permissions
it requires 'folder visible' permission at the mailbox level and that
permission will be inherited by any new folders. Not too serious unless you
name a folder 'mynewmistress' or whatever and forget to take the folder
visible permission off.
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original
Dare I say it, well what the heck. The Yahoo 2000 list likely sports a
similar membership to this one but is very much less cluttered. Odd
really!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange
We do this using address book views for surname base on custom attribute 1
(as it happens). Works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 May 2002 23:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: addressing to a custom attribute?
Oops sorry.
Exchange
Correct but, as in the case of surnames, it narrows down the range you need
to look at. I guess this isn't going to work from your reaction. Perhaps you
need to set up a contacts folder indexed by employee number and put this on
everyone's address list.
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University
-installing as suggested in Q246286 yields the same
result. I wondering if anyone else has seen this recently. There are two
things which have changed - installing IE6 from Windows Update (I normally
leave it at IE5 SP2) and the inevitable drift of patches inherent in using
Windows Update.
Cheers, Roger
but beware, if you create further folders under your mailbox, they'll
inherit reviewer permissions - which is likely not what you want.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 21:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing a custom
belatedly let me comment that I've done this several times in a test
environment and the one thing I overlooked was the backup device; I still
cannot get an Onstream tape device to perform properly under W2K.
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave
installed, restored and connected on your isolated lan segment the two
servers should 'bond' and behave as your original servers in your original
site.
Cheers, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 16
I've seen this a few times and NAV isn't in our picture - nor any other EXS
based scanning. It seems to me to have something to do with the client, and
in the cases I've seen it's intermittent.
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto
.
Has anyone any experience of this scenario as far as DCs are
concerned? Would you offer any cautions from experience? I should say our
current NT4 PDC is a fairly limited desktop box and the experience on what
is a small domain has been completely OK.
Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Mackenzie
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADS DC hardware
Folks,
I'm looking for practical experience from anyone running 'minimal'
hardware configurations for domain controllers in an AD forest supporting
Exchange 2000/5.5
to be transformed to work with TS - I not know
if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your
predicament Roger?
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
.
When the engineer rebuilt the system logically everything was in working
order and has been .(did I just about say something foolish there)
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2002 06:56
To: Exchange
as it is actual live
service backup and I don't want caught out with trashed recovery tapes. I
should perhaps add that the backup spans 4 tapes.
Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
_
List posting FAQ: http
.
Any experiences you can relate would be appreciated.
Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
to tell you. What kind of RAID
card is it? What kind of cache does it have? Does it support a really
heavy load of disk I/O's?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Eseutil
Folks
Q273478 perhaps? otherwise no comment
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 September 2001 08:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Exchange 2000 after abortive install
Have any of you ever considered just
Sorry, just back in the office so this reply may be too late. Is not the
answer to add another server to the same site and organisation and move the
mailboxes? At least that seems to be the implication of 'because the old
machine is running out of disk'.
Cheers, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow
.
For what it's worth we are running Exs 5.5 SP4.
Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
Matthew,
Yup, you can but not on any of the tutors machines! Weird.
Re-install time I fear.
Thanks, Roger
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 12:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Teaching Outlook
Adil,
Does the 'pop up' ask for 3 items - login id, domain and password,
or just two - login id and password?
Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Adil Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 12:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
21 matches
Mail list logo
