Re-assign/ Move mailbox
SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
It seems to me that all you need to do is add the new AD account to the original mailbox and then remove the old corrupt account from the permissions. Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rob Hackney Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-assign/ Move mailbox SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
I want to know who I can call to make sure I'm getting my proper kickbacks. That's money I'm losing out on Deckler! Matt -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Oh, it's the same guy all right. http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is ridiculous. Do give http://www.infonition.com/docs/Briefs/The%20Importance%20of%20Ethics%20i n%20IT.pdf a read for fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? At only 88 pages, it doesn't seem like it would be the same guy. He used to have posts in this list longer than that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Bielby Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deckler wrote a book?!? For those of you that remember the early days of the list, is this the same Deckler that used to post here? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595289703/qid%3D1063417520/sr%3D 11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-3211233-4840161 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
Hi Nate, I have added the new AD account already and removed the 'SELF' rights from mailbox permissions however when I try and delete the 'corrupt'ad account, I cannot deselect the check box against 'mark this mailbox for deletion'. Perhaps this is a Small Business server restriction? Doesn't make much sense if it is. Thanks -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox It seems to me that all you need to do is add the new AD account to the original mailbox and then remove the old corrupt account from the permissions. Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rob Hackney Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-assign/ Move mailbox SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
It's okay to delete the mailbox if you have retention set on the Store. PSS didn't give you exact directions. Check out http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enfamilyid=9e52bafc-5c33-46b9-af14-04e4d989ef6b From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:05:41 +0100 Hi Nate, I have added the new AD account already and removed the 'SELF' rights from mailbox permissions however when I try and delete the 'corrupt'ad account, I cannot deselect the check box against 'mark this mailbox for deletion'. Perhaps this is a Small Business server restriction? Doesn't make much sense if it is. Thanks -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox It seems to me that all you need to do is add the new AD account to the original mailbox and then remove the old corrupt account from the permissions. Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rob Hackney Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM To:Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-assign/ Move mailbox SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get 10MB of e-mail storage! Sign up for Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
If you are running exchange 2000 sp3, you have an updated ADUC. Click on view and enable the advanced features. Right click on the corrupt user and choose Exchange Tasks. Remove the exchange attributes. Go into the ESM and right click on mailboxes and choose run cleanup agent. After it completes, the mailbox in question should have a red X over it. Right click on it and choose reconnect. This will allow you to pick the new account you want to connect to it. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Re-assign/ Move mailbox Subject: Re-assign/ Move mailbox SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Isn't that permissions/account modification information going to be in the logs for one of your DC's? -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Thanks to everyone who helped! I finally found out the culprit. Something very stupid to boot. Almost 200 out of 500 mailboxes had their primary NT account changed to another person's NT account. It appears to be totally random as well. The first person I had to troubleshoot on had the correct NT account as a primary as he was already logged in to Outlook when the script ran. So I didnt pick up on that immedaitely. Then when he logged off and could not get back in . . . we were clued in. I suspect a rouge WSH script as the developers have been working on one to auto create mailboxes via a web interface. So you know my next question . . . anyone think of a way to track this down? I see the 200 Informational messages from the DS in the event logs about account properties being changed, but not by who or what. Any other suggestions? Obviously someone is hot to know how this happened . . . Thanks! Chris PS I know about doing that work on a Dev Domain/Exchange server . . . I warned them about that but was vetoed! :) - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes There has to be something logging when attempting to login to the mailbox. Did you look hard at the logs? From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:56:04 -0400 So nothing was changed on the servers? Was anything changed on those workstations? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes cannot find inbox for same users via OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Mailbox Manager
Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Manager
I think Exmerge changes the time stamp of messages. Not sure open and look see. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:13:17 -0400 Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
I understand, but that's why I set the time to only be 3 days... It also is not sending any log files to my Administrator mailbox Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Manager I think Exmerge changes the time stamp of messages. Not sure open and look see. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:13:17 -0400 Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
I was thinning maybe a permissions issue but you are probable using the Exchange account to login and run. But since this is a 5.5 Exchange server, maybe something to do with LegacyDN. Are you running AD yet. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:24:25 -0400 I understand, but that's why I set the time to only be 3 days... It also is not sending any log files to my Administrator mailbox Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Manager I think Exmerge changes the time stamp of messages. Not sure open and look see. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:13:17 -0400 Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
We are running AD and I thought of permissions too I was just unsure where to start looking, because I am using the Service account. Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager I was thinning maybe a permissions issue but you are probable using the Exchange account to login and run. But since this is a 5.5 Exchange server, maybe something to do with LegacyDN. Are you running AD yet. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:24:25 -0400 I understand, but that's why I set the time to only be 3 days... It also is not sending any log files to my Administrator mailbox Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Manager I think Exmerge changes the time stamp of messages. Not sure open and look see. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:13:17 -0400 Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials
Thanks. This worked for me on the same issue, but I only had one user affected. __ D. DuBose Egleston Jr. Director of Technology Porter-Gaud School Charleston, SC 29407 843.402.4677 wk 843.343.9774 cell 843.219.0336 pgr [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.portergaud.edu -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials OL: You Continuously Receive Prompts for Your NT Domain Credentials http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b321652 Nikki I've actaully created a new test account to try and repicate this issue. The first time I tried to open Outlook with the new account the prompt appeared. After hitting cancel about 10 times, Outlook worked fine. Then, when I let this new account sit for about 1/2 hour the prompt reappeared. I will try deleting this profile to see if it makes any difference as well as look into RFR. Does this happen if the users create a new Outlook profile? (maybe something got screwed up in their original profiles) Outlook 2000 uses RFR. After the first contact with the Exchange 2000 server, it is instructed to talk directly to the domain controllers. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Nadine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials At this point there are no known issues between the clients and domain controllers. They are all running Outlook 2000. Then probably the RFR or NSPI component of the System Attendant service is misbehaving. RFR is in charge of arranging a meeting between a MAPI client and a Global Catalog. For some reason such a meeting is not taking place. Are there network issues between clients and domain controllers? =20 By the way, which version of Outlook are they using? If it is 2000 or 2002, then RFR may be to blame. =20 Outlook 97 and 98 do not use RFR services, instead they rely on NSPI proxy - the Exchange server talks to GC on their behalf. NSPI normally uses randomly negotiated RPC TCP ports. Have there been any port closures recently? There is a way to tell NSPI to only use specific ports. =20 Sincerely, =20 Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Nadine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials =20 Andrey,=3D20 =20 Actually at this point passwords are not set to expire on this network.=3D20 This will even happen to a new account that has just been setup. It seems to be happening to all the users connected to this exchange server, not just a select few. =20 Nadine =20 _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Manually relocate transaction log files
You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move (keep) the log files to another drive/server, and start the services. When you stop the services, all data in the transaction logs SHOULD be committed to the databases. I've seen KBs on MS' website implying it doesn't always happen ut it has always worked for me. Definately move the files and save them elsewhere just in case. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Manually relocate transaction log files
No way. Never do it manually, never. Way to often people move or delete their log files and hose the whole system. Next thing you know they are on the phone with PSS. Use the tools provided by Exchange to do the job. In your case, the optimizer. -Original Message- From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Manually relocate transaction log files You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move (keep) the log files to another drive/server, and start the services. When you stop the services, all data in the transaction logs SHOULD be committed to the databases. I've seen KBs on MS' website implying it doesn't always happen ut it has always worked for me. Definately move the files and save them elsewhere just in case. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Manually relocate transaction log files
What? I don't thnik so. From: Chris Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Manually relocate transaction log files Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:53:41 -0700 You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move (keep) the log files to another drive/server, and start the services. When you stop the services, all data in the transaction logs SHOULD be committed to the databases. I've seen KBs on MS' website implying it doesn't always happen ut it has always worked for me. Definately move the files and save them elsewhere just in case. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Manually relocate transaction log files
And how do you tell Exchange where to look for transaction logs next time it starts? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Manually relocate transaction log files You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move (keep) the log files to another drive/server, and start the services. When you stop the services, all data in the transaction logs SHOULD be committed to the databases. I've seen KBs on MS' website implying it doesn't always happen ut it has always worked for me. Definately move the files and save them elsewhere just in case. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Manually relocate transaction log files
You are kidding, right? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Manually relocate transaction log files You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move (keep) the log files to another drive/server, and start the services. When you stop the services, all data in the transaction logs SHOULD be committed to the databases. I've seen KBs on MS' website implying it doesn't always happen ut it has always worked for me. Definately move the files and save them elsewhere just in case. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PF renaming
Is there a way to rename Public Folders from the command line? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox
Hi Experts, sorry for my little knowledge as new to Exchange. Got inherited with some couple of Exchange servers. I want to know if its possible to create a new mail box and hide it and if possible all the incoming mails can be received or not.. Looking forward to hear from you. Senty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
Yep, Advanced TAB can hide it from the GAL (also means you can not access it from OWA). -Original Message- From: Senty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Hi Experts, sorry for my little knowledge as new to Exchange. Got inherited with some couple of Exchange servers. I want to know if its possible to create a new mail box and hide it and if possible all the incoming mails can be received or not.. Looking forward to hear from you. Senty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
You could take the work IT out of these kinds of statements and put in anything you want and it would come out exactly the same -Original Message- From: Joel Wampler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Well, to look at your point about a Pfizer certification, don't mechanics have different certifications based on what type of automobiles they work on? I believe there's a Ford certification and something else... I'm not real knowledgable on the subject. Matt -Original Message- From: Joel Wampler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials
I did find this artical earlier and all systems already have the correct values. So I'm still getting the same issue. Thanks. This worked for me on the same issue, but I only had one user affected. __ D. DuBose Egleston Jr. Director of Technology Porter-Gaud School Charleston, SC 29407 843.402.4677 wk 843.343.9774 cell 843.219.0336 pgr [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.portergaud.edu -Original Message- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials OL: You Continuously Receive Prompts for Your NT Domain Credentials http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb%3ben-us%3b321652 Nikki I've actaully created a new test account to try and repicate this=20 issue. The first time I tried to open Outlook with the new account the prompt appeared. After hitting cancel about 10 times, Outlook worked=20 fine. Then, when I let this new account sit for about 1/2 hour the=20 prompt reappeared. I will try deleting this profile to see if it=20 makes any difference as well as look into RFR. =20 Does this happen if the users create a new Outlook profile? (maybe=20 something got screwed up in their original profiles) =20 Outlook 2000 uses RFR. After the first contact with the Exchange=20 2000 server, it is instructed to talk directly to the domain=20 controllers. =20 Sincerely, =20 Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Nadine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials =20 At this point there are no known issues between the clients and=20 domain controllers. They are all running Outlook 2000. =20 Then probably the RFR or NSPI component of the System Attendant service is misbehaving. RFR is in charge of arranging a meeting between a=20 MAPI client and a Global Catalog. For some reason such a meeting=20 is not taking place. Are there network issues between clients and=20 domain controllers? =3D20 By the way, which version of Outlook are they using? If it is 2000 or 2002, then RFR may be to blame. =3D20 Outlook 97 and 98 do not use RFR services, instead they rely on NSPI proxy - the Exchange server talks to GC on their behalf. NSPI normally uses randomly negotiated RPC TCP ports. Have there been any port closures recently? There is a way to tell NSPI to only use specific ports. =3D20 Sincerely, =3D20 Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion =3D20 =3D20 -Original Message- From: Nadine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials =3D20 Andrey,=3D3D20 =3D20 Actually at this point passwords are not set to expire on this network.=3D3D20 This will even happen to a new account that has just been setup. =20 It seems to be happening to all the users connected to this=20 exchange server, not just a select few. =3D20 Nadine =3D20 =20 _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchangetext_mode=3D= lang=3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
auditing unread messages
Hi all. Are there tools out there that would examine all the mailboxes and count their unread messages, and if the number of unread messages in a given mailbox is greater than a certain threshold send a warning to the admins? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange COnnections 2003
So who all is going to the Exchange Connections conference in Florida? www.winconnections.com -Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Thanks, I did try it in a lab first of all, but was with an empty system. What step was missed? Exchange 2000 to 2003 - no issues. All admin tools working, no access denied message. Windows 2000 to Windows 2003, issue below. All AD steps were taken. Any Ideas? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clean Mailbox feature in 5.5...
Server - Exchange 5.5 SP4 + hotfixes on Win2k SP2 Workstation - WinXP SP1 I am trying to automagically clean out my admin mailbox from my workstation, using the Exchange Admin Console. Due to brute force spamming, this mailbox has over 171k NDR's in it that I don't need or want. They were received between 8/29 and 8/1. After highlighting the mailbox and going to the Tools | Clean Mailbox... option, I have selected a number of items as follows. - Older than 5 days, based on received date. - Both read and unread - All Sensitivity types - All message types - Delete items immediately Once started, the tool sits at 1% for a considerable amount of time and then it's 100% finished and goes away. The first time it ran, I got the 1010, 1012, and 1011 events in that order, but it only got rid of ~1,000 items. On that run, I told it to delete anything older than 15 days. I have since run it 3 more times, incrementing the number of days down, until I am at 5. Since the first run, it has only deleted a maximum of 7 messages at a time. Also, when logging into the mailbox after completion, it does not reflect any messages having been deleted. After trying to figure out why, I came upon these two items in the KB which seem to be completely contradictory...which one is correct? One of them HAS to be right...doesn't it? Or are they both right and that's why nothings getting deleted? What is the difference between the Clean Mailbox tool and the Mailbox Manager tool? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;180569 180569 - XADM: Counting Age in Clean Mailbox http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;188302 188302 - XADM: Clean Mailbox Command Cannot Delete Based on Date Received This seems to answer my question and indicate that I need to give PSS a call for the patch: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297686 297686 - XADM: Mailbox Manager Cleans Messages According to PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME in Service Pack 4 Additional info I've read: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305109 305109 - XADM: Exchange Server 5.5 Mailbox Manager Overview http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;258758 258758 - XADM: Understanding How and When Mailbox Manager Processes Items TIA, ~Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
The Mailbox Manager began using the Last Modified Date with SP4. You can add this field to your Outlook view to check it, or you can view the properties of the message. Every time you modify message (move it, delete it, etc.), the timer is reset. Russ -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager We are running AD and I thought of permissions too I was just unsure where to start looking, because I am using the Service account. Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager I was thinning maybe a permissions issue but you are probable using the Exchange account to login and run. But since this is a 5.5 Exchange server, maybe something to do with LegacyDN. Are you running AD yet. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:24:25 -0400 I understand, but that's why I set the time to only be 3 days... It also is not sending any log files to my Administrator mailbox Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Manager I think Exmerge changes the time stamp of messages. Not sure open and look see. From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Manager Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:13:17 -0400 Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
It's the assertion that doctors are more professional /because/ they don't take benefits from the manufacturers - which is false. Further, if a particular piece of technology is complicated enough to require a certification, then I'd sure prefer them to not only be certified on it, but also to choose to use that one over another. It's the assertion that lawyers are more professional /because/ they don't have conflicts of interest - which is false. The operational definition of conflict of interest is different in the law arena in my opinion. It's the assertion that /any/ association with a software or hardware manufacturer /always/ clouds your judgment and makes you an IT unprofessional. I don't agree that an independent board of governance is suitable guarantee of ethics or professionalism. I don't believe that a vendor's certification should be used as a measure of that either. Obviously there's lots more to this topic, but then that's one of the other problems with the short paper on ethics that we're talking about. It is too generalized to provide adequate information. And, yes, there's certainly history in the mailing list archives. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Pardon my penny and a half's worth, but any site with connections to an organization that has Social Responsibility in it, is nothing more than a front for some wildly left leaning, anti-capitalist, anti-business nest of hobgoblins. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, September 13, 2003 12:20 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Oh, it's the same guy all right. http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is ridiculous. Do give http://www.infonition.com/docs/Briefs/The%20Importance%20of%20Ethics%20i n%20IT.pdf a read for fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? At only 88 pages, it doesn't seem like it would be the same guy. He used to have posts in this list longer than that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Bielby Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deckler wrote a book?!? For those of you that remember the early days of the list, is this the same Deckler that used to post here? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595289703/qid%3D1063417520/sr%3D 11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-3211233-4840161 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2k multiple domains
I have to be missing something and it's causing me to go bald very early in life. Here is what I am doing: Single Exchange 2k Server domain1.com has always worked Have added new users that will be using domain2.com. DNS records are changed and pointing to the same server and are working fine. Whenever a user gets an e-mail from the outside the sender gets relaying not allowed. I went into the SMTP VS and added the domain2.com as granted. Even restarted the VS and still get relay not allowed. Now I have made this work on 5.5 servers for an ISP that wanted to use Exchange for their users mail server, but I must be missing something in E2K to make it work right. Any help, direction would be great. Am sure this has been discussed before, but I don't have access to my archives right now. Thanks in advance! The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
So to draw a parallel to the world of doctors, you want: A state licensing board for an IT guy/gal to call themselves an IT guy/gal. A state licensing board for every subspecialty of IT (programming, systems admin, network design, network operations, mail (Netscape), mail (Exchange), mail (isocor), etc. A state association that you MUST may association dues to, or face being listed not in good standing in their directory. (repeat above for each and every state that you want to practice your trade in, whether in person or via tele-presence). Not for me, thanks. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Joel Wampler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Hmmm. Oddly enough, I would have figured it to be the other way round; that any person who attempts to keep me from being able to do my job freely with no complications was a capitalist wage-slave owner, but's that's just my particular set of thoughts... Matt -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Pardon my penny and a half's worth, but any site with connections to an organization that has Social Responsibility in it, is nothing more than a front for some wildly left leaning, anti-capitalist, anti-business nest of hobgoblins. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, September 13, 2003 12:20 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Oh, it's the same guy all right. http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is ridiculous. Do give http://www.infonition.com/docs/Briefs/The%20Importance%20of%20Ethics%20i n%20IT.pdf a read for fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? At only 88 pages, it doesn't seem like it would be the same guy. He used to have posts in this list longer than that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Bielby Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deckler wrote a book?!? For those of you that remember the early days of the list, is this the same Deckler that used to post here? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595289703/qid%3D1063417520/sr%3D 11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-3211233-4840161 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usenet newsfeeds
Hello all, I would like to set up certain groups here at the hospital (most namely sci.med.* and Microsoft.public.*, but our ISP doesn't appear to have a news provider that allows push/pull (supernews). If anyone knows of free newsfeeds with push/pull, let me know! TIA, Mitchell D. Lawrence **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
That would automatically make him unethical then as well. He was one of the consultants that helped migrate our mail system (not my choice to bring in consultants). Walked in wearing a Novell jacket and a Novell shirt. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:12 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
gasp And how many NetWare/Groupwise seats did he force you to buy? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? That would automatically make him unethical then as well. He was one of the consultants that helped migrate our mail system (not my choice to bring in consultants). Walked in wearing a Novell jacket and a Novell shirt. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:12 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Please describe the issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
I don't know what your issue is, so I'm afraid I'd have to answer No at the moment. :) Perhaps you could elaborate? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe:
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
However, if he walked in wearing a Lotus Notes shirt/jacket you COULD question his intelligence. ;) Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? That would automatically make him unethical then as well. He was one of the consultants that helped migrate our mail system (not my choice to bring in consultants). Walked in wearing a Novell jacket and a Novell shirt. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:12 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To
RE: tony@lantzos.net - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
This one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: 15 September 2003 21:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? I don't know what your issue is, so I'm afraid I'd have to answer No at the moment. :) Perhaps you could elaborate? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a
Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
I don't think I explained that right; Everything was ok when the system was Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003. The issue came when I Upgraded the Windows 2000 to Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Why don't you re-run the Exchange 2003 installation? It looks like Windows 2003 setup over-wrote some Exchange-related stuff. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 I don't think I explained that right; Everything was ok when the system was Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003. The issue came when I Upgraded the Windows 2000 to Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
I would a) re-apply the Windows 2003 adminpak.msi and b) reinstall Exchange - specifically the admin tools. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:08 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 I don't think I explained that right; Everything was ok when the system was Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003. The issue came when I Upgraded the Windows 2000 to Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Thanks, I have tried that, the re-install of the Windows 2003 admin made no difference, and the re-run of Exchange 2003 setup, now comes up with Access Denied -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: 15 September 2003 22:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Why don't you re-run the Exchange 2003 installation? It looks like Windows 2003 setup over-wrote some Exchange-related stuff. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 I don't think I explained that right; Everything was ok when the system was Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003. The issue came when I Upgraded the Windows 2000 to Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
And you'd pay all this money just so that state board could aggressively ignore all violations of standards as medical boards typically do. Ed --- John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So to draw a parallel to the world of doctors, you want: A state licensing board for an IT guy/gal to call themselves an IT guy/gal. A state licensing board for every subspecialty of IT (programming, systems admin, network design, network operations, mail (Netscape), mail (Exchange), mail (isocor), etc. A state association that you MUST may association dues to, or face being listed not in good standing in their directory. (repeat above for each and every state that you want to practice your trade in, whether in person or via tele-presence). Not for me, thanks. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Joel Wampler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2k multiple domains
You need domain2.com in a recipient policy. Ed --- Steck, Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to be missing something and it's causing me to go bald very early in life. Here is what I am doing: Single Exchange 2k Server domain1.com has always worked Have added new users that will be using domain2.com. DNS records are changed and pointing to the same server and are working fine. Whenever a user gets an e-mail from the outside the sender gets relaying not allowed. I went into the SMTP VS and added the domain2.com as granted. Even restarted the VS and still get relay not allowed. Now I have made this work on 5.5 servers for an ISP that wanted to use Exchange for their users mail server, but I must be missing something in E2K to make it work right. Any help, direction would be great. Am sure this has been discussed before, but I don't have access to my archives right now. Thanks in advance! The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
What I'd expect from an Atlanta plantation owner. Ed --- John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pardon my penny and a half's worth, but any site with connections to an organization that has Social Responsibility in it, is nothing more than a front for some wildly left leaning, anti-capitalist, anti-business nest of hobgoblins. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, September 13, 2003 12:20 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Deckler wrote a book?!? Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Oh, it's the same guy all right. http://www.infonition.com/home.shtml And his age old arguments about how unprofessional we all are are now here: http://www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml Of course he's still wrong. His counterpoint to IT people being unethical compared to doctors and lawyers is ridiculous. Do give http://www.infonition.com/docs/Briefs/The%20Importance%20of%20Ethics%20i n%20IT.pdf a read for fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? At only 88 pages, it doesn't seem like it would be the same guy. He used to have posts in this list longer than that! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Bielby Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deckler wrote a book?!? For those of you that remember the early days of the list, is this the same Deckler that used to post here? http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595289703/qid%3D1063417520/sr%3D 11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-3211233-4840161 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
True for Exchange 5.5. Ed --- Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, Advanced TAB can hide it from the GAL (also means you can not access it from OWA). -Original Message- From: Senty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Hi Experts, sorry for my little knowledge as new to Exchange. Got inherited with some couple of Exchange servers. I want to know if its possible to create a new mail box and hide it and if possible all the incoming mails can be received or not.. Looking forward to hear from you. Senty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The question is, do you have anything to contribute to the ethics/book discussion or are you just hijacking this topic? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Sorry, this change in topic requires a new subject. Don't post a new question like this with an old subject line. The people who you might interest will ignore it and the people in that other conversation will be a tad annoyed at your interruption. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: 15 September 2003 21:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? I don't know what your issue is, so I'm afraid I'd have to answer No at the moment. :) Perhaps you could elaborate? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent
Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
Hello Guys, I have a server that I want to move OWA 5.5 to but the dam thing won't take the Exchange SP4 update :( Here are the specifications on the box. Windows Server 2000 SP3 1 gig of ram Dual Xeon CPU's Exchange 5.5 OWA installs fine to the box. It's when I go to run the SP4 update to Exchange that the darn thing starts erroring out saying that could not open File named This same Service pack install fine on my other servers :( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
I would, at this point, then call PSS. PSS= Microsoft Product Support Services. They are paid to get your system back up and running. Seems you've exhausted the quick ideas of the free support forum. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Thanks, I have tried that, the re-install of the Windows 2003 admin made no difference, and the re-run of Exchange 2003 setup, now comes up with Access Denied -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: 15 September 2003 22:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Why don't you re-run the Exchange 2003 installation? It looks like Windows 2003 setup over-wrote some Exchange-related stuff. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 I don't think I explained that right; Everything was ok when the system was Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003. The issue came when I Upgraded the Windows 2000 to Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. - Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:21:17 -0700 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access Exchange System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
Kinda sounds like a service is not shutting down properly. Try manually shutting down all services for Exchange then try. From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :( Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:18:33 -0400 Hello Guys, I have a server that I want to move OWA 5.5 to but the dam thing won't take the Exchange SP4 update :( Here are the specifications on the box. Windows Server 2000 SP3 1 gig of ram Dual Xeon CPU's Exchange 5.5 OWA installs fine to the box. It's when I go to run the SP4 update to Exchange that the darn thing starts erroring out saying that could not open File named This same Service pack install fine on my other servers :( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
I completely agree with you. I have progressed on the issue. I deleted the administrator local profile, now the tools work. However, I am getting a nasty message in the event log that suggests there is a schema problem... Maybe Ed can look at it ? Source EXOLEDB Event Id 111 Microsoft Exchange OLEDB was unable to do Schema propagation on MDB startup HRESULT = 0x80040e19 Is a Windows 2003 Server with Exchange 2003, recently upgraded from Windows 2000 Exchange 2000... Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: 16 September 2003 00:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The question is, do you have anything to contribute to the ethics/book discussion or are you just hijacking this topic? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past
RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Tony, If you agree with Andy, then why not do something about it and CHANGE THE SUBJECT?! themolk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? I completely agree with you. I have progressed on the issue. I deleted the administrator local profile, now the tools work. However, I am getting a nasty message in the event log that suggests there is a schema problem... Maybe Ed can look at it ? Source EXOLEDB Event Id 111 Microsoft Exchange OLEDB was unable to do Schema propagation on MDB startup HRESULT = 0x80040e19 Is a Windows 2003 Server with Exchange 2003, recently upgraded from Windows 2000 Exchange 2000... Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: 16 September 2003 00:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The question is, do you have anything to contribute to the ethics/book discussion or are you just hijacking this topic? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
I tried manually stopping the IIS services but, it didn't help. Outlook Web Access is the only exchange app installed on this box :( -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :( Kinda sounds like a service is not shutting down properly. Try manually shutting down all services for Exchange then try. From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :( Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:18:33 -0400 Hello Guys, I have a server that I want to move OWA 5.5 to but the dam thing won't take the Exchange SP4 update :( Here are the specifications on the box. Windows Server 2000 SP3 1 gig of ram Dual Xeon CPU's Exchange 5.5 OWA installs fine to the box. It's when I go to run the SP4 update to Exchange that the darn thing starts erroring out saying that could not open File named This same Service pack install fine on my other servers :( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
[My apologies for the cross-post, but this has the potential to impact just about everybody who uses the Internet...] As of a little while ago (it is around 7:45 PM US Eastern on Mon 15 Sep 2003 as I write this), VeriSign added a wildcard A record to the .COM and .NET TLD DNS zones. The IP address returned is 64.94.110.11, which reverses to sitefinder.verisign.com. What that means in plain English is that most mis-typed domain names that would formerly have resulted in a helpful error message now results in a VeriSign advertising opportunity. For example, if my domain name was somecompany.com, and somebody typed soemcompany.com by mistake, they would get VeriSign's advertising. (VeriSign is a company which purchased Network Solutions, another company which was given the task by the US government of running the .COM and .NET top-level domains (TLDs). VeriSign has been exploiting the Internet's DNS infrastructure ever since.) This will have the immediate effect of making network trouble-shooting much more difficult. Before, a mis-typed domain name in an email address, web browser, or other network configuration item would result in an obvious error message. You might not have known what to do about it, but at least you knew something was wrong. Now, though, you will have to guess. Every time. Some have pointed out that this will make an important anti-spam check impossible. A common anti-spam measure is to check and make sure the domain name of the sender really exists. (While this is easy to force, every little bit helps.) Since all .COM and .NET domain names now exist, that anti-spam check is useless. VeriSign's commentary: http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/implementation.pdf http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/bestpractices.pdf Third-party reference: http://www.cbronline.com/latestnews/d04afc52ae9da2ee80256d9c0018be8b -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
Not sure maybe shutdown any antivirus programs running From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :( Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:44:37 -0400 I tried manually stopping the IIS services but, it didn't help. Outlook Web Access is the only exchange app installed on this box :( -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :( Kinda sounds like a service is not shutting down properly. Try manually shutting down all services for Exchange then try. From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :( Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:18:33 -0400 Hello Guys, I have a server that I want to move OWA 5.5 to but the dam thing won't take the Exchange SP4 update :( Here are the specifications on the box. Windows Server 2000 SP3 1 gig of ram Dual Xeon CPU's Exchange 5.5 OWA installs fine to the box. It's when I go to run the SP4 update to Exchange that the darn thing starts erroring out saying that could not open File named This same Service pack install fine on my other servers :( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get 10MB of e-mail storage! Sign up for Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP
I need to create an automated bulletin board system using Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2000. It needs to be fairly automated with people being able to subscribe and unsubscribe. ANY direction would be appreciated. Thank you Ron PS: Users are in a W2K domain. No outside access. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP
Why not use Public Folders? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP I need to create an automated bulletin board system using Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2000. It needs to be fairly automated with people being able to subscribe and unsubscribe. ANY direction would be appreciated. Thank you Ron PS: Users are in a W2K domain. No outside access. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
