The M: drive (M for Mail) just has to be a throwback to the old
Microsoft Mail days. Someone on the Exchange team got a little
nostalgic, perhaps?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
Are there any articles out there that explain why there are
such radical changes since Exchange 5.x - 2000?
Because incremental change in the High Tech industry is a death sentence.
For example, maybe all of you can shed some light on 3 questions:
1. In 5.x - part of the install was a
1) Exchange2000 is 'self-tuning' (Is that Scharff laughing?). There is no
performance optimiser, though third parties may be testing something
similar.
2) Exchange5.x uses its own directory services. The directory database was
stored in a file called dir.edb. Exchange2000 does not maintain
Discussions
Subject: RE: Basic Exchange 2K questions
1) Exchange2000 is 'self-tuning' (Is that Scharff laughing?). There is no
performance optimiser, though third parties may be testing something
similar.
2) Exchange5.x uses its own directory services. The directory database was
stored in a file
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Basic Exchange 2K questions
1) Exchange2000 is 'self-tuning' (Is that Scharff laughing?). There is no
performance optimiser, though third parties may be testing something
similar.
2) Exchange5.x uses its own directory services. The directory database was
stored
5 matches
Mail list logo
