RE: Drive m:????

There is no M: drive... Crgre: Jryy, bxnl. V sbhaq gur anzr Mhhy sbe lbh. (ernqvat bss n cvrpr bs cncre) Gur anzr Mhhy ersref gb n qrzv-tbq jbefuvccrq nebhaq 6000 OP ol gur... jung'f gung jbeq? Qnan: Uvggvgrf. Crgre: Uvggvgrf, gur Zrfbcbgnzvnaf naq gur Fhzrevnaf. Qnan: (ernqvat) Mhhy jnf gur

RE: Drive m:????

Ghostbusters? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference) JP -Original

RE: OT Upgrade question

take a bat to the server -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and

RE: Drive m:????

Are you the Keymaster? There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference) JP -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive...=20

RE: Drive m:????

what is spies like us -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Are you the Keymaster? There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference) JP

RE: Drive m:????

I am the gatekeeper -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Are you the Keymaster? There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the

RE: OT Upgrade question

The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 E5.5 are closer to becoming non-supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question

RE: OT Upgrade question

If they've determined the additional functionality isn't worth the cost, why should you upgrade? Wait to upgrade until MS is discontinuing support for your versions. -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:12 PM Posted To:

RE: OT Upgrade question

If you have remote users, show them the new OWA. That functionality alone convinced management here. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question take a bat to the

RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K - The fix

For info See Q289869 on the FTP view problem and Q293386 just about covers the second issue. -Original Message- From: Lantzos Antony Sent: 21 May 2002 08:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K I have an upgraded 5.5 server now on E2K sp2 which responds

RE: OT Upgrade question

If its not broke you don't need support so who cares if support is available? Eventually the increased functionality may be of value to the higher ups, after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've

RE: OWA Help

OK. Why when I go to do a new mail message does it ask for Office STD CD? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help OWA does not render the GAL. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS,

RE: OT Upgrade question

Bonus? Yeah, right. Our salary people had to take a 10% paycut that was only supposed to be for 1 month. Well, 4 months later that cut is still here. If its not broke you don't need support so who cares if support is available? Eventually the increased functionality may be of value to

RE: OT Upgrade question

The last thing you want to hear, when or if you need it, is Dude, you are so not supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Bryant Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question If

RE: Drive m:????

Of course there is. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive... Crgre: Jryy, bxnl. V sbhaq gur anzr Mhhy sbe lbh.

RE: OT Upgrade question

If your management likes Gartner reports, they suggest that the must move off 5.5 date to be 2Q04. When you think about non-support, you should also factor in that more and more technical folks are moving to E2K. The list of people that can run a 5.5 organization is going to get shorter and

RE: OT Upgrade question

Jumping in... That, support going away, was a major selling point for us to get our servers moved to Win 2000. (Actually, we also told them that our servers probably would be too slow to run 2K, so we're gettting new servers, too). It's crazy because our users are complaining about how slow the

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

Hello, I think it has gotten more complicated than 5.5, especially for different hardware. If you're going by the DR doc, light candles, make sacrifices, etc... that you'll be able to restore the System State to your different hardware. They have updated the E2K DR doc from the original

Moving site from one server to another

Title: Message We are have a hard ware problem on an Exchange server and we want to move the site from that server to a new one within the same org. Can that be done? And if so once the move is made can you shut down the original server and expect the new server to run with out problems.

RE: Moving site from one server to another

Title: Message You also have a problem with your e-mailsyour sending out footer attachments -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of George HalsteadSent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:05 PMTo: Exchange DiscussionsSubject:

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

That's a good tune man. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:25 PM To:

Exchange not connecting to remote sites

Prior to our upgrade, had our Exchange 5.5 server receive all e-mails and then they got forwarded to our remote site. I installed the ADC connector and then upgraded to Exchange 2000. The remote site is still on Exchange 5.5. Two questions: 1. It is very difficult to tell how the replication is

RE: Drive m:????

I believe I opened a can of worms!g -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the possibility of the

RE: Drive m:????

Time to go fishing... Where's my cane pole. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and

RE: Drive m:????

An M: drive just popped up on my machine from nowhere. Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002

RE: Drive m:????

I have 3 of them if you want one -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: An M: drive just popped up on my machine from nowhere. Joseph Smith

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks..

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective)

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

Real friends pay my tab... -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks...

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

When and where John? -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Real friends pay my tab... -Original

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

KC. Bryant's on Brooklyn around lunchtime. :) Seriously, I somewhat stumbled into MS Exchange administration and this list a few years ago. Any question I've ever thought I had has been answered by 1)research and 2)someone on this list. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

You get what you pay for. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals. John

RE: Drive m:????

You're gonna need em! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: I hope you have good backups -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

What is a TAM?

In the link below there is a reference to contact a TAM for the mbinfo app http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm A2: There's an app called mbinfo which can extract it for you. Contact your TAM for a copy if you don't have it.

RE: What is a TAM?

Technical Account Manager for Premier and Alliance customers of Microsoft -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: What is a TAM? Subject: What is a TAM? In the link

RE: What is a TAM?

Thanks.. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is a TAM? Technical Account Manager for Premier and Alliance customers of Microsoft -Original Message- From: John

RE: Drive m:????

Jedi Mind Trick This is not the drive you are looking for /Jedi Mind Trick -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:34 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Drive m: Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M:

RE: Drive m:????

I've heard of lots of people using drive M extensively! They change permissions And destroy their database They scan it for viruses. And destroy their database They play with it cuz it's there And destroy their database -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Drive m:????

It wsa a really good idea based on the assumption that if an administrator didn't know what it was, he would find out BEFORE doing anything with it On second thought, it was just a bad idea -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21,

Problem with accessing a PF

NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals. This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month to six weeks. The user has reviewer permission to

Re: Problem with accessing a PF

what about aging limits - Original Message - From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: Problem with accessing a PF NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to

<    1   2