Occasionally.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
But you can recall
Epiphany is a period in the Christian calendar. I think it's January 6th.
And speaking of viruses and holidays, has anyone else noticed
how Klez changes for some holidays? How else can you explain
messages like Have a humour Epiphany, which only turn up in
early January?
Take photographs of the screen?
If I use my phone to do that, I can even email them to anyone.
Les (I like my SPV) Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Direct Dial: 0191 269 0110
Mobile: 07976 234 165
http://www.sandersons.com
-Original Message-
Yes, I use the Notes folder to record certain things, so that I can
recall them later. ;o)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
But you can recall
Hello
Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS
Exchange Server 5.5
Thanks in advance
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the
message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Let's see, in no particular order:
-NTBackup will backup remote Exchange servers, if the backup server has
Exchange Admin or the ESM tools loaded (depending on the version of
Exchange)
-Brick level backups are a waste of time and tape. Read the Ed Crowley
Never Restore Method in the FAQ and
Oh, and your issue with the IMS dying is the fact you're not doing an
Exchange aware backup, and something is munging a file in your IMC directory
while the service is shut down.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis -
Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this domain to a
number of different domains. Since the from domain is my customer, I
am them (coocookuchoo - bastardized from John Lennon) who has to track
this. I have Trend involved with this, but did not hear back from my
email or phone
Yeah something is going on. I did a compare and the MTA deferred
delivery queue is emtpy and the IS send queue is still at 54.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MSExchange
What is everyone using for automating the recreation of Outlook
profiles? I have found Autoprof that appears to the job, but wanted to
get any input as to what experience others have had using this tool.
Thanks,
Mike Lagase
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase
Sent: Friday, January 17,
Probably not, no. But if you're willing to set up a second box, there
are lots of linux ones, or you could use mercury32 for Win32 OS's.
http://www.pmail.com/whatsnew/new_m32.htm
http://www.slipstick.com/exs/lists.htm
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL
Wasn't Coocookuchoo from Simon and Garfunkel?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Nope. I am the Walrus.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery
Wasn't Coocookuchoo from Simon and Garfunkel?
Is there a way to export a distribution list from your Contacts Folder to a
CSV or XLS file? ... Using the Import/Export utility of Outlook 2002 only
captures single contacts and not distribution lists within the Contacts
Folder.
You mean a Personal DL? I would check on slipstick.com for utilities or
code.
- Original Message -
From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:41 AM
Subject: Contacts
Is there a way to export a distribution list
Our security guy does. He wants to put linux on every desktop.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
Everyone?
-Original Message-
From:
Roger,
I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message.
Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am
assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error as everyone
seems to think. Thanks for the 'help'.
Damian
-Original Message-
From:
I would recommend capturing your network data at the time the email should
have been sent. This will show you:
1. If your mail server sent (or attempted to send) the mail.
2. The response from the other server.
3. If your mail server never sent the mail when it should have.
I have used a
quack
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
EXACTLY!
Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Damien,
I have the same issue with a few of my rules in a Outlook 2000/ Exchange 2000 setup.
I've done everything I can think of, scoured the internet for an answer, but so far
it is unsolved.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free Mailing List Software
Sensitivity: Private
Hello
Can anyone recommend a
So am I.
Doesn't mean he's not wrong, just that he's got a title.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
EXACTLY!
Unfortunately he is also a Assistant VP
So far hes bullet proof, every challenge to his proposals is met with this
is the direction the company is moving
Got any job opening for a 2nd rate net admin with a kick for learning things
quickly? :p
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Nope.
On 1/17/03 5:10, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello
Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS
Exchange Server 5.5
_
List posting FAQ:
Sorry, you'll need to look at the logs of their mail server to see when it
transferred to the intermediary box and then troubleshoot the issue from
there.
On 1/17/03 6:30, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Therein lies my problem - this has been happening from this domain to a
number of
I use a small Canadian named Pierre. Autoprof works too.
On 1/17/03 7:06, Mike Lagase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is everyone using for automating the recreation of Outlook
profiles? I have found Autoprof that appears to the job, but wanted to
get any input as to what experience others
What, you wanted to give away software that was free?
On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
I already searched at many places. Microsoft comes with one article which
seemed to be the solution. That is: deleting an object from the
transaction server. Windows 2000 places these objects in the component
services, aldo the right object to delete wasn't there.
Regards,
Bob
Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of
yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an automated mailing
list on MS Exchange for nowt
Nik
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44
To:
I would fall on the ground laughing if I could just tell him that.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
He's a moron. Operating systems aren't secure. Secured
Exchange 5.5
I have always made my Exchange mailbox alias the same as the NT user ID this
simplifies the authentication process for POP3, IMAP and NNTP and it makes
it easy to rollout Outlook through an intellimirror mst file. However, one
of my clients has a different naming convention in the
There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, none of them
are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry.
On 1/17/03 8:55, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of
yahoogroups, and I
Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and 'web beacons'
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2003 14:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software
There are some 3rd party mailing list
The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias.
That's the format I use all the time, every time[1] so it doesn't matter to
in the least what the format is, as long as it minimizes the potential
ambiguity associated with logon IDs. I also never use Exchange for NNTP, as
Have I mentioned Mercury32? Oh wait, yes I have. I guess web beacons
and adverts are preferable?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:09 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Free Mailing List
Putting up with those is what gets you 'free' lists right?
On 1/17/03 9:08, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and 'web beacons'
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17
I guess so, wouldn't be too bad if you didn't get replies 3 hours before you
get the original :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software
Putting up with those
I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when doing
an Exchange-aware NTbackup backup, or if the databases are already
compressed?
I have a 12GB capacity DDS3 tape drive that I use to do on-line backups of
my Exchange server. I have made sure that I am either using the
I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook
2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta,
exchange 5.5, client outlook 98,2000 (mapi, NOT pop3).
User sends pre-made message, it looks like the copy that is supposed
to go to sent items winds up in the outbox.
User clicks send, message is received by recipient, but seems to be
stranded in the outbox. I caught one in action and looked -
Roger,
Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the
EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the email. Not
make a copy. As for it not being a product issue, when have you ever
seen a Microsoft product that was not buggy? I've been using Microsoft's
I used to back up a 17GB+ Priv on a DDS3 tape drive without spanning tapes.
Something must be wrong with either the tape HW or the driver you are using.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does the tape drive support it?
- Original Message -
From: Jim Helfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: NTbackup hardware compression ?
I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when doing
I've got Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 98 and I've exported and imported Public
Folders to PSTs many times. However, I'm trying to export some Public
Folders now so that we can retire them to tape and remove them from the
system and I'm getting the following error:
Some items could not be copied.
Get a copy of cleansweep from the resource kit, install it, blow away your
rules and recreate them. If that doesn't work, rebuild your Outlook profile.
Otherwise, if you're absolutely sure it's a bug, call PSS and prove it to
them, not us. The fact that its not reproduceable by others lends
Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that, or
are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug?
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules
I can't get rules after it to work. - well, that is kinda the point of
that particular rule option.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 16:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Tried this and it makes
Hi,
we are using an Exchange integrated Fax solution and it is using EXE files
for the custom forms.
We blocked with our AV (Symantec) the transfer of EXE,COM. VBS ... files.
The vendor says that's the way there forms are and we basically have to live
with it.
I would like to know if it is commopn
Here is my issue, the laptop is brand new, the install of Outlook 2002
is brand new, the rules created were brand new on a new profile. This
is why I say it is a bug. No I am not so 'blinded' by my presumption
that it is a bug to try other peoples ideas. That is why I wrote here.
After seeing
2 cents..Sounds like you are using Faxination.
I ran into the same thing... I was running NAI 4.5 on the exch55 box.
NAI tech support, came up with a reg hack to exclude said exe files.
thus the app then was able to work correctly with OL thru Exch.
Id say call Symantec and see if they can do the
2 more cent's
I personally I never depend on the mass installed OS's loaded from the
hardware vendor..As I have run into more errors with these factory
installs then if I reload the whole thing fresh...
Me Id blow it away load fresh..then see
bill
-Original Message-
From: Scoles,
I believe this was done fresh at the company here Of course there's
the argument that ghosted installs suck too. ;) Seriously, I don't know
where the problem could lie. If I had the option to redo the install on
the laptop I would, but as it is my third day here and I'm not an
internal
You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only', does
that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why?
On 1/17/03 10:06, Scoles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
My apologies for not relaying these results. It still fails. I
even tried creating a whole
I'm moving a 5.5 server from one machine to another. I've followed the EC
Move Server steps from the FAQ and all _seems_ good. I've rehomed the public
folders, added the replicas, moved all mailboxes and followed the MSKB on
removing the fist server in a site.
Now I'm up to the point of REMOVING
Make sure your IS deleted item retention is set correctly on the new server
before you do the move. I just lost my delete item restore ability since I
hadn't changed the default of 0. I've now changed the default.
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800
Floss every night.
- Original Message -
From: Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM
Subject: Something to add to the EC Move server method
Make sure your IS deleted item retention is set correctly on
Chris,
I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only...
This is the process I used to create the rules:
Tools -- Rules Wizard -- New
Selected 'Start from blank rule'
Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a contact in my PAB
to meet this critieria.
Selected 'Move
So you see them all under the instances tab on the pub info store properties
for the new server?
- Original Message -
From: Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: EC 5.5 Move Server Method -
Thanks, I'll check my drivers hardware. I'm using either a Sony
SDT-9000, or an HP Surestore, so I'm fairly confident that at least the
Surestore should be able to do hardware compression.
Jim Helfer
Aaron Brasslett wrote:
I used to back up a 17GB+ Priv on a DDS3 tape drive without
Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a
contact in my PAB
Makes it a client side rule.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
Er, yes, I know that. What I was remarking on was the fact that Klez seems to know it
as well.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity
Epiphany is a period in the
That wound't be sufficient. As soon as I say move they'll show up there,
I'm looking for that warm fuzzy feeling that the data has actually moved.
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C'est la vie. -- Thanks.
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
-Original Message-
From: Chris
I'd think it shouldn't, but I've seen the rules wizard choke for a while
under a heavy load. Like logging in first thing in the morning and it trying
to move all the messages from this forum to another folder.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr.
shut down the original server and then see if everything works
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EC 5.5 Move Server Method - Public Folders
That wound't be sufficient.
Most perceived problems have simple solutions. One of the bad things about a forum
with this many participants, is that the frequency that we see complex or unusual
problems is sufficiently high that it tends to make us go looking for complexities a
little too quickly at times.
So, are there
You can open the DL and do a save as to a txt file. That's about as close as you'll
get without going the third party route.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Contacts
You
When I move from one server to another I find that comparing the public
folder resources at the server level gave me that warm fuzzy feeling. Easily
done with save window contents and Excel. I can spot right away any folder
that hasn't fully replicated yet.
And I always leave the old machine up
The file is there, but it seems nobody on the list knows about this error.
So i have to figure it out myself.
#2) Well obviously, a 404 error is Page not found at (this location)
What's so hard to figure out about that? Go to the location that it's trying
to access and see if there is a
Or get your account banned for having a non-existent auto-responder[1]. Or
have your account suspended for bouncing emails at a time when you've got
all groups set to no mail.
[1] Happens to anyone who types a bit fast for them, as far as I can tell
-Original Message-
From: Niki
Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant?
There is a KB article about that.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
I am
I havent seen a need to do that since Outlook 98.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox
Andrey,
I had this half completed as I was trying another suggestion.
Here is where I am right now:
I've run cleansweep to kill all the old rules. Still does not work.
I've just activated the Inbox assistant to see if this helps.
If the last step fails I will be blowing all rules away,
Should be 'to people or a distribution list' I think.
On 1/17/03 10:36, Scoles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only...
This is the process I used to create the rules:
Tools -- Rules Wizard -- New
Selected 'Start from
PABs are evil.
On 1/17/03 10:44, Scoles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger,
Does this make any difference? Other than the client has to be
open to process it? I ask only because my rules are no longer client
side (the rules don't specifically state this in the rule wizard as
Hi.
We are running Exchange 2000 in mixed mode. We are migrating people from
5.5 by moving their mailboxes to an E2K server. For various reasons, our
users on Exchange 2000 servers who use OWA do so by going to an Exchange 5.5
OWA. They can do everything they could before they were moved,
Chris,
You're a genius... I should have seen this from the
beginning.I was using 'From' and not 'To' to sort my messages. I
guess being out of work for almost 3 months made me forget some basic
Outlook stuff. Sorry to harass your guys with such a stupid issue... R
Roger,
Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3.
This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA,
they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their
credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their
credentials the second time, OWA works fine.
We had exactly the same problem in our environement and I found the same
so we added the default domain on the following virtual directories
folders:
Exchange
Exchweb
and the Public Folders Virtual Directory
And that seemed to resolve the issue.
HTH
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you specify it for
the private and the public store?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Users must
We have this issue, to wit:
Users are in the NT4 domain storedomain. E2k servers are in AD
addomain. Users use their \storedomain account to authenticate to their
e-mail accounts on E2k server2.
If we point them at a front end server i.e. server1 and their account
is on server2, it does not
Well maybe in this particular case it will solve this dude's problem.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
I havent seen a need to do that since Outlook 98.
-
Use CSVDE.exe and export the users from Active Directory to a CSV file (you can export
only the fields that are needed)
Then massage the CSV file to fit the Exchange 5.5 field names and import it into 5.5
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I cannot seem to find specific documentation on how you upgrade a webserver
that is only running OWA from 5.5 to 2000. Common sense tells me to pop the
Exchange 2000 CD in and run setup (followed by SP3) but I would like to see
some documentation.
Has anybody done this? Are there any pitfalls
Did you stop and start the service after the change?
- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA
We have this issue, to wit:
Users are in the
This might be very stupid but I cannot find any conclusive reference to
answer my questions. First of all my network: NT 4.0 PDC and BDC then an
NT 4.0 server running exchange 5.5. My plan is to upgrade the PDC then the
BDC to 2k server leaving it in mixed mode leaving me with one non DC nt
4.0
You bet.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Users must login twice to OWA
Did you stop and start the service after the change?
- Original Message -
From: Ali
When you ask if I specified it for the public store, do you mean did I
specify the default domain on the public virtual directory? If so, yes.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have set the default domain on the Exchange and Public virtual
directories. My Exchweb virtual directory does not have Basic
Authentication selected, so therefore I can't set the default domain on
it. Did you have to go in and manually enable Basic Authentication on
the Exchweb virtual
Exactly what I thought.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Users must login twice to OWA
The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you specify it for
the private
There is nothing quite analogous to 'only running OWA' in E2K, you'll want
to spend some time researching the requirements for and implications of
implementing a FE/BE topology.
On 1/17/03 12:50, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot seem to find specific documentation on how you
I have moved my old server to a new server and I noticed that the Private
store on the old machine is still a huge file..
Is it suppose to purge or something? I need some space on the box but I have
not shutdown exchange yet because of replication with the public folders
yet
P.S. this is a 5.5
Offline defrag
-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving from 1 server to another
I have moved my old server to a new server and I noticed that the
Private store on the old machine
If all the mailboxes are gone, just delete the priv.edb. Otherwise, offline
defrag.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving from 1 server to another
I have moved my old server
Especially if you had Mexican food the night before.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving from 1 server to another
Give it a courtesy flush.
- Original Message -
If that doesn't work, you might want to grab the plunger.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving from 1 server to another
Give it a courtesy flush.
- Original Message -
Thanks guys, I figured something like that but was not 100% sure
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving from 1 server to another
Especially if you had Mexican food
Can you be more specific?
Can you run OWA 5.5 against a Exchange 2000 server?
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
(602) 631-7486
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange
yes but not the other way around.
- Original Message -
From: Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Upgrading OWA from 5.5 to 2000
Can you be more specific?
Can you run OWA 5.5 against a
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
