Saw Roger.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections Conference
Guess I'll have to just do Disney World next week then!
Ed Crowley MCSE
, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections Conference
Actually it ends tomorrow! g
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando??
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
Discussions
Subject: Exchange Connections Conference
Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando??
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl
, November 04, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections Conference
No, the conference is next week!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
For those of you attending let's get together Tuesday night for dinner and
drinks. Let's meet up at the Conference registration desk Tuesday after the
last session.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
*
So who all is going to the Exchange Connections conference in Florida?
www.winconnections.com
-Tony
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin
Disclaimer.. I'm working on it... I can't stand it either.
... I want to block unencrypted because I don't want unencrypted Outlook
connections going over the internet.. Before you propose a VPN... it
breaks connections and is very unstable.. We have it and use it, but
want to drop
If the server is Win2k, what about using IPSec connections to the server?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto
Too complex to configure and mantain.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 16, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
If the server is Win2k, what about using IPSec connections to the
server
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
Too complex to configure and mantain.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:59 AM
Subject: RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
Disclaimer.. I'm working on it... I can't stand it either.
... I want to block unencrypted because I don't want unencrypted Outlook
connections going over the internet.. Before
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer.. I'm working on it... I can't stand it either.
... I want to block unencrypted because I don't want unencrypted Outlook
connections going over the internet.. Before you propose a VPN... it
breaks connections and is very unstable.. We have it and use
Hi,
I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I
know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's
GUI Dyslexia or something)
Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be
set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect.
Andrea
OK, and my question is...
How do I do this?
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini
Sent: January 15, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
Hi,
I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I
know it's simple
Why would you want to? And if you did, would you then be able to use a
shorter sig/disclaimer?
On 1/15/03 5:20, Andrea Coppini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I
know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess
Discussions
Betreff: Re: AW: Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000
All righty then, give this one a whirl. This comes from
Q324205.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q324205;
SUMMARY
Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1 (SP1) or later includes the
Simple Mail Transport
All righty then, give this one a whirl. This comes from Q324205.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q324205;
SUMMARY
Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1 (SP1) or later includes the Simple Mail
Transport Protocol (SMTP) Protocol diagnostics logging functionality. You
can use SMTP
Always looking to learn something new.. what does one learn by examining
this information?
-Original Message-
From: Freddie Soerensen
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/6/2002 12:43 PM
Subject: AW: Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000
Greg
I have activated everything
Hi list
I have now been searching the Exchange Help and Google for some time to
find out how to do this but I cannot find the answer
If I have blocked some IP addresses from connecting in the SMTP Virtual
Server Properties, I would like to be able to check if there has been
any attempts to
Exchange System Manager | Servers | server | Protocols | SMTP | SMTP virtual
server | Properties
On the General tab at the bottom you can enable logging and by hitting the
properties button, you can include a ton of information.
Hi list
I have now been searching the Exchange Help and Google
Greg
I have activated everything there but it seems it is only logging what
happens AFTER the connection was successfully established. What I want
to see is if an incoming connection is NOT accepted by my server because
the IP address has been blocked
Freddie
Exchange System Manager |
Hi,
We have a problem when Java-applications try to
connect to our IMC. They now and then get a message saying:
send failed: java.net.ProtocolException: 421 servername..com
connection limit reached.
It doesn't happen everytime but often enough to cause problems!
Any ideas?
Q225538
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IMC connections
Hi,
We have a problem when Java-applications try to
connect to our IMC. They now and then get a message
Sounds like the connection limit has been reached on the IMS.. You might try
increasing the maximum number of connections allowed and msking sure that
your java application is appropriately closing connections when it is
through.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL
Go to the connection options of the IMC and see what the limit is. If it
is low, bump it up a bit.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IMC connections
Hi,
We have
Check message size on connector's Advanced tab on the properties page.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 3:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IMC connections
Hi,
We have a problem when Java
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: SMTP connections
Is it possible to get a list of all established SMTP connections. Our
q-mail server was getting dropped connections and I wasn't able to get a
reason why exchange was dropping them.
Info: NT 4.0 SP 6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
I am running Exch 5.5 SP4. I need to lock down my IMS so that only
certain machines can connect to it internally (it is not in the DMZ, I
have a Sendmail box route mail in to the IMS). I know that under the
IMS I can Specify by Host what machines can connect to the IMS, but is
there a way to
Umm now I might put those machine in a given IP range/net then maybe allow
that IP range say like 192.168.1.0
that might work
-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS Connections
I am
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMS Connections
Umm now I might put those machine in a given IP range/net then maybe
allow that IP range say like 192.168.1.0
that might work
-Original Message-
From: paragon400
1) no it doesn't
2) he can't have it anyway
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forcing encrypted RPC connections with Outlook client.
Perhaps the DMS version of the client
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forcing encrypted RPC connections with Outlook client.
1) no it doesn't
2) he can't have it anyway
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forcing
Discussions
Subject: Forcing encrypted RPC connections with Outlook client.
I am looking for a way to force encrypted RPC sessions
between Outlook and Exchange. I am familiar with the client
MAPI settings that allow the user to optionally select
encryption, but I want to enforce
Does anyone know what the Q article is describing exactly what causes
multiple logons (connections) to the mailbox store? I'm trying to gather as
much info about it as possible but cannot seem to locate any good, detailed
material.
Thanks!
John Clark
AVP, IS Technology Operations
First USA
I dim my monitor all the way until it's completely dark and then wear
night-vision goggles.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: connections
Glad you asked. My colleague has
Hi,
I don't watch the open connections through the firewall that much, but
there seems to be a lot of strange ports opening etc...
Any strange behaviour anywhere else?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
I do strange behavior everyday.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: connections
Hi,
I don't watch the open connections through the firewall that much, but
there seems to be a lot
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: connections
Hi,
I don't watch the open connections through the firewall that much, but
there seems to be a lot of strange ports opening etc... Any strange
behaviour anywhere else?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: connections
Hi,
I don't watch the open connections through the firewall that much, but
there seems to be a lot of strange ports opening etc...
Any strange behaviour anywhere else?
Kim
_
List
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January, 2002 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: connections
Ports such as? And if you have a fire wall why would they be opening?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
My wife said I was acting strange this morning
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: connections
Hi,
I don't watch the open connections through the firewall that much
From the old exinternals Permissions Guide...
To create a CCA
Technically, you need to have the following permissions:
* Read on the CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,
DC=your-domain-here object
* Full control on the CN=Active Directory Connections,CN=Microsoft
We have an Exchange 5.5, SP4, NT4 site that we want to join a WIn2k,
Exchange 2000 server to (from a different domain) We have run forestprep
(successfully), domainprep(successfully), installed ADC (successfully) but
we are not allowed to make a CA.
We have tried with numerous accounts (the
I am attempting to design a Exchnage solution that inculdes firewall rules.
I found a paper on E2K but no 5.5. Any help?
Can I use this?
-John Q
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Before you go any farther:
OWA or VPN.
There, your solution is complete.
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: E5.5 connections same as E2K?
I am attempting to design a Exchnage
:16 PM
Subject: RE: E5.5 connections same as E2K?
Before you go any farther:
OWA or VPN.
There, your solution is complete.
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: E5.5 connections same
Discussions
Subject: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple
Exchange servers
This is the output from netstat -a. Why Outlook opens so many RPC
connections to multiple Exchange servers even though only mailbox is
configured in Outlook profile?
The problem we have encountered here
This is the output from netstat -a. Why Outlook opens so many RPC connections to
multiple Exchange servers even though only mailbox is configured in Outlook profile?
The problem we have encountered here is kind of strange to us. We moved all mailboxes
and public folders from one server
Virus?
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exchange
servers
This is the output from netstat -a. Why Outlook opens so many
Public folders
- Original Message -
From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exch
ange servers
Virus?
-Original Message-
From
52 matches
Mail list logo
