Is this the one?  Kind of looked like the type of thing your training
could inspire...

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap021014.html



-----Original Message-----
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering


Doing fine, doing fine. Cthough'ng'aa chewed up her first gas giant
yesterday. I'll post pics soon.

How's you and yours?

(:=

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering


As always, I bow to your greatness.

How's the little tentacles?

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
>
>
> My passive/passive/passive/passive Datacenter cluster has a perfect 
> 100% downtime. Top that, I say! We even keep the power cables in a
> separate area
> to prevent any accidental uptime.
>
> (:=
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger 
> Seielstad
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
>
>
> Then you don't need it active anywhere.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:14 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> >
> >
> > Only the best. Microsoft DNS, active-directory integrated. :)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:11 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> >
> >
> > Only if you have crappy DNS servers.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > Atlanta, GA
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:10 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > >
> > >
> > > I vaguely remember talking about it in the past. Although we were 
> > > talking about domain controllers. I thought that on the Exchange 
> > > server I should still have it running.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:06 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > >
> > >
> > > Just disable the DNS Client service - it only causes
> > problems anyway.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > > Atlanta, GA
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:46 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I did just that.
> > > >
> > > > From personal experience I prefer to reboot the machine after 
> > > > stopping the service (as opposed to simply restarting the 
> > > > services). Sometimes the Information Store service takes hours 
> > > > to stop. And if a full backup is running at the same time 
> > > > (because it got delayed for whatever reason), IS will
> > > never stop.
> > > >
> > > > There was a period of time when I had to restart the back-end 
> > > > Exchange server every night after applying SP2. Otherwise OWA 
> > > > refused to work correctly the following day.
> > > >
> > > > But then I discovered that doing ipconfig /flushdns once in a 
> > > > while solved that problem.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 9:02 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Heck, just write a batch file that stops all services and 
> > > > bounces the box Sunday at 2AM and you don't even have to call it

> > > > in to an operator. Five
> > > > nines, indeed. The box only really needs to be up when people
> > > > are using it.
> > > >
> > > > (:=
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Ed Crowley
> > > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:00 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's a pretty steep price to pay to avoid an occasional
> > > Sunday morning
> > > > reboot.
> > > >
> > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > > > Tech Consultant
> > > > hp Services
> > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Dennis Depp
> > > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:15 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've looked into Exchange Active/Passive clustering for
> > our Exchange
> > > > 2000 servers.  The largest Exchange problem that causes
> > downtime is
> > > > corruption in the database.  I agree with Ed that clustering 
> > > > cannot help in this senario.  However, even with high quality 
> > > > hardware,
> > > you still
> > > > have to deal with the 58 security patches and one Windows
> > > 2000 service
> > > > pack that have been issued this year.  Granted not all the
> > > 58 security
> > > > patches are Windows 2000 related, but a large number of
> > > them are.  An
> > > > active/passive cluster gives me the capability of
> > > installing hotfixes
> > > > and service packs without impacting my Exchange server
> even for a
> > > > reboot.  Also I can install the hotfixes during the day on
> > > the passive
> > > > node and then failover that evening.  If there is a problem, I 
> > > > can fail back to the unpatched node.  The reduction in reboots 
> > > > and
> > late hours
> > > > makes an Active/passive cluster very appealing.  However,
> > > clusters do
> > > > add a level of complexity.  Unless you understand clusters and 
> > > > how they operate, this added complexity can decrease uptime 
> > > > instead
> > > of increase
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > Denny
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Ed Crowley
> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:11 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think at this stage of its development clustering
> > > provides very poor
> > > > business value.  It really protects you from very few failure 
> > > > scenarios. Instead, I'd make sure I had the most highly 
> > > > internally redundant system
> > > > I could afford, buy a capable recovery and hot standby
> server, and
> > > > practice my disaster recovery skills.
> > > >
> > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> > > > Technical Consultant
> > > > hp Services
> > > > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
> > > > problems."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Imran Iqbal
> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 2:36 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move
> > > to Exchange
> > > > 2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node
> > Active Active
> > > > cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or
> > > real world
> > > > experiences with similar setups.  Each server would
> have about 800
> > > > active users and would probably be connected to a SAN for
> > the shared
> > > > storage.
> > > >
> > > > I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup
> > > pre SP3.  I
> > > > would like to know if there are any other problems and if
> > > it is worth
> > > > doing
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Imran
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to