change. Look for reasons to need to deviate and
how out sourcing will compromise overall user experience and executive
staff features.
BG
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outsource
You'll find that IBM are fully au-fait with all the security,
regulatory, recovery and performance aspects.
You are up against IBM who, along with EDS (Whom I just left), CGEY and
a pile of others who have done this inside out and upside down and more
times than you've had hot dinners.
Put all,
Faxination's a great one for the Enterprise level.
Another good one is Message Manager from www.syssol.com.au which we've
just implemented. It's does everything faxination does and also delivers
inbound faxes to a network share, which was the reason we chose one over
the other (we've got a
Behave,
They'll still ask, and because the answer will be a simple and easy Q (oops) article
you'll end up with more bleedin' follow up questions from people who have decided to
put it into production rather than giving it up for lost in development.
Be careful what you wish for, as the old
I'd be surprised if setting up a VLAN for your inter exchange traffic
would reduce the user LAN loading by anything much more than a trickle.
Of course, LAN cards and switch ports are cheap but add a level of
complexity to your environment that your LAN and NT support people might
not want to
GFI used to be really good at Tech Support in EMEA. I have head they've
gone downhill somewhat of late. MimeSweeper is still in a strong
position over here.
Mark Arnold, MVP(Exchange)
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2002 00:28
Exchange 2000 would probably allow itself to be added to the SBS/E5.5
but you are likely to have problems. I have tried linking SBS to real
5.5 several times in a lab environment but always had the MTA take
offence after a short while.
I don't think it's worth the risk, better to start afresh.
That might be the answer, but what is the question
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 19:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
When asked this question I've always gone with what Ed has said only less blunt, the
business must decide what it wants to or can afford to fork out for and then the
business must be told what it will get for its money. The Exchange designer must
present all the available options to the
The IMC/SMTP services receive the message with the time zone attached
(if you look at the message header) but I know of no way to have
Exchange take that information and insert it into the message.
-Original Message-
From: Kully [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 15:25
To:
Rather than set a mailbox and fill it with smtp addresses from ex
employees do the same with a distribution list and assign no members.
This way the mails will just disappear into oblivion.
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 09:15
To:
There ought to be someone who has the [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp
address, the mail will drop there, defaulted to the person who installed
the first server. If not, assign it to yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Duckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 15:41
To: Exchange
Isn't that for all mails to a single domain going to a specific user? We
got this a little while ago and I quote from the summary
This article describes how to create an event sink to capture
all e-mail messages that are sent to a particular domain, and then
direct them to a single
This is done in exchange admin.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
Is this done via the outlook client or at the 5.5 server. The issue
being I
have users who have
Ouch Nate, bad day in Plano ?
Mark Arnold MCSE MVP
EDS UK
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2002 12:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange Problems
What has changed in your environment? Things don't just happen
Indeed, reduce the message limits and make a note of who shouts.
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2002 11:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment
is there a way to monitor who are sending with large attachement?
E2K server.
This is in English
http://www.thestandard.com.au/IDG2.NSF/All/D56A4C61ECC7F0C3CA256BC60038E
885!OpenDocumentNavArea=HomeSelectedCategoryName=News
But left me no wiser.
Anyone for some StorageWorks ?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2002 15:28
It'll never be time to go with the D word. The D people don't make
servers, they only claim to.
Who's the I word though?
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2002 18:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the
Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I'll bet 'I' is for Intel..
why? one of our divisions sell's these
What do I win if I'm right?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I'll bet 'I' is for Intel..
why? one of our divisions sell's these
What do I win if I'm right?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have the option to
view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but isn't usually that far out.
I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of white space but have you tried an offline
defrag, in my experience you'll gain more
of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only
gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported
whitespace in the event logs).
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB
Yeah
XIMS: Troubleshooting POP3/IMAP 13002 Errors w. SSL on Exchange [Q251097]
My experience was getting a certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't permit getting
mail over [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example. You'd need to set DNS up for one dns name only,
which should be ok since you're using different
That got him where it hurts Lori.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 19:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking
-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 20:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Hope so. This man refuses to learn to fish, so he can just starve.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold
:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
SM's...is that a new candy?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Chef?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes
it? ;-}
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Kind of, but instead of them being candy they're all chocolatey (that's
Explains why they're making 3000 ignite people redundant.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Products to replicate Exchange data over the wire
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: Louis
eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Products to replicate Exchange data over the wire
Explains why they're making 3000 ignite people redundant.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
http://www.amtsoft.com/geocluster/
Geocluster will replicate Exchange data to alternative data centres and
is supported by MS subject to being on the relevant HCLs and other key
parameters.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold ()
Sent: 21 May 2002 14:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Usual option is a Disaster Recovery Restore onto alternative hardware,
either by DR restoring the entire box off the production LAN or by hot
spare recovery (which I tend to define as a server on the production
network with a live DS and blank stores onto which you restore the IS)
Once done, then
Sounds a little like you've got an open relay and the messages are being
received by your people as spam and also relayed elsewhere.
Check your system (IMS / smtp service) for relay
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 May 2002 20:09
To:
Taught me.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 May 2002 20:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails
Or not.
-Original Message-
From: mark arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:16 PM
I'm glad this newsgroup goes into its own Public Folder Store. I foresee
exponential growth for a little while.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 May 2002 16:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PSS?
Here it comes!
-Original
The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and
Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called
the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys).
His job is to support lots of different accounts as witnessed by the fact
that he sent the mail from
are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind,
and those who mind don't matter.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration
The question came from a person who
I was just going to reply with the old swap the 21 and 24 routine until John
read the question right and moved only one number.
Phew, glad I avoided making a fool of myself and no one found me out.
- Original Message -
From: Chinnery Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter
don't mind, and those who mind don't matter.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MS
Documentation Chapter called
MIGRATION
Mark Arnold MCSE MVP(Exchange)
-Original Message-
From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 13:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS Mail mjgration
Hi,
I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find
40 matches
Mail list logo
