Will read them and try and understand them! It wasn't from a spammer
tho but from someone who wants us to sponsor them (we sell skateboards).
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 17:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange
Rather than use cable, switch to a business DSL provider that gives you a
static IP. Then you can use real DNS and you will probably see this issue go
away.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Exchange
Here take the one off my back.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: internet.com
Do I get a t-shirt?
-Original Message-
From: Walker, Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was kidding about this, BTW. Please don't contact Martin offlist and
inquire about his services. Sorry for the confusion.
You can't use your ISP's relay?
Your best bet as was pointed out by Ben is to upgrade to a business class ISP
and ensure that you get services like a static IP in a
It's, um, shall we say, a running inside joke?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:00 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: AOL is Blocking Mail
Yep, and I should have marked my comments to indicate that it was a joke.
I think we've all learned a lesson today, Kyle.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking
Sounds like a ASP setup you are trying to achieve almost. Check MS's site
for info on doing that.
From: Troels Majlandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange
Date:
Use Earthlink's SMTP server as your outbound relay. If it originates from
their network, their SMTP server should relay for you.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL
We have 2 domains: my mail server hosts the visionics domain and the other
one (PS08) the Identix's.
Any email sent to my user's Identix addresses get forwarded by PS08 to my
mail server.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November
Mongo change ISP.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
I would if I could.
Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable
Have you asked Ed to? :) *DUCKS*
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Martin Blackstone has an ISP you can use.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Mongo change ISP.
-Original
That's what I had suspected too. Now I have also noticed that the spam load
has increased tremendously
and that kind of coincides with these kind of problems. Every day I have to
go to IMS's Queue
and delte blank originator emails manually.
Does that mean the server gets so overloaded that it
That is exactly what I did, but I'm still seeing emails on the Relay
Server (Dead Letter Queue; Retry Queue) of those addresses I listed in the
DL. My DL has no members because there is no physical mailbox. The only
thing it has listed are SMTP addresses of users that no longer exist. Is
there
Hi Ronni,
I'm having difficulty understanding what you mean by alternate. I
created a DL called DEPARTURES, then under the EMAIL ADDRESSES tab of
the DL I added all the SMTP addresses of the employees that have left the
firm. Under the GENERAL tab, there is no one listed because there is no
What happens when you send a test message to an ex employee address on
the DL?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hilda De
Nigris
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid
Start searching Google for Exchange 2000 Hosting. There are a lot of
whitepapers about this.
Better yet - go to www.microsoft.com/isn
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
why don't you just make another DNS entry so that doamin1.com and domain2.com point to
the same IP on your exchange server (assuming you own both or they are just
subdomains)..
then set up your recipient policy on Exchange to receive for your new domain
then add the SMTP address to your user
http://www.microsoft.com/serviceproviders/whitepapers/exchange.asp
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange
More than one domain in the
Update:
This is the second morning that I have not had to reboot, everything is
running fine. I have no comfort from this as I don't know what changed
to cause the problem or what has changed to end it. I am back to running
GFI Mail Security and Mail Essentials. Backups were run last night,
Hmm, sounds like you have configured it correctly. You have removed the
mailboxes right? Not just restricted their send/receive or something? I'm
not sure what would happen in that case.
I only have the one server (and it is an Exchange 5.5 machine), so I don't
know if it is related to the
It sounds like you want to drop them at the relay server; not the exchange
server.
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
Hmm,
She[1] told me she has it working now. She had missed some of the bad
addresses and that was why they were still bouncing. But you are right, I'd
rather be doing it at the relay than on the Exchange box, if I had a relay.
Which I don't. Yet.
Ronni
[1] making a hopefully not unwarranted
The Relay Server is forwarding them to the Exchange. What we don't want is Exchange
to send them back to the Relay. When it does, they all sit in a DEADLETTER Queue and
99% of the time, the sender is unknown. Besides, 99% of these emails are SPAM anyway.
It sounds like you want to drop
Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them
in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX
records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to
their a/s and a/v software.
Paul Chinnery
Get your wallet ready...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti-virus
Has anybody on the list had any experience with
Then the instructions Ronni gave you will take of it.
-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
The Relay Server is forwarding
Seriously though, I hear it is a pretty good service, but the price is
outrageous. We met with them and quickly shot that option down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange
Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v,
dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around
$5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v,
it almost seems a bargain.
Paul
Here's the only problem I have with ANY service like that. It means
that I am relying on THEM to determine what is and is not spam, and I am
relying on THEM to scan my e-mail for viruses. I don't like doing
either - I would much rather be in control of both of those options. It
may mean a
Hey, if I had my way I'd drop it at the Relay too, but my Director wants
it dropped at the Exchange side.
She[1] told me she has it working now. She had missed some of the bad
addresses and that was why they were still bouncing. But you are right, I'd
rather be doing it at the relay than on
They must have dropped their price since we looked at them. 5k per
year? They based our price on throughput.It came to 40k a year I
think.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:10 PM
To:
I thought the same at first, but they do let you manage a great deal of
config. We just wanted to get a feel for what this kind of service
offered. We stuck with in house.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Friday,
I agree with you on that point, Ben. The spam part doesn't bother me too much but the
a/v does. It's a little troubling to give up that kind of control. And thank you for
pointing that out.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz
Really? Our price ranged from (and I haven't received an exact quote), IIRC, around
$2 to $3.20 per mailbox per month.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:17 PM
To:
We're a small organization (90 bed rural hospital) and our dept is, of course, small,
too. Their's just 7 of us and that includes director and supervisor. But because of
other duties I'm pretty much in charge of servers, email admin, patch mgmt, firewall,
etc. So, part of me, said hey that's
What are you running for those services now if you don't mind me asking?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email
Does it include the standard open relay option?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Martin Blackstone has an ISP you can use.
Trend for email and desktop a/v and we've got a budget for spam but haven't
implemented it yet. That's why we met with Sprint.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM
Yes, contact him offlist for pricing and further details.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Does it include the standard
Does it include the standard AB Open Relay option?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:23 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: AOL is Blocking
I think what Candee means is (I'm much too cautious to claim I know what she
meant), instead of letting them in past the relay server, have the relay
server send them to /dev/null or the equivalent in whatever your relay
server is. Then none of your internal bandwidth is wasted on sending them on
When creating new mail objects it is taking roughly 24 hours before they
appear in the GAL to MAPI clients. My first thought was the RUS, but I
have created some new objects and done the following:
1. Opened the default GAL object in ESM and did a preview to see if the
new objects appeared
Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's
because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a
night.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange
doh!
It is Friday right?
Thanks Steve
Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's
because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a
night.=20
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On this side of the ocean it is still friday ;)
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
46 matches
Mail list logo
