Why is it showing the envelope icon multiple times? That should only
show up to the respective Terminal Services user.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 11:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Suppressing the
It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching
things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery
method that's different, along with the attempt to make it
vaguely legal.
But there's a big difference between legal and ethical.
Personally I'd just block the users
Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy
Options.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No more free/busy data?
I noticed something odd today and I'm
They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the
same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in
first cluster).
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13,
How long do you reckon before one of these companies due an AV company from
block their 'legal' (choke) SPAM, as the spy ware companies did!
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob
due (dodgy finder here) I meant SUE
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:Paul.Hurst;eu.sony.com]
Sent: 13 November 2002 13:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
How long do you reckon before one of these companies due an AV company from
block their 'legal'
By design I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A question of NDR
Scenario:
mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2.
mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with
Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't
worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
3. Ask the user
And that works for all kinds of restores!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't
worth the
Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something
like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course!
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
If you are asking if there is a way to globally set the Free/Busy publish
date. I am not aware of any. the only place I know to change this is on
the client.
--
From: Yanek Korff
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:55
To: [EMAIL
Are these people within the same site? How many servers do you have if they
are in the same site?
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Martinez
Any value in excess of 12 is ignored.
Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior
to the current day, plus the current month).
ref: Q262812
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002
If you know all the answers, why are you asking us?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply
send a message from
Korff,
By design the free and busy only show complete months at a time it does not
roll forward on each day (IE if you have three months it will only show to
the end of the month).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From:
Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job
description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something.
Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro
to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com]
Sent: 13 November 2002 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Sent Item
Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that
its part of the job
description, to backup the data and be able to
If..
1) the deleted item retention time is set to some number of days, and
2) you are still within that number of days
then,
1) close Outlook
2) open the affected user's registry
3) drill to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Client\Options
4) add the DWORD: DumpsterAlwaysOn with a value of 1
5)
I think the whole point is to keep from having to do unnecessary restores.
Would you want to restore, say, an email that contained a joke? It's a way
of getting a user to examine their priorities - how important is the email.
Is it important company data that needs to be recovered, or is it just
of course not.
and what's with the non-sequitor..?
in my first post on the issue I question what I believe is unusual behavior.
you claim the behavior is by design.
in my second post, I challenge your claim.
geez.. if you don't know an answer, it's OK skip the thread, andy. we won't
miss your
Which Outlook version?
I just did some testing with Outlook XP and it works correctly - NDRs return
to mailbox2.
Further explain what you're seeing, and also look at the headers to see
what's going out.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems
Your attitude is apparently by design as well.
Like I said, if you send an email from within Outlook in the manner you
described , I believe it works that way by design .
If I am wrong, so be it.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November
You mean like this, which worked as advertised, not as you're experiencing?
Come on Tim - you know we need more details.
---SNIP
Received: from atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (atlrelay1.itlogon.com [10.33.1.60])
by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version
I don't do much admin work any more. (quack) Deleted Items Retention solves
99.9% of the issues with someone deleting something unintentionally. Most of
the time the user hits delete and immediately has knows that they needed
that message. Our helpdesk (least cost) can walk them through how to
Backups are done primarily for business continuance. They are not done
because someone's too stupid to think twice before deleting a 50mb
spreadsheet without making sure that its not needed anymore.
If our job was to pick up after morons all day long, we'd never get anything
done.
Although, our
Yeah, I saw and read that article. The real problem here is that ...
well... why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars
are available? Seomtimes meetings need to be scheduled more than 1 month in
advance -- so we make all users go into their settings and change them? I
Yup! I've got high standards.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
Darcy, you sure expect a lot. It isn't fair to expect me to actually
comprehend everything I read
Sounds like a replication issue. Single server?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information
They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on
That is correct; the message is sent on behalf of mailbox2 (as seen in the
headers). The NDR goes the to _original_ sender. It makes sense:
Secretary has user permissions on her boss' inbox.
Secretary sends message on his behalf to other user(s).
Message bounces.
Who needs to know to resend the
In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You can set that
to whatever you want on an individual message basis.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A
perzaktly.. thanx roger. Your experienced is (I believe) the normal and
expected behavior.
However, a user working under the scenario I described reports intermittent
issues with an OL2k client where some NDR's appear within the user's
mailbox, rather than in the Inbox of the secondary mailbox.
You asked: why the hell do we want our users in control of when their
calendars
are available?
The answer is because they know a lot more about their calendars than you
do!
Why would a user want some lowly e-mail admin controlling how much
information they show??
-Original Message-
Not sure what you mean by single server? Exchange,DC,etc?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information
Sounds like a replication issue. Single server?
-
Sorry, my bad... thinking too much about my two week vacation coming up and
not looking in the right place. I've got the right location now. thanks
again.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 18:17
To: Exchange
Unfortunately . . . VBG
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
Backups are done primarily
Look at the headers for either a Reply-to: line or an X-Reply-To: line.
It would seem that OL2k does it differently than OLXP.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Thanks, Daniel. That's what I would expect (and what I experience in
testing) as well. The NDR will appear in the Inbox of secondary (mailbox2
in my example).
After a bit closer peek at the NDR header, it seems the headers of the NDR's
(within mailbox1 Inbox) list the 'return-path' with the
thanks, Darcy. The user mentioned not setting that item in the original
message. Maybe that should be an add'l step prior to sending their message?
Still, in my tests, just changing the From field to list a different mailbox
resulted in NDR's delivered to that secondary mailbox.
Tim.
x3683
From the This Just in Dept.:
The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has User
permission. The PF is configured correctly to receive inbound email.
return-path with the address of the origin mailbox appears in the header
of NDR(s) in the origin mailbox. So maybe we have the
Perhaps you might push the changes to all the users thru your network.
Create a .REG file containing the desired F/B settings (ref. 197712)
Set that file to be executed within the logon script.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Wait a year or two until a few new systems are in place and that might
change.
Then again, there's not enough deliniation between departmental budgets
here, or in many other companies, in which chargebacks are a good thing.
--
Roger D.
Do the users mail info reside on two different servers or just two different
DB's on the same server.
.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information
No. But we are only 23 people here. 13 of us are IT/developers.
AW
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:54, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com]
Sent: 13 November 2002 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Sent Item
Are you
MSX5.5 +SP4
1 Organization 12 sites
We have noticed that onlye one site has contents in the
systemfolders\exo:/ou\OAB version 2 it has two subfolders with numbers
separated by hyphens.
Do you knwo why this only site has those two subfolders is this ok or not?
Rgds,
ER
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running
Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Does anyone use the AutoDL utility that ships with Exchange2K? There have
been very few responses to recent questions concerning the configuration of
AutoDL, and I'm just curious if it's because no one uses it. The
instructions aren't very clear, at least for those of us (like me) that
don't have
Anyone know a resource for programattically determining the number of
mailboxes on an Exchange 5.5 server?
Thanks
Steve
*
The information transmitted is intended solely for the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
Here's the message I'm getting:
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: X.400 Service
Event ID: 209
Date: 11/13/2002
Time: 14:16:46
User: N/A
Computer: EXCHANGE
Description:
Global domain identifier (Country, ADMD, PRMD) in
The answer is because they know a lot more about their
calendars than you do!
Why would a user want some lowly e-mail admin controlling how much
information they show??
Because users generally don't have a clue? Frankly I'm surprised this
hasn't come up before. We often have users
After migrating the mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (basically
by bringing new Exchange 2000 servers into our Exchange 5.5 organization and
then moving mailboxes from the 5.5 to 2000 servers) we have ended up with
two outstanding problems that, to date, PSS has not been able to
Fallout from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade Part II:
After migrating the mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (basically
by bringing new Exchange 2000 servers into our Exchange 5.5 organization and
then moving mailboxes from the 5.5 to 2000 servers) we have ended up with
two outstanding
I would miss your reply, Andy. You're like the little baby buffalo nibbling
around the edges of the Exchange field. And I am the coyote who doesn't want
to get sat on.
--
be - MOS
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:18 AM
Is somebody forging the headers? Trivially easy to do. Check to see if there
are any SMTP headers in the messages, and if so, find the offender and put
superglue on his or her keycaps.
--
be - MOS
You are confused; but this is your normal state.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez,
Different servers, node1 holds virtual server1/user1 and node2 holds virtual
server2/user2. Sorry about the confusion.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free/Busy
Have a user that when he types in more than 2 addresses in the TO: line it
drops the first address. Did a test that had 4 seperate addresses that all
come to me. The first address did disappear and the e-mail never arrived
to that mailbox. This only happens with multiple addresses. If he sends an
Create a list with no email address and put them on the list. All email sent
to people belonging to the list will just disappear. It's called creating a
blackhole.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002
Most of us create either a dummy mailbox or Public Folder. Then assign the
addresses in question to said mailbox or pf and set it to auto delete into
never never land.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53
There was a big discussion within the last week. Check the archives.
- Original Message -
From: Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:00 PM
Subject: AutoDL
Does anyone use the AutoDL utility that ships with Exchange2K?
Figure out a way to unsubscribe them, usually by putting their profile
on your system, and reading the mail that comes in and unsubscribing.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
If you aren't interested in resolving them, add their former SMTP
address as a secondary to a distribution group with no members. They
will disappear.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got a brief response about AutoDL, but haven't gotten any useful
documentation or anything of that nature.
Does anyone have a good document on how to install the product? I've
followed the instructions given on this list in the past few weeks to
try to make it work but haven't met with
You need to deploy the old Black Hole DL trick. Make a Distribution List with no
members, and assign it the smtp addresses of the departed employees. The messages will
come in to the DL, be delivered to nobody, and then vanish.
Be aware, however, that the senders will receive no indication that
Meow.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No more
U...
Open the Exchange Administrator, then expand the appropriate Site,
Configuration and Server branches, expand the required server and then click
on the Server Recipients entry? It'll tell you exactly how many people are
on that server in the lower left-hand corner.
-Original
The user may know more about their calendars than we do, but we have been
directed by management to make as much calendar info available as possible
to assist in creating a meeting. If you have to call a user who is blocking
this info, it is a waste of time. We update their registry to make 12
Create A Distribution Group, add to it all the SMTP addresses of the users
that are no longer there, hide the group. Emails disappear. No NDR.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
resend
Create A Distribution Group with no members, add to it all the SMTP
addresses of the users that are no longer there, hide the group. Emails
disappear. No NDR.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM
1. Create a dummy alias
2. Add the no-longer-valid addresses to that dummy as alternates
3. Identify the lists
4. Unsub those addresses from those lists
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:53 AM
Then I feel it's a replication issue. I would look in that area.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information
Different servers, node1 holds virtual
PFs don't do NDRs. By design.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/2002 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: A question of NDR
From the This Just in Dept.:
The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has
User
permission. The PF is configured
User error and/or insufficient data.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J.
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/2002 4:04 PM
Subject: Outlook drops first address in TO: line
Have a user that when he types in more than 2 addresses in the TO: line
it
drops the first address. Did a test that
I'll have to check when I get to work (and of course I'll forget) but
something tells me I read a bit about it in Jim McBee's
_Exchange_2000_24seven_. If not, there's something useful in the pile
of papers that helps my desk remain firmly rooted to the floor. My
second guess being that I saw it
Not to mention Peregrine!
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz
Sent:
73 matches
Mail list logo
