RE: Single instance storage anyway to revert?

Hu I am resaonbly sure that this should NOT have happened. UNLESS you used ExMerge to move the mail out to a PST and then imported it back in. How did you move the mailboxes? If you use the Move option in Exchange Tasks to move a mailbox, Single Instance Store is preserved. And

Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52?

I asked a couple of days ago on the official stance on which is best between Scanmail for Exchange 3.52 and 3.8 - this is the reply my vendor came back with (Trend don't provide direct support in the UK any more). I've read the readme's, and the comparison document on the Trend website and it's

RE: Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52?

Interesting. I would still use 3.8 with ESE based scanning. There is a 3.81 in beta currently. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52? I asked a couple of days

RE: Mass e-mail removal?

Dear Ed, I agree with you 100%. The problem is there are restrictions and similar issues have been encountered in the past, fortunately nothing as sensitive as what Georgetown has endured. The issue is that restrictions are in place and even with a confirmation system things like this do occur.

RE: Migration Scenario

LDSU (from HP/Compaq and I have worked with someone who wrote that programit will do pretty much everything when it comes to import and export) might be the answer for all of your questions. It will cost you but not that much. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problems with ADC Public Folder CA...

Both of these errors indicate a problem with the account used by the ADC to connect to the Exchange 5.5 server I would look into that little more harder... Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McBee, Jim Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003

RE: Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52?

Very interesting.this sounds more like outdated materials. This sounds more like Scanmail 1.0 where ESE scanning was overlooked (other than Sybari). Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Saturday, February

RE: Single instance storage anyway to revert?

Hi, Thanks for the info, yes I use move mailbox process from active directory users computers. Yes the final database in size is samller that the original, but some individual mailboxes are triple in size. -er -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Outlook problem with recurring group meetings

Users began using Outlook's schedule feature to schedule recurring group meetings. They have problems when one instance of the meeting is changed. Meeting participants claim to not being notified of the changes. They also can look for a meeting and not find it to reschedule, and can have two

RE: Migration Scenario

While it is a fine tool for directory integration, I don't think LDSU is the complete answer to any migration. For example, it does not move mail. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From:

Message Tracking FAQ?

Does anyone know of an Exchange 5.5 message tracking FAQ? I'd like a short rundown on what I should be able to monitor when I don't have a specific message ID to track. When I have a message ID I can use advanced and track the flow of the message on each server, however if I don't have a

RE: Outlook problem with recurring group meetings

Interesting. What version of Outlook and what version of Exchange are you using? Does this only happen with recurring meetings or does it also happen with single-instance meetings? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com