On 03/06/2020 11:56, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> I have a suggestion, and that is to allow detainting of data via a new string
> expansion called detaint.${detaint{}{}}
No.
Absolutely not.
This would be an open invitation to evade the security measure.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
On 03/06/2020 01:15, Ken Olum via Exim-users wrote:
check spam = $acl_m2/defer_ok
= kdo/defer_ok
> LOG: 198 [5883] 1jgCzR-0001Wt-U4 Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist:
> acl_check_condition 3675
Third time around... yes, this is a bug. If you
can't avoid it (by arranging
On 03/06/2020 01:15, Ken Olum via Exim-users wrote:
> LOG: 198 [5883] 1jgCzR-0001Wt-U4 Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist:
> acl_check_condition 3675
Having checked that line number, you're not running 4.94.
You didn't say what, but it's not the latest - so that's
something else you could do.
--
On 03/06/2020 01:15, Ken Olum via Exim-users wrote:
check spam = $acl_m2/defer_ok
= kdo/defer_ok
> LOG: 198 [5883] 1jgCzR-0001Wt-U4 Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist:
> acl_check_condition 3675
>
> Is the problem that $address_data is tainted
Sounds like it
> and so can't
On 03/06/2020 09:42, Mikhail Golub via Exim-users wrote:
> 42885 creating notifier socket
> 42885 /var/spool/exim/exim_daemon_notify
> 42885 LOG: MAIN PANIC
> 42885 daemon_notifier_socket bind: Address already in use
>
> It's bug?
It's something still using that socket.
Either "ss -p" or
On 02/06/2020 22:07, john via Exim-users wrote:
> I have two users who are active and afer I built 4.94 one of them got
> mail as usuual (user jpff) but the other had mail deferred
>
> 2020-06-02 18:06:09 1jgAMV-0001uS-F7 <=
> mail.rmqfdelalpjhcevwhvfec...@email-vodafone.co.uk
>
On 02/06/2020 19:39, Jürgen Edner via Exim-users wrote:
> public_folder_maildir:
> driver = accept
> set = r_dir = ${extract{folder}{${lookup{$local_part} \
> lsearch{/etc/pubfolders}}}{$value}}
> debug_print = r_dir=$r_dir
> condition = ${if
On 02/06/2020 19:06, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
> This router no longer works:
>
> virtual:
> driver = redirect
> domains = dsearch;/etc/mail/virtual
> data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/mail/virtual/$domain}}
> no_more
>
>
> Testing with -bh I get "Tainted filename
On 02/06/2020 17:15, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
> Right now I' doing this in the RCPT ACL:
tl;dr. Which bit does not work?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with
On 02/06/2020 15:29, dan...@k8n.de wrote:
> The only thing I replaced is database name, database user and password.
>
> so it is "127.0.0.1/mail/mailro/mysupersecretpassword"
> (password obviously changed), it doesn't say anything else...
>
> Pasting the full line here again:
> message: failed
On 02/06/2020 14:58, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
> https://git.exim.org/exim.git/blob/HEAD:/src/README.UPDATING
>
>
> Line 36 should be "replace $local_part with $local_part_data." instead
> of "replace $local_user with $local_part_data." ?
Yes.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List
On 02/06/2020 14:43, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
>> In src/auths/call_pam.c at about line 158,
>> replace "big_buffer" with "NULL" and "big_buffer_size" with "0".
>>
>
> Made the change and got:
>
> 2020-06-02 10:39:32 Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: pam_converse 86
>
> So I
On 02/06/2020 14:22, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 02/06/2020 13:50, Franz-Werner Gergen via Exim-users wrote:
>> dkim_private_key = ${if
>> exists{/usr/local/dkim/${dkim_domain}.${dkim_selector}.priv.pem}{/usr/local/dkim/${dkim_domain}.${dkim_selector}.
On 02/06/2020 13:50, Franz-Werner Gergen via Exim-users wrote:
> dkim_private_key = ${if
> exists{/usr/local/dkim/${dkim_domain}.${dkim_selector}.priv.pem}{/usr/local/dkim/${dkim_domain}.${dkim_selector}.priv.pem}{false}}
> Tainted filename '/usr/local/dkim/is.mpg.de.20190121.priv.pem'
On 02/06/2020 13:16, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
> On 6/2/20 8:58 AM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
>> On 02/06/2020 02:06, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
>>> 2020-06-01 21:35:52 Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: auth_call_pam 158
>>
On 02/06/2020 13:20, exim.org--- via Exim-users wrote:
> 12:19:39.352 12159 message: failed to expand [...] DEFER: PostgreSQL server
> "127.0.0.1/xx/xx/xx" is tainted
^
Unfortunately
On 02/06/2020 12:12, exim.org--- via Exim-users wrote:
> However after updating to 4.94 I only get errors like this (private details
> replaced):
>
> 2:19:39.350 12159 ╭considering: ${lookup pgsql
> {servers=127.0.0.1/mydb/mydbuser/mydbpw; SELECT
> string_agg(DISTINCT userid,',') AS target FROM
On 02/06/2020 02:06, Patrick Boutilier via Exim-users wrote:
> 2020-06-01 21:35:52 Taint mismatch, string_nextinlist: auth_call_pam 158
Thanks for the report. Is this a self-build, or from a distro?
Either way, feels like a bug. If you can build yourself then
a possible fix can be tested
On 01/06/2020 21:46, Mike Brown via Exim-users wrote:
> I'm currently running fc27.x86_64. I'm trying to find a Fedora RPM for
> version 4.94, but the exim wiki for downloading Fedora binaries is broken,
> as it points to fedora.redhat.com, which can't be found.
>
> Anyone know where I can find
On 01/06/2020 17:44, Jacques B. Siboni via Exim-users wrote:
> It seems there are many ways to configure the acl part of exim4.
Yes; essentially ACL code is a programming language.
> I have tried
> many options but, so far I can't get rid of spammers using our smtp to send
> spam
> mails.
On 01/06/2020 16:24, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> Today we released Exim 4.94.
>
> There are no significant changes since RC2.
>
>
> For changes in 4.94 that ARE LIKELY TO AFFECT existing runtime
> configurations please see:
> https://git.exim.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Today we released Exim 4.94.
There are no significant changes since RC2.
For changes in 4.94 that ARE LIKELY TO AFFECT existing runtime
configurations please see:
https://git.exim.org/exim.git/blob/HEAD:/src/README.UPDATING
For new features
On 31/05/2020 00:34, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
> .include_if_exists /etc/exim/forwarder_dl.conf
>
> it contains a domainlist :
>
> domainlist local_domains = @ : localhost : localhost.localdomain : QUERY >
>
> Is there any particular reason, why the content of domainlist is only
> loaded
On 29/05/2020 17:08, Jürgen Edner via Exim-users wrote:
> -> Result: "DEBUG: local_part=my-pub-folder r_1= r_2="
Let's see the entire debug output, from the start of the
router being run to that point.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 28/05/2020 11:40, IB Development Team via Exim-users wrote:
> Exim configured with TLS forced to such recipient domanin should use MX
> to find servers but verify server cert against domain name from exim's
> config (i.e. file/db lookup).
tls_verify_cert_hostnames ?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
On 28/05/2020 11:54, Jürgen Edner via Exim-users wrote:
> set = r_dir = ${extract{folder}{${lookup{$local_part}
> lsearch{/etc/pubfolders}}}{$value}}
> condition = ${if exists{/home/imappublic/.$r_dir/cur}}
> condition = ${if exists{/home/imappublic/.$r_dir/new}}
> ...
>
On 28/05/2020 10:38, Hendrik Meyburgh via Exim-users wrote:
> finding IP address for ::0:107:4::583
> calling host_find_byname
> gethostbyname2(af=inet6) returned 2 (TRY_AGAIN)
> gethostbyname2(af=inet) returned 2 (TRY_AGAIN)
> no IP address found for host ::0:107:4::583
>
On 28/05/2020 10:09, Hendrik Meyburgh via Exim-users wrote:
> route_item = * <+ ::0:107:4::583
> gmail.com in "*"? yes (matched "*")
> original list of hosts = '<+' options = '::0:107:4::583'
>> route_list = * <+ ::0:107:4::583
We're getting closer. Lose the space after
On 28/05/2020 07:25, Hendrik Meyburgh via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Thanks, but still not working.
>> route_list = * <; ::0:107:4::583
Wups, my mistake. We can't use ; here, either.
route_list = * <+ ::0:107:4::583
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 26/05/2020 07:53, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
> I need to make business logic decisions in the MIME ACL on how to screen
> MIME content based on the sender domain and recipient domain
The message could have multiple recipients, having different domains.
Therefore, in general, the
On 24/05/2020 14:54, Hendrik Meyburgh via Exim-users wrote:
>>> example with route_list =<; * ::0:107:4::583
>>
>> route_list, per Ch 20 section 2, goes:
>>
>>
>> You are wanting the list-of-hosts to be the single ipv6 address.
>> The list needs the <; rather than the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I have built, and placed on the FTP site, Release Candidate 2 for
exim release 4.94
ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
The commit for RC2 is ef546e7882, at git://git.exim.org/exim.git
No further new features will be accepted for 4.94;
On 22/05/2020 11:25, Hendrik Meyburgh via Exim-users wrote:
> I did test it an provided some samples in the original mail, here it is again.
>
> example with route_list =<; * ::0:107:4::583
route_list, per Ch 20 section 2, goes:
You are wanting the list-of-hosts to be the single
On 20/05/2020 17:01, Hendrik Meyburgh via Exim-users wrote:
> routing e...@testing.com
> > backscatter router <
> local_part=echo domain=testing.com
> checking "condition" "${if and{{bool_lax{${if def:sender_address
> {0}{1{bool_lax{${lookup ldap {USE"...
> backscatter router
On 21/05/2020 16:50, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
> 2020-05-21 15:48:03 PLAIN authenticator failed for (DESKTOP1OI0BHK)
> [41.1.2.3]:54719 I=[192.96.24.71]:587: 435 Unable to authenticate at
> present (set_id=u...@domain.co.za): lookup of "SELECT despass FROM admin
> WHERE
On 20/05/2020 09:15, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> Which script or file is causing these changes? And how can I prevent them?
Possibly better asked on a Debian forum than here?
It doesn't sound like Exim's fault.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 18/05/2020 23:13, Leonardo Boselli via Exim-users wrote:
> After an update senfing to certain domains i get this DFN:
>
> 504 5.5.2 : Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname
> but exim on helo say just 'w' not the FQDN .
> Where is the problem ?
a) you'll need to look at the
On 18/05/2020 15:59, Mike Clarke via Exim-users wrote:
> In addition to my normal email address, I collect mail for an address at
> another domain which for the purpose of this post I'll call
> other.m...@my.example.com. I have the following router defined for this
> domain in the Exim
On 14/05/2020 10:08, kevin shell via Exim-users wrote:
> I read through the exim spec and came cross cutthrough deliver/mode,
> Can someone explains what is cutthrough deliver mode?
> I can't find a definition in the exim spec doc.
Cutthrough delivery sets up and uses an SMTP connection
for
On 13/05/2020 13:56, Vincent Lefevre via Exim-users wrote:
> I've reported the following bug in the Debian BTS[*], as I think that
> spec.txt (from exim 4.93) is incorrect.
>
> In /usr/share/doc/exim4-base/spec.txt.gz :
>
>
> In order to append to an NFS file safely from more than one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I have built, and placed on the FTP site, Release Candidate 1 for
exim release 4.94
ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
The commit for RC1 is 632b9f8daa, at git://git.exim.org/exim.git
-
On 11/05/2020 19:34, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> Put another way, how would the new default "&127.0.0.0"
> interact with an ACL condition like
> deny dnslists = spamhaus.example/<|192.168.1.2|192.168.6.7|...
> (from spec.txt 44.32) ?
> Answer: I'd rather not think about that.
On 11/05/2020 14:19, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> be changed to default to "=127.0.0.0&127.0.0.0" ?
Oops, just "&127.0.0.0". After the dnsbl name.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
Question for the list:
Should the behaviour of the "dnslist" condition
be changed to default to "=127.0.0.0&127.0.0.0" ?
The existing behaviour is to return true if
any value is retrieved.
The rationale would be that most operational DNSBLs
return values in the 127.0.0.0/8 range, but that
dead
On 08/05/2020 13:03, Damon Hill via Exim-users wrote:
> My server, say SERVER A, hosts e-mail for coolstore.com domain, but the
> web is hosted by SERVER B (which uses several servers for mailing). I
> need to exclude from Exim SMTP auth checking in Server A:
> smtp1.serverb.com,
On 08/05/2020 01:42, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> Do you have some link to a diff or changes, so I could have a look for
> myself what was fixed?
https://git.exim.org/exim.git/shortlog/refs/heads/exim-4.93+fixes
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 08/05/2020 00:52, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> Now I did that, and STRAIGHT AFTER, the first SPF debug query you gave me.
> They give different results about MX for lansforsakringar.se, apparently
> dnsdb and spf isn't in agreement of whats MX for lansforsakringar.se
There have
On 08/05/2020 00:40, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> How does exim handle DNSSEC when traversing SPF?
> Does it simply trust the ad flag from the local stub resolver, or does exim
> walk DNSSEC itself?
Exim trusts your local resolver library interface.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On 08/05/2020 00:18, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> spf_interpret.c:823 Debug: found 0 MX records for lansforsakringar.se
> (herrno: 1)
It got that and stopped. Yet when you used "dig" it worked...
Try the debug for exim doing an MX lookup:
'${lookup dnsdb
On 07/05/2020 23:34, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> I got the following weird SPF rejection in my logs (im using the built-in
> SPF handler in exim):
>
> 2020-05-07 11:14:35 H=mxcluster2.lansforsakringar.se [194.16.160.133]
> X=TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP521R1__RSA_SHA512__AES_256_GCM:256 CV=no
On 07/05/2020 12:33, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users wrote:
> Good morning, I am having reception problems, I am not receiving emails from
> a certain domain.
>
> I would like to know if there is some way from the console to perform a
> traceroute through exim to a domain.
Exim doesn't do
On 06/05/2020 21:50, Rigu Cucu via Exim-users wrote:
> When a lookup cannot be completed in a router or transport, delivery of the
> message (to the relevant address) is deferred, as for any other temporary
> error. In other circumstances Exim may assume the lookup has failed, or may
> give up
On 01/05/2020 20:32, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
> So I need a Perl script that runs permanently in the background and
> opens a network socket that any local user can query to get information
> about mail quotas?
Either that or do a manual job in ACL coding that evaluates a
maildirsize
On 01/05/2020 16:12, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:> When an e-mail
is received for a user but the mailbox is full, this> results in a
bounce message which ultimately gets me on DNS blacklists.> (And it
causes backscatter spam which is to be prevented.)
On 01/05/2020 12:39, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
> Somehow related, I have stumbled upon this paragraph in
> 26.1 The file and directory options [of the appendfile transport]
Yup, one of several. I'll run a sweep.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 01/05/2020 07:01, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
> Afaict practically it does not make a difference but shouldn't it better
> read
>
> "require_files = $local_part_verified:$home/.procmailrc"
>
> for consistency's sake. (To get in the right mindset and avoid using
> "$local_part" for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It's time for another release.
This will be mostly bugfixes content; for details please read
the ChangeLog file. As far as features go:
There is a major introduction of parallel-operations in 2-phase
queue runs. This is expected to help a) sites
On 28/04/2020 11:32, Russell King via Exim-users wrote:
> I notice you set a Reply-to: header on your messages, were you
> expecting me to reply to that address, or to the list? I've
> chosen the list.
I blame Thunderbird. List is preferred, as far as I'm concerned.
> When exim chooses to
On 28/04/2020 11:17, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
>
> On 27/04/2020 20:52, Russell King via Exim-users wrote:
>> 2020-04-27 20:36:15 1jT9Y7-0003B4-Mf <= pat...@.armlinux.org.uk
> U=patchd P=local S=1535
>> 2020-04-27 20:36:15 1jT9Y7-0003B4-Mf H=pandora.armlinux.org.uk
>
On 28/04/2020 08:12, Russell King via Exim-users wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:11:18PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
>> On 27/04/2020 20:52, Russell King via Exim-users wrote:
>>> I'm running debian stable on my machines, and I've noticed that when
>>&
On 27/04/2020 20:52, Russell King via Exim-users wrote:
> I'm running debian stable on my machines, and I've noticed that when
> one of my scripts sends email,
I'm hoping that means you can trigger it on demsnd?
> I get a spurious and unexplained
> "Permission denied" error:
>
> 2020-04-27
On 27/04/2020 20:09, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
> 2020-04-27 19:05:46 1jT88X-0003Qr-G5 DKIM START:
> domain=bounce.wowcher.co.uk possible_signer=e.wowcher.co.uk status=pass
> 2020-04-27 19:05:46 1jT88X-0003Qr-G5 no IP address found for host
> localhost.localdomain
> 2020-04-27 19:05:46
On 27/04/2020 15:46, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
> ARC_state: condition = true logwrite = reason: miscompare>
>
> I don't have access to the emails in question to examine their headers
> but I am assuming that, in contrast with all the others, they were ARC
> signed
Yes
> and that my ARC
On 27/04/2020 14:12, Kai Bojens via Exim-users wrote:
> I want to archive every outgoing mail for customer "foobar". This would
> be easily achieved by using a manualroute and "unseen" which sends all
> mails to the archive server.
>
> The archiving software on the other hand expects all mails to
On 27/04/2020 11:45, Jacques B. Siboni via Exim-users wrote:
> When a spammer sends an email to any address of our domain and that the
> mailer daemon detects it is a spam, it returns the mail to the From address
> telling it won't be delivered.
You are better off refusing such messages at SMTP
On 25/04/2020 04:20, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
>> You could have done the same edit using native Exim factilities,
>> and not needing the system-filter, but no matter.
>
> Out of interest how?
in data acl :-
warn hosts =
remove_header = Subject
add_header =
On 24/04/2020 19:52, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
> Done but I am not much the wiser. I get (slightly obfuscated) eg.,
>
> 16:56:30 16565 using ACL "acl_check_data"
> 16:56:30 16565 processing "warn"
> 16:56:30 16565 check verify = arc/pass:none:fail
> 16:56:30 16565 ARC: collecting arc sets
>
On 24/04/2020 03:19, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
> I wondered about this but DKIM verification is already turned on, and is
> on by default (eg. section 58.1 of the Exim Book). My college's Central
> IT email service (O365), which I mainly use for testing my exim server
> does not DKIM sign
On 23/04/2020 19:49, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
> now getting an Authentication-Results: header
> added to the top of the message containing the server's FQDN and
> "arc=none".
So, one step forward at least.
Did the incoming message have any ARC headers to be verified? If not,
the
On 22/04/2020 20:10, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
> Now I get "ARC: no Authentication-Results header for signing" logs for
> each email processed in /var/log/exim/main.log and no emails get any
> ARC-* header fields added or an added "Authentication-Results:" field.
>
> From the
On 20/04/2020 16:27, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> How would you solve the problem with a domain owner having set
> identity-aligment = STRICT
Sounds like they don't want their messages being forwarded.
> to a adress that checks for this?
Sounds like they don't want to receive
On 20/04/2020 15:53, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Now when forwarding emails, I want to encapsulate them in a new container,
That constitutes either an edit, or the creation of a new message.
Not an MTA's job.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 18/04/2020 06:03, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
> Any ideas to accomplish both of these in Exim4?
You can't. Exim takes the view that an MTA should edit
message bodies.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 20/04/2020 15:32, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 18/04/2020 06:03, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
>> Any ideas to accomplish both of these in Exim4?
>
> You can't. Exim takes the view that an MTA should edit
> message bodies.
>
Wups. "Shoul
On 20/04/2020 11:32, Орлов Олег via Exim-users wrote:
> The task is to append item to the whitelist of addresses every time a
> local user sends an email out.
> The whitelist is stored in LDAP. I wrote a perl script for writing
> e-mail to properly branch of LDAP tree.
> How to run a script when a
On 20/04/2020 14:33, Tom Crane via Exim-users wrote:
> I am attempting to configure my server (exim-4.92.3) to ARC
> (Authenticated Received Chain) sign and possibly also verify messages.
There's been several ARC-related fixes since then; I suggest you
consider moving closer to the
On 15/04/2020 18:46, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
> I read this to mean that the new "trust-ad" option, if set, causes the
> Glibc stub resolver to set AD=1 in queries, but *otherwise*, causes it
> to strip the AD bit from replies.
So much for back-compatibility, eh? They broke it for
On 16/04/2020 17:51, David Saez Padros via Exim-users wrote:
> is there any way to activate DSN for locally submitted messages ?
If you mean the ESMTP DSN extension, no there is not. Raise a request
at bugs.exim.com if you have a use-case.
If you're just asking about bounces and warnings for
On 15/04/2020 23:16, Emilio Augusto Lazo Zaia via Exim-users wrote:
> I would like to queue all messages to be delivered through a smarthost based
> upon some criteria, for instance the number of messages the smarthost can
> transport without blocking us for security reasons.
>
> Some user in
On 14/04/2020 11:45, Axel Rau via Exim-users wrote:
> To: Recipients@
> From: "Mr.David Ash "@
> ___
> My IMAP server doesn't like such From:, if no envelop sender exists.
Like
verify = header_syntax
perhaps?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 10/04/2020 01:48, Otávio Nogueira via Exim-users wrote:
> How can I find all directives/options can be set in one section? (Link for
> MAIN instruction ...)
>
> For example, here can I use: helo_data, interface, event_action...
In the documentation:
http://exim.org/docs.html
>
> begin
On 09/04/2020 14:58, Pascal Rolle via Exim-users wrote:
> warn hosts = <; ${expand:${if exists {PATH/ip_wl/$domain} \
> {PATH/ip_wl/$domain}{}}}
> add_header = X-wh_IP_: Yes
You didn't say which ACL you're doing this in. I hope it is
the
On 09/04/2020 12:16, Rainer Dorsch via Exim-users wrote:
> I am wondering, can I send a copy of email to a local user also to other
> local
> users?
Yes
> E.g. does an entry in /etc/aliases like
>
> joe: foo,bar,joe
>
> work?
Yes, assuming your config does aliases-handling using that file.
On 08/04/2020 12:27, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
> When an e-mail bounces back to the sender - it does not appear to have
> any "Message too big" message in the bounced e-mail. How do I fix that?
bounce_message_file
On 07/04/2020 21:33, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
>> Getting that knowlege depends on your existing setup.
>> Possibly it's a case of pointing Exim at your AD server,
>> and hoping it really does talk LDAP sanely.
>
> Exim does recipient callouts and cutthrough delivery.
> Are either
On 07/04/2020 19:43, Linda Pagillo via Exim-users wrote:
> set up Exim as a backup MX server for the
> Windows servers.
Preferably you need to have the backup know what the legitimate
email accounts are - both local-part and domain - so that it
can reject bad ones at SMTP time. Otherwise it
On 05/04/2020 12:49, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Maybe we're talking about the same, bot I didn't get your point.
> That's what I think:
>
> systemd Type=forking
> t0 `-- exim -bd
> fork() exim daemon
> t1 <--' - read
On 05/04/2020 11:13, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
[systemd forking mode]
> For what I understood - the main advantage is, that systemd doesn't have
> to guess the PID if the main process. And can do a better job in
> supervising (and restarting) the main process.
>
>> I've seen one
On 04/04/2020 14:10, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (Sa 04 Apr 2020 12:13:36
> CEST):
>> On 04/04/2020 10:08, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users wrote:
>>> AFAIK running exim under systemd (as the OP clearly does) requires -f in
>&g
On 04/04/2020 10:08, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users wrote:
> AFAIK running exim under systemd (as the OP clearly does) requires -f in
> any case.
I don't think so. Here's a unit file I'm using
(though I have no idea if it is optimal) :-
=%cut here%
#
On 03/04/2020 21:06, Ivor Durham via Exim-users wrote:
> I must not be using "exim -d+all -bdf" right; I'm not seeing any output
> after "Listening..." when I send test messages.
Are the tests sent as SMTP to the daemon, or are they command-line
nonsmtp mail? For the latter, it's the sending
On 30/03/2020 14:01, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via Exim-users wrote:
> If I want to install Exim as a standalone MTA/SMTP server, are there any
> good tutorials which I can follow?
Just read the manual.
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List
On 30/03/2020 07:50, daniel via Exim-users wrote:
> And is exim
> by default will try DANE on all hosts or not? Because i dont found
> these two configs in the exim config currently.
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-concept_index.html#index_concept_D
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 26/03/2020 13:20, Neal Blount via Exim-users wrote:
> This is the rewrite I am using:
>
> begin rewrite
> *@* "${lookup mysql{select destination from rewrite where
> source='${quote_mysql:$1@$2}'}{$value}fail}" Tbct
OK. That sort of rewrite happens just at/after message acceptance :-
On 23/03/2020 13:30, Neal Blount via Exim-users wrote:
> Is it possible to save the original recipient in a header when we are
> rewriting the reciepient?
What variant of "rewriting"?
Beware: the term has specific meaning in Exim.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 21/03/2020 20:01, randyd via Exim-users wrote:
> Using version 4.93
> I have several trusted_users = user, they are denied from receiving messages
> under their unix username
> instead they can only send and receive mail under one of several aliases,
> thunderbird sets their identity.
> I'm
On 20/03/2020 17:09, Lukas Haase via Exim-users wrote:
> 1.) Exim received a message to be delivered externally on a port != 10029 and
> router dkimproxy processes which uses transport dkimproxy_smtp to pass the
> message to localhost:10028
I assume you mean "received, on port != 10029, a
On 18/03/2020 04:31, Lukas Haase via Exim-users wrote:
> However, for PRDR the info is pretty sparse and all I can find is a simple
> global option "prdr_enable = true".
The "Concept index" in the docs has several listings for PRDR.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 17/03/2020 21:30, Lukas Haase via Exim-users wrote:
> Example: User lu...@example.net on my system sends an email to
> recipie...@gmail.com and recipie...@gmail.com. From the logs below, it can be
> seen that the message (1jEJOC-0001UM-Td) is successfully accepted and then
> passed on to
On 17/03/2020 19:49, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> There is a Dovecot Authenticator for Exim (spec.txt chapter 37)
> I'm not sure whether $sender_host_address is passed to Dovecot,
> so it may or may not be possible to enforce the GEOIP policy
There are dnsbls providing geographical
901 - 1000 of 3189 matches
Mail list logo
