RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-31 Thread RBHATIA
Regarding the mail blasts, we presently use an outside source to send out our mail blasts. The way this works, is that each time we upload our content as well as the list of addresses to whom the mail is to be addressed, the mail is then sent to all those addresses in a combination of HTML

Re: Mail blasts

2002-10-31 Thread Daniel Chenault
] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: RE: Mail blasts Regarding the mail blasts, we presently use an outside source to send out our mail blasts. The way this works, is that each time we upload our content as well as the list of addresses to whom

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-31 Thread RBHATIA
in order to send it as a MIME type multipart/alternive ? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mail blasts There are only two ways: 1. The mail goes out as MIME type multipart

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-31 Thread East, Bill
on their screens. The only saving grace is that by now they are used to it. If I were sending mail blasts I'd do them in plain text. But then again, I'd make the message so persuasive that people would buy my goods or services even _before_ they had opened the message. It would just be that good

Re: Mail blasts

2002-10-31 Thread Daniel Chenault
to do in order to send it as a MIME type multipart/alternive ? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mail blasts There are only two ways: 1. The mail goes out as MIME

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-29 Thread RBHATIA
Do I need a real beefy server to handle that kind of traffic ? I'm looking at mail blasts to 20,000 recipients once a week. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:greatcthulhu;aohell.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-29 Thread Daniel Chenault
Discussions Subject: RE: Mail blasts Do I need a real beefy server to handle that kind of traffic ? I'm looking at mail blasts to 20,000 recipients once a week. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:greatcthulhu;aohell.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-29 Thread Roger Seielstad
- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail blasts You like to pay more for it? The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)? You don't want to deal with reply traffic? Your link

Mail blasts

2002-10-28 Thread RBHATIA
We presently use an external source for sending out a mail blast to 22000 subscibers to our e-newsletter. Is there any reason why I shouldn't consider to do this via our Exchange server ? The emails go out in various formats to cater to different email clients - for instance, in HTML, and plain

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-28 Thread Dupler, Craig
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail blasts We presently use an external source for sending out a mail blast to 22000 subscibers to our e-newsletter. Is there any reason why I shouldn't consider to do this via our Exchange server ? The emails go out in various formats to cater to different email

RE: Mail blasts

2002-10-28 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail blasts You like to pay more for it? The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)? You don't want to deal with reply traffic? Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem? -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA