OF LEGAL THEORY AND
WHETHER OR NOT DATASYNAPSE, INC. HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGES OR LOSSES.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
Sounds like a good reason to use an ESE based AV solution instead.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
I'm debating wether going with the ESE version of ScanMail or the
MAPI/AVAPI. Do any of you have any suggestion on the pros and cons of each?
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
(remember the P stands for
Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz
8-16-01
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
And what do you have now for AV that does cause this issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Loftus Greig
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a
VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST
synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan
it before it hits the mailbox.
Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI
scanner. The two articles seem to point towards
: Exchange-aware virus scanners
VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST
synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan
it before it hits the mailbox.
Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI
scanner. The two articles
ms suggestion) is off. I
think we tried fiddling
the OpenRetryDelay value too, but to no effect.
Cheers,
Loftus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 13:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
The Exchange AV products I've used do not interfere
with such things.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Loftus Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a
Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't
interfere with archiving
and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations,
Thought as much.
Thanks anyway,
Loftus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 15:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
No. The files in those queues are transient and in
encoded formats that the file
Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST
synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan
it before it hits the mailbox.
Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI
11 matches
Mail list logo