RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-21 Thread Ed Crowley
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Yeah, that bugs the heck out of me. With your ISP, are you saying that this only happens when replying to a thread? If you send

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-21 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE
I get bounced either way (new or reply). *SOMETIMES* -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages I never have problems with a new message, just

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-17 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE
]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-17 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Another fun part is that sometimes you get the bounce message and your message still posts on the list. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-17 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE
. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:19 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages I've had that one happen too. I bet someone over there is changing things on purpose

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-17 Thread Exchange Discussion
Let me try ... -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I just sent a reply to the list stating that maybe the internet.com people had got their act together because

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-17 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I just sent a reply to the list stating that maybe the internet.com people had got their act together because I had successfully posted 2 replies directly to the list this morning. That reply bounced. So 2 out of 3 direct replies made it to the list. I'm

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Brent Wells
I get an e-mail from internet.com w/ subject: Internet.com format error. Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Red Hat Professional Services -Original Message- From: Brent Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I get an e-mail from internet.com w/ subject: Internet.com format error. Sorry, your stylized text

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread msharik
? - -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Hey, Michèle his mail system chewed on your 'è' ... when he

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Bob Sadler
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages You need to configure your server to send only plain text to internet.com. If your default global setting is set to send both HTML and Plaintext, you can either change that, or create a domain

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Really? Interesting...I'm gonna have to check into doing this :) Any pointers as to where I can find this info at? Can you do that reverse? What I mean

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Wells, Brent
if this gets through then thanks, if not, then, Oh, I guess you won't get it... -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Global Settings\Internet Message Formats

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE
Because there is something wrong with the setup of the internet.com mailing list servers that they apparently have no intention of fixing. It is a royal pain in the a$$. I have the same problem as you. I do not have the problem on other mailing lists running the same list software. Someone had

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
No, they aren't. I believe this is why the SMS 2.0 crowd went elsewhere. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I agree ... why can't they fix a listserver

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
an attachment, and kicks it back. Tom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages 5.5 SP3 if I send in Rich Text, it gets converted to Plain Text if I send in HTML

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Because there is something wrong with the setup of the internet.com mailing list servers that they apparently have no intention of fixing. It is a royal pain in the a$$. I have the same problem as you. I do not have the problem on other mailing

RE: ASCII messages

2001-08-16 Thread Ed Crowley
Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure out what