I would FIRST just try SMTPreinstall, without reinstalling Exchange
itself.
Use the appropriate smtpreinstall.exe file from your Exchange Service
pack CD, see if that fixes it.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:18 AM
To:
Why not run a full everynight and then use something like Power Controls
to access the backup if needed? How often do you see yourself restoring
someones mail?
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:20 PM
To: Exchange
A googolplex is
10^1
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I would write a script.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berry Schreuder
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing SMTP addresses in bulk
Exchange 2000 SP3 on W2K SP3
Upgraded a number of Mac clients to the new Entourage.
Now when doing a send/receive, we get the following annoying dialogue
showing up as it gets roughly to the middle of the Public Folders. Never
saw it before with plain IMAP with Entourage 10.1.3 on the same
Was wondering how many people are getting hit with this at the moment.
Thanks!
This is a test of the disclaimer
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New Entourage
yippie ki aye
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Hello Friends.
I want to remove zombie accounts for an upgrade to Exchange 2000. I will
run the DS/IS Consistency Adjuster to complete this task. In some of the
articles that I have read about the DS/IS Consistency Adjuster, people have
experienced a complete corruption of the IS after running
What if creating a new Outlook profile on the client in question?
Phillip
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Client Not connecting on reboot of Exchange 5.5 server
Hey ya all,
Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not
that big or you'll be in for a long backup process
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
Yep, exmapi can obtain that data. Somewhat more detailed discussions of
where the data is held is available in the archives.
From: Patrick Scribner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:31:57 -0600
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Using NTBackup for BLBs sounds like an awesome idea, assuming one
doesn't want to do them.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:20 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Windows 2000 Backup
Subject: RE: Windows 2000
Good point. Although does that really delete the tombstoned object or not?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
IMNSHO upgrading to W2K at this point is a waste of time. If you're going to
upgrade, upgrade to E2K3. It greatly simplifies the upgrade process from
Exchange 5.5 and offers a number of significant enhancement which make it a
much more compelling upgrade story than E2K.
From: Dickenson, Steven
It is worthless for downloading; I checked myself after the first email
after thinking about it. I'm a bit surprised your rep couldn't tell you
about your licensing. Sorry for the lack of detail - it's been a long
week already. After two years of layoffs our ratio of servers to admins
is around
It should be run off hours, but I have run it during the day before with
no bad results. I did it at lunch time, though.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KCC
You guys
When you add an SMTP address to a recipient policy it adds the addresses
to all selected users. How can I remove an (or all) SMTP addresses for all
users?
Berry
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Yeah, but they're still never showing anything good and the popcorn is
overpriced.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Gosh, some companies are truly humorless, aren't they...
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep
on Wi n2003 Domain?)
No
Hi friends,
Do you know about of any software for manage List group ( free/cheaper) . No
hotmail or yahoo.
TIA,
LB.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Server
I have several 5.5 servers that have this problem, too, primarily when the
client is Outlook XP (same workstations did not have an access problem under
Outlook 2000). The clients are on the LAN, and the 5.5 servers are NOT
multi-homed or clustered. Been looking for a solution myself, but haven't
They don't have to be in place upgrades correct? We can bring in a new
Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
consider this
Ive got the trend suite + IMSS (SMTP gateway product)
Now beside's Martin's list of danger (See FAQ) Ive add a bunch of other
stuff.
i.e. Ive set it pretty aggressively.
here's what I came into this morning:
,
--
From: System Attendant
Sent: Tuesday, August 05,
Dear sir,
Current web server = IIS4.0 running on NT 4.0 member server with OS SP6a
installed
Application running = Exchange Outlook Web Server with Exchange SP4
installed
Ever since I loaded all latest patches and hotfixes from Windows
Updates, I find the WWW service randomly stop running a few
I'm starting to plan for my 5.5/W2K to E2K3/W2K3 migration. We currently use
NTBackup to backup 5.5 on W2K, and it's great. My assumption is that W2K3's
NTBackup will backup E2K3, but I don't want to assume and I'm not to the
testing stage yet. It that a safe assumption?
Will W2K3's NTBackup
How many 5.5 servers are in your site?
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KCC
Will it take a long time? I have a 19Gb IS.
Thanks again.
Samantha
-Original
I don't doubt it. That makes perfect business sense.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for
the
27 matches
Mail list logo
