RE: Backup rituals
whiskey. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Tequila! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 December 2003 16:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Real men drink Stout! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Oh yeah...I forgot to add that we do a full backup with Backup Exec each night. Also, beer is good for youG. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Totally valid question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Agreed. Particularly seeing as how I did weekly full, daily incremental, and am now switching Backup Exec to daily full as I write this! Tony, might I suggest a nap. ;) Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I thought it was a good question. Arch -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure. I've got my ways of doing things and I'm asking my peers if they have better ideas. If I started asking you guys how to add user accounts or What is SMTP, then yes, I deserve to be pimp-slapped. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600 I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Crossing fingers and praying is pretty cheap in my book ;) -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Yes, they do, actually. The problem is that my employer had no idea how bad their mail infrastructure (and everything else, for that matter) had gotten. They had no idea that their mail server was not being backed up. The problem is that my IT budget will not become effective until Jan 1. 04. I'm doing what I can to get by until the new year. As far as the brick backups, I am not a big supporter of this, but it was requested that I have the ability to restore individual mailboxes. After reading Ed never restore method, I'm a changed man! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Do they expect you to pull miracles out of your you-know-what? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment, video game reviews, and more here. http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
So I take it that your predecessor wasn't very far up on that chain either? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 That only works when you are far enough up the food chain to NOT get fired when the mail server crashes. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Crossing fingers and praying is pretty cheap in my book ;) -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Yes, they do, actually. The problem is that my employer had no idea how bad their mail infrastructure (and everything else, for that matter) had gotten. They had no idea that their mail server was not being backed up. The problem is that my IT budget will not become effective until Jan 1. 04. I'm doing what I can to get by until the new year. As far as the brick backups, I am not a big supporter of this, but it was requested that I have the ability to restore individual mailboxes. After reading Ed never restore method, I'm a changed man! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Do they expect you to pull miracles out of your you-know-what? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Best Practices materials
Tell them they are fired if they question your authority. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best Practices materials Write them all down and then tell them it's written procedure. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best Practices materials Why not share your controversial procedures and let us commend you or shoot them down? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pat karr Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best Practices materials Does anyone have a template for best practices when MS Exchange is being used by an org? I keep having to explain to users that it is industry standand or it's org. procedure that we do things a certain way but I don't have anything in writing that dictates those explanations. I would be very grateful if someone knows of a link or your own procedures manual that I could follow. best regards, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VB Question
does comadmin.dll exist on the server? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: VB Question Hi all. I am trying to understand why a piece of VB code works on my PC but doesn't do anything on a server. All I want it to do is to show me the names of all COM+ applications. I compile it into an EXE and run on my PC and it works great. Then I copy it to one of my servers and run it there - nothing. Here is the code - Private Sub cmdStart_Click() Dim oCatalog As COMAdminCatalog Dim oApps As COMAdminCatalogCollection Dim oApp As COMAdminCatalogObject Set oCatalog = New COMAdminCatalog Set oApps = oCatalog.GetCollection(Applications) oApps.Populate For Each oApp In oApps MsgBox oApp.Value(Name) Next End Sub Any ideas? Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VB Question
Basically you are missing the required libraries. Do as previous poster suggested and use the packager wizard to include all dependencies. Probably the vb libraries aren't on the server. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VB Question Just checked - yes. Under c:\winnt\system32\com -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VB Question does comadmin.dll exist on the server? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: VB Question Hi all. I am trying to understand why a piece of VB code works on my PC but doesn't do anything on a server. All I want it to do is to show me the names of all COM+ applications. I compile it into an EXE and run on my PC and it works great. Then I copy it to one of my servers and run it there - nothing. Here is the code - Private Sub cmdStart_Click() Dim oCatalog As COMAdminCatalog Dim oApps As COMAdminCatalogCollection Dim oApp As COMAdminCatalogObject Set oCatalog = New COMAdminCatalog Set oApps = oCatalog.GetCollection(Applications) oApps.Populate For Each oApp In oApps MsgBox oApp.Value(Name) Next End Sub Any ideas? Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: internet.com
Here take the one off my back. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: internet.com Do I get a t-shirt? -Original Message- From: Walker, Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: internet.com Join the club. -- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu Nov 06 15:43:20 2003 Subject: internet.com anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old? Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webmail
May I substitute rings for fries and add a chocolate malt instead of a pop? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webmail Would you like to Super size this order sir? _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webmail when i access my webmail i recieve only the parent directory _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
If I read the post right he isn't wanting to do an inplace upgrade of exchange but of the NEW PDC which is NT4. Thus an upgrade from nt4 to win2k server with AD and leaving the ex5 on the nt4 box. His problem is that he wants to know if he can rename the domain to domain.com during this procedure and not affect exchange. -Original Message- From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question DEFINITELY hire a consultant. I've actually been in this situation already and it turned into a 3 day nightmare with Microsoft Tech Support. The most important thing to know is that Microsoft does not recommend an in place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 and it can potentially be the absolute worst thing you do ever in your career. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other people's systems if they are using dnsbl's. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Bad experiences with dns based blacklists is that we are frequently refused to send mails because our ISP appears on a number of blacklists. -Original Message- From: Erik Renberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 31 oktober 2003 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Hi, I'm using a small free Exchange EventSink program called ORFilter. http://martijnjongen.com/eng/orfilter/default.htm ORFilter only checks the senders IP-adress against DNS-based blacklists but that seems to get rid of most of the spam for us and it's free... The software can be configured to only modify the subject (allows for client side filtering of the spam) or to move the spam to special mailbox or just delete them straight away. / Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: den 28 oktober 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Patch 2657.74 Exchange 5.5 Information Store
I am assuming negative -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Patch 2657.74 Exchange 5.5 Information Store Nehatibve? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wood, Harriet [CCS] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Patch 2657.74 Exchange 5.5 Information Store Does anyone know of any nehatibve effects from Exchange 5.5 Information Store Patch 2657.74? We are still using ex 5.4 sp4 and some users will be connecting via outlook 2003 See Exchange 5.5 hangs when using outlook 2003 client... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=829418 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=829418 Any feedback welcome, Harriet _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bogus Email
Whats to stop anyone from puttin in a forged return address? Nothing. Just like postal mail I can send something to someone and place someone elses return address on the package. It's nothing new. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bogus Email I have Exchange sever 5.5., and our naming convention is first name. last name. There is some one who is emaiing porno to users and is going by [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can he do this with out using our naming convention ie.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with OWA
You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser. Also other John Deere locations worked fine. Just this one was tweaked wrong and they admitted no fault. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OWA I have a problem with OWA on Exchange 2000 Server. Almost client login correctly at OWA, then the page begins to open and internet explorer 6 crashes. All the clients are Win2000 Prof SP4 with IE 6 SP1, and they are updated with the latest patch from WindowsUpdate. The event log gets the following entry: The description for Event ID ( 1000 ) in Source (Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: iexplore.exe, 6.0.2800.1106, datime.dll, 6.1.9.727, 0001260c. The description for Event ID ( 1001 ) in Source ( Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: 22873022. Other client, with the same configuration and whith the same applications installed, work fine. Have you any idea for the solution? Thanks a lot Klunk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with OWA
My OWA was in a DMZ outside of their org. At that company we did embedded design and programming. I had our OWA in OUR dmz not Deere's. All other clients and facilities we worked with had no problems. Just this one facility of Deere's was the problem. The work around was not to use IE. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the FW in the DMZ? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser. Also other John Deere locations worked fine. Just this one was tweaked wrong and they admitted no fault. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OWA I have a problem with OWA on Exchange 2000 Server. Almost client login correctly at OWA, then the page begins to open and internet explorer 6 crashes. All the clients are Win2000 Prof SP4 with IE 6 SP1, and they are updated with the latest patch from WindowsUpdate. The event log gets the following entry: The description for Event ID ( 1000 ) in Source (Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: iexplore.exe, 6.0.2800.1106, datime.dll, 6.1.9.727, 0001260c. The description for Event ID ( 1001 ) in Source ( Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: 22873022. Other client, with the same configuration and whith the same applications installed, work fine. Have you any idea for the solution? Thanks a lot Klunk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with OWA
It's where we put all our web servers and never had any problems until they updated their firewall. It happened for everyone accessing ANYONE'S OWA not just ours. So the problem wasn't on my end hence nothing I could do to solve the issue. I even setup a test box outside the firewall with exchange and owa fully exposed to the interweb... still wouldn't work. So would you have any more ideas since that one didn't work. This was 2 years ago... I no longer work there and my work around works. Basically not my probem then nor is it anymore. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA The correct work around would be to not put OWA in the DMZ Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Windows Server Systems - Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA My OWA was in a DMZ outside of their org. At that company we did embedded design and programming. I had our OWA in OUR dmz not Deere's. All other clients and facilities we worked with had no problems. Just this one facility of Deere's was the problem. The work around was not to use IE. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the FW in the DMZ? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser. Also other John Deere locations worked fine. Just this one was tweaked wrong and they admitted no fault. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OWA I have a problem with OWA on Exchange 2000 Server. Almost client login correctly at OWA, then the page begins to open and internet explorer 6 crashes. All the clients are Win2000 Prof SP4 with IE 6 SP1, and they are updated with the latest patch from WindowsUpdate. The event log gets the following entry: The description for Event ID ( 1000 ) in Source (Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: iexplore.exe, 6.0.2800.1106, datime.dll, 6.1.9.727, 0001260c. The description for Event ID ( 1001 ) in Source ( Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: 22873022. Other client, with the same configuration and whith the same applications installed, work fine. Have you any idea for the solution? Thanks a lot Klunk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin
RE: Problem with OWA
No and I am sorry for the confusion. We were contractors with onsite offices and needed access to our exchange from behind their firewall. Deere's rulesets were not allowing the transactions with IE and they denied any recent changes. Funny thing is it worked prior to one weekend when they scheduled Internet downtime. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA Scott, The reason I asked was because I thought you worked for John Deere at the time and that it was their OWA sitting outside the FW, that employees inside the FW could not get to. If that had been the case, then it was probably due to a misconfigured FW rule that blocked on a combination of outgoing port 443 traffic and network credentials. IE passes those credentials in the background to the requesting server. Mozilla does not. Since it didn't meet both conditions, it may have been allowing the Mozilla traffic thru. -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA It's where we put all our web servers and never had any problems until they updated their firewall. It happened for everyone accessing ANYONE'S OWA not just ours. So the problem wasn't on my end hence nothing I could do to solve the issue. I even setup a test box outside the firewall with exchange and owa fully exposed to the interweb... still wouldn't work. So would you have any more ideas since that one didn't work. This was 2 years ago... I no longer work there and my work around works. Basically not my probem then nor is it anymore. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA The correct work around would be to not put OWA in the DMZ Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Windows Server Systems - Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA My OWA was in a DMZ outside of their org. At that company we did embedded design and programming. I had our OWA in OUR dmz not Deere's. All other clients and facilities we worked with had no problems. Just this one facility of Deere's was the problem. The work around was not to use IE. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the FW in the DMZ? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser. Also other John Deere locations worked fine. Just this one was tweaked wrong and they admitted no fault. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OWA I have a problem with OWA on Exchange 2000 Server. Almost client login correctly at OWA, then the page begins to open and internet explorer 6 crashes. All the clients are Win2000 Prof SP4 with IE 6 SP1, and they are updated with the latest patch from WindowsUpdate. The event log gets the following entry: The description for Event ID ( 1000 ) in Source (Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: iexplore.exe, 6.0.2800.1106, datime.dll, 6.1.9.727, 0001260c. The description for Event ID ( 1001 ) in Source ( Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: 22873022. Other client, with the same configuration and whith the same applications installed, work fine. Have you any idea for the solution? Thanks a lot Klunk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Problem with OWA
Exactly, thus causing problems the problems we and other suppliers were encountering. They wouldn't even allow VPN connections to remote sites either. So we dialed into our network instead to bypass those limitations. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA They probably closed some of the gazillion holes OWA needs. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA It's where we put all our web servers and never had any problems until they updated their firewall. It happened for everyone accessing ANYONE'S OWA not just ours. So the problem wasn't on my end hence nothing I could do to solve the issue. I even setup a test box outside the firewall with exchange and owa fully exposed to the interweb... still wouldn't work. So would you have any more ideas since that one didn't work. This was 2 years ago... I no longer work there and my work around works. Basically not my probem then nor is it anymore. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA The correct work around would be to not put OWA in the DMZ Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Windows Server Systems - Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA My OWA was in a DMZ outside of their org. At that company we did embedded design and programming. I had our OWA in OUR dmz not Deere's. All other clients and facilities we worked with had no problems. Just this one facility of Deere's was the problem. The work around was not to use IE. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the FW in the DMZ? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser. Also other John Deere locations worked fine. Just this one was tweaked wrong and they admitted no fault. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OWA I have a problem with OWA on Exchange 2000 Server. Almost client login correctly at OWA, then the page begins to open and internet explorer 6 crashes. All the clients are Win2000 Prof SP4 with IE 6 SP1, and they are updated with the latest patch from WindowsUpdate. The event log gets the following entry: The description for Event ID ( 1000 ) in Source (Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: iexplore.exe, 6.0.2800.1106, datime.dll, 6.1.9.727, 0001260c. The description for Event ID ( 1001 ) in Source ( Microsoft Internet Explorer ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: 22873022. Other client, with the same configuration and whith the same applications installed, work fine. Have you any idea for the solution? Thanks a lot Klunk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Secure E-Mail
We currrently use the Certified Mail with the Mail Marshal package. It accepts site certificates from other servers so if you send to a domain that the 2 of us have shared certificates and they have a secure mail server... then all mails sent to and from those servers will be encrypted. Anyone else will receive an unencrypted email with a link to https://server.name.here/getmymail and asks for them to create a login and password for mail retrieval. We have it setup to encrypt mail when the subject contains the word SECRET. Otherwise all mail going through this server is unencrypted. Just set it up as your smarthost if your using exchange. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4 Gig's of RAM
About time someone learned how to read. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 4 Gig's of RAM I have a 2000 AS with E2K with 4 Gig's of RAM... 2000 AS = 2000 Advanced Server... I believe that to be a reasonable assumption and in this case the correct one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 4 Gig's of RAM Only applies if he is running Advanced Server. The /3gb switch should not be used on Standard server Eric, If you REALLY want to use all that memory, you REALLY need to be running Advanced Server, not standard. If you insist on running W2K Standard, I would recommend removing at a minimum 2gb. Microsoft recommends running Advanced Server on any server that has more than 1gb of memory. Reality is that running up to 2gb should be ok. I've got 1 server with 2gb (ISA server) and my Exchange server has 1.5gb - both are running Standard edition. I would not go higher than 2gb, as the O/S will not be able to take advantage of it. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:39 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: 4 Gig's of RAM Subject: RE: 4 Gig's of RAM Do you have the /3GB switch in your boot.ini file? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 4 Gig's of RAM I have a 2000 AS with E2K with 4 Gig's of RAM, I keep getting: The virtual memory necessary to run your Exchange server is fragmented in such a way that normal operation may begin to fail. It is highly recommended that you restart all Exchange services to correct this issue AND I DID. Is there any special memory switch for WIN2K and E2K for 4 gig's of RAM? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
that answer is valid. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address Yes -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address 2000 or 5.5? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 2:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: winmail.dat
There is a KB article about this saying that it has to do with Outlook and RTF. -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: winmail.dat All, We are in the process of moving from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (SP3, May Post SP3 rollup). We have 3 Regional Hubs to which all outbound SMTP traffic is routed through from downstream offices. My Team is getting numerous complaints of external clients receiving the winmail.dat files instead of the original attachments (hotmail, aol, etc...). This only happens to our senders that are from a downstream office. If we send from one of the Hub locations it works perfect every time. I think then we have narrowed it down to the X400 connector, as that is the only difference between sending from a downstream office and a Hub. We have the settings on Exchange 2000 connectors the same as they were with the 5.5 X400 connectors. Has anyone else experienced this? TIA, BM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: email distribution management software
http://www.msexchange.org/software/List_Server_Software -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: email distribution management software The Admissions Department for the College has decided that they have to do something to get a better handle on mass email distributions. About 5 or 6 times per year they will send an e-mail to 40,000 plus recipients trying to recruit the new Freshman class. In the past they have managed their distribution lists in a home grown Access database and then sent the mailings in small pieces because we used to be limited hardware-wise on the Exchange Server and our Internet pipe wasnt all that big. Those 2 issues are no longer a problem. Doing it this way gives them no real feedback on how many bad addresses there were, if anyone read the mailing, etc. They have talked with several companies that offer these as services but they are looking at $7,000 and up every time they put out a mailing. Im thinking we can find software that does these things for less than $42,000 per year? Does anyone know of apps that do these things that will work in an Exchange 2000 environment? Thanks! Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drives almost at capacity
Offline defrag of the exchange db. -Original Message- From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drives almost at capacity I am waiting for our new server but am almost out of drive space. I had people clean their mailboxes (probably 3.5 GB) but I dont see the freed up space on the Hard drives. What do I need to do to see the free'd up space? Thanks a ton to anyone who can help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
What if you set the attribute on the file as read only before sending? -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
It will however if it is posted to a public folder. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Jim, If I drag a doc into a public folder, then open that doc within outlook, edit it, and save it... it saves directly back to the public folder. I never stated opening it as an attachment on the local drive. However if I email that doc to the public folder as an attachment then you are correct in assuming it stores a copy in local settings/temp interweb files and that is the one that gets updated in this case. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments No...it won't. If you save an attachment to an e-mail, located in a PF to your HD and modify it, you are working on a new copy of the document...not the one sent in the original e-mail. Then once you are done working on the document, you reply to the original or post a new message, it is adding the document that was on your HD and is not overwriting what is already in the store...it's adding a second document to the store. The only way this would be possible, is if you were saving attachments off to a file server and including a link to that file in the post or e-mail. Then, if the individual goes out and modifies the document at the end of the link, it would indeed change the base document sent to everyone. But again, in that case, set the original to read only. Doesn't Office also come with a version control tool somewhere in the settings? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It will however if it is posted to a public folder. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
I am game. My review will be impartial since I have bothered reading your previous posts. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these reviews will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the pompous bags of gas will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k
Yes there is a KB article on how to do this. Search using Accessing Exchange through firewall or something of the like. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Unless I'm mistaken, in order to let a front-end server communicate to back-end server servers (exchange and ad), a variety of ports are needed... Including one negotiated port for RPC. Usually this ends up being 1026 on my server, but it's possible to lock it down to one high port and allow that port only through the FW to the internal lan. Yah? Excerpt: If you want the features that require RPCs, such as authentication or implicit logon, but do not want to open the wide range of ports above 1024, you can configure your domain controllers, global catalog servers, and all other back-end servers to use a single known port for all RPC traffic. For more information about how to restrict RPC traffic, see Microsoft Knowledge Base article Q224196, Restricting Active Directory Replication Traffic to a Specific Port (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=3052ID=224196). My question is, does back-end servers above refer only to exchange servers or all win2k servers on the LAN? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:02 Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Subject: Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Why the need to do this? - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k In an effort to sound stupid... What durn patch? For the recent RPC vulns? Yeah, done. Now, to lock RPC to one port, do I need to do that for all win2k servers or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange back-end servers? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 16:10 Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Subject: Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k just apply the durn patch. Sheesh. - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Quick question. When restricting RPC to one known port by adding REG_DWORD TCP/IP Port to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters, does this need to be done on EVERY Win2k server, or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange Back-End Servers? -Yanek. -- -- This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or its contents. Thank You. -- -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete
RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
I think the travesty is in your flaming post, but that is my opinion and I am entitled to one. What does his company's website have to do with Verisign hijacking unregistered domains? Absolutely nothing and is unrelated to the list. Your comments are unnecessary and directed as a personal attack. I would appreciate it if you would refrain from posting to the list unless you can contribute in a useful manner. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist Actually, the travesty is that your company is so far behind in the hardware/software options available when spec'ing out and building a new computer from your web page. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist My mistyped domain resulted in versigns page.What a travesty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 questions
I am looking for some software to integrate into my Exchange 5.5 environment that will allow me to send duplicate emails sent from any user to their assigned manager. Basically we have several people in the building who are abusing the company's Electronic Communications policy. We would like to track any emails sent from their account to be duped into their managers inbox. I don't think Exchange has this built-in. I do know it has it for incoming mail and I can specify multiple recipients for incoming but not for outgoing mail. Also would like to know of software to create better backups for the Exchange 5.5 environment. Currently if a user gets mail and hard deletes it off the system then it never gets backed up at the nightly run, same thing goes for sent mail. Do you know of software to eliminate that circumvention as well? I know there is software out there to do that... just don't know who makes it or what it is called. Thanks. - Scott Weston - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
It is in my book. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I thought the solution was alcohol. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
