*plonk*
OK own up, who cross linked the list to alt.trolls.pathetic?
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 07:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
well Ed thanks for your
Go back under the bridge and wait for the goats...
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 07:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: new to
yes, we did look into archiving products and a couple of them looked really
good, but they were really expensive and we couldn't justify the cost
following the initial outlay for server hardware and licensing. it's
something i'm considering for the future, however.
dan.
-Original
Hi,
does anybody know of a good discussion list for database management?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
if its SQL server - go to swynk - they are by far the best list I have come
accross (for databases)
:)
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: 15 January 2002 11:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Databases
Hi,
I don't understand your solution Ed. You're saying to keep the IS
manageable, get everyone to use OST's and save off attachments? OST's aren't
for archiving, they mirror the store - no space saved. Why get users to pull
attachments out of exchange to disparate locations on the network? No
backup,
Go look at the profile for the client [mailboxname]. See
what's funny -
ie. They're hitting the mailbox using MAPI and IMAP within the same
profile, with both trying to deliver to PST... Don't just fix it -
delete it and build it properly from scratch using only the
services you
need.
How kind :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 01:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight
I'm sorry, I realize how over your head this must be. I will try to keep it
K-8 for your understanding...
-Original
Don't you think it's time you moved out of your parent's basement?
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
good come back Ed I feel my face
Ed, I should note that Reuters reports that eating more than 400 Euro notes
at once may prove to be toxic. Please be careful.
--
be - MOS
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yes, we saw the same thing after the #217 anti-spam rules file update. We
disabled anti-spam and configured our worst offenders by hand.
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
See the FAQ
open Relay
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm Section 3.73
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 08:25 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: mail
Subject: mail
Hello,
I received this message from a client
that was all they sent me as a ndr.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
sorry it is
dealers
prices
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
Works here:
test Your message
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: test
Sent:Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:44:06 -0500
was delivered to the following recipient(s):
ICECteam (midship) on Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:43:22 -0500
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:LOGISTICS:LOGISTICS1
-Original
No laughing list persons, to much multi-tasking.
Sorry for the interruption return to your Exchange discussion.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
sorry it is
dealers
prices
-Original
yup i recieved the message
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
Works here:
test Your message
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: test
Sent:Tue, 15 Jan 2002
Then our work is done here.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
yup i recieved the message
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
yup must be the guy web hosting our site or a user type error.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
Then our work is done here.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
You know some days I really like this job, and other days I really hate it.
Apparently my boss in his infinite wisdom decided it would be wise to give a
bunch of people that know nothing about Exchange the service account
password. A result of this was the deletion of several mailboxes and
Corupted profile. Whack your profile and create a new one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL
There is a technet whitepaper - get it, read it, read it again. There could
be many gotchas depending on your Org and site setup.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oh crap. Need to
m
gotchas...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Oh crap. Need to change service account password.
There is a technet whitepaper - get it, read it, read it again. There
Would that be q157780?
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Oh crap. Need to change service account password.
There is a technet whitepaper - get it, read it, read it again.
hi jim,
you make some good points, but it's a little different here. We're a media
company - advertising, prepress, web solutions. A lot of document traffic is
PDF's, quark documents - artwork revisions etc. It's very useful for our
staff to keep this data in Outlook, because it provides an
That's one of the articles. You didn't say how you are setup though.
One thing that jumps out at me though is that you should never be using the
service account anyway. Systems use the service account; people use logon
accounts that have privileges.
Also you should be training [1] your
Apparently there is something in the faq about this, sorry for not looking
there first. I'm sort of freaking out as to why my supervisor is so damn
stupid.
Sorry again.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:08 AM
To:
I don't use the service account. But my super knows all the domain admin
passwords and it was he that gave it out to a bunch of the helpdesk people.
I have one backup that knows what to do and how to behave, and I have a
person that creates accounts for me but her rights are trimmed.
Basically
Ohlet's not go down this path ok? This is a subject that both sides
take way too personal, way too fast.
-Original Message-
From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: configuration question
Only
I can dig it, but it's part of your job to educate all management types. :)
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Oh crap. Need to change service account password.
I don't use the
You should look into version control software for better control. It will
also help to cut down on the amount of data you store. One copy vs many
copies of a document. It will also help you track who checked out and made
changes to docs and allow you to revert back quickly to older versions if
Jennifer,
Is that going to work? In his 8:35am post, he clarified that he was using
Ex5.5. Isn't the dsa.msc the Active Directory Users and Computers MMC
snap-in? Wouldn't he be using this only if he was running E2k? Or is Tim
so confused that he doesn't even realize what version of Exchange
They cant be educated.
I had a manager one time use a phrase, when questioned about his traning in a
particular subject, that nailed it on the head:
I cant read or write, but I can trace like no ones business.
I think that phrase fits just about all managers I have ever had.
~!Mike
Dear Joshua,
Exchange Admin Program
Organization / Site / Configuration / Connections
Internet Mail Service (ExchangeServer)
Routing tab
Routing Restrictions
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q196626
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL
Keep in mind that the boneheads could have mapped drives or open
terminal server sessions going using the service account. If you run
into a lockout after the change, keep this in mind.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15,
I got the same thing.
~!Mike
-Original Message-
From: MAILsweeper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 1/15/2002 9:26 AM
To: Mike Carlson
Cc: Postmaster
Subject: You sent a message with obscene wording
Sheesh and I thought I had our mimesweeper bad words filter dialed up
high.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 15:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Postmaster
Subject: RE: You sent a message with obscene wording
I got the same
Have a nice life. I think you have just ensured that no one on this list
is going to help you at this point. Might I suggest a career change:
Would you like fries with that?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 AM
To:
PLONK!
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
good come back Ed I feel my face turning all red from
the embarrassment now I can no longer
I am new to exchange and have just set up my first exchange server and
migrated all services from a linux sendmail server hosted externally. It all
works fine, but I have been asked to make the linux server a fallover or
secondary mx as our exchange server is running on an ADSL that is a bit
I think it's part of the job description.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Oh crap. Need to change service account password.
Apparently there is something in the faq about
Apparently life is too short for puncuation either.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
good come back Ed I feel my face
Something else to watch out for is all the Exchange-related products.
Exchange Service account may have been used as a service account for your
AV, backup, content filtering etc products (this is a bad practice in
general). Also, if you run Mailbox Manager, remember to change the password
for
2 $hort!
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
That's too short you little eunuch.
-Original Message-
From: Tim McGrath
Even though this is off topic, its fairly easy.
Leave sendmail running on the Linux box (but remove any alias file entries
that you might have used for local delivery), and make sure that it has an
MX record with a higher preference number (lowest number is always tried
first). Viola.
As long
I'm about to go see LOTR at the Cinerama - 4:00 showing tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
Well, Paul Allen will be
Hi Could someone clarify the arguements for and against making a E2000
server into a domain controller? Also, if an E2000 server was to become
a 2nd Global Catalogue server, does that force my hand into making it a
DC anyway?
Thanks
Mike
i have looked at version control software and it's a nice idea but it's not
quite applicable to what we're doing and also the kind of thing that would
never happen - too much change required, training, cost, getting clients and
vendors involved - urgh.
dan.
You should look into version control
thanks! - um without meaning to sound stupid, where do I set the MX
preference number??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: 15 January 2002 16:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: primary/secondary mx
Even though
A user is trying to send an email to a valid address but keeps getting this
ndr as shown below. Any ideas why this is happening?
TIA.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/15/2002 8:23 AM
The recipient name is not recognized
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
require authentication
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 553 error
A user is trying to send an email to a valid address but keeps getting this
ndr as shown below. Any ideas
Question about backup :
Each time you restore the IS to the recovery server, and pull the mail to a
PST, does this make that mailbox unable to take advantage of the Single
instance storage?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January
Hello,
Our present scenario is the following: Corporate users, that have
a PC on their desk. These users, *may* travel to another location in
which they will use a PC sitting on someone else's desk. And about
half of these employees will have a laptop - in which they work from
home, and
On your DNS server, in the MX record itself.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 16:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: primary/secondary mx
thanks! - um without meaning to sound stupid, where do I set
the MX preference
cheers!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: 15 January 2002 16:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: primary/secondary mx
On your DNS server, in the MX record itself.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Clark
use Outlook as it's intended - as an exchange client, not imap or pop3. then
you get all the collaborative features of exchange (scheduling, public
folders, custom forms etc etc). without this you're not really justifying
the outlay for exchange.
give the laptop users offline folders and set up
No. Check with your HR, ask them to check with the companies legal advice.
Don't get involved in the decision.
JDE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Legal
use A vpn solution to connect to the exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question)
Hello,
Our present scenario is the
I have seen this error at customer sites when the DNS pointer from the
sending server doesn't point to the sending domain like yours does. see
below:
Name Server: AUTH2.NS.ENI.NET
Query: 206.135.201.2
Type of Search: PTR - Domain name pointer
Protocol: UDP
Verbose: Yes
Recursion Desired: Yes
Hi all
MSX 5.5+SP4
Please is there any way to make a public folder to be acesible offline
*whitout* making a copy of these before?
Rgds,
-ER
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Get rid of POP
IMAP could work
OWA is great
Best: Get a VPN and use the regular Exch/OL combo.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users
Huh??
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline publci folders
Importance: High
Hi all
MSX 5.5+SP4
Please is there any way to make a public folder to be acesible offline
James,
I have made that recommendation, I am also curious to where the law lies on
this one.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Legal Question...
No. Check with your
tell them you can show them how to access mailboxes if they want you to, but
also tell them that there might be legal implications that they should check
with their human resources people or the company lawyers.
if you're not qualified to offer legal advice, then they should know that,
and
Your HR or Legal department is the best place to go for that answer. If the answer
comes back that it *is* legal, make sure you have a request, in writing, from the
supervisor of the person you are giving access to before you actually do anything.
Better yet, make it a request from HR.
Eclipse is a web site we are hosting. The traffic is directed via Proxy
Server.
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mike O'Toole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It would also be a good idea to have the employee handbook updated with info
stating that mailboxes may be accessed blah blah blahlegaleze
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yes, this is the way I do it maybe others, usually is with Outlook. Drag
you PF from its current location under All Public Folders into Favourites
(oops sorry American spelling Favorites) under Public Folders. Once this is
done you can select the PF from your Favorites and make it available
IIRC, you *have* to add it to the favorites before you can have it avail for
offline use...
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline publci folders
Importance: High
Hi all
MSX
What is the Favourites folder? is that just any folder I like the most?
what is going to happen after coming back to online mode? all what I enetred
in that favourite will be updated to the public folder?
thanks,
-er
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The law varies by location as does company policy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Legal Question...
All,
I have pretty much been lurking on this list for awhile now.
What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run
everyday, twice a week? Also do you switch the view to 15 minute and just
add a block to the time you want IS maintenace to start??
_
List posting FAQ:
1. Favorites folder under Public Folders.
2. Could be.
3. Easy enough to test out.
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline publci folders
Importance: High
What is the
Is there a way to make or increase an auto-refresh setting in OWA?
An employee here passed the request on to me, now I pass the question on to you :)
Thanks in advance,
Fred
Fred Macondray
Systems Administrator
Virtual Purchase Card, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hit F5 more often than usual?
:)
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 17:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Auto Refresh?
Is
The view we have is dont fix it if it isnt broken. Although, if you have
recently migrated a lot of data off the server it may be worthwhile running
ESEUTIL to defrag the database, daily IS maintenance should take care of
defragmenting the databases though.
-Original Message-
From:
IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer) nor do I play one on TV.
Have the customer put in writing that you, the consultant, are being tasked
with this job and that the company assumes full responsibility for, well,
everything. Reduce it down to where you are only performing a function and
nothing more. It's a
manpower.com refuses to accept mail from you. Most likely you are failing a
reverse DNS lookup.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: 553 error
A user is trying to send an email to a
mine is set to run early hours when the backup finishes.
dan.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2002 17:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Maintenance
What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run
If I can program my finger, sure...
any others?
Thanks ;-)
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Auto Refresh?
Hit F5 more often than usual?
:)
Regards
Mr Louis
IMHO the best is default. Don't mess with it. It will thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Maintenance
What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run
Apologies, misread the question, yes we run IS maintenance in the early
hours every morning. Use whichever view you are comfortable with.
G
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chad Gibson
Sent: 15 January 2002 17:19
To: Exchange Discussions
I've left the default settings in place, with the exception of Saturday and
Sunday where it runs all day both days. This is needed so that it gets
through at least one pass uninterrupted.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Yes. Put the public folder up into the FAVORITES section of the client and
then mark for offline use like any other folder.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing
Enjoy! I actually saw it there on Christmas Eve, and it is quite the spectacle on that
screen. Just be sure not to trip over the two guys who are already in line for Star
Wars Episode 2.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15,
Q1 -
http://www.swynk.com/friends/janssen/Articles/Install_DS_or_MS.asp#InstallOn
DSOrMS
Q2 - a GC is a Domain controller, but it also holds a replica of selected
attributes from all objects in the forest.
Have a look at the Microsoft site - Exchange section. Jam packed with
answers to this
Actually, I saw it last Thursday. Tonight was going to be a second viewing, but the
friend who was going to see it with me bailed. I might skip tonight. No fun watching
the same movie twice - alone.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Check www.cdolive.com
(http://www.cdolive.com/address.htm)
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kiran, Murat
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: scripting mailbox attributes
Brothers and sisters,
How many men does it take to open a beer? - None. It should be opened by
the time she brings it.
That should cover the tease part!.
-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: January 15 2002 1:53 AM
Posted To: exchange
Conversation: configuration
Okay -
I like the VPN route - and use Outlook 2000 as it was intended.
BUT, what kind of Network Overhead is involved - when connecting
remotely over a potentially slow connection? Will it take forever
for folders to come up, especially if they are unusually large?
Also, if the client cannot
I know you can adjust the inactivity time out setting. The default is 3
mintues I believe. I know the new OWA with the latest patches will allow a
notification to appear in the lower right side indicating new msgs. At that
point the user clicks on the notification message or hits the send
I have no idea if it will work and I don't give a poop.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: configuration question
Jennifer,
Is that going to work? In his 8:35am post,
Its always better to give a poop rather than to take one...
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: configuration question
I have no idea if it will work and I don't give a poop.
Need a date?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
Actually, I saw it last Thursday. Tonight was going to be a second viewing,
We have 60+ salesmen and engineers who connect via 56K modem dial up while
on the road to access their email with Outlook/Exchange through a VPN...
Everything works well, though a bit slowly at times, but not so slow as to
be unusable or unbearable.
You can do away with IMAP completely if you
Especially on Fridays when there is only one left and the weekend is coming.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: configuration question
Its always better to give a poop rather
Ok I am fairly cetain but not 100% on this yet for the setting for SMTP
relaying.
To restrict my 2000 email server from being a open relay. I click on the
SMTP virtual server go to access then relay. I click on only the addresses
below and I put in my domain where the email resides and any
Unless, like my daughter, you have a crush on Legolas.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
Actually, I saw it last
AWESOME! -
That's precisely the answer I was looking for.
This list is awesome :)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Need advice from the
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
