Thanks Ed. That's what I thought, but our security manager needed
convincing.
Our clients in this case are all internal to the organisation so I'll push
ahead with the MS certificate option.
Best wishes,
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Ok well T minus 4 wks for the exchange deployment and I need a little advice
/suggestions/ideas
for our field offices, total of about 15 mailboxes, I want to know which way to best
setup mail for them , the MAX they can get on the dialup is 14,400 kb, and from
Africa to
here I do not believe
With that high speed connection that you have to Africa. I'd say go with OWA. It's
only 15 users. The OWA in E2K and E2K3 are almost similar to having an Outlook client
on their desktop anyay. Just my 2 cents.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
High speed? 14,4not 144k as in the speed we had when modems first came out, we
don't have a direct connection to them ,their max speed to their local ISP
africasomething.net is only 14,4
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Not sure how feasible this is, but could you have something at the remote
sites like vpop that polls all mail for that sites users over pop3 they then
get it locally?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL
I was being sarcastic :)
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jean-Paul
Natola
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
lol :)
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Ecxhange for far far away office
I was being sarcastic :)
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this flaw?
-Original Message-
From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Johnson
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
We have
I'm about to implement Mailbox Manager for Item retention (something I
completely disagree with) and right now I have it set to Delete
Immediately.
Question if I do this will I these items be held in the deleted item
retention space until it is purged or do I need to change my settings to be
They should still be sent to the Deleted Items, albeit for the folder
they were removed from. If mail from that folder needs to be retrieved,
you only need make the requisit dumpsteralwayon registry entry and you
should be able to get it back.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317)
I have not heard of it...
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
Subject:
That's because Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix yet.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
I have not heard of it...
Ben
So you have seen this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
That's because Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix
I haven't seen any reports of this on any of the newsgroups or anywhere
else. If it was this big of a flaw, I suspect there would be a big
stink about it.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM. Some guy had to shut off OWA
indefinitely because of the issue.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
I'm thinking the same thing.
I imagine this guy managed to flub up his install some way or another and
now it's a bug to him
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
So to fix this, send beer to Tom, then to Martin, then Ben, then me :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue.
I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs have
no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist.
Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this?
-Original Message-
From: Erik
It's always Microsoft's fault.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
I'm thinking the same thing.
I imagine this guy managed to flub up his
I seem to remember something similar when e2k came out, and it was a
permissions issue.
Don't know if I still have anything about it tho.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange
Not that I am aware of. My boss just passed it on to me. I'm not a
participate in that list. I just thought it was odd since that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
It could be the poster's BAS.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
Not that I am aware of. My boss just passed it on to me. I'm not a
This is no bug. This is BAS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
Not that I am aware of. My boss just passed it on to
Ben, since you found out your server was not handling the RPC connections
fast enough, what did you do to correct this?
thanks
john
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting
One user is getting the above error message after logging on to OWA and
entering the Network ID and Password information. He gets the message when
accessing OWA from both work and home.
-
I have found various articles that talk about permissions on the WinNT and
exchsrvr\* directories but the
Added more memory :-)
Go through the counters though. What was my problem may not be your
problem. Our server supports roughly 180 mailboxes, dual P2 2.0Ghz
Xeon, was 1gb ram, W2K standard, E2K Ent. We added another 512mb of
memory and it has been happy ever since. But like I said, that was
Did someone just say beer Christ...it's Miller Time now boys/girls
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Friday,
I have heard of this issue in Exchange 2003 FE/BE environments. It does
not happen without a FE server or with a 2003 FE and 2000 BE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:57 AM
Posted
Thanks Ben, understand what is your problem may not be my problem but its a
start, should have stated that we are running ex 5.5 nt 4.0 and having the
same problem. The box exchange runs on is dual proc p2 400 with 1 gb of
memory with about 360 users plus its a PF server and has IMC.. This is good
The doc I posted is specific to troubleshooting Exchange 2000, but you
should find many of the same counters available. I'll see if I can dig
up one for Exchange 5.5.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky
thanks ben...got the doc and filed it away in my AD migration folder, I have
an old exchange book put out by microsoft press (notes from the field), that
I looked at after I read your email but it has nothing about rpc requests to
be used as a monitoring tool...
john
-Original Message-
But it doesn't say to not use RPC requests as a monitoring tool :)
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...
thanks ben...got the doc and filed it away in my
correct, but what would the benchmark be?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...
But it doesn't say to not use RPC requests as a monitoring tool :)
A whole bunch would mean it is too much :)
Seriously, I guess you could monitor it during a normal morning and see
what the average is. Then as the users start using the server more
heavily and receiving the waiting for data message - check the number
of RPC requests then. Then take an average in
thanks, Andrey
john
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...
A whole bunch would mean it is too much :)
Seriously, I guess you could monitor it during
At the network ID (Alias) prompt, ask him to type in his smtp address
instead, and then enter his userid and password. Any luck after that?
Cheers,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
people can you please shed some light on my scenario, I will be very grateful. Please
do let me know if you need any other info.
regards
irf.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office
37 matches
Mail list logo
