RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-04 Thread Chinnery Paul
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange There are multiple reasons. All of the best ones (i.e. most compelling) revolve around security. It's getting to the point where it is difficult to find a way to penetrate a company's

Re: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Tony Hlabse
Try looking at MS's Exchange site. They site E2K's advantages over 5.5 and the reasons to move We all know that Microsoft has announced the planned end of support for NT 4.0. I know they had a link which listed life-cycles of various products but I can't seem to find it anymore. I've search

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Soysal, Serdar
I believe MS supports the current version and the previous version of every product. So, they'll probably phase out support for Exchange 5.5 when the next Exchange Server comes out. S. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002

Re: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Daniel Chenault
The party line is N-1 - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:24 PM Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange I believe MS supports the current version and the previous version of every

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Mike Lagase
Test -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange I'm going to wait till .NET and then next version of Exch before moving to AD. Im just crazy like

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Dupler, Craig
There are multiple reasons. All of the best ones (i.e. most compelling) revolve around security. It's getting to the point where it is difficult to find a way to penetrate a company's defenses attacking things in layer 6 and below. Wireless is a temporary exception, but most attacks are now

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Elkins, Justin
1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: life cycle of Exchange There are multiple reasons. All of the best ones (i.e. most compelling) revolve around security. It's getting to the point where it is difficult to find a way to penetrate a company's defenses attacking things

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Erik Sojka
] * * -Original Message- From: Elkins, Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange Back to life cycle. Is there a spot on Microsoft's website that one can find

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Elkins, Justin
Thank you, Found it. I wish I could stop supporting it. 9x has no real place in a secure business network. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: life cycle

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Hansen, Eric
Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange Thank you, Found it. I wish I could stop supporting it. 9x has no real place in a secure business network. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: life cycle of Exchange

2002-01-03 Thread Elkins, Justin
Right O Thank you, -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: life cycle of Exchange Thank you, Found it. I wish I could stop supporting it. 9x has no real place