ource record. Tried host header change, alias.
Can't seem to get it to consistently work. Client is the SP1 3.5
version. No other version installed over it.
TIA for any thoughts.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
_
List posting FAQ:
sometimes it will start working again for a while or it takes several
attempts of re-creating before it works again. Eventually, it starts
having the same problem again.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
Senior MIS Manager
NetCarrier Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netcarrier.com
Direct Phone: 21
I believe I found the problem... It is apparently Post SP1 as it
requires SP1 to use.
KB Article Q303991
Fits my circumstances. Didn't see this the first time I searched. It's
all in how you ask :-)
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-----
From: Dan Bartley
Se
Yep, that too. Turns out to probably be related to the dsaccess.dll.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
Senior MIS Manager
NetCarrier Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netcarrier.com
Direct Phone: 215.966.3310
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
n the
application log or is it just gone now?
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 15:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Policing the Police
Any access to any mailbox that is not "your" primary
It did. And their server replied to your server which then passed back
to the sender as to the results it received.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 14:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
location.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 08:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Login?
On her home computer, she reinstalled windows/office/etc...wiped it
clean.
-Original
For us, if you logon to the desktop with the same account info as the
account that owns the mailbox and the site is seen by the browser as in
the Intranet zone, no prompt. Just goes directly in to the mailbox.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony
installed.
Having it on the same server as E2k can be problematic. There is an
update that can be had from PSS, no charge, that resolves some of the
authentication problems with AD with a same server setup.
The best solution is to run the IM from another server.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
Has anyone heard anything about a timetable for release of IM client 4.5
for Exchange? The Windows update site has a link and paragraph about the
Exchange version, but it takes you to the 3.5 version download page.
Thanks for any info.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I
still get the "You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools" error
when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times.
Am I missing something?
Dan Bartley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Origin
Correction. It clears the selection for ESM after the error. Read my
reply to a later suggestion though.
Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, that is a fine option, but not always the most convenient in all
circumstances (this could just be one of those preference areas).
However, it can work as I mention in a reply to a later post on this.
Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
INTRASYS Network Technologies
LAN/WAN
Too obvious, I guess. Never even thought to continue anyway with the
Win2k adminpak, even though I do it all the time with other apps. That
did it. It installed by this method and everything works fine. Thank you
very much.
Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message
One little caveat though, upgrade ESM to SP2 before upgrading the
adminpak to beta 3. Otherwise, the same problem.
Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dan Bartley
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 21:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System Manager
server slow enough for that message, even if
you don't see the message.
In my case it has most often been a switch acting up.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 15:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subjec
mplete the scripts without
restarting the agent.
The biggest thing about MOM is to be sure you assign computer groups to
the rule sets, or you'll get nothing, and be very careful what you
decide to pull from the logs and scripts. The database will get very
large, very quickly.
Dan Bartley, MCSE+
One other thing to check, if it hasn't been mentioned. Make the sure the
DSL routers are not handing out the same private subnet space as the one
you use for the exchange server. Exchange is the first place subnet
routing confusion will show up.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Me
to clients needed to see the machines on the
network. Easiest is to set up a WINS server for VPN client use.
Since it is via VPN you DO NOT have to open any NetBIOS ports or remove
any firewall. I'm not sure why anyone would be recommending that.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Me
ng all services manually
first (something I learned to do as far back as 4.0).
The important part is that I know what to expect when I apply the patch
in production and that makes for a smooth transition and minimum
downtime.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: MS Excha
often
identified by most scanners as an active code.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 08:19
To: Exchange Discussions
I leave them on - it's a good indication someone is
much ignore it. If it is something
else we look at the headers and see if we can trace it. If we can, we
send a notification.
A little extra work for us, but we are not causing extra work for others
by doing it this way. That is where the above "bad Netiquette" comment
comes from.
Best
ter the hard coded work ethic of someone else on this kind
of thing. :-)
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Here's the problem with not performing sender no
Owaserver/exchange/username/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Is there a way for those users who access
Yep, completely missed she said 5.5.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:50
To: Exchange Discussions
I don't think this works with Exchange 5.5. In Exchange 5.5 you can
only
open your own cal
Outlook 2003 will make this possible (as well as user specified sounds,
etc.), current versions do not. He will have to wait.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 15:26
To: Exchange Discussions
That is where the OS2k3 resource kit comes in. Build a custom
installation and you have the ability to turn it off as the default.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Diane Poremsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:27
To: Exchange Discussions
is a refresh
coming out any day for those who have beta 2.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Can you add those choices from Tools/Customize and rebuild/reset the
toolbars
Sure, but I was addressing what he said too. He was trying to find it in
the menu. He needed to add it to the toolbar, if available, as a work
around to it missing from the menu, not reset the toolbar. :-)
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
I saw this with an ATI video chip. Latest driver fixed it. Not all O11
menu items just certain ones.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
I havent see that.
I can however
it is different. In fact, in some states, even cameras
and "baby monitors" can be used with no notice. The defining rule on
that is whether it is recorded or not. If it is not recorded, it does
not fall in to the wiretap or communications laws.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message--
sigs anymore, just normal text now.
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Fenton
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
And an electric email commanded tas
though that in our environment, it solved a couple of things
but introduced some new ones. Veritas doesn't seem to be applying very
much QC to this product anymore.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 20
My mistake, there is already a Hot fix 2 for revision 4454. However, it
is just to add tape support for S-AIT, so I don't think it will affect
the remote agent on Exchange problem.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Dan Bartley
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:
Go to the properties for the user, click the email addresses tab and
edit or add the email address you want. Go to Exchange General tab and
change the alias to match the renamed logon name.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
therefore fails to backup.
I'm not sure it works with Exchange 2003 on the live database, I did not
see it in the Shadow Copy items that can be backed up on our test
server. It does work on a SQL database though.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[
http://Servername/exchange/mailboxname/calendar
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 08:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Question
I thought for some reason that you could view others
http://www.ISAserver.org
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 09:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ISA group list
I will be doing a rather complex deployment it the near future dealing
with
change.
It is possible that it was being described "and the cursor changed to a
click me hand icon" as opposed to the pop up had a hand in it and said
click me?
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 200
* win the "fight" must sacrifice the truth and
good judgment, thereby violating basic ethics.
Just another opinion :-)
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:24
To: Exchange Discussions
S
any customer will give you a blank check simply based
on being an MVP, but I know I can have a higher degree of trust for the
info (usually) a MVP provides in lists like this.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
tion or the exchange
server.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 03:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator
Hi,
I am a independent consultant hir
anyone encountered this? Is there a way around it?
TIA
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
turn out to be this.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 14:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Are there any NAT firewalls between the client and the Exchange server?
What VPN client are they using?
They are under reconstruction.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with www.cdolive.net
Use cdolive.com.
> -Original Message-
>
No problems for SP2, haven't put SP3 on a production box that is backed
up yet.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 19:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange SP2 and SP3 with Backup
atures. None of them are
perfect, everyone has a different experience for each one. Test several,
see what addresses the most of what you need and expect.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 18:
47 matches
Mail list logo
