PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 4:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
Hi,
We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain
(e.a. microsoft.com)
A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different
Pop3 will let you send as whoever you'd like to be. (Depending on the server
configuration of course)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an external Domain
Errr... I think you mean SMTP. POP3 doesn't deliver email.
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
Pop3 will let you send as whoever you'd
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
Errr... I think you mean SMTP. POP3 doesn't deliver email.
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
I think he means that some POP3 clients allow you to enter whatever you want
as your from and reply to information.
As opposed out Outlook MAPI, which most definitely does not.
Darcy
-Original Message
Hi,
We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain
(e.a. microsoft.com)
A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different
Domain name (e.a. msn.com)
Is there a way to configure Outlook/Exchange 2000 to give only this user
permission to send
]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:16:02 +0300
Hi,
We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain
(e.a. microsoft.com)
A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf
Hi,
I receive multiple emails that are 'sent on behalf' of Data Center. The
rule I have created never works. I specifically must state who the
email is being sent from
Hi,
I receive multiple emails that are 'sent on behalf' of Data Center. The
rule I have created never works. I specifically must state who the
email is being sent from, in this case Brian Hale, for the rule to work.
This is the from the email:
From: Brian Hale On Behalf Of Data Center
My
That becuase you have them setup as a deleagte.
From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:02:03 -0700
Hi,
I receive multiple emails
I have an interesting behavior we've noticed here. I'm wondering if this
is due to some glitch in our set-up, or if anyone else is experiencing
this as a more generalized behavior.
In this situation, we are running Exchange 2000. No server side send
as permissions have been granted; only delegate
Sounds about right.. 'on behalf of' is really an Exchange-ism which
doesn't have a direct parallel per se in the relevant RFCs AFAIK.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:28 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Send on Behalf
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on Behalf delegation not working outside of org
Sounds about right.. 'on behalf of' is really an Exchange-ism which
doesn't have a direct parallel per se in the relevant RFCs AFAIK
Hello,
I have users who send on behalf of the president of our company. The users
request a read receipt for every message that is sent on behalf. Since we upgraded to
exch2000 the read receipts no longer go to the person sending on behalf of the
president they are only sent
Hi,
I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have
granted them 'Full mailbox rights' to that mailbox however when they
send mail as that mailbox they are told they 'do not have permissions'
I then went and gave them 'send on behalf' rights and that resolved it.
I
-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:28 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Subject: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Hi,
I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have
Are they supposed to have send as or send on behalf of rights? If it's
the former, do they have that right granted explicitly?
On 3/26/03 11:28, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have
granted them 'Full mailbox
in the Public Knowledge Base yet.
Thanks,
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:39 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Subject: Re: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Hello,
The follow-up replier experiencing similar problems:
E2K SP3 + Store Roll-Up Hot fix 811853
W2K SP3 + All Critical Security hotfixes
, 2003 11:39 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Subject: Re: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Are they supposed to have send as or send on behalf of rights? If
it's the former, do they have that right granted explicitly? On 3/26/03
11:28, Erik L
Hey:
Just got off the phone with MS PSS. If you install the 811853 OR the
813840 post SP3 roll-up you WILL have to specify the 'Send on behalf
rights'. The + thing is you can remove the roll-up through 'Add/remove
Programs' and you will go back to normal unless you really need that
post sp3 fix
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Hello,
E2K, W2K SP3 + security fixes
That use to work for us too! But last weekend I applied the Store
Roll-up Hot fix for E2K post-SP3, and many W2K OS fixes
these people go to reply, they get you do not have permissions to send
on
behalf...
This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners
of the
mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here?
Thanks.
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information
to add to their folder list.
They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as
delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all
folders.
When these people go to reply, they get you do not have permissions to send
on
behalf...
This doesn't work like
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions
to Send As that entity.)
Nikki
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin
-Original Message-
From
Martin,
How do you do that?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin
-Original
Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.
Dennis
The phrasing of the question and terms used based on the question as asked
are ambiguous. Delegate permissions is sufficient for 'send on behalf of'
rights, if that checkbox is marked. Send As permissions are another set of
permissions and can only be granted via the Exchange admin.
On 2/28/03 11
When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender.
When I open the message, it still looks like it came from the sender.
When I use send on behalf of, in my inbox, the message looks like it
came from the person I have send on behalf of permission. When I open
the message
, but... It doesn't work..
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender.
When I open the message, it still
I'd never noticed before that making someone a delegate puts their name in the
Exchange Admin delivery options screen. However, if that's how it gives the delegate
send on behalf of rights, then maybe it's subject to the standard Exchange Admin two
hour delay.
-Peter
-Original Message
If someone has both send on behalf and send as and they send a message as
the person they have these rights for, what will it do and why?
*
The information transmitted is intended solely for the
individual or entity to which
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send on Behalf vs Send as
If someone has both send on behalf and send as and they send a message as
the person they have these rights for, what will it do and why
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send on Behalf vs Send as
If someone has both send on behalf and send as and they send
a message as the person they have these rights for, what will
it do and why?
_
List posting FAQ
Looks like send as rules...kinda goes against the standard of most
restrictive from a ntfs/share perspective...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on Behalf vs Send
36 matches
Mail list logo
