Yes. Change your address and then, to help keep it from happening again, don't ever
enter your email address on a website. If you must give a valid email address for some
web site registration, use a throwaway address.
If you're an admin on the exchange server (or know one) it's easy to do by
I've found a tool that helps with problems like this (Spyware, Adware, Browser
hijackers, etc) and includes tools for prevention. Take a look at Spybot Search and
Destroy at http://security.kolla.de/. I've been usgng it for a year and it works great
(plus it's completely free.)
it have on the server.
I appreciate any input you can offer.
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Size Question
I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a
definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB
] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 11 November 2003 06:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Information Store Size Question
Subject: Information Store Size Question
I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a
definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached
it to thirty-five and your job still requires
you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error.
--Dennis Miller
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up
You could also try simplifying the process of importing the meetings/events using the
Slipstick transmit holiday form. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job
I recently had the same issue and I believe running through the process to manually
sync the IWAM and IUSR accounts between the Active Directory and the metabase.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still
Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4
Question:
Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following
error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup.
Final error code: a00084f8 HEX
Final error description: A
' right.
I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26
fail
at least 2 times a week when it was part of a bigger job.
I wound up separating it and by itself it ran fine. Forgot completely about
that.
Never could explain why.
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
9
Maybe just changing the order would work
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44
Yea, we went through all that as well.
I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck.
Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds..
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the
beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put
] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Yes to both, although only about 20 minutes ago on the Recipient update
service. Am I now dealing with replication delay?
Thanks...Ray
I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple
question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope
someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice.
My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have
service for that new domain?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM
To: Exchange
For the rule, replace the From [user] criteria with contains [text] in the message
header and then put the name in the [text] position. This should catch even the sent
on behalf of messages.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes
We had this issue a while back when we first started using ScanMail. We
found out from Trend that when ScanMail runs in MAPI mode, it doesn't scan
the attachments until AFTER the message is in the inbox; which leaves the
possibility if the server is extremely busy scanning, the user could see
and
occasions, the MetaFrame server's WWW Publishing Service stop
unexpectedly at around the same time as the Exchange services go down.
As always, I welcome any input or suggestions.
Thanks...Ray
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM
but almost the same thing happened to 2
of my exchange servers (we have 7). The WWW service would go down
almost at the same time on both servers. I originally thought we were
hit by a virus but I did a scan and both servers were clean.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL
of the worst mistakes that can be made in his
subject, and how to avoid them.
--Werner Karl Heisenberg
-Original Message-
From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Ray Beckwith
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender
the key later when you get it.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Thanks again. Have you been
but are unsure if we can do
this without adding a subnet or some other complexity.
I appreciate any opinions or recommendations from the wise ones of the list (more
butt-kissing).
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit
, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and AD Question
You want a separate TREE in the forest, not a child domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
of the same root forest
you should have no problem with that. If I am wrong I am sure someone here
will be more than happy to correct me.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
I see a couple possibilities.
1. They are using POP3 or IMAP connection and have the mailbox set to
leave messages on the server when they download.
2. They are using Outlook in Corporate/Workgroup mode over the VPN but are
working offline and not synchronizing the offline folder after
on the
server.
I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can
offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help.
Thanks in advance...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California
2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
We had the same issue about a month ago. By any chance, are you using
Trend scanmail?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have a question to run
and ask for it.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Fantastic. How do I get it? I don't see it in their downloads section.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
An expert is a person
A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring
and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the
correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by
mispronouncing it when paying homage.
: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones
A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been
monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always
Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot Open OWA Logoff Page
I have a problem with OWA in Exchange 2000, SP2 that has me stumped.
Recently we noticed that when you click the Logoff button from Outlook
Web Access, the page generates an error HTTP 500
settings or whether they are inside or
outside the firewall. I found MSKB article Q318329 and tried the suggested fix, but
that didn't help and I can find no other clues. Any ideas on this one?
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
is practically useless.
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org
http://www.ccul.org
their inboxes by
the received date. Any suggestions about this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL
PSS.
Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith
correctly.
Thanks...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org
http://www.ccul.org
of us got used to it. Now the only way to get the
correct name is to start from the beginning and work across (First Last). Has Exchange
2000 really gotten stupider?
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
How are the names displayed in the list? FN LN
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM
Subject
, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
You will have to change the display name by running a script. They are
available on MS's site. Search for Display Names Change I think.
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:59 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
So, what you are saying is, I can only search
sent in?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Drago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:58 PM
Subject: Email Attachments Disappearing
I have a single user who is having a strange problem
...
Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org
_
List posting FAQ: http
44 matches
Mail list logo
