, I found this so far:
The Ultimate Guide to AutoDL
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exch2000/whitepa
pers
/e2kwps.asp
Hope that helps.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:Michelle.M.Harmon;conoco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 6:33 PM
Does anyone have (or know of) any documentation for this utility? I've
already used it to find some messages in a corrupted mailbox, but what
I'd like to know is if there's some way to use it to extract/export
them.
Many thanks.
-Michelle
I got a brief response about AutoDL, but haven't gotten any useful
documentation or anything of that nature.
Does anyone have a good document on how to install the product? I've
followed the instructions given on this list in the past few weeks to
try to make it work but haven't met with
DAMN. That was GOOD.
Next project I'm on, will you write my docs?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Hence my assertion that the investment
Very much true, yes.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server migration
Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go
to E2K. True?
Regards,
Orin
A DC uses port 389, a GC uses port 3268.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP Issues
Exchange 2000 should not be using port 389 by itself since the directory
is now
My thoughts exactly.
Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth?
But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my
knowledge - cumulative.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange
512-322-0071
===
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
Joe, I really don't think
You may want to check their RPC binding order if you haven't done so.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q163576;
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Joe:
I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well. Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.
Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.
you to just try it, would you have just said OK?
Thanks,
Joe Rojas
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
Joe:
I know of *at least* two ex-PSS
, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you.
But unfortunately, not everyone works that way.
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
Did you try removing Exchange from that server from add/remove programs?
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group
I am currently running E2K SP3 and I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group
No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1
I think we all need cookies, blankets, and a nap...?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?
no sorry didnt relize that...
-Original Message-
From: Dale
And who the hell is Cartman and why should he throw exceptions,
anyway?!?
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
He knows, but is sworn to
I think we missed Hawaiian Shirt Monday this week too. :(
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Time blurred, what day this?
I mean, haikus are nice, but...
And the M drive. Always exclude the M drive.
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 1:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Protect on an Exchange Server
Actually this is right. I had Norton virus scanner and
Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Protect on an Exchange Server
And the M drive. Always exclude the M drive.
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL
Sounds like you may have cached DNS/Wins stuff in there. How long ago
did you remove 5.5?
-Original Message-
From: Piper, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Hodges, Mark; Parsons, John; Piper, Pat; Powers, Glenn
And he's all over that like a donkey on a waffle.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: RE: Can't view HTML emails
Holy hairy frickin' jumping albino radioactive post-pliestocene
Not for Exchange 2000, they won't. Neither of them work reliably with
E2K.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Poublic Folder structure export
PFAdmin or PFInfo I believe.. both
, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Poublic Folder structure export
Not for Exchange 2000, they won't. Neither of them work reliably with
E2K.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
If anyone has lost the link for RFC 821 (which appears to have happened
for a few of us), here it is:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt?number=821
Start reading at approximately page 13 for the subject at hand.
Here is an example _IN THE RFC_ of a _FULLY COMPLIANT_ undeliverable
mail
If all you want to do is make sure the public folders live SOMEWHERE,
then you can import the recovered folders to PST and then import them
into your production AD.
If you want them to go to their original homes, well, you may have to
wrestle with the Exchange 2000 version of Pfadmin.
If
Years of experience has nothing to do with knowing what RTFM means.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
You guys are brutal on here to newcomers. I've
26 matches
Mail list logo
