In my lab I have set up two 1 way agreements. One pulls all items from my
5.5 directory and deposits it in an OU called Legacy as appropriate. This
is great because it saves me from building bunches and bunches of ADCs to
each site in my ORG.
However...
When I try to build an agreement to
it might be you. Let me know and I'll show you how
to advance the tombstone deletion time closer that the 3-4 days min that
it will let you configure
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
feed on better) as a low calorie, low brain snack? or is this just one more
example of a setting that you only find out about if you want to pay extra
(via time and effort, helpful places like this, or PSS) for a product that
works?
/Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto
Does anyone have any experiences good or bad with the AVAPI implementation
of Antigen for exchange 2000 vs. the traditional ESEAPI? I have been very
happy with the ESEAPI, but Microsoft seems to indicate that the AVAPI is the
way to go, though it doesn't seem to work very well on the 5.5 side
Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share for
disclaimers?
Aside from the fact that it seems sort of silly for Microsoft not to have
included this in the product except as a code example, it would be helpful
to us non developer administrators if some generous
wrong with the disclaimer you are using now?
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k Disclaimers
Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share
article
268343
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morrison, Gordon
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k Disclaimers
Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers
Sounds like it is the Bain of your existence...
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers
Other than it exists
It worked for me!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 2000 KISS
Are you sure? Have you done that? I'm not saying it won't work, but others
have had trouble getting that to
This may or may not be slightly off topic, but it is certainly hosing my
Exchange install. My server seemed to build correctly, and seemed to be
happy becoming a DC and learning all of the DC things there is to know.
Other servers in my domain seem to have some idea that it is there, but
Personally, I would add in .com and .sys
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: extensions to block
Ah, I noticed what was missing rather than what was excessive. Yes, we
allow .TXT
Thanks, this site was handy. It turns out that the issues was with the
initial AD replication from DCPROMO. When The initial replication happened,
not all of the required information came through. From any GUI perspective
everything was there, but if you dug down into the SPNs, you could see
First, if anyone has a good resource for the bits and bytes Enterprise
public folder architecture, I would love to know of it. I seem to be
encountering alot of difficulties in the area, and am not finding much
material describing exactly how I should be able to expect them to behave
across
or try:
XADM: Recipient Update Service Does Not Stamp Users and No Error Is Logged
(Q297124)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Address generation stopped with no event logs
If I create a new server in e2k,
and put it in a new Administrative group,
is there any way to get that server to show up in 5.5?
I can see the Administrative group - shows up,
but without a 5.5 server - for the config_ca,
I can't see how I can get the server - to appear in 5.5
...Any
Says I
I says to him
more patience is what you need
15 miles an hour - fifteen minutes a hop
and replication will occur indeed!
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Administrative
If you use Q262054 as your guide, you could:
Method 1, create an exmerge importer account, which does not have
administrative permissions, but does have full rights to all user mailboxes
(assigned at the information store).
Method 3, it will still work as you tried even with the deny check boxes
I have a mixed mode org consisting of 5.5/2000 servers.
If I want to add an e2k server into its own administrative group into my
environment, do I have to build a corresponding 5.5 server if I want my 5.5
users to be able to email anyone on that server???
Likewise, do I have to wait to remove
Here I thought it was just because they were talking and did a bad job of
pretending they were trapped inside a box...
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime
Is there any way to tweak the amount of time (or number of retries)a Routing
Group Connector is willing to go through before giving up on a message and
generating an NDR? The general SMTP settings do not seem to apply.
/Gordon
, February 22, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tweaking RGCs
The Delivery Report timeouts are set on the SMTP Virtual Server that
would generate it. It doesn't matter what kind of connector is used.
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Perfmon does offer total size of recoverable items, which would be
functionally equivalent to what you are looking for (i.e. how much space
could be retrieved if it were not for these tombstoned items), presuming
that what you want is not the total size of the database minus the total
size of
On our network we have many AGs
our recipient policy does as it please
my mail lives in MA
but when time came to take messages away
It said that I lived in Belize
For some reason our automatic recipient policies (which we have added our
message retention policies to ) seem to be getting
have you looked at disabling/locking/changing the virtual directory via IIS?
I haven't tried it myself, but I'm guessing that if you went into a lab
environment and tweaked the default website\exchange folder, you could
universally disable OWA without needing to manage individual users.
And another thing, If the disclaimer comes at the end of the message, what is the
legal point? The person has already gotten through all the confidential stuff they
aren't supposed to look at in the first place...
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
From reading technotes, I am supposed to give anyone associated with doing user moves
Domain Admin rights (q259426). It seems that this is so that the AD administration
can create a dynamic MAPI profile on the server.
Is there a way to accomplish this without using Domain Admin Rights?
I
While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind, I have found a kind of
interesting web site I thought y'all might be interested in...
www.couldmark.com
On the positive side, it so far has not deleted anything that isn't spam. On the
negative side, plenty of spam still gets
That should be:
http://www.cloudmark.com
As opposed to could-mark...
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Interesting spam filtering technology
While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind
Has anyone played with using the filtering capabilities of e2k to filter out domain
names and anonymous messages? A quick stab at it caused messages to stack up in the
directory lookup queue (though it did drop the filtered messages appropriately).
After removing the filter from the default
I am looking at adding PKI functionality to my network and am curious as to anyone
else's experience with the performance impact of it in a production environment. When
I added a CA to my lab, suddenly all of my servers were grabbing certs off of it, and
presumably using them. I would expect
I am looking at adding PKI functionality to my network and am curious as to anyone
else's experience with the performance impact of it in a production environment. When
I added a CA to my lab, suddenly all of my servers were grabbing certs off of it, and
presumably using them. I would
Environment:
2 e2k,sp2 servers in same administrative group, sitting right next to each other.
Problem:
Public folder are told to replicate between the two, while some obey this request,
other, impudent folders replicate none or a portion of their backfill contents. New
material appears to be
IS the website part of their trusted zones within IE?
Try having them hit the server by IP address and see if it works. If it does,
register the server with a second domain name in DNS (owabdi.cc, for example). Do not
include this second domain name in your trusted zones.
/Gordon
I have had a couple of reports from users this morning saying that have received an
email from people containing a link to an e-card at www.friendgreetings.com, when they
click on it the web site starts going through their address book and emailing everyone
an e-card on the user's behalf.
If you have subfolders that have different replica settings you need to be careful
with this, as the propagation will wipe out those sub-settings (unless they have
somehow fixed this with SP3).
i.e.
server a, -folder 1 replicates to server b and c
-folder 2, a subfolder
Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the
user mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
I believe ExMerge can only be run against
Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as
distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account?
E2ksp3
Thanks,
Gordon
___NOTICE_
This electronic mail transmission
Sorry for the repost.
It's Friday afternoon and I forgot about the thread topic field being a header field.
For those of you who sort by thread topic.
Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as
distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to
I have seen this occasionally with various 3rd party products (Anti-virus or Anti-spam
products). Do you have either of these on the Australian server? If so, which ones?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Molkentin
Sent: Monday, June
39 matches
Mail list logo
