that is the way I understand it.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Design Question
Exchange 2000 SP3
Windows 2000 SP4
I am sitting here reading the PDF Using Microsoft
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Posted At: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:28 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: OWA Design Question
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound to the
internet is 80
for
instance) to proxy the connection from the DMZ.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound to the
internet
: RE: OWA Design Question
It is my understanding that even if I publish OWA through ISA I still
have to open 389, 88, and 53(if we don't use host files) to our network
for authentication. So it seems that I will just save my self from
opening ports for GC Queries and RPC Traffic.
-Original
-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
It is my understanding that even if I publish OWA through ISA I still
have to open 389, 88, and 53(if we don't use host files) to our network
Do the users eventually get a case of keyphobia? :)
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
You can use ISA. It's not that hard to set up and works well
Exchange 2000 SP3
Windows 2000 SP4
I am sitting here reading the PDF Using Microsoft Exchange 2000
Front-End Servers trying to get a feel for how I should set up OWA
access from the internet for my company. Currently we have an Exchange
5.5 OWA server in a DMZ with port 443 open from the
I'd put the FE server with the BE server. Connections for mail will, in the
end, be across the WAN either way...
- Original Message -
From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Design Question
Good
Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Design Question
I'd put the FE server with the BE server. Connections for mail will, in the
end, be across the WAN either way...
- Original Message
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Design Question
10 matches
Mail list logo