7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here?
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original Message-
So who all is going to the Exchange Connections conference in Florida?
www.winconnections.com
-Tony
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Microsoft actually recommends it a best practice to run Exchange 2003
forestprep/domainprep before installing the Exch2003 ADC. SO your issue is
something else. We have done this exact scenario several times in our lab.
Actually the lab is one server running VMware GSX, all 6 servers used in the
We use MMS and I have yet to get any of these spam.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody
Yes this will work, while not reccomended, is perfectly doable in small
offices. Truthfully I wouldn't do RPC over HTTP especially since this is
your DC also.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL
There has been an issue raised with the store.exe service crashing with
outlook 2003 clients being used in some cases. MS has released a store.exe
patch that fixes it. One exch 5.5 server out 36 we have had this issue, and
the patch fixed it.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information
Well I will be seeing you there then Ken, looking forward to what they're
presenting on 99.99% uptime without clustering.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
)
I have the perfect solution, go to:
http://www.dyndns.org/services/mailhop/relay.html
They offer a service to allow you to redirect smtp traffic across a
different port for exactly this reason. I don't use this specific service, I
use there backupMX service for my home exchange server. Service
We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working
great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging
Were you using IM on EX2000? Is there a migration tool?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto
Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original
Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are
going forward with this most likely.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2
For those of you attending let's get together Tuesday night for dinner and
drinks. Let's meet up at the Conference registration desk Tuesday after the
last session.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
*
Correct, the IM client is dependant on your version of the IM server, in
your case it's exchange 2000. In the case of exchange 2003, the IM server is
called Live Communication server 2003.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North,
Yes they can
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
We have both IBM Sharks and EMC clarions and they both have tested very
nicely, though I prefer the EMC solution due to hardware costs and more
feature rich functionality.
Anthony L. Sollars__
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480
We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 2003 without incident.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lori Sagert
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Diskeeper and Exchange
Hello All:
I would like
To clarify, we only run diskeeper on the OS drives not the drives that house
the logs and/or exchange db's.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Hello all,
We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to 2003 and are
researching an issue that an email admin here is having with the location of
the Transaction logs in our new Exchange Architecture. We are planning to
Deploy Quad-proc servers that are boot-to-SAN
the SAN running
on some form of UPS anyway.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Location of Transaction Logs
Hello all,
We
-identical hardware for cold spares in that kind of case.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Location of Transaction Logs
Hello all,
We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to
2003 and are
researching an issue that an email
DePants
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DeThong
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
23 matches
Mail list logo