Might be worth just checking your event log to confirm that the online
maintenance is indeed running and not being interrupted by the backup. You
should see 1221 events indicating the amount of white space for instance.
Also I assume you are doing full online backups as well since the backup api
Best thing I can see for everyone is to have the important emails resent.
A bigger question - what were important emails doing in Deleted Items
folder to begin with?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002
Alex -
By default, NAVCE creates a network scan of the M drive - turn this off
in the Symantec System Center Console. This scan seemingly ignores any
exclusion settings set locally on the server. Unfortunately, the only
resort I found was to restore from backup.
Jeff
-Original
And whats that beeping sound coming from the server room?
- Original Message -
From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:57 AM
Subject: RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti
on=0
Best
Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook
2000 installed on an XP box.
Please advise.
Regards,
Orin
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
1. Recreate Outlook Profile?
2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc...
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Don't find
Is he sure he has an Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box
1. Recreate Outlook Profile?
2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail
Heck, Im not sure I have one.
- Original Message -
From: Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Is he sure he has an Exchange server?
-Original Message-
Yabbut. You can use Martin's.
;)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Heck, Im not sure I have one.
- Original Message -
From: Candee Vaglica
Does anyone know of an easy way for mac clients to perform LDAP
searches. I know it works if they use outlook, but, most use
eudora and other apps. I'm running W2K SP2, E2K SP2 at my site.
Also, pro's and con's of allowing LDAP Anonymous queries to the AD.
Understand mac clients need this to
I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've
been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail
loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're
right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for
that fact. Cause
OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
I
You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go
into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail administrators rely
on our users to use this feature correctly. You're just setting
yourself up for trouble.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Deny auto-replies to the Internet and you wont have to worry about users
setting it up incorrectly.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses -
Yea, I know. That's what I finally convinced my manager to turn that
function off. Up until now, they wanted to keep that function. But
once that happened she realized that we cannot leave ourselves open to a
potential mail loop because of our users, using Outlook incorrectly.
Yes, fortunately we were allowed to purchase Backup Exec - which is the most
wonderful tape backup solution I've ever found. So - we have solid backups
of the Message Store.
Thanks for everybody's input - I just won't worry about it then, but still
look at the event logs from time to time.
Have
I am quite familiar with Q258696 about modifying global settings in Exchange 2000 and
have read the section on Creating a Message Filter List. In that section it gives
the following examples on adding filters.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*@ domain.com
user@*. domain.com
*@*. domain.com
I want to do a
Thirded. The other benefit is the lower costs. A BCV volume for EMC is
essentially a mirror of your existing set of spindles (which are probably
mirrored). The DB is shut down and the mirror is broken and mounted
elsewhere for backup to tape. In order to remount that mirror for the next
day,
greetings,
Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6a.
We have users in multiple NT4 domains (same domains as the Exchange servers)
and users in a Win2k domain with multiple two-way trusts. The problem is
that when I want to add a Win2k user to the permissions tab of a mailbox, I
cannot see all of the Win2k
Dear DL Members,
Our environment looks like this.
NT Server 4.0 with SP6a
Exchange 5.5 with SP4
One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation
during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000
Clients hang (hour glass).
In
IS Maint Tab
Properties of the Server.
- Original Message -
From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: Online Defragmentation
Dear DL Members,
Our environment looks like this.
NT Server
That's the feature of XP.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server
Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their
Outlook XP pops up a
Best paces to check would be:
www.puremac.com
Or better yet do what I did an dgo to Google and search on
+LDAP +Macintosh
You get quite a few entries with this search.
Cheers.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Pennell, Ronald B.
Reply To:
Yeah. It tells you when it's improperly configured so you can hire someone to fix it,
and annotate it on your network/email administrator's performance review.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:42 AM
Posted To:
Sounds like an AD permissions issue.
Has someone removed Authenticated Users from having Read rights from the
top level of those OUs? This is sometimes done to prevent browsing through
the OU structure despite there being Read rights further down the structure.
It can cause problems with Address
I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002
You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
I'm not seeing that tab on the server
Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not
seeing the IS Maintenance tab.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
On the server name itself, not Servers.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab.
In the Exchange Administrator?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing
the IS
Do you only have one Exchange Server? Are you in 5.5 or E2k? We have seen
this when I User requests information from one of our other Servers (or the
bandwidth is saturated).
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December
Dear Andy,
Thank you.
How much consecutive time should I give for this process? What are
your settings (out of curiosity)?
At the present (some of it will change), I have all 7 days looking
the same, and each day has four hours total, given to this process. There
are
Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't
you?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
Yes, right clicking on the server
Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad!
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
I've also seen this when the GC was being swamped (high CPU)...
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Do you only have one
Do you use outlook?
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
this was the problem.
Thank You!
-mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin
Sounds like an AD permissions issue.
Has someone
Set it to run in the middle of the night -- say 1:00 a.m. Block out the
1:00 a.m. for all days. That doesn't mean it will stop when 2:00 a.m.
comes. It will complete the cycle.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance
interval.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Online Defragmentation
Every night off hours and outside the backup run schedule makes sense to me.
Its a low priority task, and will run up to one hour after the scheduled
time block.
- Original Message -
From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot
there I see :)
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or
Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the
users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views.
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
Thank you very much. Sorry about
Too much information.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 December 2002 17:15
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Online Defragmentation
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today
But it seems that XP wants to hang more often. I am using Outlook 2000, most of my
users are on XP. We are all on the same LAN, and the Exchange server is on the same
LAN too. I admit, once in a while my Outlook hangs. But not as often as these people
get their progress bars on XP.
I have seen this. But we have only one server.
-Original Message-
From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
I have found this to be related to attempts to find a
But that's where the is BDSM chamber is, why would I want to move
out..sorry got to go, I need to put the ball gag back in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Now that comment is definitely categorized in the TMI department.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates?
Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer
window, the folder view does not display?
It remains grayed out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied
the critical update last night.
Just curious.
-
All,
I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What
I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector
setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are
located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all
our servers
Are you using terminal services to view this server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: explorer window grayed-out
Does anyone else on this list
A little too much information there.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today
-Original
nope, at the console.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: explorer window grayed-out
Are you using terminal services to view this server?
-Original
And don't turn it off. Set it to run in the offhours. And whoever set it to
run during the day, remove his admin privileges.
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Online
Clark who?
--
From: Bowles, John L.
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K
I don't want to be like Clark Griswold when he opens his bonus
checkjust trying to get
There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16)
Excerpt:
When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an
improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides
Although in another message you mentioned something about the server being
uninstalled and reinstalled or something like that leaving an orphan FB
folder.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19,
Chevy Chase in Christmas Vacation. Clark Griswold.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002
Thank you very much for this information. I would have never looked
passed the user. We have had some difficulties with the user when they
are trying to update meetings and add and delete others so I basically
chalked this one to user error but this is very good info. Thanks
again!
Thank
why when the GC is busy ?? is the client waiting
because it needs some data back from the GC like a
directory lookup??
or is this an exchange server issue, is there a way
that you can tell what the real cause is without
putting a sniffer on the lan
thanks
Ray
--- Edgington, Jeff [EMAIL
That's on a different network, on our hosting side where we have many Exchange 2000
servers and a lot of users connecting over the Internet.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago.
It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think
you will be happy.
One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server
window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order.
The
Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago.
It is very frustrating.
The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange
Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change
DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and
the E2K server.
I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5.
The most
Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever
used.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr.
Yes, but the key is wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange
No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with
the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a
hard time understanding why the key would change.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems
I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key
for 5.5!![1]
I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under
the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5.
I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5
-
I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I found changing the outlook binding order from doing WINS lookups to DNS
lookups helped for a lot of users. There's a Q article on this somewhere.
Also check out the reply to another thread I sent out on Public Folder ACL
caching.
Lastly what do the performance counters on your exchange
Does this require a reboot?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look.
--
Roger D.
This is a client setting and only requires a restart of %exchange client%.
On 12/19/02 14:26, Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this require a reboot?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM
To:
of the desktop? Yes. The Exchnage server, No!
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Does this require a reboot?
-Original
---Correction ---
--
I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY
E2K, not 5.5. should have read, blah. [1]
Sorry for aby confusion.
- John Q Jr.
[1] Roger Seielstad (Swynk Exchange list communication, December 19, 2002)
stated that Um, RPC binding order has
Sounds logical to me. I never had to reboot after making Outlook-related registry
changes.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
This is a
Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support?
Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from
another vendor to remain name less)
It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all
at this point yet)
Ive had an occasion where
try Q259321
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5
I had a similar problem with my home machine, even after disabling the pop-up
We had a virtual loop happen here from an OOF. Somebody went on vacation and set up
OOF, then added an extra rule to auto-reply to all messages [1]. We have an app that
uses a mailbox to send out daily updates, and has a rule on the mailbox to fire off a
new message in response to anything
I have a W2K EXCH2K Server (sp3 on each) with XP/outlook 2002 clients. We are all
noticing lag in the delivery of messages. When sending a new message it will stay in
the outbox until the sender clicks on another folder. Also there will be times that
no new email will have come in but when
open inbound UDP ports on your router.
-Original Message-
From: Bentley, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: My exchange server is acting like a POP3
I have a W2K EXCH2K Server (sp3 on each) with XP/outlook 2002
I had this scenario
PC(DHCP)- D-Link router(DHCP) - BellSouth DSL modem/router
I was able to click reply and get the reply window. But then when I clicked Send, the
window would not close and the message would not get sent. The Send button turned grey
for a few minutes.
I think it is similar
I've used Trend and I am very happy with their support. The only other
company I would consider for my Exchange server is Sybari. They have
some very interesting technology.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002
What scan engine and DAT versions are you using?
Do you have it configured to scan all file types?
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product
Does Trend call their updates DATs? I always thought that was a McCrappy thing.
FWIW, I havent used Trend's support, their corporate product rocks so I havent had the
need I guess. I also use their retail AV version at home, but quite frankly, IMO, the
new 2003 version of Peni$cillin bites and
They call them Patterns actually.
Isn't it your dinner time?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support
Does Trend call
One MAJOR gripe with the Corporate Product...
It will not delete an ingected zip/rar file. It will detect it as infected, but
cannot delete it because it is locking the file itself...
A bit of bone-headed programming that they have been promising to fix for about a year
now.
Still love
Exchange 2000 in a native mode child domain.
OWA server setup as front end server in DMZ.
5 exchange 2000 servers scattered across the world, one in each remote office.
For one office, they can't forward or reply to emails in OWA. All other remote
offices are fine.
I've tried logging in as
Will it quarantine or rename it?
-- Original Message --
From: David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:15:33 -0800
One MAJOR gripe with the Corporate Product...
It will not delete an
Mongo eat BLT.
-- Original Message --
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:47:47 -0800
They call them Patterns actually.
Isn't it your dinner time?
-Original Message-
Hello,
I admit, I am very new to modifying GALs - but it's an important skill to
master, and I have to get this working.
Since the Default Global Address List is grabbing everything from Active
Directory that has an Exchange Address attached to it (which is not a
desired thing), I want to create
First off, if you're going to insist on doing it this way (which I hope
you don't) you're going to want to do use the distinguished name of the
group:
Group Membership Is Exactly
cn=groupname,ou=OUname,dc=anderson,dc=net.
Groups are calculated entities, and they don't work quite the way that
Thank you SO much for taking the time to write such a great reply.
I appreciate the information, and I will dive into this immediately.
Mike :-)
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:41
92 matches
Mail list logo
