Nigel Wade wrote:
I'm currently leaning towards the idea of a separate Exim process handle
mail submission, and for this to relay the mail to the main Exim process
for delivery. I'm hoping that will be easier to setup and maintain than
a single configuration. Are there any gotchas to this
Leonid Shulov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
host mail.arabellasw.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: 550 cannot route to
sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably myhost.localdomain isn't in the DNS as viewed by
mail.arabellasw.com.
Bill Hacker wrote:
However, and this is the important point, looking for multiple different
HELO values from a single ip is a _MASSIVELY_ effective way of detecting
apparent ? potential ?
You're slightly too terse for me to tell exactly what you're asking here.
However, looking for
j2 wrote:
If I read this correctly, Exim does not (as default) show if a mail was sent
as an authenticated user.
Is it possible to make Exim show which user the sender was authenticated as
in mainlog?
If you mean received on an smtp auth'd connection, look for
the string like esmtpsa on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is there a way to check quota on mailbox at smtp_data time.
Checks: is account over quota (which can be MTA-imposed) and whether
it will be over when writing message.
Yes, but it's quite involved.
Here's the core of a checker;
call it as a sub-acl from both
Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
The ideal setup though would be adapting to the load, scanning
by ACL, until too crowded, then switching to 'scan later' in
the queue
Even better would be scanning in the ACL always, but limiting
the number of concurrent connections you accept so as to not
overload your
Kenevel wrote:
Firstly, I do not want to have the
emails appear to originate at a real mailbox to which addressees can
reply.
This means that anyone doing sender-verification will refuse your mails.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
Kenevel wrote:
Is there a way of avoiding having to maintain identical code in two
different places?
A macro.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
R. Sánchez wrote:
I still haven't resolved inside-outside port 25 problems. Why can't I
telnet from the outside but I *can* smtp from the outside? I've
double-checked there are no firewall rules, smtp connections are not
using ssl or tls... Can there be some sort of ISP filtering?
Always
Tom Fischer wrote:
i have much trouble sending to comcast Mailservers. The comcast Servers
returns 450 [TEMPFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender domain.
So, what domain does the envelope-from have on a typical mail
that gets rejected? Does that domain exist, have proper rDNS
and matching
Mike Cardwell wrote:
If I set $acl_m0 to equal something in the rcpt acl I can refer to it in the
routers. If there is more than one recipient, I'll end up overwriting the
contents of that acl variable. I need to be able to store information on
a per recipient basis from the rcpt acl and then
Michael Bordignon wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to have exim look at the sender address for all incoming
mail, if it matches more than one row (via a mysql query) then prepend
the subject with 'foo'.
I've come this far;
--
set acl_m9 = mysql;SELECT COUNT(*) FROM prospect_addresses WHERE
James Barros wrote:
I dont suppose you could point me in the right direction for disabling
sender verification?
Take out the line saying verify = sender. It's not complicated.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Riaan Annandale wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have a fairly simple question:
I am running exim with brightmail 6.0.3 and it works, ie. I can use
brightmail verdicts / vars in the routers section.
But now I would like to reject spam messages after the end of data
command .
So I imagine i need to add
Balzi Andrea wrote:
Hi All
There is a function that allows me to delete from command line a
recipient in a specific message-id?
I've found on the docs how can add a recipient (-Mar), but not for
delete.
How can it?
You can mark a recipient as already delivered.
Note that the headers of the
wiseas wrote:
What I want to do, is to configure the server to exclude some domains
which are not spam-senders.
How can I accomplish that?
I've read about sender_verify, sender_verify_hosts *,
sender_verify_hosts_callback *, sender_verify_callback_domains !
*.some.domain :* but I don't know
wiseas wrote:
HI,
I created an acl. Something like:
#added just for testing on 28-03-2006
test_acl:
accept hosts = mail.xxx.com
There is no configuration error, but also nothing has changed.
What have I done wrong?
You didn't do what I said.
What to do next?
Read what I said. Or
Gururajan Ramachandran wrote:
How do you handle sending error back without ending up
sending error back to bulk emailers and so on? I
really would not like to go back to having the
outgoing email folder filled all the time trying to
send back error emails to non existent From email
addresses.
Hugo Osorio wrote:
now when i say tail -f /etc/exim4/mainlog i am receiving another error
message as follows:
how this error could be corrected?
thank you
2006-03-28 11:17:25 1FOGsm-7e-9E gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [
66.249.83.114]: Connection refused
2006-03-28 11:17:25 1FOGsm-7e-9E
wiseas wrote:
I've read the specification from
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.30/doc/html/spec_38.html to figure out
how this functions.
I thought I understood, but the result is not as expected.
in my exim.conf I added:
domainlist test_list = mail.xxx.com
ok
Then in the check_recipient
Adam Funk wrote:
But when MTA(n) rejects a message that MTA(n-1) is trying to relay,
MTA(n-1) has to bounce it, right?
Which in turn is why MTA(n-1) should be doing recipient-verify callouts.
-Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 30/03/06, Adam Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of MTA(n-1) as a department's outgoinggmailhub or ISP's
smarthost. It's usually configured to accept anything from within the
IP range it's supposed to cover,
That part it what it shouldn't do. By all means
Steve Hill wrote:
Is there any way to pipe a message through an external command, and then
continue on to process the message that's produced on the command's
stdout as if it were the same message rather than having to re-transmit
the command's output as an entirely new message?
As a
Peter Bowyer wrote:
I disagree. It should.
We're talking about an outbound relay sending to arbitrary
destinations, with verified senders. Callouts are a waste of time,
because it can deliver a bounce to the known sender if it's unable to
deliver a message.
Which known sender would this
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to figure out what's causung this error:
2006-04-02 19:16:14 1FQEc2-0008MU-AJ == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=virtual_userforward defer (-1): bad mode (0100777) for
/etc/exim/control/domains/perkel.com/users/marc/filter.txt: 022 bit(s)
unexpected
Having your filter file be
Jason Keltz wrote:
How can retry timeout be exceeded?
Exim replied to the original sender with a message
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
host x.x.x [#.#.#.#]: 450 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Recipient address rejected: Greylisted: retry timeout exceeded
Doug Jolley wrote:
In the absence of the endpass
modifier, control is always passed to the next
ACL if there is a failing condition. Am I
looking at this correctly?
Nope.
In the absence ... control is passed
to the next verb in this ACL if there is a failing
condition (which could be an
Dave Lugo wrote:
My apologies if this has come up before, I did check the list archive,
but didn't really find an answer.
A remote client seems to have trouble sending to my exim:
Apr 10 15:42:54 spot exim[13343]: TLS error on connection from
hawk.ummail.com (hawk.sc1.ummail.com)
MrTheo wrote:
What I want is that someone who wants to send a mail using the server's smtp
services has to login with server's user account,
- advertise auth
- decide what types of auth you will support.
- educate your users in configuring their MUAs
- reject, in an ACL, senders who are on
Alan J. Flavell wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Jeremy Harris wrote:
[...]
- reject senders not matching the specific auth data
Rejection is not as easy as it sounds. We try to reject mail
submissions which present non-existent sender addresses - but mail
client software typically does
Ben Story wrote:
We've been having some problems with the require verify = sender line of
our exim config with Postini's outbound SMTP servers. They're wanting a
detailed explanation of what this has exim do and I've not found a good
answer in the specifications. Does anyone have a good place
Andy Smith wrote:
Now, this works, but none of the dnslist_* variables get set, so the
message ends up looking a bit like:
You're trying to use the variables before they're set, because the
line where you use them comes before the line where they're set.
So they're not set, so they're
Adrian wrote:
Is there a way to make exim replace the subject instead of just adding
it?
Yes, but do it in a router not an ACL.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
ECJ wrote:
You may get some information by running a delivery with debugging turned
on for a message that is, for example, hitting the quota error.
Sorry for being ignorant about this. What exim flags should I use to
accomplish this? I only know the 'mail -v' option.
Thanks!
Exim has a -d
Andy Smith wrote:
What you may find useful is translating the IP address to the AS
number which can be done via DNS:
http://www.cymru.com/BGP/asnlookup.html#dns
$ dig +short -t txt 5.231.50.69.origin.asn.cymru.com
26904 | 69.50.224.0/20 | US | arin | 2003-06-05
$ dig +short -t txt
Should a recipient verify with defer_ok and callout=10s, which gets a
TCP connection but times out during the SMTP conversation, return
success?
denymessage = recipient does not appear to exist
!verify = recipient/callout=20s,use_sender\
Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
Yes, there are several things I'd like to try out, but wouldn't know how
to easily implement them using Exim-ACL. For example, I'd like to have
some rate-limiting, which should keep an average of mails/timeunit sent
by some IP, which should send alerts to the
Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
However, the key is average of mails/timeunit significant
derivation. I don't want to have fixed limits but consider keeping
several values for a given IP, like average values, maximum values, etc.
and them do some calculations wheter the current rate seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it possible to use in the DATA ACL the ip address over the email arrive the
exim? so that i can do
denymessage = This message contains an attachment of a type which we
do not accept (.$found_extension)
demime= bat
Christian Schmidt wrote:
Hello enediel,
I have the whole list of available accounts on the domain, and I want to
configure exim4 to pass to the exchange server only the messages with valid
rcpt field.
This can easily be done by a recipient verification via smtp callout.
Don't forget to
Frank Myhr wrote:
As I understand it, Exim allows only a single outer ACL for the RCPT
(and other) smtp commands. So the above acl logic must be written like:
Do Check 1
If Condition A:
Do Check 2
If Condition A:
Do Check 3
Nope.
acl = acl_foobar
- Jeremy
--
## List
Kai Riasol wrote:
I use exim as a smtp relay. This relay forward the emails to the mail
server. I have the problem that, the relay take all mail and try after
received the email to forward the email to the mail server The problem
is, if a user does not exists and the return-path is false
Dennis Skinner wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
cat fileA fileB | sort | uniq -u fileC
Unfirtunately no. file B has addresses mot in file A.
Just do fileB twice then :)
cat fileA fileB fileB | sort | uniq -u fileC
Ahem... useless cat again.
Also useless uniq.
sort -u fileA fileB fileB
Tony Finch wrote:
I suggested using defer rather than deny because (a) they are spammers and
are unlikely to retry,
I think (woolly-level feeling from watching mainlog and
assorted graphs) that this is unfortunately becoming less
so.
Whether it's because zombies are starting to use system's
Debbie Doerrlamm wrote:
Reading your comments 3 times now.. can my Exim be configured to not send a
null to verify so this won;t happen?
Of course it can; Exim is very flexible. How to do this is in the
documentation.
However, doing so would be a long-term disservice to the
reliability of
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 04 19:57:06 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:57:06 +0300
Received: from acaen-251-1-97-4.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr ([86.205.243.4])
by ns2.wananchi.com with
Ian P. Christian wrote:
I want to do a database cleanup in my exim config, so there's a 1 in 10,000
chance some SQL will be run - I could cron it, but I prefer the config to be
self-contained.
To do this, I obviously need to generate a random number - is this possible
in
the ACLs? I've
Bridgit Griffin (Withers) wrote:
Recently, since late Jun, I have been seeing spam that appears to be
sent from an email alias I have. However, closer inspection of the spam
headers shows that someone connected into the smtp server (Exim ver
4.52) then sent it out using my alias.
My
Marten Lehmann wrote:
is it possible to enable a different logging for both types of limit
exhaustion? At present I can just see Connection refused in the
logfiles, but I don't know if the overall limit is exhausted or the
smtp_accept_max_per_host so I don't know which values to increase.
Marten Lehmann wrote:
mail from:
501 Anonymous Senders Prohibited
Is it possible to configure this similar with exim?
Of course it is. But before you do, look into the
definition of a bounce.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
Marcus Barczak wrote:
On our primary mail server here i'm noticing major (up to 1-2
minutes) delays on incoming SMTP connections at the end of the DATA
phase. After the final period exim appears to be hanging a majorly
long time before notifying the client that their message is
Chris Blaise wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Balzer
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:03 AM
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates
I can confirm this MSN behavior, one recipient here was at
Odhiambo G. Washington wrote:
I need some advise on a task I am working on towards spam control and
bandwidth saving. I am going to have a dedicated server hosted somewhere
upstream and this server is going to be my highest priority MX for several
thousand domains.
I assume you have a
Chris Lightfoot wrote:
No valid bounce will have 1
recipient
I think there are cases (mailinglists?) where that isn't so.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
John Dalbec wrote:
execve(/usr/sbin/sendmail, [send-mail, -i, jpdalbec], [/* 22 vars */])
I assume you checked that /usr/sbin/sendmail is actually exim on your
system?
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
##
Robert Fargher wrote:
2006-08-14 14:11:57 H=53541e05.cable.casema.nl (-1209460120) [83.84.30.5]
F=[EMAIL PROTECTED] rejected RCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Unrouteable address
There are so many of these rejections logged that it is almost impossible
to
use the log files in real time.
tail
Felix Havemann wrote:
I run exim4-daemon-heavy (from backports) on a debian sarge machine
Ask on the debian-specific exim mailinglist, as suggested in the
debian exim documentation.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Stephen Kestle wrote:
I just can't seem to find some documents on a default account or
redirect for my server. It seems to reject any non-local address, and
that also seems to eliminate any alias redirection (I tried
*:mail-default).
It's something pretty simple, but I just can't find
Mark Adams wrote:
I was hoping to draw from the pool of experience that the exim mailing
list has, as I realise this is a spamassassin or other issue. We are
running exim4.62-4 with Spamassassin 3.1.4-4 and suffering extremely
high IO Wait times on the server whenever spamassassin scans an
Fernando Barajas wrote:
Do you know if ther's a way that I could send different domains' mails
from a different IP? That is, that all mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
go out from IP 11.22.33.44, and all mails from *anotherdomain.com
will go out from IP 55.66.77.88?
Your can put an interface
David Woodhouse wrote:
Perhaps I should ship the exim package with its existing fairly basic
config (perhaps with some mailman stuff ifdeffed out), and then ship a
_separate_ all-singing, all-dancing exim config package which is capable
of just about everything? And perhaps that package could
Martin Nicholas wrote:
I would of thought a vacation message would be do the least
damage if it came from a blackhole, rather than be a bounce. Bounces indicate
a delivery failure to most mailing systems.
I'd like therefore to be able to set the return_path to something like:
[EMAIL
Marcin Krol wrote:
and would block only a tiny %age of spam.
This may be so, but I would like to see some realistic numbers and
experiments to show that. My own (admittedly, quick) estimates based on
my mail logs indicate that the volume of spam cut short by callouts is
approx. 5/6 of
Marc Sherman wrote:
[I changed the subject because this is not a continuation of the part of
the thread that was getting acrimonious]
Jeremy Harris wrote:
Without knowing for sure what mails are spam and what are ham,
we reject connections:
10% rdns + 2mx
35% helo
5% dnsbl
Nizar KHEIR wrote:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])/usr/exim$: bin/exim
Exim is a Mail Transfer Agent. It is normally called by Mail User Agents,
not directly from a shell command line. Options and/or arguments control
what it does when called. For a list of options, see the Exim documentation.
Start/stop
Andrew Rosolino wrote:
There is also a bigger problem.. most of those e-mails are all SPAM being
sent from our server =(.. we are being badly abused!!!
I have it set to delete SPAM messages and not deliver them but its not even
deleting it.. I am using SpamAssasin by the way.. here is some
Andrew Rosolino wrote:
I added a RBL and it seriously blocked almost every single e-mail going out
and no one go their e-mail.
I tried using these Reject mail at SMTP time if the sender host is in the
zen.spamhaus.org, or bl.spamcop.net rbl
Probably you added the dnsbl test in the wrong
Knaupp, Thomas wrote:
| I've set up two servers that act as backup MXs for
| various domains. In times when spam flood is increasing
| more and more, I tried to load balance them ..
|
| The MX-Records for the domains using this servers
| is set round robin, i.e.
|
| IN MX 10
Andrew Rosolino wrote:
So it tried to send the message for 5 minutes and then timedout and kept the
message on the list? I am assuming it keeps trying to process these messages
and wasteing 5 minutes on each one.. why doesnt it just delete them if they
timeout.
Because the target host might
Andrew Rosolino wrote:
Yeah the problem is I have over 160 websites mass e-mailing their meembers.
If a website with 50,000 members mass e-mail the first day there will be at
least 10,000 in the queue by the next morning and then a site with 30,000
e-mails and it piles on sometimes like that.
Chris Laif wrote:
I wonder what's the best way to insert a large number (~ 5000) of
emails into exim's queue (No, these are _not_ spam messages!). Each
email will consist of customized content for the recipient and it is
planned to use VERP.
If it's a one-time 5000 you may as well talk SMTP
Peter Thomassen wrote:
is it possible to monitor a remote Exim installation using the Exim monitor?
X is not installed on my mail box.
Certainly; it's a Simple Matter of Networking.
You'll need to a) get the X shipped off-system
and b) get your DISPLAY environment set correctly
on the mail
Marc Perkel wrote:
Basically most all good email servers are polite and do the quit. Most
all spam bot server don't want to expend the time and bandwidth to be
polite and that can be used in combination with other indicators to
catch spam.
The new 4.68 Exim is a major advancement with
Lars Timmann wrote:
Hi Exim-Users,
I have the problem that one of our customers need the possibility to
ratelimit the number outgoing emails on a per host basis. The receiving
host blocks the customer if he sends more than 2 mails per second.
Tony Finch wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Jeremy Harris wrote:
Lars Timmann wrote:
I have the problem that one of our customers need the possibility to
ratelimit the number outgoing emails on a per host basis. The receiving
host blocks the customer if he sends more than 2 mails per second.
http
Jim Pazarena wrote:
2007-09-11 08:42:47 no IP address found for host
reverse.154.51.184.66.static.ldmi.com
(during SMTP connection from [66.184.51.154])
[...]
Can someone advise what I have configured to have generated this?
Possibly host_lookup = * ?
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List
Marcin Krol wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is there any way to increase verbosity of debugging router condition? It's
not
enough in one complicated case I have - I need (incoming mail) router to skip
one (outgoing) address and can't get it to work:
I've been known to use such gross hacks as:
A.smith wrote:
We have had a complaint from a user that they are recieving a lot of
spoofed
undeliverable email messages, the user in question catches all email to
unkown
addresses for his domain.
If you mean he has a catchall on his domain, feeding into his own mail -
well, he's
How should one deal with multi-valued attributes in ldap,
where an attribute could contain a comma?
The spec says
If the attribute has multiple values, they are separated by commas.
Actually I see comma, space - but while this is less likely to
appear in an attribute value it still isn't
Phil Pennock wrote:
Exim requires you to quote at the point of use, since different services
require different quoting. So there are ${quote_foo:...} expansion
operators for various foo. For Exim's own parsing, ${quote:...} is
useful, for putting the string into double-quotes as needed.
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
If a value can contain , I'm afraid you're out of luck. Either you make
sure that no value contains , , perhaps by putting the space inside [ ] if
it's in a regexp, or change the separator string in src/lookups/ldap.c line
683 and recompile Exim.
Ah, thanks for the
Graeme Fowler wrote:
the MX records aren't in RFC1918 space and so on
Before I dive into processing my logs - is this
a common case in the wild?
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use
Robert Nicholson wrote:
How can I differentiate b/w
1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. Robert Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
without using is ie. exactly comparison
I want to be able to canoncalize the address before the comparison.
in the above I want
Madan Thapa wrote:
Hello,
Please advise an ACL to accept inbound emails from email gateway ( one IP
or a list of mail gateway IPs ) only for some domains, most likely at HELO
stage
Say for example:
#
I have a.com,b.com . z.com ( a number of domains on the
Jon Schneider wrote:
I just mailed a friend via the local squirrelmail and got an immediate
bounce from what looks like a temporary error.
The second line shows a 421 error from the remote system.
(The extra stuff is my maildrop forwarding a copy to my gmail)
Why is the 421 causing an
Marc Perkel wrote:
Most of what I'm seeing are spammers. Is there legit email that does
this? Or is this just viruses?
One retry isn't unexpected, if the first was EHLO and the second HELO.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Searcher wrote:
I also applied a fix I found somewhere:
defer
message = only one recipient at a time
condition = ${if def:acl_m0 {1}{0}}
But not sure if it does anything useful
$acl_m0 will only have something put into it if your
config file puts something
Mohit Tewari wrote:
dnslists = dnsbl.sorbs.net
condition = ${if == {USE_RBL} {1}}
We'd need a few more lines around that pair for context,
but it's likely that you'd want them the other way
around.
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exim -bV
Exim version 3.36 #1 built 11-Nov-2006 10:47:21
Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2002
Time you upgraded to a version-4 exim. Six years is
forever, in internet time. Few people here will
be able to help you with version 3.
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Hi,
For tracking email, I'd like to log the message-id generated by Exim
for mail submitted by a local process. How could I achieve this?
Look in the docs at http://exim.org for log_message and $message_id
- Jeremy
--
## List details at
WJCarpenter wrote:
${map{a:b:c:d:e}{[$item]}}
I'd like to construct a list where one of the items in the list is the
3-character string b:c. Is there a way to do it? I've tried
various things like ${quote:b:c}, etc, with no joy.
Something like ${sg{foo}{:}{::}} ?
cf.
Does this error mean anything to anyone? Tom?
DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near
OPTIMIZE at character 1 at
/usr/local/exilog/bin/../Exilog/exilog_sql.pm line 201.
The routine in question looks like:
sub _pgsql_sql_optimize {
my $where = shift || nothing;
Tom Kistner wrote:
Jeremy Harris wrote:
DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near
OPTIMIZE at character 1 at
/usr/local/exilog/bin/../Exilog/exilog_sql.pm line 201.
Funny we just had this issue discussed 3-4 weeks back.
See
http://www.exim.org/mail
Jeremy Harris wrote:
I'll post diffs once running.
This seems to work fine:
*** 196,202
sub _pgsql_sql_optimize {
my $where = shift || nothing;
! my $sql = OPTIMIZE TABLE .$where;
my $sh = $dbh-prepare($sql);
$sh-execute;
$sh-finish;
--- 196,202
sub
Phillip Ryker wrote:
ok,
I changed to all brackets from braces as follows:
mailman_router:
driver = accept
require_files =
/virtual/${domain}/mailman/lists/${lc:$local_part}/config.pck
local_part_suffix_optional
local_part_suffix = -bounces : -bounces+* : \
- The ratelimiting doc,
http://exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch39.html#SECTratelimiting
says If the client is over the limit it will be subjected to
counter-measures. Isn't this dependent on the use of the ratelimit
in context in an ACL?
- The ${run expansion item,
gascione wrote:
Anybody?
Insufficient question.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
Marten Lehmann wrote:
What is the asterisk at the end of a logline for?
2006-11-02 22:39:22 1GfkHC-0007TK-Du = [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=mailbox_cyrus
T=mailbox_lmtp H=10.0.1.10 [10.0.1.10]
2006-11-02 22:39:22 1GfkBY-0005FL-Mr = [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=mailbox_cyrus
T=mailbox_lmtp H=10.0.1.10
Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's the situation. I get a dictionary attack from an IP address. So
what I want to do is count bad recipients so that every time I get a bad
recitient from an IP address I add 1 to the count.
In a separate ACL I want to look at the count and if it is greater than
my
Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:12:25 +0800, W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But specifically NOT allowing pipelining (and enforcing sync) tosses off a
whole
'nuther class of spambots.
I have always thought that these were caught before PIPELINING was
advertised?
Not at
1 - 100 of 3189 matches
Mail list logo
