RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-14 Thread Roger Seielstad
. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AV/Spam scanning services It's

Re: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Scharff
A number of our customers use FrontBridge or MessageLabs and I've heard generally positive things about both. From: Michael Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:24:54 -0700 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Scharff
] MessageLabs, MailSweeper, Trend's Instercan, et al. From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:10:22 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services There are some discussions of a few

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
There are some discussions of a few of them in the archives. Personally, I'm not a fan of outsourced anti-spam, but that's in part because we're a heavily email dependent company and so we can justify the expense of in house measures to combat those issues. As a side note - outsourced antivirus

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-08 Thread Mellott, Bill
Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services I see the outsourced AV as another layer that gives me greater defense in depth (I have Trend on every

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-06 Thread Michael Brownell
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services My point is that you're spending money on an internal AV product for mail (i.e. ScanMail or Antigen) plus the second layer at the gateway - either internal or external. My caution is geared towards those who think that they ONLY need

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-05 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services I see the outsourced AV as another layer that gives me greater defense in depth (I have Trend on every platform). Also their use of multiple and different AV scan engines gives me another (admittedly small) edge. I'll take

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-05 Thread Martin Blackstone
? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services I'm considering going with an outside SPAM/AV company. However, my manager feels that we don't need to put AV on our Exchange server

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-05 Thread Etts, Russell
Hi there I have used Frontbridge - good but pricey. Singlefin is good and much less expensive - but small. We're testing Postini right now. My opinion - Singlefin, then Postini. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04,