Distribute personal information

Server : Windows NT Server 4.0 SP 6a Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 Clients : Outlook 97 We have an ISP that holds our external e-mail. Clients (about 220) are using Outlook 97 with Internet e-mail service to connect to our ISP to download e-mail. Today when we want new accounts, delete

RE: Exchange Directory Synchronization service

This service is for synchronisation with MSMail. If you don't have MSMail, you don't need it. Kevin -Original Message- From: James Lockley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 07:03 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Directory Synchronization service I have

RE: Public folder limits

The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement? -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public folder limits Hi all, Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5

RE: Public folder limits

Actually it doesn't. It is only used to set the warning. An admin would have to act on it. As far as I recall, there is no effective means of limiting public FOLDER size. William -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17,

RE: Public folder limits

Good! Hence, the format of the message being a question rather than a statement! To me, it is an effective means of limiting a PF but to others it may not. Kevin -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: Public folder limits

Feel free to write something that accomplishes this. ;) William -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public folder limits Good! Hence, the format of the message

RE: Public folder limits

William, You know me better than that! I already have! Kevin -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 08:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public folder limits Feel free to write something that accomplishes this. ;)

RE: Public folder limits

That doesn't surpise me. Have a great day, Kevin. William -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public folder limits William, You know me better than that! I

OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

I am Using exchange 5.5 sp3 on one server and IIS4 with OWA 5.5 sp3 on another server. OS is NT4. OWA has just stopped, I rebooted both machines - still no joy. I then restored a backup - still no joy. The only error message that comes up if you leave it long enough is; error 'ASP 0113' Script

Re: Exchange setup question

I like to use the Ctrl-F3 combination to popup the header details in Outlook. This can be done from the Preview Pane as well from the message. -- Jeff Eggleston [EMAIL PROTECTED] !retupmoc eht ni deppart m'I !pleH == Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message

Exchange Backup

Anyone using HP Omniback for excahnge backup? If so how do you like it? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

custom installation wizard

Hi, just a quick question. when using the custom installation wizard to deploy outlook 2000 can I specify the mailbox name as %username%? Thanks Stu List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange setup question

Ctrl-F3? I have never seen that one before and I can't get it to popup on Outlook XP. I will have to try it on 2000 later. -Original Message- From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange setup

RE: Outlook XP Question/Oddity

Title: Message Hmm, no, I haven't, have just downloaded the Office XP SP1 that includes all the Outlook updates. Will install and see what happens. Thanks, Sherry -Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:33 PMTo:

RE: Exchange setup question

Nope that doesn't even work either.. -Original Message- From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange setup question Ctrl-F3? I have never seen that one before and I can't get it to popup on Outlook XP. I

RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

James, Update to SP6 (NT) on all the servers. Then update to SP4 on your Exchange 5.5 AND on the OWA/IIS box. This should fix it. This is a known issue with Exchange / NT and lower SPs. Bob Fronk, MCSE BTR Technologies, Inc. -Original Message- From: James Palmer

RE: Outlook Web Access

http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;q259506 Bob Fronk, MCSE BTR Technologies, Inc. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Web

RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

You may have a corrupt metabase.bin file. -Original Message- From: James Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again! I am Using exchange 5.5 sp3 on one server

e2k OWA password change issues

Environment: Exchange 2k Front-end/Back-end topology Front-end is in a DMZ with all the necessary ports Front-end requires SSL Everything is working fine EXCEPT: When you go to options and click on Change Password a small window pops up and says page not found Anyone else seen this? List

RE: Internet mail question

I would expect this to work, too. I wonder what is going on Are there any messages in the firewall log to help. Can you Ping or traceroute to your firewall external from someplace upstream from the Provide A router? Why does the DNS entry need to be changed? The IP addr of your SMTP server

Exchange Control Codes

A long shot but does anyone here have a list of control codes that you can send to Exchange services using the Control Service API call. I used to have a list but can't find it any more. Kevin List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

To All: Anyone know how to migrate users from DEC all-in-one directly to Microsoft Exchange 2000. Regards Nadeem List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

I know DEC-all about that. -Original Message-From: Nadeem Rehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000 To All: Anyone know how to migrate users from DEC all-in-one directly

RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

Title: RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again! Yep.. Bob hit it on the mark(or Bob).. that's your issue. -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

Does the ALL-IN-1 source extractor provided on the E2k CD do the trick? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Nadeem Rehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At:

Finding Inactive Accounts

Is there a way to find accounts that haven't been used for a specified period of time?? I'd like to nuke accounts that haven't been used for six months or more. I haven't found this information. Since Arcserve IT and other processes log into the users accounts the last login time isn't

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

Multiple at random complaints.. beginning to wonder if the ScanMail is the problem. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

RE: custom installation wizard

Title: RE: custom installation wizard This might help you. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q234370 -Original Message- From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: custom

Alias template has changed

Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from FName to FirstN and I don't remember how to change the template. Jim Busick Database Network Analyst, MCSE Santee School District List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed

I don't remember what version you have. (Site addressing?) William -Original Message- From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Alias template has changed Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has

RE: Alias template has changed

Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4 -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Alias template has changed I don't remember what version you have. (Site addressing?) William

RE: Alias template has changed

Tools / Options in the Admin program, but can't remember from then onwards (auto-naming or something??) HelpI'm losing my 5.5 memory...! Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original

RE: Alias template has changed

You are exactly correct. You shouldn't doubt yourself. ;) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Alias template has changed Tools / Options in the Admin program, but can't

RE: Alias template has changed

Title: RE: Alias template has changed I think that's what it defaults to in a new exchange admin client install. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Alias template has changed

RE: Alias template has changed

Thanks. It was set correct in my Admin, but my tech had her's set for FirstN and she has always just changed the alias when she added. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:

Clustering Exchange

My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange Servers that we should have them clustered. Now I have never clustered servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with. How hard is it to do, and how

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

My .02 worth.. once a month I down the entire network and reboot... I avoid exactly these problems for that reason... as for technet web interface, I have the CD subscription so I never use it. Thanks! Joe Irvine http://www.tbopayroll.com/ 609-597-1155 -Original Message- From: Bob

exchange 2000 certificate and encryption

HI, I'd like to know if I need a certificate on setting up exchange 2000 for email encryption and ssl. Can I use the certificate services that is included with windows 2000? what is the best way of encrypting email and also supporting secure socket layer? Thanks for the input. List Charter

RE: Clustering Exchange

Didn’t we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO NOT built a cluster server period. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Clustering Exchange

If you have a lot of money there are several solutions. http://www.directplus.compaq.com/dstore/default.asp?page=ctoBasesProduc tLineId=431Family_Id=650 http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3670 http://www.nsisoftware.com/main/pages/Products/DTspec.html No I'm not a sales

RE: Clustering Exchange

Title: RE: Clustering Exchange For 5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain no real advantages in doing it, as 5.5 isn't truly cluster aware. For XCHG2000 I say DAH - IF you have a solid cluster solution with known HCL Server hardware. I recommend Compaq's cluster solutions as I have the

Allowing POP3 Access

I have some users asking about POP3 access to the exchange server. Is this possible, will it work with outlook express? Thanks. Jim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Allowing POP3 Access

Yes, Exchange is an RFC compliant IMAP4 and POP3 server. It will work with any RFC compliant POP client from incredimail to outlook express to pine. -Original Message- From: Jim Traino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: Clustering Exchange

I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two machines that will give you no trouble at all. Of course, you have to be running OpenVMS, and so far, Exchange doesn't run under that, but hey... -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Clustering Exchange

Title: RE: Clustering Exchange However, the level of "cluster-aware" is very dependant on the person that is setting it up. I can think of some that I would not want setting up any types of clusters. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems

RE: Clustering Exchange

An OWA web farm? -Original Message- From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two machines that will give you no

RE: Clustering Exchange

I have installed the NSI Double-Take solution for exchange. It's a really slick package as long as you set it up properly. We have failed over the exchange services twice with very successful results. This was on an NT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP3 environment. The target server is the

RE: Clustering Exchange

Using F5 load balancers -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange An OWA web farm? -Original Message- From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL

Exchange 2000 SP2 support for OWA Spell Checker

FYI To: Announcement list for our OWA Spellchecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] The latest version of the OWA Spellchecker has support for Exchange Server 2000 Service Pack 2. If you have purchased the OWA Spellchecker, please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and once we have

RE: Clustering Exchange

We run www.marathontechnologies.com. Better than clustered. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that

owa and re

I have a question about OWA and Raiser's Edge Web. If i have them both on one server what are the issues if any for access them both behind a firewall? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

Title: RE: Clustering Exchange I currenlty have 9 exchange clusters. I am using Ms Clustering.. It works.. not to bad.. When you failover you do have a little response time isue but its a few sec. You have to de side on what type of clustering you want.. Active / passive Active / Active I

Exch2k and SP2, is it safe?

What is the consensus, is it safe to installed SP2 for Exch2k? Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exch2k and SP2, is it safe?

There is a risk of increased stability and improved performance! Oh and watch out for those nasty 'new email' alerts in OWA! sp2 has been good to me. William -Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 AMTo:

Exchange SPAM Blocker Option

Hi Gang, I'm looking for a solid/good Exchange Solution for SPAM blocking. Also any WEB sites you would use to find such products would be good. If this body's opinion is that I should go to a LINUX based solution, like SPAM assassin, I will.. but I'm trying to stick with a single

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

If you are using the Scan Mail eManager anti Spam filtering and you have recently updated the rules update them again to verify you have the latest version. The previous version 217 was blocking hotmail.com, yahoo.com and other list servers. The current version is 218 and appears to be working

RE: Clustering Exchange

Yell - Hey ClusterBoy! and maybe he'll help. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Clustering Exchange My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange

RE: Problems with Distribution list

Good point. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I assumed it would only go out as rich text if there was rich text in the message. Putting in the domain names and setting those to only send in plain text seems to work for now. Thanks for your help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: exporting gal

Title: RE: exporting gal I went to the charter for this maillist to see if I could point this person to some archives. It mentions archives but doesnt say how to get to them. Are they available? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed,

Exchange Scanmail problem...

might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound. Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version -Original Message- From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem... might be OT, but I am trying to block

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves. I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the upgrade price. MZ -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone

RE: vpn with outlook

Title: RE: vpn with outlook That's funny. I had to do the same thing with our vpn. I thought I was bastardizing name resolution but it worked. I am glad to hear someone else hasthe same problem, misery loves company I guess. -Original Message-From: Don Guyer [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine, etc? -Original Message- From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem... Yeah I know, but currently

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at 5.600-1011. If I remember correct tho, the version I am on cannot upgrade beyond my version without purchasing the newer version, but I will look into this more. Thanks again, MZ -Original Message- From:

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

I think 3.51 was a free upgrade. You should see if you can find that. Also, use AVAPI, MAPI and Message Body scanning. -Original Message- From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Oh yes, and my famous file blocking list as well. The Martin Blackstone Blocked Files List. Copyright 1999-2002 - Martin Blackstone Basics vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB Full List EML;VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I

Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Hi All, I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on Exchange. The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty. She has permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own email is open. I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now. What does the rule say? -Original Message- From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response Hi All, I have

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

This rule is a client-only rule, and will process only when Outlook is running. Thanks, Danielle Roper -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Well, there is the problem. Now, tell me why you need a client only rule for an auto responder. The rule should be simple, like this Check messages when they arrive and have the server reply using this message -Original Message- From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Clarifying what Martin said, when you make the rule up there is an option to have the server reply using a specific message or template. That will make it a server side rule. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Once again, thanks for the upgrade. Just found out that I can actually upgrade to 3.52 for free, but the only other issue is that I HAVE to upgrade to 5.5 sp4, which I was planning on doing, but know have to do it a little soon than planned. We are blocking most of those attachments, I guess

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

As I was finding out what the message said, I noticed that there was that option...now my concern is that when I went to set this up it said that the feature would not be compatible with Outlook 98. Does that mean it would affect the people using it or the people receiving it? Thanks,

RE: Allowing POP3 Access

By default, pop3 is enabled when exchange is installed and IMC is alive , make an A record (i.e. mail.domain.com) pointing to your server. Fred -Original Message- From: Jim Traino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

You have waited too long already for SP4. One improvement in the SP is in the AVAPI. There is no reason for you to wait any longer. You could do this in a couple of hours. Uninstall Scanmail, reboot Install SP4, Reboot Install Scanmail Run Optimizer -Original Message- From: Mike Zatkalik

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

No, it just means that if you were to attach to that mailbox with OL98 instead of 2K, you may have some issues with the rules. Don't worry about that at all. -Original Message- From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Okay, Thank you very much for the help. Funny how you don't see things until someone points it out :] Thanks, Danielle Roper Technical Support Transworld Systems Inc. 5880 Commerce Blvd. Bldg. 1 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 T: 707-584-4225 Ext. 160 F: 707-584-5629 P: 707-973-2301 E: [EMAIL

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved

Hi all, As many of you suggested, some sleuthing was required. What I discovered is that in the Winnt folder there were thousands of wfv* folders. A little further research found that backup exec from veritas was the cause. Backup exec has its own virus scanner which I run before

Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000

Now I don't want to start any fights, but we are considering implementing 2000 across the office. I have 50 staff currently running 98 on desktops and NT4 on servers I will change all servers to 2K and implement AD, but the question is really what do people think about Ex 2K? Is it better? is

RE: Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000

S many variables. Does the upgrade path fit your companies' needs? Exchange2000 is a good move, but there is a learning curve. The end users do not really see any difference aside from OWA. AD deployment should not be underestimated either. I do not know. I like to keep plugging away

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved

Jason Dwyer, Super Sleuth. -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved Hi all, As many of you suggested, some sleuthing was

virus scan

I was told that this was not a virus and that it was a problem with the detection message where no detection name is given, is an error message that is given by the engine and misinterpreted by the GUI product, not a detection by the DAT files. The files are now in quarantine, so can i send out

RE: virus scan

Try scanning the file with another Antivirus product. I would suggest connecting to the trendmicro site (www.antivirus.com) and using their housecall? product for a quick check if you don't have access to another vendor's antivirus product.   cheers Wayne Hanks Systems Administrator

RE: virus scan

Personally, if it says it a virus, I don't take a chance. I also do quarantine. If its important, the sender can fix the file and resend it. In any case, I would delete this file and get a fresh copy. -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17,

RE: virus scan

Excellent tool. -Original Message- From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: virus scan Try scanning the file with another Antivirus product. I would suggest connecting to the trendmicro site

RE: virus scan

Oops, DO NOT quarantine -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: virus scan Personally, if it says it a virus, I don't take a chance. I also do quarantine. If its important, the sender can fix the

RE: OWA for 5.5

My point is if you have E5.5 and run W2K server why would you want to run owa2000 but not E2K. I understand that OWA2000 adds some nice features (multiple calendars, etc) but E2K adds some very nice admin stuff. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Lefkovics,

RE: Public folder limits

It only gives a warning message and that too is not grammatically correct !. This public folder has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator. The public folder size is 750 KB Public Folder size limits: You will receive a warning when this public folder reaches 10 KB.