Recipient Policies, set the options on the Mailbox Management tab of the
server, then started Mailbox Manager. Being unfamiliar with what was
supposed to happen when I started Mailbox Manager, I 'accidentally'
started it multiple
Only about 7% free on your primary partition? Depending on how big your
paging file is, that's not enough free space. Try and move some stuff
off that drive or consider more/bigger disks.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28,
Only having 7% free space on your primary petition is not enough.
Consider freeing up some space on that disk or investing in more/bigger
drives?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
OK, just going by your original figures - 27g, 25g free.
-Original Message-
From: Sauer, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
Primary partition for the system
I'm still trying to track down how to delete some accidental multiple
instances of Mailbox Manager. I've searched all the normal sources,
can't find a thing on it. Can't even find how you would stop a single
instance of it once it's started. I'm thinking they must be scheduled
in the registry,
Doublecheck to make sure your Exchange box isn't an open relay and that
you've not been dumped into one of the 'blackhole' listings. Some
domains go by those databases and refuse mail from anything resembling
an open relay.
-Original Message-
From: Ewerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Welcome back, tentacled one!
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 6:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting messages disappearing.. Oh my...
Which problem are you referring to? The messages disappearing or
Consider whether that isn't probably a Klez-type message coming from
elsewhere and spoofing your addresses?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need Detective Help on Exchange Error
Of course, you've probably drilled down and found the list concensus on
GroupshieldSuggested, when/if you have the opportunity, consider a different AV
solution.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange
Number of total users? Will the machine be doing anything else? What drive
configuration? What does your network architecture look like? More information would
help...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:13 PM
To:
Agreed, with that load it won't matter a lot which of the two you use. I'd probably
pick the dual 300 box and upgrade it by another 256M of RAM.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Great story, Tom - good fodder for those yet to make the journey.
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just an informational post, you're
Having been on my most excellent behavior, I'm getting a bit peeved at the freakin'
list for putting my address on hold once a day for the last several days. I know what
the message says, but why does it do that in a random manner (hadn't happened for a
couple of months before this), and has
I trust your judgment, but would you remind me how that occurs -- if OOF only fires
once per correspondent?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF Messages to the Internet
Only time that's come up here it was an unusual third-party mail system on the other
end, he ended up having to disable ESMTP on his side.
-Original Message-
From: Cornwell, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
MIME - Plain text - Western European; Advanced - RTF Format=Determined by individual
user
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA creates attachments?
ESM | Global Settings |
98 matches
Mail list logo
