whiskey.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Tequila!
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 16:20
To:
Crossing fingers and praying is pretty cheap in my book ;)
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Yes, they do, actually.
The problem is that my employer
enough up the food chain to NOT get fired
when the mail server crashes.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02
Tell them they are fired if they question your authority.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best Practices materials
Write them all down and then tell them it's written
does comadmin.dll exist on the server?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: VB Question
Hi all. I am trying to understand why a piece of VB code works on my PC
but doesn't do
12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VB Question
Just checked - yes. Under c:\winnt\system32\com
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VB Question
does comadmin.dll
Here take the one off my back.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: internet.com
Do I get a t-shirt?
-Original Message-
From: Walker, Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May I substitute rings for fries and add a chocolate malt instead of a pop?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: webmail
Would you like to Super size this order sir?
If I read the post right he isn't wanting to do an inplace upgrade of
exchange but of the NEW PDC which is NT4. Thus an upgrade from nt4 to win2k
server with AD and leaving the ex5 on the nt4 box. His problem is that he
wants to know if he can rename the domain to domain.com during this
procedure
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other
people's systems if they are using dnsbl's.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Bad
I am assuming negative
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Patch 2657.74 Exchange 5.5 Information Store
Nehatibve?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Whats to stop anyone from puttin in a forged return address? Nothing. Just
like postal mail I can send something to someone and place someone elses
return address on the package. It's nothing new.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great
for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that
they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone
else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser.
: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great
for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that
they could
Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
My OWA was in a DMZ outside of their org. At that company we did embedded
design
to the
requesting server. Mozilla does not. Since it didn't meet both conditions,
it may have been allowing the Mozilla traffic thru.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
It's where we put all our web servers and never had any problems until they
updated their firewall. It happened for everyone
set it up as your smarthost if your using exchange.
- Scott Weston -
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Secure E-Mail
All,
Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E
OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member
service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy
sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send
SSN's and take patient care orders online.
-Original Message-
About time someone learned how to read.
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 4 Gig's of RAM
I have a 2000 AS with E2K with 4 Gig's of RAM... 2000 AS = 2000
Advanced Server...
that answer is valid.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a KB article about this saying that it has to do with Outlook and
RTF.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: winmail.dat
All,
We are in the process of moving from Exchange
http://www.msexchange.org/software/List_Server_Software
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: email distribution management software
The Admissions Department for the College has
Offline defrag of the exchange db.
-Original Message-
From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drives almost at capacity
I am waiting for our new server but am almost out of drive space. I had
people
What if you set the attribute on the file as read only before sending?
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
My users need to be able to save the document
It will however if it is posted to a public folder.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without
in
assuming it stores a copy in local settings/temp interweb files and that
is the one that gets updated in this case.
- Scott Weston -
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
I am game. My review will be impartial since I have bothered reading your
previous posts.
- Scott Weston -
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List
Well
Yes there is a KB article on how to do this. Search using Accessing Exchange
through firewall or something of the like.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Locking down RPC;
. I
would appreciate it if you would refrain from posting to the list unless you
can contribute in a useful manner.
- Scott Weston -
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
don't know who makes it or what it is called.
Thanks.
- Scott Weston -
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
It is in my book.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
I thought the solution was alcohol.
32 matches
Mail list logo
