RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems

2003-12-12 Thread Crista Murphy
Thanks, but there is no problem logging in to OWA, it's only Outlook POP3 that requests passwords and only this 1 client out of 5 who also log in using POP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web

RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems

2003-12-12 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
I have seen this many times - Outlook XP freaks out and starts asking for password all of a sudden. Sometimes it seems to coincide with the company's change password policy (even if the specific user is set to never expire). Just change the user's password, log out, log back in and see if it

RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems

2003-12-12 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems I have seen this many times - Outlook XP freaks out and starts asking for password all of a sudden. Sometimes it seems to coincide with the company's change password policy (even if the specific user is set to never expire

RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems

2003-12-11 Thread Crista Murphy
As I said... it's set to never expire and it has not. She is able to send and receive email, she just keeps getting prompted for her password. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems

2003-12-11 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems As I said... it's set to never expire and it has not. She is able to send and receive email, she just keeps

RE: Outlook XP - Exch 2ksp3 POP3 Login problems

2003-12-10 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
The user's password hasn't expired, has it? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003

RE: Outlook XP

2003-10-10 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Seeing how any version of Outlook is specifically designed to work with any version of Exchange, and this relationship has been historically proven, I would bet that the problem is not with Outlook. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original

RE: Outlook XP

2003-10-10 Thread Arlo Clizer
Sounds like a dns or name resolution problem. I've had to install a little add-on for WINS on PDAs. What OS is the PDA using? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP NT4sp6a

RE: Outlook XP

2003-10-10 Thread Ben Winzenz
Make sure that his Outlook XP has the Windows Messenger component unchecked. Tools, Options, Other - uncheck the Messenger thing. See if that helps. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP

2003-10-10 Thread Dolphin, Jeff
I'm using Outlook XP with Exchange 5.5 right now as I type. No problems at all...Except if you count that my Exchange server version is as old as dirt! -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Outlook XP on E2K

2003-09-16 Thread Kim Schotanus
Message- From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 12 september 2003 21:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP on E2K I currently have a few users whose outlook blocks there PC's on regular intervals (in that case OUTLOOK.EXE is peaking for 4-5 minutes at 98

Re: Outlook XP on E2K

2003-09-16 Thread Andy David
Set the format to Plain Text and see if that helps. - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:59 AM Subject: RE: Outlook XP on E2K Nope, they are set to HTML, Instant messaging is disabled

Re: Outlook XP on E2K

2003-09-12 Thread Andy David
Apply Latest Office and OS Patches and make sure they do not have the IM thing enabled in Outlook ( Tools/Options/Something) - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:49 PM Subject: Outlook XP

RE: Outlook XP on E2K

2003-09-12 Thread Arlo Clizer
Yes, that instant messaging item can cause tons of problems. Disable it straight away. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP on E2K Apply Latest Office and OS Patches

RE: Outlook XP on E2K

2003-09-12 Thread Juancho Ciocon
Hi, Kim: Start with the basics: can you recreate the problem on your machine? Verify this further by having a user with the problem log onto a machine of a user that doesn't have the problem. That said, Andy's answer about the latest Office SPs warrant more serious consideration. When did it

RE: Outlook XP on E2K

2003-09-12 Thread PF: Exchange
I currently have a few users whose outlook blocks there PC's on regular intervals (in that case OUTLOOK.EXE is peaking for 4-5 minutes at 98%) and in other instances they cannot use the buttons in the toolbar (reply etc) Make sure they are not using MS Word as an email editor. I am

RE: Outlook XP Licensing

2003-06-05 Thread Neil Hobson
AFAIK, yes, since you're using E2k. If you were 5.5, then no. Neil -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 June 2003 15:50 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Outlook XP Licensing Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient

RE: Outlook XP Licensing

2003-06-05 Thread Roger Seielstad
In general, yes, that is how the Exchange CAL license reads. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June

Re: Outlook XP Licensing

2003-06-05 Thread David N. Precht
Contact MS Licensing. They are the true source. - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:50 Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to

RE: Outlook XP

2003-03-22 Thread Ben Schorr
What error messages, if any, do you get? Did it ever work? Are they on the same network or are you connecting via LAN? Anything in your event logs? Do you have other Outlook clients that can connect to that server successfully? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-06 Thread Stidley, Joel
XP Actually, they ran out of Coors and Coors Lite.. ;) -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Plenty of beer there. Tech Ed this year they ran out. Pissed a lot of folks

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Andy David
Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Myles, Damian
Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Myles, Damian
Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Who's Mark? I do have it enabled yes. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Andy David
That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his install. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Stevens, Dave
we have seen no difference moving to XP from 98. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Andy David
Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Robert Moir
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. And Outlook 2002 SP1 too? - I think that's where the issue was fixed; IIRC it's a client issue not a server one

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Yeah, we are running SP1. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
OK, well...I'm running Office XP SP-1 also. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
Outlook XP Version (10.3513-3501) SP-1 Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Yeah, we are running SP1. -Original Message

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
10.3513.3501 not a - (sorry) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Outlook XP Version (10.3513-3501) SP-1 Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Myles, Damian
Are you both running in native mode Win2k and Ex2K ? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 14:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Yeah, we are running SP1. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Running Native for Windows, Mixed for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Are you both running in native mode Win2k and Ex2K ? -Original Message- From

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
Mixed. (Just haven't pulled the plug) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Running Native for Windows, Mixed for Exchange

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Roger Seielstad
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Bob Razler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: I noticed that when you have it set to allow for working offline, Outlook XP is very slow. I suppose because it's always copying everything locally as well as on the server. It just seems a lot slower then previous versions.

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Myles, Damian
: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Michael
, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
A beer at MEC will be fine. :) -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Andy David
Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need this update. Im on XP here. What O/S are you using? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
Plenty of beer there. Tech Ed this year they ran out. Pissed a lot of folks off. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP A beer at MEC

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
Subject: RE: Outlook XP Win XP and Office XP Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Bob Razler
, May 03, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need this update. Im on XP here. What O/S are you using? - -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK, you need it irrespective of OS. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Every time one of my users get Outlook XP, there are problems. Outlook 2000 was much better -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
I have found Outlook XP to be substantially better. Have you applied SP1 and the hotfix I mentioned? Tom. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Every time one of my

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Avi Smith-Rapaport
which patch? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have) Thank you

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Andy David
Not according the website: http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/oxpauiu.aspx -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK, you

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Very curious. Everywhere else only says OL2002. Hm -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Not according the website: http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002

RE: Outlook XP

2002-05-03 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
This one. http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/oxpauiu.aspx Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP which patch? -Original

RE: Outlook XP Home Edition

2002-03-19 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Home Edition will work fine. -Original Message- From: Peter Blouin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Home Edition I have a dialup user who needs to run Outlook at home and is connecting to Exchange 5.5 server.

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread John Q Jr.
I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar. I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec. UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar. So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread Daniel Chenault
Where are the three users located, server-wise and network-wise? - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar I am attempting to figure out why a user can

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread John Q Jr.
Ohh man, What meant to say was UserA can not see UserB's Free / Busy time. - John Q. - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:18 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar I am attempting to figure out

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread Daniel Chenault
They're on different servers, aren't they? - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Ohh man, What meant to say was UserA can not see UserB's Free / Busy

RE: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread Martin Blackstone
Street-wise -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Where are the three users located, server-wise and network-wise? - Original Message - From: John Q Jr

RE: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread Erik Sojka
Group-Wise -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Street-wise -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread Daniel Chenault
Wash your mouth out with lye soap!! - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Group-Wise -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread John Q Jr.
Nope same server, only 1 server in the site. - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:01 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar They're on different servers, aren't they? - Original

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread John Q Jr.
Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Street-wise -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Where are the three users located, server-wise and network-wise

RE: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread Ryan Malayter
Not only is zis possible, zis is ESSENTIAL! -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Same internal LAN. Same server. Legacy system, this is an old admin

Re: Outlook XP Calendar

2002-03-08 Thread John Q Jr.
Ahh! Where can I set this permission? AD or ESM? - John Q - Original Message - From: Ryan Malayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:13 PM Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Not only is zis possible, zis is ESSENTIAL

RE: Outlook XP and To: Email Addresses

2001-12-05 Thread Bueffel, Scott M - CNF
I believe that someone posted a utility that would let you edit the file Outlook stores those in. Try searching the archives...it was about a month ago. -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange

RE: Outlook XP and To: Email Addresses

2001-12-05 Thread Bueffel, Scott M - CNF
: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP and To: Email Addresses I believe that someone posted a utility that would let you edit the file Outlook stores those in. Try searching the archives...it was about a month ago. -Original Message- From

RE: Outlook XP and To: Email Addresses

2001-12-05 Thread Bolser_Scott
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q242074 -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP and To: Email Addresses It is called the Microsoft

RE: Outlook XP on 5.5 no Schedule Plus Data

2001-10-05 Thread David N. Precht
Import other file option in import in outlook What version of Exchange ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of bigape Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP on 5.5 no Schedule Plus Data We are

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-26 Thread Tristan Gayford
]] Sent: 26 September 2001 01:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP application Thanks Jeff, but the problem is not with attachments, but rather an outside application accessing the address book (this is coded in to Outlook XP to prevent mass mailers). I have one user who has written

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-26 Thread Presley, Steven
Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP application Have you tried the admin part of it (http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm). From there you can allow access to address books and the whole CDO bit

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-25 Thread Scharff, Chris
I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model: http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-25 Thread Presley, Steven
Thanks Chris...guess the answer is that there is no free way to do it. -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP application I believe he could use Redemption

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-25 Thread Scharff, Chris
* -Original Message- From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP application Thanks Chris...guess the answer is that there is no free way to do

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-25 Thread jvfantin
Check here... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm Jeff -Original Message- From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP application I have a user who has built an application that

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-25 Thread Presley, Steven
of the limitation\security on XP. Best Regards, Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP application Check here... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm

RE: Outlook XP application

2001-09-25 Thread Kevin Miller
Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP application I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model: http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com

RE: Outlook XP - cant read .EXE attachment

2001-08-30 Thread Neil Hobson
There's a registry hack, or better still, the COM add-in on slipstick.com Neil -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 30 August 2001 12:40 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Outlook XP - cant read .EXE attachment Subject: Outlook XP - cant read

RE: Outlook XP - cant read .EXE attachment

2001-08-30 Thread Scharff, Chris
XP receives .exe and .com files just fine. It simply blocks access to them as part of the updated security model which has been discussed here and elsewhere ad infinitum. Q. ... Outlook ...? A. www.slipstick.com -Original Message- From: BY To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/30/2001 6:40

RE: Outlook XP - cant read .EXE attachment

2001-08-30 Thread Ken . Powell
See Q290497. OL2002: Cannot Access Attachments. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL