Outlook uses MAPI (the messaging API) over RPC (remote procedure calls).
Here are some good starting points. You will probably need the Exchange
SDK to do very much with MAPI.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/e2k3/e2
k3/_exch2k3_mapi_access.asp
Certain types of relay attempts will also show up in this folder, also.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:11 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Conversation: BadMail Folder
Subject: RE: BadMail
Hi all:
I had posted this to the E2K list and no one seemed to know how
to do this.
In Exchange 5.5, you could configure a SYSTEM address for the System
Administrator on one of the mailboxes and whenever anyone managed to
reply to a notification message from the System Administrator,
Nope, I think the number of mailboxes you can read is based on the
licenses you purchased. It is a great piece of software. One of my 5.5
customers does snapshot backups to a NAS and they use it all the time.
- Jim sends
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Brett:
Hummm, where to I start
I have never seen this problem. What is the error message? Is
it a MAPI error? I'm betting it is. I doubt it is really Exchange 2003
related, but more related to the fact that you have Outlook installed on
the Exchange server.
they are in the book Exchange 24/7 by Jm McBee
From: McBee, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:01:25 -1000
Hi everyone:
I'm looking for some
Hi everyone:
I'm looking for some information on a feature in Exchange 2003 and I
have used up all of my ideas on how to find out more info. It was
called OWA segmentation in Exchange 2000 and was introduced in Exchange
2000 SP2. It allowed you to turn off public folders, the calendar,
Moving servers between admin groups was something they attempted in the
betas but coul dnot make work. Even with Exchange 2000 in native mode,
all objects have a legacyExchangeDN associated with them. If I remember
correctly, this was the reason that the decided it was going to be too
Hey everyone:
I'm working with an organization that has 9 Exchange 5.5 sites
and a bridgehead site. They use the IMS to connect the spoke sites to
the hub site and directory replication occurs with the bridgehead site.
However, they are using the OnlySystemMessagesUseCDs registry key on
Erik:
I don't have a knowledge of that specific setting, but if it
exists, I doubt that it is a registry setting, but rather an Active
Directory setting since E2K uses AD groups for mail distribution. Wish
I could give you a more specific answer, but maybe it will help just
pointing you
Are you running Exchange 5.5? If so, you can export the distribution
lists to a CSV file. The membership list is included in th
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:48 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
(Oooppsss, darn notebook touchpad... - Completing and resending)
Are you running Exchange 5.5? If so, you can export the distribution
lists to a CSV file. The membership list is included in CSV file. It
ain't pretty, but it will get you're a copy out to a file.From their
you can massage it
Hu
I am resaonbly sure that this should NOT have happened. UNLESS
you used ExMerge to move the mail out to a PST and then imported it back
in. How did you move the mailboxes? If you use the Move option in
Exchange Tasks to move a mailbox, Single Instance Store is preserved.
And
Tony:
A couple of companies have got POP3 connectors for Exchange.
Try www.exchangepop3.com, PopCon
(http://www.christensen-software.com/popcon.htm), or
http://www.popbeamer.com).
I believe that Small Business Server has a POP3 connector built
in to it. If you want to offload
I have not seen any whitepapers from Microsoft or anyone else regarding
using KMS. One of the best resources I found was the Exchange 5.0
courseware.
Not to toot my own horn, but I spent an awful lot of time covering the
KMS in my Exchange 2000 book (Exchange 2000 Server 24Seven)
Ken:
Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I
have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that
have had good things to say about them.
Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-)
Jim
-Original Message-
From:
Paul:
Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to
delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you
want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information
Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are
running
Message-
From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc]
Paul:
Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to
delete them both at the same time. Just out
Jim:
If you have big bucks and want comprehensive reports on
EVERYTHING, look to something like NetIQ (http://www.netiq.com). Some
other interesting solutions include Promodag (www.promodag.com), MELIA
(www.sunbeltsoftware.com is the best place I know to find info about
it), and
Hi folks:
I am re-posting this. I sent it several hours ago, but it never
arrived. I have configured a PF CA between an Exchange 5.5 server and
the Active Directory. The user account I am using on the Exchange 5.5
side is the service account. The account to Windows is a member of
Leave the tombstone at the default. It is possible if you drop the
tombstone lifetime to a very low level and then some replication
messages get missed, you will end up with orphaned objects.
I did have one instance where PSS advised us to drop the lifetime down
to 1 day because we were having
*Blush*
Thanks!
Jim
P.S. I'm very open to suggestions as to the content for an Exchange
2003 version. Contact me offline.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:19 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Mark:
The Mailbox Manager in Exchange 2000 can do exactly what you
are looking for; it is available in Exchange 2000 SP1 and later. There
is a good article on using the mailbox manager at
http://www.exchangeadmin.com. Look for InstaDoc ID 21147. The article
is called Exchange 2000's
I just recently did a check on this (back around October) and this is
what I came up with:
Exchange 5.5 Post SP4 hotfixes (in order of recommended installation)
Order Component KB Article
Number
1 Remote Procedure Calls Q304602
2
Hi everyone!
I have been asking around about this and no one seems to know. I had
someone recently ask me how they can change the SMTP Message-ID field in
the SMTP header. Their E2K servers are sending out a message ID that
they don't want sent. It looks something like this:
Message-ID:
Charles:
I have never seen a tool for mining information from the
transaction logs. The information in those logs would be information
that only a mother could love. Specifically, mother-ESE. The
transaction logs contain pages of data that will be written to the EDB
or EDB/STM files;
with some Oracle
folks and Oracle logs are a useful source of report info. Oracle has an
email app and we were discussing it. You ever had any experience with
it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McBee, Jim
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:19 PM
Hi everyone:
I have a sticky problem. A customer is moving to Exchange 2000.
Everything seems to working okay. The ADC is configured properly, data
is replicating between Ex 5.5 and AD properly.
Move a mailbox from Ex 5.5 SP4 to E2K SP3 on W2K SP3. Force the
ADC Recipient CA
Are you running E2K SP2 or SP3 (you should be). Pre-SP2 was not as good
as automatically switching over to another global catalog.
And Mike is right, both domain controllers must be global catalogs if
you want redundancy for Exchange 2000.
HTH,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Dan Aalberg
Hi Jim:
I hope that the book has not been too tedious for you. :-)
The 16GB limit is imposed on Exchange 2000 Server (unofficially
known as standard edition.) If the sum total of the EDB file and the
STM file exceeds 16GB, then the store dismounts. So, basically, you are
Hi everyone:
I have been looking around for a definitive recommendation on locking
down NTFS permissions on an Exchange 2000 server. Does anyone have any
recommendations or thoughts on this subject? Possible problems?
Thanks much,
Jim McBee
Are any of your public folders on clustered back-end servers?
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards;watrust.com]
Posted At: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:01 PM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Conversation: OWA 2000 login prompt
Subject: OWA 2000 login
Chris:
You probably only need the SP4_550I.EXE, which is the core files
that updates the 5.5 server. The SP4_55SS1.EXE includes the files you
find in the \SUPPORT directory.
There a number of hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 SP4 (you need SP4
first!) that you can download from
Chili dog in one hand, surfboard in the other grin
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:26 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Conversation: recipients
Subject: RE: recipients
But that Jim Mcbee dude
Dan:
Are you having problems sending a particular character? If you are
reading RFCs, I'm sure you are already aware that most data today is
transmitted in some encoded format (MIME or UUENCODE). The newer ESMTP
RFCs, of course, cloud this a little bit with the introduction of 8-bit
MIME and
35 matches
Mail list logo
