Exchange 2k sp3. A user went over our storage limits and cant send. I
changed her account so she doesn't have any limits until she sends out
these important emails while she is on the road. The exchange server
isn't reflecting the change though even after I ran the RUS with no
errors? Any
Does this fit the bill?
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327378
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 15 August 2003 14:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Storage limts not working
Subject: Storage limts not working
Exchange
I'd advise you to try Symantec's Knowledge Base:
http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/
I'd also advise you to look in the event logs on the affected machines for
any clues.
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sanderson Townend Gilbert
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst
That would probably be it.. Thanks, didn't see that one. I tried to
run the post SP3 patch, but it hosed my server and had to roll back out.
Restarting the IS is not an option so I guess they are screwed.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
We did add this to our reroute box, hit apply and OK, then restarted the
IMC service. It still doesn't work. However, I am wondering if I need
to go into raw mode to adjust the routing tab address? I will try this
later today. Thanks for the help.
Damian Scoles
Senior Technical Analyst
MCSE+I,
Hmmm,
I spent a fair amount of time trying to make this work in MSX 5.5, and
could never make it work. I was told by various members of this list
that it just was not supported.
I'll admit that I've never seen Q194742, though.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
We have reached a point where we must upgrade from Backup Exec 8.6 to
Backup Exec 9.0 for the entire organization. Backup Exec 8.6 doesn't
support Windows 2003. We have 2 backup servers that perform backups.
The backup agent must be upgrade on all our servers. Sadly, this
requires the 8.6
Do you know of any good 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs ( they use
Brightmail)?
TIA
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
MessageLabs
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, August 15, 2003 9:49 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail)
Subject: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail)
Do you know
GFI has a decent one. Also gives you a few more features like autoreply disclaimers
as well.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs
Our company is testing Microsoft's CRM application, the problem we seem to
be having deals with the CRM router service. We can send email through
the CRM and recieve via Outlook but the message never makes it back to
CRM. We currently have an escalated case with Microsoft and they have yet
to
I have 3 field offices with about 80 users each, that currently have HP E60 servers
deployed running Exchange 5.5 with no complaints. Those servers are P3
500 single cpu's, with 512mb ram, and 4 18.2GB 7200rpm disks running raid 5. Currently
we don't have any speed issues.
To simplify our
Ahh - that's part of your problem then.
The reroute option means you're going to have to add [x.x.x.x] as a valid
inbound address, in the same place as the domain name is now.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems
I have to admit that Trend does tend to be the better product out there
(from what I have heard and seen). I know Groupshield at a VERY intimate
level (more then I would like to admit on this list) and I would recommend
staying away from it personally. One thing to point out about Trend (and
any
IIRC the reroute via store option may have some effect on the ability to
scan bridgehead traffic. For my org, pricing for most Exchange AV
products has historically been per seat rather than per server. YMMV
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday,
We are using Exchange 5.5 on nt4.0 on 6 different domains(really sad)
We have a calendar created on public folder store on a server in the
eastern time zone on one domain. The users use it to show when different
technology users will be off for the day or sick. We have a user adding an
appointment
Just wanted to make this point because I have seen a number
of companies
paying for licenses for an Exchange AV solution on a bridgehead server
that uses the AVAPI.
You're obviously not intimately familiar with Trend's licensing model.;)
They license on a per user not per machine basis.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, at 9:48am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know of any good 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs ...
My ISP at home uses Postini (www.postini.com). They seem to do a good
job. No idea if they are what you're looking for.
--
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The
Your right...I'm not (I honestly forgot what the model was)but
another way to approach it would be to say it is a piece of software
installed on a server that does not need to be :-).
I suppose my post should have been based on that as opposed to the
licensing model (which I did not mean to
Well, a -to- appointment in Mountain Time would be 0200-0200 Eastern
Time. You can check this, but I think the newest versions of Outlook handle
this better.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original
We added the [x.x.x.x] to the IMC and it worked fine. Apparently there
was some miscommunication about what to put in the box and x.x.x.x was
entered the first time. Now the client is off the blacklist. FYI, even
though the MS article says the Exchange admin program strips off the [],
it did not
I have been able to set permissions on individual folders (delegate
access) using ACL and CDO 1.21. I have also been able to set 'Mailbox
permissions' for the entire mailbox using CDOEXM (sp2 and up) with the
MailboxRights property. My question is can I set folder permissions with
CDOEXM? or
Matt,
Yes, we had a problem with BE 9.0 on our E2K SP3/W2K SP3 servers. After
installing BE 9.0, some users could not access public folders and personal
folders that they could access previous to the upgrade. We thought we had
a bad install so we reinstalled BE 9.0. The result was the same, just
23 matches
Mail list logo
