Does anyone know where the settings are defined as to how the following
IM attributes are stamped when a user is IM enabled?
msExchIMAddress
msExchIMMetaPhysicalURL
msExchIMPhysicalURL
msExchIMVirtualServer
We have had IM running for over a year now w/ no major issues.
Recently, new users
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Instant Messenger attributes
Does anyone know where the settings are defined as to how the following
IM attributes are stamped when a user is IM enabled?
msExchIMAddress
msExchIMMetaPhysicalURL
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messenger attributes
I believe they are stamped based on the way your _rvp record is setup in
DNS. Did anything change in your DNS that coincided with the stamping
being different?
Dave Cook
Exchange Administrator
Kutak Rock LLP
402-346-6000 x1356
[EMAIL
:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messenger attributes
Didn't think of that. Just checked it and reflected the proper host.
_rvp._tcp SRVpriority=0, weight=0, port=80,
IMServer.domaina.com
-Heath
-Original Message-
From: Cook, David A. [mailto
-
From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messenger attributes
Do you have an _rvp record under domainb.com? I have only one domain so
I'm kind of guessing here.
Dave Cook
Exchange Administrator
Kutak Rock
domain. Killed the ESM and restarted and everything
started working as expected.
Many thanks for the help.
-Heath
-Original Message-
From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messenger
Does anyone out there use the IM built into Exchange 2000? We are
considering using it to support our customers and any feedback or links on
it would be much appreciated.
_
List posting FAQ:
I've configured this at some of our clients. It works as expected. The
main issues are the interoperability or lack thereof between your internal
system and external IM. In addition, last I heard Microsoft is decoupling
IM from Exchange in the next release, so you might want to check into that
as
syntax rather than trying
to guess it from the smtp address.
3) you didn't answer my second question below re: FQDNs or RVP records
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 November 2001 18:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messenger
Has anyone successfully setup and configured IM with Exchange 2000 on
W2K?
I am just starting out with the installation and am getting lost in the
process.
I have IM installed and active on the 2000 server. I installed the IM
client (3.5) on the same W2K box and I get all sorts of
set up an IM domain with appropriate RVP
service records, A records and so on? What error messages on the IM Server
event log, etc, etc.
Mark H
-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 November 2001 17:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Instant
-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Instant Messenger
Has anyone successfully setup and configured IM with Exchange 2000 on
W2K?
I am just starting out with the installation and am getting lost
, November 12, 2001 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messenger
AFAIK the 4.5 client doesn't yet support E2K IM.
Regarding your other problem, you don't say where you have got to in the
setup. Have you defined an IM home server yet or just installed the
service? If installed
13 matches
Mail list logo
