: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
Just found out.. they don't like love
Now.. who wants to work for a company where love is a forbidden word.
_
List posting FAQ: http
: Stupid disclaimers
Just found out.. they don't like love
Now.. who wants to work for a company where love is a forbidden word.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http
Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
Just found out.. they don't like love
Now.. who wants to work for a company where love
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
Just found out.. they don't like love
Now.. who wants to work for a company where love is a forbidden word
, March 22, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
Closing the loop, Buddy was of course in the Herbie, the Love Bug
movie.
-- Original Message --
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
No, it's The Fabulous Bud-E-Luv. Check him out at:
www.budeluv.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
All the ladies know me
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
All the ladies know me as Buddy Love.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Now now, remember, my City is filtering on only two words, F*** and
S***. Why we don't filter on other, much more obscene words then that
is beyond me :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers
Now now, remember, my City is filtering on only two words, F*** and
S***. Why we don't filter on other, much more obscene words then that
is beyond me :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original
'
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
taken.
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Ed Crowley
Subject = RE: Stupid disclaimers
Delivery Time = March 21, 2003 (Friday) 22:38:41
Policy
= Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Ed Crowley
Subject = RE: Stupid disclaimers
Delivery Time = March 21, 2003 (Friday) 22:38:41
Policy = Dirty Words
Action on this mail = Quarantine message
Warning message from administrator:
The content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail
Just found out.. they don't like love
Now.. who wants to work for a company where love is a forbidden word.
To prevent others from reading their policy they didn't put it on the place
where they say it is.. smart move if you want to do business..
B.
At 08:08 22-03-2003 +0100, you wrote:
Not
Absolutely nothing. . . I still think that disclaimers are a totally useless annoyance.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Of course it is - what's to stop me
12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Absolutely nothing. . . I still think that disclaimers are a totally useless
annoyance.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Oh shit I'm putting that one on mine from now onComedy Gold Sir
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Tullis
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I think the following
offends you, lighten up, get a life and move on.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I think the following disclaimer says it all:
DISCLAIMER: The information
welcome :)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Oh shit I'm putting that one on mine from now onComedy Gold Sir
-Original Message-
From
Excellnetconsider it stolen g...
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Sent to me by a co-worker:
DISCLAIMER:
This Email message does not reflect the thoughts
See then, that's OK - we agree :)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 17:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Absolutely nothing. . . I still think that disclaimers are a totally useless
annoyance
Of course we do.
Besides which, I don't enjoy being publicly flogged. Agreeing with you is the best
way to avoid that.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Yeah yeah, whatever :)
When, pray tell, have we ever disagreed?
Or were you just waiting for it to be in private?! :)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 23:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Of course
. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Yeah yeah, whatever :)
When, pray tell, have we ever disagreed?
Or were you just waiting for it to be in private?! :)
-Original
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Hmmm. Maybe the SPAM-filter people have it all wrong, and what they
should really be doing is pattern-matching on variations of this is not
an unsolicited e-mail
Opting-In on some exciting offers for herbal viagra in Pittsburgh
Jim Helfer
-Original
I should probably butchering all of my massages too, so they be thinkink I
not have an IQ above 68 too?
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
If you get a lawyer
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
If you get a lawyer out of the office and talking like a human being, (I
did this once) you get really interesting information.
Like one told me once that if you create a website with all borrowed
to be me, but I
never me if it isn't.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't understand how this relates to disclaimers one way or another.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet
I hereby claim or disclaim that I am stupid.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't understand how this relates to disclaimers one way or another.
Ed Crowley
:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't understand how this relates to disclaimers one way or another.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I wasn't clear..sorry palm pilot has taken up two days because I cant
get it to sync..and I'm way beyond being frustrated bye it..
But to clarify.
Adding a disclaimer to an e-mail is like adding a citation to item under
Wouldn't the easiest solution to all of this be killing all lawyers?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Also, I could simply claim
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Also, I could simply claim that I am not bound by contracts which I did
not sign. Copyrights (note the spelling) are enforceable
now youre trying to get on my good side
;-)
bill
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Wouldn't the easiest solution to all of this be killing all lawyers
: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Also, I could simply claim that I am not bound by contracts which I did
not sign. Copyrights (note the spelling) are enforceable by law. You
could, I imagine
, Bill
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
now youre trying to get on my good side
;-)
bill
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I figure there's that town in the southwest that has the annual
rattlesnake round up. Where they capture as many rattlesnakes and then
kill them. Couldn't we have something like that for lawyers
We are going to start putting disclaimers on emails because HIPPA and
government told us too if we want to stay in business. :\
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
That used to happen out around Brothers, in Eastern Oregon. I think though
that they may have had to phase that out due to the PETA folks. Note, I
don't think there is a similar protective organization for lawyers...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
of HIPAA.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
We are going to start putting disclaimers on emails because HIPPA
Wickieup AZ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I figure there's that town in the southwest that has the annual
rattlesnake
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
We are going to start putting disclaimers on emails because HIPPA and
government told us too if we want to stay in business. :\
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:58
Yes everything I write is protected, but then if you copy it, I disavow it
and its yours.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I figure there's that town
, June 07, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't remember seeing anything in HIPAA that requires a disclaimer.
(Although I did say in an earlier email, that we'd do it, too, because of
HIPAA.) Actually, we'll do it but encrypt anything with PHI in it.
Eric, I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't think it would hold up either I'm just doing what the security
director in charge of the hippa implementation wants.
The idea of posting to the list
Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I wasn't clear..sorry palm pilot has taken up two days because I cant
get it to sync..and I'm way beyond being frustrated bye it..
But to clarify.
Adding a disclaimer to an e-mail is like adding a citation to item under
copywrite. You show, very plainly
Only after we've dealt with all the list trolls.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 19:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Wouldn't the easiest solution to all of this be killing all lawyers
If you mean HIPAA, would you care to quote the parts about disclaimers?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 20:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
We are going to start putting disclaimers on emails
The idea of you constantly referring to hippa doesn't make me happy.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 22:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't think it would hold up either I'm just doing what
07, 2002 23:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
There is another reason for disclaimers that include things like if you are
not the intended recipient. Forwarding. I questioned the head of our
legal department on the need for a disclaimer, and he said that it is
primarily
: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I'm still fighting the battle of we don't need no stinkin' disclaimers. So
far, I've won.
BTW, has anybody ever heard if those disclaimers actually hold up
PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I'm still fighting the battle of we don't need no stinkin' disclaimers.
So far, I've won.
BTW, has anybody ever heard if those disclaimers actually hold up in court?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff
: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
http://www.emaildisclaimers.com/
There are several reasons why you might decide to add disclaimers to your
e-mails. The reasons can be categorized into two groups: legal and marketing
reasons.
1. Legal
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I lost... They said it gives them a good foundation to any lawsuit.
Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord Communications Inc.
A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility
614.543.6405
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Search Google if you are that desperate for a case scenario to prove your point and/or
not.
I would try e-mail disclaimer, court case and American :) as points of reference.
E.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Alright, alright. There. Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass
by adding personalmail in the body somewhere. Are you happy?
Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord
Just my 2cents
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/apply.html
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: stupid disclaimers
I think I might just start blocking messages with
see how fast your company
fires you, even if you had a disclaimer.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
http://www.emaildisclaimers.com
Prezactly. I'm not going to agree to keep a message written on a postcard
confidential.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
This is BS. If you are dealing
: Thursday, June 06, 2002 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
http://www.emaildisclaimers.com/
There are several reasons why you might decide to add disclaimers to your
e-mails. The reasons can be categorized into two groups: legal and marketing
reasons.
1. Legal reasons
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Do you think her data was right?
I tend to think that the law of bailments applies to all e-mail and
probably trumps other legal arguments. I don't think you can
: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Do you think her data was right?
I tend to think that the law of bailments applies to all e-mail and probably
trumps other legal arguments. I don't think you can become a bailee by
force of someone else's
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Just like the disclaimer that comes on 50% of the Spam I get that says
that this is not an unsolicited e-mail.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Do think this was my design? Our lawyers think we need this. Like it
actually performs some kind of function.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: stupid disclaimers
I think I might
]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Do think this was my design? Our lawyers think we need this. Like it
actually performs some kind of function.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute action?
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I'm taking action on your message. I'm
The printing does
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute action?
-Original Message
if it's a litmus test
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute action?
-Original Message
: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Do think this was my design? Our lawyers think we need this.
Like it actually performs some kind of function.
-Original Message-
From
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
personalmail
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
if it's a litmus test
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it
right now. Nyah
nyah nyah nyah nyah.
Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from J.D.'s 'R' Us.
--
be - MOS
Noone ever built a statue to a critic
I used Exclaimer and configured it to exclude mail to this list from
getting
our disclaimer.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: stupid disclaimers
I think I might just
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
It performs a function... It states I'll be breaking the law if I act on
messages you send to the list. In fact I'm apparently breaking the law now
by clarifying why I'll no longer
)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
It performs a function... It states I'll be breaking the law if I act on
messages you send to the list. In fact I'm
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Alright, alright. There. Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass
by adding personalmail in the body somewhere. Are you happy?
Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord Communications
73 matches
Mail list logo
