Sounds like folder replication was not yet complete for the folder(s) in
question. PF replication is a lazy operation IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:33 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Public Folder
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Sounds like folder replication was not yet complete for the folder(s) in
question. PF replication is a lazy
Jim,
We have a similar environment and experienced a similar problem
with public folder replication. We ( in consultation with PSS ) ended
up doing the following to try and narrow down where the problem was ...
Turn up diag logging to MAX for every 'Replication' setting and
1) Make sure the public folders that are being a problem have instances on
NewServer. To check this go to the Instances tab of the Public
Information Store on NewServer, select the problem folders and move them
from the left side to the right side.
2) Newserver should be in the Replicas tab (on
and get the appropriate response for fully functional RPC communication.
Ronni
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 4:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: public folder replication problem persists
1) Make sure
I'm not convinced that it means anything. I'm interested in whether anyone
else has better experience than I.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I'm with you but the Execs here seem to think it has some deep meaning
of what is going on when the box gets slow. I have never really cared
that much about it in the past but now I am forced to.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003
this on every server and there all fine now,
they are all working as I want them with my chosen setup :)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 May 2003 08:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Across Routing Groups
Have you
Have you created instances on those public folder servers?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 12:48 AM
To: Exchange
-
From: Gagrani, Kishore
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
I am able to move all my users to this new server. The only thing doesn't
move/replicate are Public Folders (System e.g. Free Busy, Off Line Address Book as
well User
that is included in a site definition)
John
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
2000.
Ed Crowley MCSE
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
2000.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
with Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication
topologies... Which is why I think Ed
, 2003 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into
sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
correspond
to the
site did fix our problem with Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication
.
-Original Message-
From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into
sites for a better handle on replication traffic
Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
Then by site you meant what?
On 3/21/03 11:08, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same
subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed
Windows-2k
for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange
server).
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
Then by site you meant what?
On 3/21/03 11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
So by site, you meant server? Your other folders have replicated
successfully and you've consolidated the user onto this new server?
On 3/21/03 11:30, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote
And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
2000.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
Kishore
What version(s) of Exchange at each site?
Are permissions correct?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Santhosh. H
Sent:
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: public folder replication
What version(s) of Exchange at each site?
Are permissions correct?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Set the top level and then propagate the replica for each subfolder. One
step shopping.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Berthiaume
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: public folder replication
Do you also have 2 different Exchange orgs?
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 July 2002 13:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Replication
In regards to replicating Public folders between two different domains, is
this
Exchange 5.5 doesn't know anything or care about domains when it comes to PF
replication.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Replication
In regards to
Ed,
Thanks for the reply. This has been a point of confusion for me. If you
get the opportunity, can you shed some light on what the 'Propagate these
properties to all subfolders' check box on the general tab is supposed to
do? When I check it and click ok, a window pops up that lists things
That's so you can pick with attributes you want to propagate. I generally
uncheck all but permissions.
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Ed,
Thanks
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Ed,
Thanks for the reply. This has been a point of confusion for me. If you
get the opportunity, can you shed some light on what the 'Propagate these
properties to all subfolders' check box on the general tab is supposed to
do
Replication DOES propagate.
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
That's what I had thought, but there was a discussion on another list that
went nowhere
Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Sorry, that doesn't propagete down to the child folders.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Set up Public Folder Affinity.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: public folder replication
We have two domains here that we would like to share info
between
Thabnks John, I will check it out.
Regards
RB
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the Exchange 2000 CD you can find the InterOrg utility
(:\SUPPORT\EXCHYSYNC\I386) which will synchronise public folders.
You can find more info at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q238573
HTH
- Original Message -
From: RB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
exchange 5?
need 5.5 sp3 and the active directory connector.
william
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder replication
Folks, is there a way to replicate opublic folders between
Yes Exchange 5.5 with Sp3
I believed the ADC just replicated addresses and accounts between Exchange
5.5 Sp3 systems and Exchange 2000?
Do you guys any reference to documentation that shows the ADC replicated
actual Exchange 5.5 data such as Public folders?
Remember I did mention in my posting
yes
- Original Message -
From: RB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 3:48 PM
Subject: Public Folder replication
Folks, is there a way to replicate opublic folders between an Exchange 5
organisation and an Exchange 2000
Thanks Roger for clearing that up. Have a great Turkey Day tomorrow.
Nate
--
From: Roger Seielstad
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 08:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Correct - you can't
I don't believe it can be done.
Actually, in retrospect, it could be done, but it would be ugly. Very ugly.
By default, Public Folders officially live in the default Recipients
container, but there is an option to change that (can't remember where, but
its there). Theoretically, you could make
A Public Folder Affinity?
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Replication
Greetings,
I was wondering if anyone might have a suggestion on a reoccurring issue I
have. My users
]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 13:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
I don't believe it can be done.
Actually, in retrospect, it could be done, but it would be ugly. Very
ugly.
By default, Public Folders officially live in the default
40 matches
Mail list logo
