I've been looking through technet, but I can't seem to find out the
information regarding forms that I'm looking for.
Can someone tell me where I can find instructions on how to remove custom
forms from the forms library?
Thanks in advance.
My company is a securities firm and has various SEC requirements to
follow, including logging all communications with clients. This includes
Email and Instant Messaging communications. Users are usin various types
of Instant messenger, including Yahoo, AOL, and MSN. We need to capture
that
There are some users in my company who utilize a program that enables the
user to place multiple recipients in Outlook (as many as 4-5000). Aside
from the fact that I hate the application, user's don't realize the
ramifications that it can have, not to mention, the nastygrams that we've
received
Thanks everyone. I appreciate it.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange
Thanks! I'm psyched! I can stop the spammers of my company
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?
Personally, I don't care if user's receive it. It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.
Any suggestions would be
Currently, we have Address Book Lists configured to work within our
Exchange 5.5 organization. We intend to bring this same concept over to
2000. Does anyone know of any articles that explain how to perform this?
I've been looking in Technet and on their Premiere site, but can't find
anything.
Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.
I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as
you know, it's pretty inefficient.
_
List posting FAQ:
This is what is happening: A user sends an email to a bad address
and receives this error:,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obviously, the syntax is incorrect with that comma in the beginning of it.
The user receives the following message multiple times.
553 ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced ''
553
Currently, I have a single 5.5 site in a single domain. We are planning
to keep 5.5 co-existing with 2000 during the migration.
For Windows 2000, we would like to create a parent/child domain
(Management decision for no reason other than to add complexity)
For the purposes of clarity, I'll
I just work for the monarchy, keeping the castle running behind the scenes
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
I should have clarified better:
Our current 5.5 organization is in a seperate domain altogether (NT 4.0)
(I'll call it the barbarian domain) We intend on creating a 2 way trust
agreement with the King Domain. The new King domain would be pure 2000
Actually, I'm almost positive that you can't view a Public Folder Calendar
from OWA. I think that there's a technet article on it, but I'll try and
dig it up for you.
_
List posting FAQ:
My mistake. It was Public Folder contacts - Q192775
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
we are planning on doing mailbox moves, so that's something to consider.
Thanks.
I don't think you can move/migrate mailboxes between domains. Not to sure
though. I would still put e2k in the king domain though.
Are you wanting to move/migrate mailboxes?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network
Does anyone know of any instant messaging server side anti-virus programs
for Exchange 2000? I realize that once the clients connect, they are
communicating directly with each other, thereby bypassing the server, so I
guess my question is two-fold: Is it possible to force all IM traffic
through
Here's a script that I used at one of my clients. It writes to a log file
if you'd like. You can leave out the switches that you don't want. This
is for an online Exchange backup with the Exchange NT backup extensions
installed.
ntbackup backup DS \\SERVERNAME IS /a /v /b /t normal /d b/u
Did you try modifying the GWART, manually?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Being a Securities company, by SEC law, we have to archive and review all
internet mail to a non-re-writeable media (it falls under the client
correspondance part of the requirement). Our system that we currently use
is out of date.
We also want to get pst's off of the network into a better
I couldn't agree more about the pst's. In fact, we are intending on doing
a registry push so users can't create pst's. Unfortunately, the network
group won't ban pst's from the network as we requested/suggested.
Thanks for the Tumbleweed comments.
I didn't realize that. There isn't a simple registry that can prevent
this?
If this is the case, what would you recommend to do that would essentially
accomplisht the same results? (other than just saying don't do it)
_
List
My company has recently purchased a shark SAN that they are putting the
company's various UNIX and windows applications on. They are pushing to
put Exchange on it, however, I am somewhat skeptical due to some testing
with another SAN (Xiotech) that was unimpressive from a performance
standpoint.
we use the IMSEXT.DLL for 5.5, but I just looked at a product called
DISCLAIMIT for 2000 and it is great, especially for those of us who have
to host multiple companies. Each company can have their own disclaimer.
It's not too expensive and it works.
Currently, were running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with hotfixes on an NT4.0 SP6A
servers. We have 2 mailbox servers with one IMS/Bridgehead server. One
of the mailbox servers also has an IMC with a cost of 99 as a just in
case scenario.
Currently, our Internet mail comes through the UNIX firewall
thanks guys. That re-affirms what I thought in the first place. The IIS
server is an interesting idea, however, I doubt that there will be any
hops in between
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
If you have the Exchange 2000 server joined to the 5.5 site, if you don't
configure the SMTP virtual server, it will continue to use the 5.5 IMC.
If you configure the virtual server in 2000, and change the costs, you
shouldn't have to remove the 5.5 IMS at all. I would think that the 5.5's
I don't see how it would. Just because it has a bad address wouldn't stop
it from sending. The virus (if properly designed) doesn't care if the
email is success. it's gonna access the address book, regardless.
_
List posting
Wow, the I see the vultures...ooops, vendors are circling...
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
It almost sounds like you have a filter on the view. Check in View,
Customize Current View and check if the Filters say off. If they don't,
then this will restrict what you see.
_
List posting FAQ:
Sorry about that dale. Forgot to hit the check box
Jonathan: It would be helpful if you included the original thread of the
message, when you post an answer, so we know what you are talking about.
TIA
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL
Don't waste your time. I set up an elaborate set up to use the turf
directory. I have over 2000 entries. And guess what? Some messages still
get in, and it's a total hassle to maintain. We're decommissioning the
set up and will no longer be supporting blocking spam. Let users set up
their
we have antigen without outlook and everything works fine. but if you
feel the need for a client, you can always use the good old exchange
client.
The only part that you'll notice is during the installation, antigen will
look for the client. if there isn't one, the installation gives you an
We're currently evaluating postini. So far it works pretty good. Has a
lot more graunlarity than Message labs. We're still evaluating, but it's
a product worth considering.
The only thing the Marshall wont stop are them Miss Kitty emails...
-Original Message-
From: Massey,
I'm not sure what the cereal interface is?
What is it for my own knowledge?
Does postini support the cereal interface?
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping Spam
I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either.
There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also
evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the
report format that management wanted.
dave
-Original Message-
So we've finally started our migration to 2000.
The environment:
w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode.
a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k.
After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox from
5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes. Instead
of taking the
yes we have upgraded and it is much better with a bunch of more options
for reports. However, it removed all of my scheduled reports which was a
huge hassle to recreate. But it's done now, and before I do another
upgrade, I'll ask first what and how I need to back this stuff up.
There is a
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Beeler
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: display names during conversion
So we've finally started our migration to 2000.
The environment:
w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode
Thanks guys. I figured that was the case - with the ol98 client.
And I'll be sure to use that discount, thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
In the past, with 5.5, we used to remove the domain Admins group from the
local administrators box from our Exchange servers. Since I've had some
permission issues with e2k, I wanted to do the same thing with the e2k
box. I just want to remove the domain admins group from the e2k server.
Does
We are setting up a new owa box for e2k. Of course, the security people
want a virus scanner. Since the server is configured as a front-end
server, and we don't have any of the Exchange services that run the
databases running (priv and pub) if I configure a virus scanner to skip
the database
We're running e2k on a shark, but we don't have many users on it. I'm
forseeing I/o issues just from the design. If you can, fight for your own
disk pack so that you don't suffer the pains of the shark for all
design. I lost the battle, here, so I'm sure we'll have slowness and it
will be all
so we're getting 1018 errors Here's the details:
single-server single site (ASP stuff with multiple address book views)
nt4.0 sp6a exchange 5.5 with sp4 and post fixes - Antigen 7.0 as the virus
scanner, but previously version 6.5.
We run nightly full backups. We have been receiving 1018
Can I get some ideas on what software people use to monitor queues within
5.5 and 2000? I'm currently using perfmon, but it's pretty limited
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
/mont.zip
Exchange server monitoring tool. Allows monitoring of Queues, Oldest
message, Disk Space and services on Exchange servers
--Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Beeler
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12
Does anyone have a preferred software for handling attachments on their
blackberries?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Recently, we've been evaluating NETIQ's AppManager for monitoring our
Exchange environment, including Exchange 2000, 5.5, Antigen, Blackberry,
and IBM Director (hardware management). It would also monitor Windows ad
AD.
At the same time, we are also evaluating MOM to monitor the same stuff,
on
other well-known product *grin*), so I am expecting big things from MOM
2004. MOM SP1 is addressing a number of my gripes above, so after I apply it
I'll see how much things have improved.
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Beeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Although I haven't used that anti-virus software, standard procedure if
you're having problems with getting the store up, uninstall the anti-virus
software. Then work on getting the store up. Once you get the store
running, you can put the anti-virus back up. It's easier to troubleshoot
the
49 matches
Mail list logo
