I see. You don't mean the admd field...Q234639 will help you.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 14:24
To: Neil Hobson
Subject: RE: GWART
Thanks for the information, its very helpful. I got confused
Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: GWART
>
>
> S
ge Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART
So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic for each
site should flow through the bridgehead for that site right? Also, I
had a question about the administrative management domain name. What is
this used for? I read that if you
ED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GWART
Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target address,
so the connector with which that is associated will
a, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: GWART
>
>
> Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
&
I had tried just raising the cost here and leaving it as is however, mail
still flows into one bridgehead and out the other. I would like to do a
drawing of our GWART on a diagram to make sure it's optimally configured. I
have been having trouble though since it appears the GWART is sect
Actually, what I meant to say is that, although I'd agree that * is the
usual way to go, doesn't the presence of a *@* in the GWART appear as a
better route than * ?
That being said, I'd just change both to * and raise the cost of the
route I didn't want stuff to go down.
In that case my mind ain't working like it used to... :-)
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: Re: GWART
Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the
Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: GWART
Something
iling List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART
One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the
other is listed as *:. One of our admins from our NJ site stated that
we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead. I tend to disagree
though. I tend to think that th
: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART
I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a six
pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.
What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow for
IMS traffic?
> -Original Message
Are both your IMC's inbound and outbound or is 1 in and 1 out?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: 11 January 2002 21:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GWART
I've read them, but could I explain how to
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
>
>
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem
> is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other
> bridgehead. I decided to look into t
I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, internet
traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. I decided to
look into the routing table to see why this is. However, I decided it
would be easier to review the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information
and
I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, internet
traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. I decided to
look into the routing table to see why this is. However, I decided it
would be easier to review the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information
and
I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, internet
traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. I decided to
look into the routing table to see why this is. However, I decided it would
be easier to review the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and
rea
16 matches
Mail list logo
