Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: K. Triona Guidry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 December 2001 01:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
At 11:02 AM 12/10/2001 -0500, Jon Hill wrote:
We also use NAV Corporate Edition on the desktop. Fantastic
Simply put it is so that if one AV vendors defs let you down,
hopefully the others will pick it up.
Hear hear!
If you are serious about protecting a network you need multiple layers of
protection that don't have a single common point of failiure. In addition to
the different scan engines on
Celebrate Diversity!
Celebrate multiple scanning engines!
-Original Message-
From: K. Triona Guidry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
At 11:02 AM 12/10/2001 -0500, Jon Hill wrote:
We also
. Triona Guidry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
At 11:02 AM 12/10/2001 -0500, Jon Hill wrote:
We also use NAV Corporate Edition on the desktop. Fantastic management
capabilities but Symantec tends to be late
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
Friggin' add http://navexchangeserver:port# and http://navgateway:port#
to your MMC console, then it's in there. Even
: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
The NAV for Exchange doesn't integrate with the Norton System Center
MMC
that it uses to manage the Norton AV on all the other workstations and
servers.
At least it doesn't with the version
:
|
| Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
|
---|
Simply put it is so
You can run AV scanning at the gateway; if you are using FW1 then TrendMicro
works well with this but there is no real problem running a reputable AV
product on the Exchange box either.
Most on this list will tell you Trend is good as is Sybari's Antigen, and I
have personal experience of
I use and prefer both.
I let the mail hit the gateway for a preliminary scan, then on to the Exch
server for a second scan. The gateway also can act as a holding area should
the Exch server go down.
If I had to choose one or the other, it would be a product that installs
directly on my Exchange
fuzzy feeling. Trend's eManager
product really is a small blip on the budget as well.
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
I use and prefer both
We have MIMESweeper between our firewall and our Exchange server. It's
great at protecting us from worms e-mailed to the firm. It works with
third-party AV software (we use Sophos but if I had to choose today I'd
probably go with Trend), plus we've set up rules to quarantine all files
with
Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
We have MIMESweeper between our firewall and our Exchange server. It's
great at protecting us from worms e-mailed to the firm. It works with
third-party AV software (we use Sophos but if I had to choose today I'd
probably go with Trend), plus we've set
We have one virus scanner on the firewall, a different one for Exchange and
a third for the OS. Hopefully somewhere along the line the virus should be
zapped by one or more of our virus scanners.
What it can't do is protect us from users with hotmail
accounts, etc. Two
users last week
If you have to choose one or the other, choose to load the anti-virus that
goes directly on the server( ie. ScanMail) The reason you would want this
instead of the gateway type of anti-virus product (ie. InterScan) is because
the version that goes directly on the server would be able to clean a
Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection
We have MIMESweeper between our firewall and our Exchange server. It's
great at protecting us from worms e-mailed to the firm. It works with
third-party AV software (we use Sophos but if I had to choose today I'd
probably go with Trend), plus we've set up
At 11:02 AM 12/10/2001 -0500, Jon Hill wrote:
We also use NAV Corporate Edition on the desktop. Fantastic management
capabilities but Symantec tends to be late to the party with their
definitions. They had defs for Goner by noon but didn't tell anyone. I
found out through this list (thank you,
16 matches
Mail list logo
